Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 34(6): 886-897, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561194

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To establish the feasibility and safety of robotic interval debulking surgery following the MIRRORS protocol (robot-assisted laparoscopic assessment prior to robotic or open surgery) in women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. MIRRORS is the first of three planned trials: MIRRORS, MIRRORS-RCT (pilot), and MIRRORS-RCT. METHODS: The participants were patients with stage IIIc-IVb epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, suitable for interval debulking surgery with a pelvic mass ≤8 cm. The intervention was robot-assisted laparoscopic assessment prior to robotic or open interval debulking surgery (MIRRORS protocol). The primary outcome was feasibility of recruitment, and the secondary outcomes were quality of life (EORTC QLQC30/OV28, HADS questionnaires), pain, surgical complications, complete cytoreduction rate (%), conversion to open surgery (%), and overall and progression-free survival at 1 year. RESULTS: Overall, 95.8% (23/24) of patients who were eligible were recruited. Median age was 68 years (range 53-83). All patients had high grade serous histology and were BRCA negative. In total, 56.5% were stage IV, 43.5% were stage III, 87.0% had a partial response, while 13.0% had stable disease by RECIST 1.1. Median peritoneal cancer index was 24 (range 6-38). Following MIRRORS protocol, 87.0% (20/23) underwent robotic interval debulking surgery, and 13.0% (3/23) had open surgery. All patients achieved R<1 (robotic R0=47.4%, open R0=0%). No patients had conversion to open. Median estimated blood loss was 50 mL for robotic (range 20-500 mL), 2026 mL for open (range 2000-2800 mL) (p=0.001). Median intensive care length of stay was 0 days for robotic (range 0-8) and 3 days (range 3-13) for MIRRORS Open (p=0.012). The median length of stay was 1.5 days for robotic (range 1-17), 6 days for open (range 5-41) (p=0.012). The time to chemotherapy was as follows 18.5 days for robotic (range 13-28), 25 days for open (range 22-28) (p=0.139). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic interval debulking surgery appears safe and feasible for experienced robotic surgeons in patients with a pelvic mass ≤8 cm. A randomized controlled trial (MIRRORS-RCT) will determine whether MIRRORS protocol has non-inferior survival (overall and progression-free) compared with open interval debulking surgery.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Estudios de Factibilidad , Neoplasias Ováricas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Calidad de Vida , Laparoscopía/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA