Providers' Perceptions Versus Practices Inform Pediatric Colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Implementation.

INTRODUCTION: There are many barriers to the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. The aim of this study was to compare surgeon and anesthesia perceptions with current practices prior to the initiation of an ERAS protocol in pediatric colorectal patients and to use that information to inform ERAS implementation. METHODS: This was a mixed method single institution study of barriers to implementation of an ERAS pathway at a free-standing children's hospital. Anesthesiologists and surgeons at a free-standing children's hospital were surveyed regarding current practices of ERAS components. A retrospective chart review was performed of 5- to 18-y-old patients undergoing colorectal procedures between 2013 and 2017, followed by the initiation of an ERAS pathway, and a prospective chart review for 18 mo postimplementation. RESULTS: The response rate was 100% (n = 7) for surgeons and 60% (n = 9) for anesthesiologists. Preoperative nonopioid analgesics and regional anesthesia were rarely used. Intraoperatively, 54.7% of patients had a fluid balance of <10 cc/kg/h and normothermia was achieved in only 38.7%. Mechanical bowel prep was frequently utilized (48%). Median nil per os time was significantly longer than required at 12 h. Postoperatively, 42.9% of surgeons reported that patients could have clears on postoperative day zero, 28.6% on postoperative day one, and 28.6% after flatus. In reality, 53.3% of patients were started on clears after flatus, with a median time of 2 d. Most surgeons (85.7%) expected patients to get out of bed once awake from anesthesia; however, median time that patients were out of bed was postoperative day one. While most surgeons reported frequent use of acetaminophen and/or ketorolac, only 69.3% received any nonopioid analgesic postoperatively, with only 41.3% receiving two or more nonopioid analgesics. Nonopioid analgesia showed the highest rates of improvement from retrospective to prospective: preoperative use of analgesics increased from 5.3% to 41.2% (P < 0.0001), postoperative use of acetaminophen increased by 27.4% (P = 0.5), Toradol by 45.5% (P = 0.11), and gabapentin by 86.7% (P < 0.0001). Postoperative nausea/vomiting prophylaxis with >1 class of antiemetic increased from 8% to 47.1% (P < 0.001). The length of stay was unchanged (5.7 versus 4.4 d, P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: For the successful implementation of an ERAS protocol, perceptions versus reality must be assessed to determine current practices and identify barriers to implementation.

Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy With EGD and Balloon Dilation: A Durable Solution for Achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and esophageal balloon dilation (BD) are the two mainstays of achalasia treatment-this study examines the outcomes when they are performed simultaneously without fundoplication. METHODS: All patients undergoing LHM&BD were reviewed for demographic and procedural data, and to see if additional procedures for achalasia had been performed. Patients were surveyed using the Eckardt score and the GERD quality-of-life score (GERD-HRQL) to assess the durability of repair. RESULTS: From 2013-2020, 66 patients underwent LHM&BD. There were no esophageal perforations and a median LOS of 1 day. Seven patients have required additional operations or procedures at median 4-years follow up. 31 patients (47%) responded to the survey. The average Eckardt score was 2.9 (goal<4) with mean GERD-HRQL of 14.4 (goal<25). CONCLUSIONS: LHM&BD allows for a safe, durable repair of achalasia. Reflux symptoms are manageable with PPI without fundoplication and the re-intervention rate similar to published values.

Magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis) in a porcine esophagus: Proof of concept for potential application in esophageal atresia.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis) is the process of forming a sutureless anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract using two magnetic Harrison rings. It has been shown to be effective in stomach, small bowel and colon, but has not been implemented in the esophagus. A pure esophageal atresia porcine model was developed to test the concept. METHODS: Five pigs weighing between 35 and 65 kg were used. In all pigs, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube was placed, and a right thoracotomy was performed. Esophageal atresia was simulated by transecting the esophagus with a cutting stapler, and magnets were placed endoscopically to approximate the two ends of the esophagus. In the first pig, the tissue within the magnetic ring was excised endoscopically to achieve immediate patency. In the second pig, approximation of the blind esophageal ends was reinforced with 3-4 externally-placed sutures but immediate patency was not performed. In the last three pigs, both external suture reinforcement and immediate patency were performed. The pigs survived for 10-14 days and received nutrition through PEG tube. At necropsy, an esophagram was performed, the specimen was explanted and a leak test was performed. RESULTS: The first pig died in the early postoperative period from a leak owing to separation of the magnets. The second pig died from aspiration before the anastomosis formed. The last three pigs survived until the study endpoint. The third pig had a contained leak owing to the staple line being placed between the magnets; this was not clinically significant. The last two pigs had well-formed anastomoses. Burst tests showed no leak when injecting saline up to 30 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Magnamosis is technically feasible for esophagoesophageal anastomoses. A survival model for pure esophageal atresia was developed and refined in pigs. Further work in this area may lead to clinical use in humans.

Public Perception of Telemedicine and Surgical Telementoring in the Pediatric Population: Results of a Parental Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine and surgical telementoring strive to provide equal access to specialized healthcare, regardless of patient location. It also aims to provide providers in remote locations real-time, second opinions from more experienced physicians who are otherwise not readily available. The goal of this study is to gauge the public perception of this technology in the pediatric population. METHODS: Patient families in our pediatric surgery and gastroenterology clinics were asked to complete a seven-question survey after being shown a 1-minute video describing telemedicine and surgical telementoring. RESULTS: A total of 129 people were surveyed. Among respondents, 89% were amenable to telemedicine for routine physician visit, 70% said "yes" for a postoperative visit, and 67% agreed to telemedicine and telementoring as a way to be evaluated by a specialist. Regarding surgical telementoring, 49% would consider it for their child, 58% would consider it for themselves, and 10% said "yes" for themselves, but "no" for their child. In addition, 24% and 19% were unsure about surgical telementoring for their child and themselves, respectively. Those with history of surgery without complications were more likely to say "yes" than "no" to telemedicine for a postoperative visit and surgical telementoring. Although a higher proportion of those with an annual income of >$100K said "no" to surgical telementoring for their child and themselves, this was not statistically significant (P = .23 and .25, respectively). Desire to see a physician in person was cited by 63% as a reason against telemedicine, although 35% reported concern about a physician's competence as a reason against surgical telementoring. CONCLUSION: Overall, surgical telementoring was only supported by about half of the respondents. We predict that with increased education about surgical telementoring, this technology will have increased public support in the pediatric population.

Assessing the Adequacy of Absorbable Braided Suture for Laparoscopic High Ligation in Rabbits.

PURPOSE: Our previous work demonstrated that intentional peritoneal injury reduces the incidence of recurrence of a patent processus vaginalis even after removal of the suture. Therefore, the necessity of permanent suture has been brought into question because of the risk of suture granuloma formation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of absorbable, braided versus permanent, braided suture in a rabbit survival model of laparoscopic percutaneous ligation of the processus vaginalis with intentional peritoneal injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen New Zealand White rabbits underwent bilateral subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL) of the internal ring. Before SEAL, peritoneal injury was caused with endoscopic shears. Each animal was randomized to receive absorbable braided suture on one side and permanent braided suture on the contralateral side. The rabbits were survived for 8 weeks to allow for complete hydrolysis of the absorbable suture. Necropsy was performed during which the integrity of the repair was assessed with insufflation of carbon dioxide up to 30 mm Hg. McNemar's test for paired data was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen rabbits survived 8 weeks. One rabbit died in the early postoperative period because of urinary tract obstruction. After insufflation, four (24%) recurrences were present in the absorbable group and two (12%) recurrences were present in the permanent group. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .50). Both rabbits with a recurrence on the side with permanent suture also had a recurrence with absorbable suture on the contralateral side. In all rabbits, the permanent suture was identified, whereas there was no visual evidence of absorbable suture. CONCLUSIONS: A trend toward a higher recurrence rate with the use of absorbable braided suture was present, although, in this study, the finding was not statistically significant. Caution should be used when considering implementation of absorbable suture for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Same-day discharge after incision and drainage of soft-tissue abscess in diaper-age children is safe and effective.

PURPOSE: Many pediatric centers admit patients following incision and drainage (I&D) of soft-tissue abscesses. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the same-day discharge following I&D. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of children aged 3 months-4 years who underwent operative I&D of an abscess followed by same-day discharge. Patients receiving antibiotics within 2 weeks of presentation were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as readmission or repeat procedure related to the initial abscess. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon Rank-Sum and Fisher's Exact tests. RESULTS: There were 442 procedures performed in 408 patients. Mean age was 1.8 years. Fever was noted in 25.8%. Of those who had a white blood cell (WBC) count drawn, 59.7% had leukocytosis. Mean time from procedure to discharge was 2.3 h, and 85.0% were discharged with oral antibiotics. Treatment failure occurred in four (0.9%) and ten (2.3%) patients at 14 and 30 days, respectively. Mean WBC count was higher in the 14-day treatment failure group (24.1 versus 16.3; p = 0.10). In patients with leukocytosis, there were 2 (1.4%) treatment failures compared to none in those without leukocytosis. CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge after I&D of abscess in diaper-age children is safe and effective.

Creation of an animal model for long gap pure esophageal atresia.

INTRODUCTION: Long gap pure esophageal atresia (LGPEA) is a congenital disorder in which the esophagus is in discontinuity, and the proximal and distal ends cannot be anastomosed in a primary fashion. No animal model for pure esophageal atresia exists. Here we describe a survival animal model for LGPEA, which will ultimately serve to test novel devices and techniques to restore continuity. METHODS: A non-survival study was first conducted in six rabbits to refine a protocol for the survival model. An open gastrostomy tube was placed, followed by a partial esophagectomy. Next, a survival study was performed with seven rabbits in which the same procedures were performed. Finally, the procedure was optimized in domestic swine. RESULTS: Despite developing the techniques and gaining valuable information in the non-survival study, none of the rabbits in the survival portion of the study lived beyond post-operative day four. Due to this complication with the rabbit, the LGPEA model was attempted in a porcine model. The pig survived to post-operative day ten, and was healthy enough to be used for further study. CONCLUSION: A porcine model of long gap pure esophageal atresia was developed which is effective and feasible to be used for testing new methods of treatment of LGPEA.

Bringing surgeons together across the world: diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite appendicitis being one of the most common surgical emergencies in the pediatric population, there is still a great deal of debate among pediatric surgeons regarding the workup and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an interactive Web symposium consisting of 130 pediatric surgeons from various regions of the world, questions about diagnosis and management of appendicitis were displayed on the screen. The audience was asked to respond to the poll questions. The questions asked to the participants pertained to an example case of a 12-year-old boy presenting to the emergency department with the classic history and exam for appendicitis. RESULTS: The total number of respondents varied between 30 and 37, giving response rates of 23%-28%. Sixty-six percent of respondents would not order imaging. Thirty-one percent said that they would order ultrasound. No participant would order a computed tomography scan, whereas 5% would order some other form. Ninety-five percent of respondents said that they would treat the patient operatively. The majority (89%) of the participants felt comfortable waiting until morning to operate on the patient if the patient arrived at 11 p.m. Fifty-seven percent stated that they would use a three-port laparoscopic approach, and 38% would use a single port, whereas 5% would use an open surgical approach. The majority (34%) reported being able to visualize the appendix as the greatest benefit to using laparoscopy. Fifty-seven percent would give the patient one additional dose of antibiotics and then discharge him 24 hours later following treatment for acute, nonperforated appendicitis. Twenty percent of respondents would give no further antibiotics and would discharge the patient from the recovery room or soon after. Sixteen percent would not give any additional antibiotics and would discharge him 24 hours postoperatively, whereas 6% would give one additional dose of antibiotics and discharge him soon after. CONCLUSIONS: The use of virtual broadcasts affords a unique opportunity to surgeons around the world to share and learn from each other.

What is "telemedicine" and what does it mean for a pediatric surgeon?

Telemedicine is a broad term and has recently become a household term in the medical field. However, there are many interpretations as to what the term "telemedicine" means. There are many facets to telemedicine and here we describe all of the elements of telemedicine, a glossary of terms, and how they relate to pediatric surgery.