Effect of tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide on the normal gut microbiota of a healthy adult population in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobials cause perturbations in the composition and diversity of the host microbiome. We aimed to compare gut microbiome perturbations caused by oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (a novel carbapenem) and by amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (an orally administered ß-lactam-ß-lactam inhibitor combination widely used in clinical practice). METHODS: We did a phase 1, single-centre, randomised, parallel-group, active-control trial to evaluate the effect of tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide on the human gut microbiota. Healthy participants aged 18 years or older with no documented illnesses during recruitment were enrolled at Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden). Study participants were stratified by sex and block-randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (600 mg orally every 8 h) or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (500 mg amoxicillin and 125 mg clavulanic acid orally every 8 h). The study included 10 days of treatment (days 1-10) and four follow-up visits (days 14, 21, 90, and 180). The trial was open-label for clinical investigators and patients, but masked for microbiology investigators. Faecal samples were collected at all visits. Sequencing of 16S rDNA was used to measure the diversity metrics, and quantitative culture to quantify selected taxa. The primary outcomes were changes in the α and ß diversity and log count of colony-forming units for selected taxa between samples compared with baseline (day 1), and whether any changes reverted during the follow-up period. The analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04376554). FINDINGS: The study was conducted between Jan 23, 2020, and April 6, 2021. 49 volunteers were screened for eligibility, among whom 30 evaluable participants (14 men and 16 women) were assigned: 15 (50%) to the tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide group and 15 (50%) to the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Complete follow-up was available for all participants, and all participants except one completed treatment as assigned. The diversity metrics showed significant changes from baseline during the treatment period. Significant decreases in richness were observed on days 4-10 (p≤0·0011) in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group and on days 4-14 (p≤0·0019) in the tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide group. Similarly, evenness was significantly decreased during treatment in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group (day 4, p=0·030) and the tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide group (days 4-10, p<0·0001) compared with baseline. Quantitative cultures showed significant decreases in Enterobacterales (days 4-7, p≤0·0030), Enterococcus spp (days 4-14, p=0·025 to p<0·0001), Bifidobacterium spp (days 2-4, p≤0·026), and Bacteroides spp (days 4-10, p≤0·030) in the tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide group. Similarly, in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid recipients, significant changes were observed in Enterobacterales (days 4-10, p≤0·048), Bifidobacterium spp (days 2-4, p≤0·013), and Lactobacillus spp (days 2-4, p≤0·020). Samples from the follow-up period were not significantly different from those at baseline in ß diversity analysis (PERMANOVA, p>0·99). By the end of the study, no significant change was observed compared with baseline in either group. There were no deaths or severe adverse events. INTERPRETATION: The impact of tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide on the gut microbiome was similar to that of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. The safety of antibiotic use with regard to the microbiome should be given attention, as dysbiosis is associated with health and disease. FUNDING: Spero Therapeutics.

Efficacy of SPR720 in murine models of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infection.

BACKGROUND: Non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasing worldwide, with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus as the predominant pathogens. Current treatments are poorly tolerated and modestly effective, highlighting the need for new treatments. SPR719, the active moiety of the benzimidazole prodrug SPR720, inhibits the ATPase subunits of DNA gyrase B, a target not exploited by current antibiotics, and therefore, no cross-resistance is expected with standard-of-care (SOC) agents. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vitro activity of SPR719 against MAC and M. abscessus clinical isolates, including those resistant to SOC agents, and in vivo efficacy of SPR720 in murine non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) pulmonary infection models. METHODS: NTM isolates were tested for susceptibility to SPR719. Chronic C3HeB/FeJ and severe combined immunodeficient murine models of pulmonary infection were used to assess efficacy of SPR720 against MAC and M. abscessus, respectively. RESULTS: SPR719 was active against MAC (MIC90, 2 mg/L) and M. abscessus (MIC90, 4 mg/L) clinical isolates. Efficacy of SPR720 was demonstrated against MAC pulmonary infection, both as a monotherapy and in combination with SOC agents. SPR720 monotherapy exhibited dose-dependent reduction in bacterial burden, with the largest reduction observed when combined with clarithromycin and ethambutol. Efficacy of SPR720 was also demonstrated against M. abscessus pulmonary infection where monotherapy exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in bacterial burden with further reductions detected when combined with SOC agents. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro activity of SPR720 against common NTM pathogens and efficacy in murine infections warrant the continued clinical evaluation of SPR720 as a new oral option for the treatment of NTM-PD.

Impact of antibiotic pharmacokinetics in urine on recurrent bacteriuria following treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

The clinical relevance of bacteriuria following antibiotic treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in clinical trials remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of urine pharmacokinetics on the timing of recurrent bacteriuria in a recently completed trial that compared oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide to intravenous ertapenem. The urinary clearance and urine dwell time of ertapenem were prolonged relative to tebipenem and were associated with a temporal difference in the repopulation of bladder urine with bacteria following treatment, potentially confounding the assessment of efficacy.

Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for oral antibiotic agents that are effective against multidrug-resistant gram-negative uropathogens. Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide is an orally bioavailable carbapenem with activity against uropathogenic Enterobacterales, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and fluoroquinolone-resistant strains. METHODS: In this phase 3, international, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of orally administered tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide as compared with intravenous ertapenem in patients with complicated urinary tract infection or acute pyelonephritis. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (at a dose of 600 mg every 8 hours) or intravenous ertapenem (at a dose of 1 g every 24 hours) for 7 to 10 days (or up to 14 days in patients with bacteremia). The primary efficacy end point was overall response (a composite of clinical cure and favorable microbiologic response) at a test-of-cure visit (on day 19, within a ±2-day window) in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population. The noninferiority margin was 12.5%. RESULTS: A total of 1372 hospitalized adult patients were enrolled; 868 patients (63.3%) were included in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population (50.8% of whom had complicated urinary tract infections and 49.2% of whom had pyelonephritis). An overall response was seen in 264 of 449 patients (58.8%) who received tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide, as compared with 258 of 419 patients (61.6%) who received ertapenem (weighted difference, -3.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.7 to 3.2). Clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit was observed in 93.1% of the patients in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population who received tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide and 93.6% of patients who received ertapenem (weighted difference, -0.6 percentage point; 95% CI, -4.0 to 2.8); the majority of patients with microbiologic response failures at the test-of-cure visit were asymptomatic patients with recurrent bacteriuria. Secondary and subgroup analyses were supportive of the primary analysis. Adverse events were observed in 25.7% of patients who received tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide and in 25.6% of patients who received ertapenem; the most common adverse events were mild diarrhea and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide was noninferior to intravenous ertapenem in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection and acute pyelonephritis and had a similar safety profile. (Funded by Spero Therapeutics and the Department of Health and Human Services; ADAPT-PO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03788967.).

Resistance among urinary tract pathogens collected in Europe during 2018.

OBJECTIVES: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis are urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens and extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing pathogens exhibit co-resistance to oral fluoroquinolones (FQ) and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). This study assessed the prevalence of ESBL phenotypes and co-resistance to FQ and TMP-SMX. METHODS: In total, 766 E. coli, 260 K. pneumoniae and 104 P. mirabilis from UTIs in 18 countries were evaluated for susceptibility in the SENTRY surveillance programme, and results interpreted using EUCAST criteria. RESULTS: E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis accounted for 57.1%, 11.3% and 7.8%, respectively, of the isolates. Among E. coli, resistance to levofloxacin and TMP-SMX ranged from 21.8% to 32.7% for all isolates increasing to 66.5-67.0% among those with a ESBL phenotype (17.9% of all UTI E. coli from Europe were ESBL phenotypes). In contrast, all E. coli were susceptible to meropenem. For K. pneumoniae, resistance rates for levofloxacin and TMP-SMX were 32.2-40.0% increasing to 69.1-78.6% for ESBL phenotypes. Meropenem was the most active agent, with 7.7% resistance. Among P. mirabilis resistance to levofloxacin and TMP-SMX was 26-38.5% and increased to 100% for ESBL phenotypes. No meropenem-resistant P. mirabilis were reported. CONCLUSIONS: High co-resistance rates were observed for oral antibiotics among ESBL phenotypes raising concerns regarding empiric use of FQ and TMP-SMX for treating resistant UTIs outside of the hospital. In contrast, intravenous carbapenems retain activity against resistant UTI pathogens. New oral options with the spectrum of the carbapenems would address an unmet need for managing resistant UTIs.

In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Tebipenem, an Oral Carbapenem.

The continued evolution of bacterial resistance to the ß-lactam class of antibiotics has necessitated countermeasures to ensure continued effectiveness in the treatment of infections caused by bacterial pathogens. One relatively successful approach has been the development of new ß-lactam analogs with advantages over prior compounds in this class. The carbapenems are an example of such ß-lactam analogs possessing improved stability against ß-lactamase enzymes and, therefore, a wider spectrum of activity. However, all carbapenems currently marketed for adult patients are intravenous agents, and there is an unmet need for an oral agent to treat patients that otherwise do not require hospitalization. Tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (tebipenem-PI-HBr or SPR994) is an orally available prodrug of tebipenem, a carbapenem with activity versus multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens, including quinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales Tebipenem-PI-HBr is currently in development for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). Microbiological data are presented here that demonstrate equivalency of tebipenem with intravenous carbapenems such as meropenem and support its use in infections in which the potency and spectrum of a carbapenem are desired. The results from standard in vitro microbiology assays as well as efficacy in several in vivo mouse infection models suggest that tebipenem-PI-HBr could be a valuable oral agent available to physicians for the treatment of infections, particularly those caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

The burden of antimicrobial resistance among urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli in the United States in 2017.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by Escherichia coli have been historically managed with oral antibiotics including the cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The use of these agents is being compromised by the increase in extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms, mostly caused by the emergence and clonal expansion of E. coli multilocus sequence typing (ST) 131. In addition, ESBL isolates show co-resistance to many of oral agents. Management of UTIs caused by ESBL and fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms is becoming increasingly challenging to treat outside of the hospital setting with clinicians having to resort to intravenous agents. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of ESBL phenotypes and genotypes among UTI isolates of E. coli collected in the US during 2017 as well as the impact of co-resistance to oral agents such as the fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The national prevalence of ESBL phenotypes of E. coli was 15.7% and was geographically distributed across all nine Census regions. Levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistance rates were ≥ 24% among all isolates and this co-resistance phenotype was considerably higher among isolates showing an ESBL phenotype (≥ 59.2%) and carrying blaCTX-M-15 (≥ 69.5%). The agents with the highest potency against UTI isolates of E. coli, including ESBL isolates showing cross-resistance across oral agents, were the intravenous carbapenems. The results of this study indicate that new oral options with the spectrum and potency similar to the intravenous carbapenems would address a significant unmet need for the treatment of UTIs in an era of emergence and clonal expansion of ESBL isolates resistant to several classes of antimicrobial agents, including oral options.

Randomized Trial of Ceftazidime-Avibactam vs Meropenem for Treatment of Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (REPROVE): Analyses per US FDA-Specified End Points.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP; nosocomial pneumonia) due to Gram-negative pathogens are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; treatment options for multidrug-resistant infections are limited. The pivotal phase III REPROVE trial evaluated the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) vs meropenem in the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP. Study results for prespecified analyses per US Food and Drug Administration-recommended trial end points are reported here. METHODS: Hospitalized adults with HAP/VAP proven or suspected to be caused by a Gram-negative pathogen were randomized 1:1 to receive CAZ-AVI or meropenem for 7 to 14 days. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure at test of cure (TOC) in the ITT and microbiological ITT (micro-ITT) populations, and safety and tolerability throughout the study. RESULTS: hundred seventy randomized patients received treatment and were included in the ITT population (CAZ-AVI, n = 436; meropenem, n = 434). CAZ-AVI was noninferior to meropenem for the primary end point (28-day all-cause mortality; ITT) based on the prespecified 10% noninferiority margin (CAZ-AVI, 9.6%; meropenem, 8.3%; difference, 1.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.4% to 5.3%) and for the clinical cure end point in the ITT population based on a prespecified -10% noninferiority margin (CAZ-AVI, 67.2%; meropenem, 69.1%; difference, -1.9%; 95% CI, -8.1% to 4.3%). Clinical cure rates at TOC for patients infected with CAZ-nonsusceptible pathogens were similar (CAZ-AVI, 75.5%; meropenem, 71.2%; micro-ITT). Safety data were consistent with established safety profiles for both agents. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI provides an important new treatment option for HAP/VAP due to Gram-negative pathogens, including CAZ-nonsusceptible strains.

Dose Selection and Validation for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Adults with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections, Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, and Nosocomial Pneumonia.

Avibactam is a non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved in combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections, and nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia. In Europe, ceftazidime-avibactam is also approved for the treatment of Gram-negative infections with limited treatment options. Selection and validation of the ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen was guided by an iterative process of population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling, whereby population PK models for ceftazidime and avibactam were developed using PK data from clinical trials and updated periodically. These models were used in probability of target attainment (PTA) simulations using joint pharmacodynamic (PD) targets for ceftazidime and avibactam derived from preclinical data. Joint PTA was calculated based on the simultaneous achievement of the individual PK/PD targets (50% free time above the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC for ceftazidime and free time above a critical avibactam threshold concentration of 1 mg/liter for avibactam). The joint PTA analyses supported a ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen of 2,000 + 500 mg every 8 h by 2-h intravenous infusion for patients with creatinine clearance (CLCR) >50 ml/min across all approved indications and modified dosage regimens for patients with CLCR ≤50 ml/min. Subgroup simulations for individual phase 3 patients showed that the dosage regimen was robust, with high target attainment (>95%) against MICs ≤8 mg/liter achieved regardless of older age, obesity, augmented renal clearance, or severity of infection. This review summarizes how the approved ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimens were developed and validated using PK/PD targets, population PK modeling, and PTA analyses.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Clinical susceptibility breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen of 2,000/500 mg every 8 h (q8h) by 2-h intravenous infusion (adjusted for renal function) have been established by the FDA, CLSI, and EUCAST as susceptible (MIC, ≤8 mg/liter) and resistant (MIC, >8 mg/liter). The key supportive data from pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses, in vitro surveillance, including molecular understanding of relevant resistance mechanisms, and efficacy in regulatory clinical trials are collated and analyzed here.

Avibactam Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Targets.

Avibactam is a novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved in the United States and Europe for use in combination with ceftazidime. Combinations of avibactam with aztreonam or ceftaroline fosamil have also been clinically evaluated. Until recently, there has been very little precedence of which pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices and magnitudes are appropriate to use for ß-lactamase inhibitors in population PK modeling for analyzing potential doses and susceptibility breakpoints. For avibactam, several preclinical studies using different in vitro and in vivo models have been conducted to identify the PK/PD index of avibactam and the magnitude of exposure necessary for effect in combination with ceftazidime, aztreonam, or ceftaroline fosamil. The PD driver of avibactam critical for restoring the activity of all three partner ß-lactams was found to be time dependent rather than concentration dependent and was defined as the time that the concentration of avibactam exceeded a critical concentration threshold (%fT>CT). The magnitude of the CT and the time that this threshold needed to be exceeded to elicit particular PD endpoints varied depending on the model and the partner ß-lactam. This review describes the preclinical studies used to determine the avibactam PK/PD target in combination with its ß-lactam partners.

Assessment of 30/20-Microgram Disk Content versus MIC Results for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

We evaluated the correlation between MIC and disk diffusion inhibition zones when testing ceftazidime-avibactam, using the 30/20-µg disk and the disk diffusion and MIC breakpoints established by the U.S. FDA and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Organisms used included 2 groups of Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 2 groups of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates; 1 group of each consisted of randomly selected isolates and the second group consisted of a challenge group from thousands of surveillance isolates with an increased proportion of organisms displaying ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values close to the breakpoints. Broth microdilution, disk diffusion tests, and data analysis were performed according to reference standardized methods. Ceftazidime-avibactam breakpoints of ≤8/4 (susceptible) and ≥16/4 µg/ml (resistant) for MIC and ≥21/≤20 mm for disk diffusion, as established by the U.S. FDA and the CLSI, were applied for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC and disk zone (30/20-µg disk) correlation were acceptable when testing Enterobacteriaceae (overall, very major [VM] and major [Ma] error rates of 0.4% and 0.0%, respectively) and nearly so when testing P. aeruginosa (2.3% VM and 2.9% Ma errors). In summary, disk diffusion and broth microdilution testing results demonstrated good categorical agreement for ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, using 30/20-µg disks.

Evolution of Ceftaroline-Resistant Mrsa in a Child with Cystic Fibrosis Following Repeated Antibiotic Exposure.

Ceftaroline is the first ß-lactam antibiotic with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We describe a ceftaroline-resistant MRSA strain, isolated from a girl with cystic fibrosis after 22 ceftaroline treatment courses. MRSA genome sequencing documented a Tyr446Asn alteration in penicillin binding protein 2 that appeared responsible for resistance. Noncompartmental ceftaroline pharmacokinetic evaluation in our patient documented increased clearance and volume of distribution compared with adults.

Ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections is increasingly difficult due to the rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a combination of the established third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime with avibactam, a novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor, which restores the activity of ceftazidime against many ß-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria, including extended-spectrum ß-lactamases and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Clinical and nonclinical studies supporting the safety and efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam include microbiological surveillance studies of clinically relevant pathogens, in vivo animal models of infection, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses, Phase I clinical pharmacology studies, and Phase II/III studies in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and complicated urinary tract infections, including patients with ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Gram-negative infections.

Accuracy of the Thermo Fisher Scientific (Sensititre™) dry-form broth microdilution MIC product when testing ceftaroline.

Ceftaroline, the active metabolite of the ceftaroline fosamil pro-drug, was the first advanced-spectrum cephalosporin with potent activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. After 4 years of clinical use, few ceftaroline commercial susceptibility testing devices other than agar diffusion methods (disks and stable gradient) are available. Here, we validate a broth microdilution product (Sensititre™; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cleveland, OH, USA) that achieved 99.2% essential agreement (manual and automated reading) and 95.3-100.0% categorical agreement, with high reproducibility (98.0-100.0%). Sensititre™ MIC values for ceftaroline, however, were slightly skewed toward an elevated value (0.5 × log2 dilution step), greatest when testing for streptococci and Enterobacteriaceae.

Serotype distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of USA Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected prior to and post introduction of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.

This study evaluated pneumococci cultured from blood or lower respiratory tract specimens from hospitalized patients in the USA (all age groups) during 2011-2012 (N = 1190) and compared findings with those from a similar study performed in 2008 (N = 694). Isolates were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution and serotypes determined by cpsB sequencing, supplemented with multiplex PCR and capsular swelling assays. Relative percentages of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) types were 6.3 and 4.9% in 2008 and 2011-2012, respectively, and the most common PCV7 serotypes (19F and 6B) comprised only 3.7% and 4.0% of all isolates from both periods, respectively. Thirteen-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) serotypes represented 42.9% of isolates in 2008 and 30.1% in the second period, and this decrease was driven by 19A and 7F. Non-PCV13 serogroups/serotypes 23A, 15B/15C, 7C, 8, and 31 increased. Penicillin non-susceptibility rates were 9.6-10.0% and 38.9-42.7% when applying the parenteral (i.e. ≥ 4 µg/mL) and oral breakpoints (i.e. ≥ 0.12 µg/mL), respectively. Ceftaroline was the most potent agent tested based on MIC50 and MIC90 values (≤ 0.015 and 0.12 µg/mL, respectively) for both time periods.

Decreased ceftriaxone susceptibility in emerging (35B and 6C) and persisting (19A) Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes in the United States, 2011-2012: ceftaroline remains active in vitro among ß-lactam agents.

Totals of 8.7% (103/1,190) and 21.0% (249/1,190) of the Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates recovered from specimens collected in the United States during the 2011-2012 AWARE (Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation) Surveillance Program were ceftriaxone nonsusceptible according to the CLSI (≤ 1 µg/ml for susceptible) and EUCAST (≤ 0.5 µg/ml for susceptible) criteria, respectively. Decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone (MIC, 1 µg/ml) was frequently observed among serotypes 19 A (51.4%; 128/249) and 35 B (29.7%; 74/249), which were most often observed in the East South Central and South Atlantic U.S. Census regions. Ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 µg/ml) remained active (≥ 96.8% susceptible) when tested against these less susceptible isolates.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses to evaluate in vitro susceptibility test interpretive criteria for ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

To provide support for in vitro susceptibility test interpretive criteria decisions for ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, as well as dose adjustment recommendations for renal impairment, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) target attainment was evaluated for simulated patients administered intravenous (i.v.) ceftaroline fosamil at 600 mg twice daily (q12h) and simulated patients with renal impairment administered various dosing regimens. Using a previously developed population PK model, Monte Carlo simulation was used to generate ceftaroline plasma concentration profiles for simulated patients with normal renal function or mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment. Using these profiles, the percentage of time during the dosing interval that free-drug concentrations remained above the MIC (f%T>MIC) for ceftaroline at steady state was calculated. Percentages of simulated patients achieving f %T>MIC targets for S. aureus and S. pneumoniae based on murine infection models were calculated by MIC. At MICs of 2 mg/liter for S. aureus and 1 mg/liter for S. pneumoniae, the percentages of simulated patients with normal renal function and mild renal impairment following administration of ceftaroline fosamil at 600 mg q12h, moderate renal impairment following administration of ceftaroline fosamil at 400 mg q12h, and severe renal impairment following administration of ceftaroline fosamil at 300 mg q12h achieving f %T>MIC targets (≥26 for S. aureus and ≥44 for S. pneumoniae) exceeded 90%. The results of these analyses, which suggested that in vitro susceptibility test interpretive criteria defining susceptible could be as high as MICs of ≤2 and ≤1 mg/liter for ceftaroline against S. aureus and S. pneumoniae, respectively, provide support for current FDA and CLSI criteria, which define susceptible as MICs of 1 and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively. Recommendations for dose adjustments for patients with renal impairment were also supported by the results of these analyses.

Activity of ceftaroline and epidemiologic trends in Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from 43 medical centers in the United States in 2009.

A Staphylococcus aureus surveillance program was initiated in the United States to examine the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and epidemiologic trends. Susceptibility testing by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution was performed on 4,210 clinically significant isolates collected in 2009 from 43 medical centers. All isolates were screened for mecA by PCR and evaluated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were analyzed for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes and the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type. All isolates had ceftaroline MICs of ≤2 µg/ml with an MIC(50) of 0.5 and an MIC(90) of 1 µg/ml. The overall resistance rates, expressed as the percentages of isolates that were intermediate and resistant (or nonsusceptible), were as follows: ceftaroline, 1.0%; clindamycin, 30.2% (17.4% MIC ≥ 4 µg/ml; 12.8% inducible); daptomycin, 0.2%; erythromycin, 65.5%; levofloxacin, 39.9%; linezolid, 0.02%; oxacillin, 53.4%; tetracycline, 4.4%; tigecycline, 0%; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 1.6%; vancomycin, 0%; and high-level mupirocin, 2.2%. The mecA PCR was positive for 53.4% of the isolates. The ceftaroline MIC(90)s were 0.25 µg/ml for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and 1 µg/ml for MRSA. Among the 2,247 MRSA isolates, 51% were USA300 (96.9% PVL positive, 99.7% SCCmec type IV) and 17% were USA100 (93.4% SCCmec type II). The resistance rates for the 1,137 USA300 MRSA isolates were as follows: erythromycin, 90.9%; levofloxacin, 49.1%; clindamycin, 7.6% (6.2% MIC ≥ 4 µg/ml; 1.4% inducible); tetracycline, 3.3%; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 0.8%; high-level mupirocin, 2.7%; daptomycin, 0.4%; and ceftaroline and linezolid, 0%. USA300 is the dominant clone causing MRSA infections in the United States. Ceftaroline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against recent S. aureus clinical isolates, including MRSA, daptomycin-nonsusceptible, and linezolid-resistant strains.