Sexual acquisition of HIV infection after solid organ transplantation: Late presentation and potentially fatal complications.

INTRODUCTION: While the growing knowledge on HIV among solid organ transplant recipients (SOT) is limited to either pretransplant infection or allograft transmission, there are only sparse reports describing HIV-infection after transplantation through sexual route, the primary mode of transmission in the general population. METHODS: From two different centers, we report nine new cases of HIV infection in SOT recipients attributed to sexual acquisition: eight cases of kidney-transplant recipients and one heart-transplant recipient. FINDINGS: There were nine cases of post-transplant HIV-infection detected among 14 526 transplants performed 1998 to 2015. In 6/9 cases, infection was contracted 5 years after SOT. All but one patient had stable allograft function under immunosuppressive therapy. The main trigger to diagnosis was late CMV disease and sexually transmitted diseases; five patients had CDC-stage 3 HIV infection. In 7/9 patients, virologic response and CD4 recovery were achieved within 3 months after starting antiretroviral therapy (ART). After an average of 3.6 years post diagnosis, 5/9 patients remained alive with well-controlled infection and functioning allograft. CONCLUSION: Sexual acquisition of HIV infection after SOT represents a difficult challenge, as it may occur in any kind of transplant and at any time. The course of infection resembles that of the general population, with life-threatening infectious complications, but good response to ART. Assessment of lifestyle and risk behavior is paramount, as indications may be not disclosed without direct questioning.

Estimation of renal function by CKD-EPI versus MDRD in a cohort of HIV-infected patients: a cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Accurately determining renal function is essential for clinical management of HIV patients. Classically, it has been evaluated by estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the MDRD-equation, but today there is evidence that the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation has greater diagnostic accuracy. To date, however, little information exists on patients with HIV-infection. This study aimed to evaluate eGFR by CKD-EPI vs. MDRD equations and to stratify renal function according to KDIGO guidelines. METHODS: Cross-sectional, single center study including adult patients with HIV-infection. RESULTS: Four thousand five hundred three patients with HIV-infection (864 women; 19%) were examined. Median age was 45 years (IQR 37-52), and median baseline creatinine was 0.93 mg/dL (IQR 0.82-1.05). A similar distribution of absolute measures of eGFR was found using both formulas (p = 0.548). Baseline median eGFR was 95.2 and 90.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 for CKD-EPI and MDRD equations (p < 0.001), respectively. Of the 4503 measurements, 4109 (91.2%) agreed, with a kappa index of 0.803. MDRD classified 7.3% of patients as "mild reduced GFR" who were classified as "normal function" with CKD-EPI. Using CKD-EPI, it was possible to identify "normal function" (>90 mL/min/1.73 m2) in 73% patients and "mild reduced GFR" (60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2) in 24.3% of the patients, formerly classified as >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 with MDRD. CONCLUSIONS: There was good correlation between CKD-EPI and MDRD. Estimating renal function using CKD-EPI equation allowed better staging of renal function and should be considered the method of choice. CKD-EPI identified a significant proportion of patients (24%) with mild reduced GFR (60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Renal transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected recipients: a case-control study from the Brazilian experience.

BACKGROUND: Highly active antiretroviral therapy has turned human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with end-stage renal disease into suitable candidates for renal transplantation. We present the Brazilian experience with kidney transplantation in HIV-infected recipients observed in a multicenter study. METHODS: HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients and matched controls were evaluated for the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), infections, graft function, and survival of patients and renal grafts. RESULTS: Fifty-three HIV-infected recipients and 106 controls were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar, but a higher frequency of pre-transplant positivity for hepatitis C virus and cytomegalovirus infections was found in the HIV group. Immunosuppressive regimens did not differ, but a trend was observed toward lower use of anti-thymocyte globulin in the group of HIV-infected recipients (P = 0.079). The HIV-positive recipient group presented a higher incidence of treated AR (P = 0.036) and DGF (P = 0.044). Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration estimated that glomerular filtration rate was similar at 6 months (P = 0.374) and at 12 months (P = 0.957). The median number of infections per patient was higher in the HIV-infected group (P = 0.018). The 1-year patient survival (P < 0.001) and graft survival (P = 0.004) were lower, but acceptable, in the group of HIV-infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the Brazilian experience, despite somewhat inferior outcomes, kidney transplantation is an adequate therapy for selected HIV-infected recipients.

Safety profile comparing azathioprine and mycophenolate in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Debate is increasing on whether mycophenolic acid (MPA) provides survival benefits comparable to azathioprine (AZA) after renal transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared safety and efficacy of AZA (n = 662) vs. MPA (n = 267) in low-immunologic-risk kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving tacrolimus (TAC) and steroids between 1998 and 2007. Primary outcomes were treatment discontinuation and infection. Secondary endpoints included survival free from biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, and renal function. RESULTS: The 5-year survival free of treatment discontinuation was higher in the MPA compared to the AZA group (74.1% vs. 60.3%, P < 0.001). MPA was discontinued exclusively because of adverse events (16.4%), while AZA was discontinued primarily for lack of efficacy (21.2%). In univariable analysis, MPA was associated with higher incidence of total (561.5 vs. 667.5 episodes/1000 person-year, P < 0.001), bacterial (167 vs. 158 episodes/1000 person-years, P = 0.001), and viral infections (83.2 vs. 100.4 episodes/1000 person-years, P = 0.001), but this association was not confirmed in multivariable analysis. Over 29% of viral infections in the AZA group occurred after conversion to MPA. A high incidence of tuberculosis was observed (2.9 episodes/1000 person-years) with a higher incidence (but not a statistically significant difference) in the AZA group. No significant differences were found in patient survival (90% vs. 89%, P = 0.78) or graft survival (81% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.08), but infection accounted for >50% of all deaths. CONCLUSION: The type of antimetabolite, AZA or MPA, was not independently associated with any safety or efficacy outcome 5 years after transplantation, suggesting that AZA is still a viable option for low-risk KTR receiving TAC and steroids.