Modulation of Thiol-Ene Coupling by the Molecular Environment of Polymer Backbones for Hydrogel Formation and Cell Encapsulation.

Thiol-ene radical coupling is increasingly used for the biofunctionalization of biomaterials and the formation of 3D hydrogels enabling cell encapsulation. Indeed, thiol-ene chemistry presents interesting features that are particularly attractive for platforms requiring specific reactions of peptides or proteins, in particular in situ, during cell culture or encapsulation: thiol-ene coupling occurs specifically between a thiol and a nonactivated alkene (unlike Michael addition); it is relatively tolerant to the presence of oxygen; and it can be triggered by light. Despite such interest, little is known about the factors impacting polymer thiol-ene chemistry in situ. Here, we explore some of the molecular parameters controlling photoinitiated thiol-ene coupling (with UV and visible-light irradiation), with a series of alkene-functionalized polymer backbones. 1H NMR spectroscopy is used to quantify the efficiency of couplings, whereas photorheology allows correlation to gelation and mechanical properties of the resulting materials. We identify the impact of weak electrolytes in regulating coupling efficiency, presumably via thiol deprotonation and regulation of local diffusion. The conformation of associated polymer chains, regulated by the pH, is also proposed to play an important role in the modulation of both thiol-ene coupling and cross-linking efficiencies. Ultimately, suitable conditions for cell encapsulations are identified for a range of polymer backbones and their impact on cytocompatibility is investigated for cell encapsulation and tissue engineering applications. Overall, our work demonstrates the importance of polymer backbone design to regulate thiol-ene coupling and in situ hydrogel formation.

The physico-chemistry of adhesions of protein resistant and weak polyelectrolyte brushes to cells and tissues.

The non-specific adhesion of polymers and soft tissues is of great interest to the field of biomedical engineering, as it will shed light on some of the processes that regulate interactions between scaffolds, implants and nanoparticles with surrounding tissues after implantation or delivery. In order to promote adhesion to soft tissues, a greater understanding of the relationship between polymer chemistry and nanoscale adhesion mechanisms is required. In this work, we grew poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and poly(oligoethylene glycol methacrylate) (POEGMA) brushes from the surface of silica beads, and investigated their adhesion to a variety of substrates via colloidal probe-based atomic force microscopy (AFM). We first characterised adhesion to a range of substrates with defined surface chemistry (self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) with a range of hydrophilicities, charge and hydrogen bonding), before studying the adhesion of brushes to epithelial cell monolayers (primary keratinocytes and HaCaT cells) and soft tissues (porcine epicardium and keratinized gingiva). Adhesion assays to SAMs reveal the complex balance of interactions (electrostatic, van der Waals interactions and hydrogen bonding) regulating the adhesion of weak polyelectrolyte brushes. This resulted in particularly strong adhesion of PAA brushes to a wide range of surface chemistries. In turn, colloidal probe microscopy on cell monolayers highlighted the importance of the glycocalyx in regulating non-specific adhesions. This was also reflected by the adhesive properties of soft tissues, in combination with their mechanical properties. Overall, this work clearly demonstrates the complex nature of interactions between polymeric biomaterials and biological samples and highlights the need for relatively elaborate models to predict these interactions.