Management of Severe Botulinum-Induced Eyelid Ptosis With Pretarsal Botulinum Toxin and Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride 0.1.

BACKGROUND: Eyelid ptosis following periocular onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) treatment is a known complication that can be frustrating for both patients and practitioners. Iatrogenic blepharoptosis occurs due to local spread of the BoNT-A from the periocular region into the levator palpebrae superioris muscle. Although injectors should have a thorough understanding of the relevant anatomy in order to prevent it, BoNT-A induced ptosis can occur even in the most experienced hands. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe a case series of patients treated effectively with topical oxymetazoline HCl 0.1% and pretarsal BoNT-A injections in the setting of botox-induced ptosis. METHODS: The study group consisted of 8 patients who had undergone recent cosmetic BoNT-A treatment preceding the sudden onset of unilateral upper eyelid ptosis. RESULTS: A diagnosis of severe ptosis (>3 mm) was made in all the cases in this series. Pretarsal BoNT-A injections alone or in association with topical administration of Upneeq eyedrops (Upneeq, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals, Marietta, GA) significantly reversed the ptosis in all treated cases. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first documented case series of patients treated effectively with topical oxymetazoline HCl 0.1% and pretarsal BoNT-A injections in the setting of botox-induced ptosis. This treatment combination is a safe and effective option in these cases.

Facial Vascular Events and Tissue Ischemia: A Guide to Understanding and Optimizing Wound Care.

The Complications in Medical Aesthetics Collaborative (CMAC) is a nonprofit organization established to promote best patient outcomes through educating clinicians in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of complications that can arise following nonsurgical cosmetic procedures. The organization is a global community sharing information, learning, experience, and data to promote best practices. This article explores how dermal filler vascular events can cause tissue ischaemia leading to a facial wound. Ideally, vascular events will be diagnosed early and amenable to reversal with hyaluronidase if caused by a cross-linked hyaluronic acid. If there is significant and extensive hypoxia to the area, there is delayed diagnosis, or the injected product cannot be reversed, the management should center around optimizing wound care. Both simple and complex wounds will benefit from good care. Patients seek aesthetic treatments to improve how they look and can be vulnerable to poor outcomes. Wounds, if not treated appropriately, can result in permanent scarring or other sequalae, such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. There are many publications addressing vascular events in aesthetic practice, but providing optimal care for facial wounds is not addressed.

Consensus Opinion for The Management of Soft Tissue Filler Induced Vision Loss.

There are multiple treatment strategies proposed for the management of vision loss related to the injection of soft tissue fillers. Currently, there is no internationally accepted consensus on the immediate management of soft tissue filler induced vision loss (STFIVL). A recent systematic review of the literature concluded that there is not enough evidence to support retrobulbar hyaluronidase, and alternative treatments require exploration. The available literature demonstrates the inconsistent and unproven success of retrobulbar and peribulbar hyaluronidase in reversal of soft filler induced vision loss. Various therapeutics have been used to aid the reversal of vision loss but with mixed outcomes. The current evidence base does not support the use of retrobulbar and peribulbar hyaluronidase. The use of retrobulbar hyaluronidase for reversing soft tissue filler induced vision loss is controversial. Its efficacy remains unproven and there is mixed evidence within the literature. The current evidence suggests that there may be an increased risk of introducing severe adverse events associated with retrobulbar hyaluronidase and may even exacerbate the problem for those clinicians who are not ophthalmology trained. Therefore, we recommend two alternative treatment pathways for ophthalmology and non-ophthalmology trained practitioners. The suggested goal of this publication is to understand the pathophysiology of STFIVL, recognize signs and symptoms, and to propose algorithms to manage vision loss for both non-ophthalmology and ophthalmology trained clinicians. Clinicians must act swiftly and arrange immediate transfer to an emergency department or ophthalmology specialist setting to give the patient the best chance of vision restoration. The focus of any intervention for non-ophthalmology trained clinicians should be based around the immediate use of non-invasive techniques.