Are there specific conditions for which expertise in gymnastics could have an effect on postural control and performance?

The first aim of this study was to analyse the effect of elite training, linked to expertise, in gymnastics on postural performance and control. For this purpose, body sway of expert gymnasts was compared to other sportsmen, non-experts and non-gymnasts, in two different postures: bipedal (easy and unspecific to gymnasts) and unipedal (difficult and fairly specific). The second aim was to compare the groups in the same tasks but in a visual condition for which they were not trained, i.e. with eyes closed. Postural performance was assessed by centre of gravity motion, which was computed from centre of pressure motion, estimating postural control. A significant difference between the two groups was observed for postural performance in the unipedal posture and with eyes open only. Regardless of their posture, the groups were similarly affected by removal of vision. Expertise in gymnastics seemed to improve postural performances only in situations for which their practise is related to, i.e. unipedal with eyes open. These reveal the importance of choosing a relevant postural configuration and visual condition according to the people's training or by extension experience.

Perceived versus actual head-on-trunk orientation during arm movement control.

Static roll head tilt induces bias in the trajectory of upper limb voluntary movements. The aim of the experiment was to investigate whether this bias is dependant on the perception of body configuration rather than on its actual configuration. We used the 'return' phenomenon as a method to produce dissociation between perceived and actual head tilt. Static roll head tilt in supine subjects was sustained for 15 min during which subjects were periodically required to estimate verbally the tilt of their head respective to their trunk and draw, with their right index finger, straight lines aligned with their trunk. After 15 min, subjects' head were realigned with the trunk, and subjects continued to give verbal estimate of head position and perform the motor task. Results showed that the initial angular deviation of the lines in the direction opposite to head tilt gradually diminished. The adaptation was noticeable within the first 3-5 min of tilt and subsequently diminished. Verbal estimates confirmed the return phenomenon, i.e. subjects perceived their head as slowly returning towards its neutral position after a few minutes of sustained tilt. When realigned with the trunk, subjects experienced the illusion that their head was tilted in the opposite direction to the initial head tilt and a line deviation in the opposite direction to those made on initial exposure was observed (after-effect). These results indicate that the angular deviation in motor production observed in condition of static head tilt were largely related to the perceived body configuration and therefore favour the hypothesis that the conscious perception of body configuration plays a key role in organising sensorimotor tasks.

Apnea-induced changes in time estimation and its relation to bradycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Both exercise and hypoxia affect human ability to estimate time, an alteration thought to be induced by changes in subjects' level of arousal. Apnea induces cardiovascular changes and a decrease in oxygen uptake that indicate changes in physiological arousal. We tested time estimation (TE) during brief periods of voluntary apnea. We hypothesized that there would be a relationship between TE and heart rate (HR), a physiological indicator of arousal. METHODS: Subjects were two different groups of seven triathletes. To measure TE, the target time interval (20 or 30 s) was demonstrated and the subject was then asked to reproduce it under various conditions. Experiment 1 required 1 min of breath-holding while immersed in a pool at 31 degrees C. Experiment 2 was performed seated on a cycle ergometer in a laboratory and involved short periods of apnea at rest and during exercise. RESULTS: TE during apnea was significantly greater than baseline during both immersion and at rest on the cycle (+27% and +17% compared with their respective baselines). A significant linear negative correlation was demonstrated between TE and HR. Training in apnea during exercise had no effect on TE. DISCUSSION: Although this study revealed a relationship between TE and HR, our results should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are needed to confirm the relationship between HR and TE. A misperception of elapsed time may be a contributing factor in diving accidents which involve inexperienced breath-hold divers.

Effects of ventilation on body sway during human standing.

Body sway was studied in standing with eyes closed during quiet breathing and apnoea. The hypothesis was that absence of ventilation improved balance. Performance and control of balance were assessed by centre of gravity and centre of pressure motions respectively. Eight healthy male subjects participated in the study. The analysis was performed for the first 20s when no activity of the diaphragm and no force variation at thoracic and abdominal levels were observed in apnoea condition. Performance and control were significantly improved in apnoea from 17 to 26% for the planar parameters; this improvement was only observed along the medio-lateral axis (around 34%), probably due to upper body asymmetry and diminution of the number of degrees of freedom that can be mobilised along this axis. In conclusion, ventilation in quiet breathing is a perturbing factor in human standing.

Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control.

The present paper attempts to clarify the between-subjects variability exhibited in both segmental stabilisation strategies and their subordinated or associated sensory contribution. Previous data have emphasised close relationships between the interindividual variability in both the visual control of posture and the spatial visual perception. In this study, we focused on the possible relationships that might link perceptual visual field dependence-independence and the visual contribution to segmental stabilisation strategies. Visual field dependent (FD) and field independent (FI) subjects were selected on the basis of their extreme score in a static rod and frame test where an estimation of the subjective vertical was required. In the postural test, the subjects stood in the sharpened Romberg position in darkness or under normal or stroboscopic illumination, in front of either a vertical or a tilted frame. Strategies of segmental stabilisation of the head, shoulders and hip in the roll plane were analysed by means of their anchoring index (AI). Our hypothesis was that FD subjects might use mainly visual cues for calibrating not only their spatial perception but also their strategies of segmental stabilisation. In the case of visual cue disturbances, a greater visual dependency to the strategies of segmental stabilisation in FD subjects should be validated by observing more systematic "en bloc" functioning (i.e. negative AI) between two adjacent segments. The main results are the following: 1. Strategies of segmental stabilisation differed between both groups and differences were amplified with the deprivation of either total vision and/or static visual cues. 2. In the absence of total vision and/or static visual cues, FD subjects have shown an increased efficiency of the hip stabilisation in space strategy and an "en bloc" operation of the shoulder-hip unit (whole trunk). The last "en bloc" operation was extended to the whole head-trunk unit in darkness, associated with a hip stabilisation in space. 3. The FI subjects have adopted neither a strategy of segmental stabilisation in space nor on the underlying segment, whatever the body segment considered and the visual condition. Thus, in this group, head, shoulder and hip moved independently from each other during stance control, roughly without taking into account the visual condition. The results, emphasising a differential weighting of sensory input involved in both perceptual and postural control, are discussed in terms of the differential choice and/or ability to select the adequate frame of reference common to both cognitive and motor spatial activities. We assumed that a motor-somesthetics "neglect" or a lack of mastering of these inputs/outputs rather than a mere visual dependence in FD subjects would generate these interindividual differences in both spatial perception and postural balance. This proprioceptive "neglect" is assumed to lead FD subjects to sensory reweighting, whereas proprioceptive dominance would lead FI subjects to a greater ability in selecting the adequate frame of reference in the case of intersensory disturbances. Finally, this study also provides evidence for a new interpretation of the visual field dependence-independence dimension in both spatial perception and postural control.