The SHELTER Trial of Transplanting Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Lungs Into Uninfected Recipients.

SHELTER is a trial of transplanting lungs from deceased donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection into HCV-negative candidates (sponsor: Merck; NCT03724149). Few trials have reported outcomes using thoracic organs from HCV-RNA+ donors and none have reported quality of life (QOL). Methods: This study is a single-arm trial of 10 lung transplants at a single center. Patients were included who were between 18 and 67 y of age and waitlisted for lung-only transplant. Patients were excluded who had evidence of liver disease. Primary outcome was HCV cure (sustained virologic response 12 wk after completing antiviral therapy). Recipients longitudinally reported QOL using the validated RAND-36 instrument. We also applied advanced methods to match HCV-RNA+ lung recipients to HCV-negative lung recipients in a 1:3 ratio at the same center. Results: Between November 2018 and November 2020, 18 patients were consented and opted-in for HCV-RNA+ lung offers in the allocation system. After a median of 37 d (interquartile range [IQR], 6-373) from opt-in, 10 participants received double lung transplants. The median recipient age was 57 y (IQR, 44-67), and 7 recipients (70%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The median lung allocation score at transplant was 34.3 (IQR, 32.7-86.9). Posttransplant, 5 recipients developed primary graft dysfunction grade 3 on day 2 or 3, although none required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Nine patients received elbasvir/grazoprevir, whereas 1 patient received sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. All 10 patients were cured of HCV and survived to 1 y (versus 83% 1-y survival among matched comparators). No serious adverse events were found to be related to HCV or treatment. RAND-36 scores showed substantial improvement in physical QOL and some improvement in mental QOL. We also examined forced expiratory volume in 1 s-the most important lung function parameter after transplantation. We detected no clinically important differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 s between the HCV-RNA+ lung recipients versus matched comparators. Conclusions: SHELTER adds important evidence regarding the safety of transplanting HCV-RNA+ lungs into uninfected recipients and suggests QOL benefits.

Decision-making Among Hepatitis C Virus-negative Transplant Candidates Offered Organs from Donors with HCV Infection.

Background: Historically, many organs from deceased donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) were discarded. The advent of highly curative direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies motivated transplant centers to conduct trials of transplanting HCV-viremic organs (nucleic acid amplification test positive) into HCV-negative recipients, followed by DAA treatment. However, the factors that influence candidates' decisions regarding acceptance of transplant with HCV-viremic organs are not well understood. Methods: To explore patient-level perceptions, influences, and experiences that inform candidate decision-making regarding transplant with organs from HCV-viremic donors, we conducted a qualitative semistructured interview study embedded within 3 clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of transplanting lungs and kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-negative recipients. The study was conducted from June 2019 to March 2021. Results: Among 44 HCV-negative patients listed for organ transplant who were approached for enrollment in the applicable clinical trial, 3 approaches to decision-making emerged: positivist, risk analyses, and instinctual response. Perceptions of risk contributed to conceptualizations of factors influencing decisions. Moreover, most participants relied on multiple decision-making approaches, either simultaneously or sequentially. Conclusions: Understanding how different decisional models influence patients' choices regarding transplant with organs from HCV-viremic donors may promote shared decision-making among transplant patients and providers.

Not All Septal Defects Are Equal: Outcomes of Bilateral Lung Transplant With Cardiac Defect Repair vs Combined Heart-Lung Transplant in Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic transplantation is considered for patients with Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) who have refractory right ventricular failure despite optimal therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. This study compared the outcomes of bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) with cardiac defect repair vs combined heart-lung transplantation (HLT). RESEARCH QUESTION: This study presents an updated analysis using a US national registry to evaluate the outcomes of patients diagnosed with ES who underwent HLT or BLT with repair of cardiac defects. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study identified patients with ES who underwent thoracic transplantation from 1987 to 2018 from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Survival curves were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by using the log-rank test. RESULTS: During the study period, 442 adults with ES underwent thoracic transplantation (316 HLTs and 126 BLTs). Following BLT, overall survival 1, 5, and 10 years' posttransplant was 63.1%, 38.5%, and 30.2%, respectively. Following HLT, overall survival 1, 5, and 10 years' posttransplant was 68.0%, 47.3%, and 30.5% (P = .6). When survival analysis was stratified according to type of defect, patients with an atrial septal defect had better survival following BLT than following HLT (88.3% vs 63.2% 1 year posttransplant, P < .01; 71.1% vs 49.8% 3 years' posttransplant, P < .01; and 37.4% vs 29.9% 10 years' posttransplant, P = .08). Patients with a ventricular septal defect (VSD) exhibited better survival following HLT than following BLT (78.2% vs 49.6% 1 year posttransplant, P < .01; 55.6% vs 34.3% 5 years' posttransplant, P < .01; and 35.7% vs 26.5% 10 years' posttransplant, P = .03). The most common cause of mortality in patients with VSD undergoing BLT was cardiac ventricular failure. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that the best transplant option for patients with VSD remains HLT, which prevents subsequent development of ventricular failure. BLT with cardiac defect repair should be considered as the first-line treatment option in patients with ES due to an uncorrected atrial septal defect. These patients can be considered to have isolated and reversible right ventricular failure akin to patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension.

A Prospective Observational Study of Hypogammaglobulinemia in the First Year After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive therapies have led to improved survival for lung transplant (LT) recipients but these therapies can lead to hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) and potentially an increased risk of infection. Large prospective studies have not been performed to evaluate the impact of HGG on outcomes for LT recipients. METHODS: This is a single-center prospective observational study of LT recipients. Pretransplant and posttransplant IgG levels were measured and related to infection, rejection, antibiotic use, and immunosuppression use. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three LT recipients were prospectively evaluated. Pretransplant IgG values were higher than IgG values at the time of transplant or any time thereafter (all P < 0.0001). Severe HGG (IgG < 400 mg/dL) was highest at the time of transplant (32.4%) while at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant the prevalence of severe HGG was 7.4%, 7.5%, 8.9%, and 6.3%, respectively. Severe HGG was associated with 2 or more pneumonias (P = 0.0006) and increased number of antibiotic courses (P = 0.003) compared with the subjects without severe HGG. Pretransplant IgG level and less than 30% of pretransplant protective pneumococcal antibody levels were identified as pretransplant risk factors for severe HGG. In multivariate analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the underlying disease and the use of basiliximab as the induction agent in conjunction with higher prednisone and mycophenolate dosing were most predictive of severe HGG (P = 0.005), whereas the combination of age, severe HGG and number of acute steroid courses were most predictive of total days of pneumonia (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our large prospective study identifies risk factors for severe HGG after LT and demonstrates that LT recipients with severe HGG are at increased risk for recurrent pneumonias and more antibiotic courses.

Surgical Strategy for Lung Transplantation in Adults With Small Chests: Lobar Transplant Versus a Pediatric Donor.

BACKGROUND: Adult lung transplant recipients with small chests have traditionally received lungs from pediatric donors, placing an additional strain on the already restricted pediatric donor pool. Performing lobar lung transplantation (LLT) can circumvent issues with donor-recipient size mismatch; however, LLT imparts additional risks. Here, we review our experience using LLT and standard lung transplantation using a pediatric donor (PDLT) for adults with small chests. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with end-stage lung disease and a height of 65 inches or less who underwent LLT (n = 15) or PDLT (n = 15) between 2006 and 2012 at our institution, a high-volume lung transplant center. RESULTS: Lobar lung transplantation recipients were older (54 ± 10 vs 48 ± 8 years) and had higher pulmonary pressure (57 ± 11 vs 52 ± 27 mmHg) and higher lung allocation scores (70 ± 9 vs 51 ± 8) than PDLT recipients (all P < 0.05). Mean waiting time was 62 days for PDLT and 9 days for LLT. Postoperatively, the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction and the incidence of acute renal insufficiency were higher, and the mean intensive care unit stay was longer in the LLT group, but the incidence of bronchial anastomotic complications was higher in the PDLT group because of significant size discrepancy in the main bronchus (P < 0.05). Interestingly, long-term functional outcomes and survival rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both LLT and PDLT are viable surgical options for adult patients with small chests. Because of the potential impact on posttransplant outcomes, the technical complexity of transplantation, decisions regarding the best surgical approach should be made by experienced surgeons.