The LACOG-0415 phase II trial: abiraterone acetate and ADT versus apalutamide versus abiraterone acetate and apalutamide in patients with advanced prostate cancer with non-castration testosterone levels.

BACKGROUND: Testosterone suppression is the standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer, and it is associated with side-effects that impair patients' quality of life, like sexual dysfunction, osteoporosis, weight gain, and increased cardiovascular risk. We hypothesized that abiraterone acetate with prednisone (AAP) and apalutamide, alone or in combination, can be an effective hormonal therapy also possibly decreasing castration-associated side effects. METHODS: Phase II, open-label, randomized, efficacy trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) and Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) versus apalutamide versus the combination of AAP (without ADT) and apalutamide. Key eligibility criteria are confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma; biochemical relapse after definitive treatment (PSA ≥ 4 ng/ml and doubling time less than 10 months, or PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml); newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer; asymptomatic to moderately symptomatic regarding bone symptoms. Patients with other histology besides adenocarcinoma or previous use of hormonal therapy or chemotherapy were excluded. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need to study and validate regimens such as new hormonal agents that may add benefit to castration with an acceptable safety profile. We aim to evaluate if apalutamide in monotherapy or in combination with AAP is an effective and safety hormonal treatment that can spare patients of androgen deprivation therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on October 16, 2017, under Identifier: NCT02867020.

Palliative care in poor-performance status small cell lung cancer patients: is there a mandatory role for chemotherapy?

PURPOSE: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy but with a high response rate to chemotherapy. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) has been recognized as one of the main prognostic factors in SCLC. There are few data about risk-benefit ratio of chemotherapy over exclusive best supportive care in ECOG PS 3 and 4 patients. This study was performed to assess the outcome of poor ECOG PS SCLC patients that received chemotherapy in our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records from patients with ECOG PS 3-4 SCLC, who received systemic chemotherapy, was performed between January 2001 and December 2006 at the Instituto Nacional do Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included. Extensive disease was observed in 85% of patients and 25% had PS 4. The median overall survival was 53 days (64 days for ECOG PS 3 and 7 days for ECOG PS 4). There were 30% of early deaths. On univariate analysis, lactate dehydrogenase value, need for hospital admission, and exposure to radiotherapy had impact on survival. ECOG PS 3 patients had better survival than PS 4 patients, even when adjusted for stage. On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS, combined with stage, sustained a major influence on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Median survival for ECOG PS 4 patients treated with chemotherapy in our series was extremely short with a high rate of early deaths. ECOG PS 3 patients also showed a poor survival. These data suggest that we need a more comprehensive approach and further studies, regarding the palliative care of this high-risk population.