Predictors of Professional Fulfillment and Burnout Among Otolaryngologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objective: The goal of this study is to assess burnout and professional fulfillment during the initial weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic among otolaryngology practitioners. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: International survey of otolaryngologists during a pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed from April 24 to May 8, 2020, via email and social media platforms to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on otolaryngology practitioners in academic and private practice. The Professional Fulfillment Index was used to assess professional fulfillment and burnout. Burnout was divided into work exhaustion and interpersonal disengagement. Results: Of 243 respondents, 202 completed the Professional Fulfillment Index portion of the survey. An average score ≥3 on the professional fulfillment section correlates with fulfillment, while an average score ≥1.33 on the burnout section correlates with burnout. The average score of professional fulfillment was 2.17, with 85.6% of respondents reporting lack of professional fulfillment. The average score on burnout was 1, with 40.1% of otolaryngologists reporting burnout. In multivariable analyses, females were found to have statistically lower professional fulfillment (beta = -2.28, P = .010) with higher rates of work exhaustion (beta = 0.62, P < .001), interpersonal disengagement (beta = 2.08, P = .023), and burnout (beta = 4.49, P = .002). Conclusion: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, most participants reported a lack of professional fulfillment while just under half experienced burnout. Female gender was associated with low professional fulfillment and high work exhaustion, interpersonal disengagement, and burnout. Attention to burnout and job satisfaction during a pandemic is critical for the appropriate well-being of otolaryngology practitioners.

Objective Assessment of Aerosolization During Transnasal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review is to assimilate the literature on objective assessment of particulate aerosolization during transnasal endoscopic procedures. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and hand-searched articles. REVIEW METHODS: The PubMed electronic database was searched using Medical Subject Headings and free-text search terms relating to aerosolization and transnasal endoscopic procedures from inception to November 16, 2020. References were hand-searched to identify additional publications for consideration. Inclusion in the systematic review required quantification of aerosol generation during clinic transnasal endoscopic procedures. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and flowchart were followed during the systematic review. RESULTS: Eight of 900 studies met criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. Five studies tested nasal endoscopy with mixed findings on the risk of aerosol generation during this procedure. Two studies assessed flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy and also reported mixed findings. Breathing, sneezing, speech, and spray anesthetic/decongestants were found to consistently increase aerosol generation above baseline. A number of studies tested new and general mitigation strategies and were found to be effective in decreasing aerosol generation. CONCLUSIONS: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has informed many considerations regarding patient and provider safety. It is valuable to understand the risk during outpatient otolaryngology procedures through the quantification of aerosolization. There are several effective methods to control aerosolization during these procedures. The findings of this systematic review will inform appropriate precautions to protect against spread of infectious agents by aerosolization.

Prevalence and Factors Associated With Oral Cavity and Pharyngeal Cancer Screening in a Rural Population.

OBJECTIVE: (1) To quantify the prevalence of provider recommendation and receipt of oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer (OCPC) screening and (2) to examine the factors associated with OCPC screening recommendation and receipt among adults. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Rural counties in central Illinois. METHODS: This study among adults (N = 145) was conducted between January 1 and June 30, 2017. The outcomes of interest were provider recommendation and receipt of OCPC screening. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between (1) sociodemographic, health care access and utilization, and OCPC risk factors and (2) provider recommendation and receipt of OCPC screening. RESULTS: The prevalence of provider recommendation and receipt of OCPC screening was 12.4% and 28.3%, respectively. Approximately 15% of current smokers, 13% of participants who consume alcohol, and 10% of participants with ≥5 lifetime sexual partners had received an OCPC screening recommendation. OCPC screening rates were 19% for current smokers, 30% for those who consume alcohol, and 32% for those with ≥5 lifetime sexual partners. In the adjusted analyses, respondents with ≥5 partners (adjusted odds ratio, 3.10 [95% CI, 1.25-7.66]) had a higher odds of receiving OCPC screening than those with <5. There were no significant associations between other OCPC risk factors and provider recommendation and receipt of OCPC screening. CONCLUSION: OCPC screening recommendation and receipt were low; only number of lifetime sexual partners was associated with OCPC screening receipt. Our findings suggest that rural populations may be vulnerable to late-stage diagnosis of OCPC, and interventions to help improve screening rates are warranted.

Rapid telehealth implementation into an otolaryngology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Report outcomes of rapid implementation of telehealth across an academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery department during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-institution study of rapid deployment of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Characteristics of patients were compared between those who agreed and those who declined telehealth care. Reasons for declining telehealth visits were ascertained. Characteristics of telehealth visits were collected and patients were asked to complete a post-visit satisfaction survey. RESULTS: There was a 68% acceptance rate for telehealth visits. In multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to accept telehealth if they were being seen in the facial plastics subspecialty clinic (odds ratio [OR] 59.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.21-1607.52; P = .015) compared to the general otolaryngology clinic. Patients with Medicare (compared to commercial insurance) as their primary insurance were less likely to accept telehealth visits (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.77; P = .027). Two hundred and thirty one patients underwent telehealth visits; most visits (69%) were for established patients and residents were involved in 38% of visits. There was an 85% response rate to the post-visit survey. On a scale of one to ten, the median satisfaction score was 10 and 99% of patients gave a score of 8 or higher. Satisfaction scores were higher for new patient visits than established patient visits (P = .020). CONCLUSION: Rapid implementation of telehealth in an academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery department is feasible. There was high acceptance of and satisfaction scores with telehealth. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Development and Assessment of an Otolaryngology-Specific Surgical Priority Scoring System.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess an otolaryngology-specific surgical priority scoring system that incorporates varying levels of mucosal involvement. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: A novel mucosal score was developed based on best available evidence. This mucosal score was incorporated into the Medically Necessary, Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) score to generate a MeNTS-Mucosal (MeNTS-M) score. A retrospective cohort of patients was identified to assess the surgical priority scoring systems. Inclusion criteria included all scheduled surgical procedures between March 23, 2020, and April 17, 2020. Decisions about whether to proceed or cancel were made based on best clinical judgment by surgeons, without use of any surgical priority scores. The predictive value of the surgical priority scoring systems was assessed in this retrospective cohort. RESULTS: The median MeNTS score was significantly lower in adult patients whose surgery proceeded compared to those for whom the surgery was cancelled (48 vs 56; P = .004). Mucosal and MeNTS-M scores were not statistically different based on whether surgery proceeded. Among adult patients, the highest area under the curve (AUC) was for the MeNTS scoring system (0.794); both the mucosal and MeNTS-M systems had lower AUC values (which were significantly lower than the AUC for the MeNTS scoring system). CONCLUSION: This study represents development and assessment of the first otolaryngology-specific surgical priority score and incorporates varying levels of mucosal disruption. The combined MeNTS-M scoring system could be a valuable tool in appropriately triaging otolaryngology-head and neck surgery procedures.

Robotic Skull Base Surgery.

Robotic surgery has become more common in otolaryngologic surgery since the introduction of the da Vinci robotic system, but has played a limited role in anterior and central skull base surgery, largely because of technical limitations of existing robots. Current robotic technology has been used in creative ways to access the skull base, but was not designed to navigate these complex anatomic constraints. Novel robots should target many of the limitations of current robotic technology, such as maneuverability, inability to suture, lack of haptic feedback, and absent integration with image guidance.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Sinonasal and Skull Base Malignancy: An Assessment of Study Quality and Clinical Relevance.

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal and skull base malignancies can cause significant adverse effects on functional status and survival. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to systematically review the published literature of patient-reported outcomes pertaining to treatment of sinonasal and skull base malignancy. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline was conducted with PubMed to identify studies that assessed patient-reported outcomes in patients with sinonasal or skull base malignancy. Patient-reported outcomes studies with at least 10 patients published in English from January 2000 to April 2017 were included. Criteria from International Society for Quality of Life guidelines and criteria unique to sinonasal and skull base malignancies were used to calculate a composite score for each article. Studies with the top 33% of scores were categorized as high quality articles. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Three studies (14%) reported a priori hypothesis. Eleven (50%) assessed specific quality of life domains and 10 studies (45%) performed statistical analysis on these domains. Specific symptoms were assessed in up to 32% of studies. Eight studies were characterized as high quality; these studies had higher sample sizes and more often assessed patient-reported outcomes prior to treatment compared to low quality studies. CONCLUSIONS: The goal of the current study was to evaluate the quality of the current patient-reported outcomes literature on sinonasal and skull base malignancies. Areas of improvement for future studies include analysis of individual domains and disease-specific symptoms, reporting a priori hypotheses, and collecting preoperative and longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.

Association Between COVID-19 and Kawasaki Disease: Vigilance Required From Otolaryngologists.

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, many novel presentations of known conditions are occurring. In the pediatric population, new instances of Kawasaki disease have recently been singled out as presenting in conjunction with or soon after diagnosis of COVID-19. This poses a novel situation, particularly for otolaryngologists, who may be the first to encounter these patients. Otolaryngologists should be cognizant of the coexistence of conditions to allow for timely recognition and optimal management.

Surge after the surge: Anticipating the increased volume and needs of patients with head and neck cancer after the peak in COVID-19.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to have extensive effects on public health as it spreads rapidly across the globe. Patients with head and neck cancer are a particularly susceptible population to these effects, and we expect there to be a potential surge in patients presenting with head and neck cancers after the surge in COVID-19. Furthermore, the impact of social distancing measures could result in a shift toward more advanced disease at presentation. With appropriate anticipation, multidisciplinary head and cancer teams could potentially minimize the impact of this surge and plan for strategies to provide optimal care for patients with head and neck cancer.

Insights on Otolaryngology Residency Training during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Otolaryngology residency training programs are facing a novel challenge due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The widespread impact and chronicity of this pandemic makes it unique from any crisis faced by our training programs to date. This international medical crisis has the potential to significantly alter the course of training for our current resident cohort. The decrease in clinical opportunities due to the limitations on elective surgical cases and office visits as well as potential resident redeployment could lead to a decline in overall experience as well as key indicator cases. It is important that we closely monitor the impact of this pandemic on resident education and ensure the implementation of alternative learning strategies while maintaining an emphasis on safety and well-being.

Evidence-Based Guidelines for Management of Head and Neck Mucosal Malignancies during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, otolaryngologists face novel challenges when treating patients with head and neck cancer. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current evidence surrounding the treatment of these patients during this pandemic and to provide evidence-based recommendations with attention to increased risk in this setting. DATA SOURCES: A review of the literature was performed with PubMed. Because recently published articles on this topic may not yet be indexed into PubMed, otolaryngology journals were hand searched for relevant articles. Guidelines from national organizations were reviewed to identify additional relevant sources of information. REVIEW METHODS: Two groups of search terms were created: one with terms related to COVID-19 and another with terms related to head and neck cancer and its management. Searches were performed of all terms in each group as well as combinations of terms between groups. Searches and subsequent exclusion of articles were performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). Additional articles were identified after relevant journals and guidelines from national organizations were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with head and neck mucosal malignancy require continued treatment despite the current pandemic state. Care must be taken at all stages of treatment to minimize the risk to patients and health care workers while maintaining focus on minimizing use of limited resources. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patient care plans should be guided by best available evidence to optimize outcomes while maintaining a safe environment in the setting of this pandemic.

Special considerations for elderly patients with head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Elderly patients with head and neck cancer are at increased risk of adverse outcomes during and after treatment of head and neck cancer. COVID-19 severity and mortality can be expected to be significantly greater in elderly patients with head and neck cancer, given that increased age, comorbidities, and presence of malignancy are known risk factors for disease severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, their management requires multidisciplinary consensus and patient input. A thorough geriatric assessment, which has been shown to be beneficial prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, could be particularly helpful in this patient population with the added dimension of COVID-19 risk. In many cases, prudent treatment plan modification may allow for overall best outcomes. Furthermore, recruitment of social services and, when appropriate, palliative care, may allow for optimal management of these patients.

Impact of age on outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common condition that affects people of all ages and negatively impacts quality of life. The goal of this study was to identify differences in outcomes by age following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CRS utilizing 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores. METHODS: Data from 1252 adult CRS patients electing to undergo ESS (2007-2018) were collected retrospectively. The median age of 50 years was used to divide the data into 2 groups for comparison of the impact of age on SNOT-22 scores at 0, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Changes in SNOT-22 scores were analyzed using a mixed models analysis. RESULTS: After adjusting for gender, race, polyp status, and number of prior ESSs, patients younger than 50 years had a higher mean pre-ESS SNOT-22 score (44.0) compared to those of at least 50 years of age (38.9). Among patients younger than 50 years, SNOT-22 scores declined by 20.7 points at 3 months post-ESS and 16.1 points at 6 months post-ESS. The rate of change between the dichotomized age groups was not significantly different at 3 and 6 months post-ESS (p = 0.7952 and p = 0.1057, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both age groups showed significant and durable improvement in SNOT-22 scores after ESS. Patients younger than 50 years of age have higher pre-ESS SNOT-22 scores, but converge to the same SNOT-22 scores by 3 months post-ESS. The rate of change of SNOT-22 scores is not different between those younger than 50 years and those of at least 50 years.

Factors Associated With Patient Nonattendance in Rhinology Clinics.

BACKGROUND: Nonattendance to clinical appointments is a global problem appreciated by clinicians with an ambulatory presence. There are few reports of nonattendance in otolaryngology clinics, and no reports on nonattendance for a single otolaryngology subspecialty. OBJECTIVE: To describe the no-show population in rhinology clinics. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed involving rhinology clinics from 2 academic medical centers in the United States. All patients who either attended their clinic appointment(s) or did not attend without previously cancelling from June 2016 to May 2017 were included. Data collected included patient demographics, appointment status, season and time of visit, insurance status, type of visit (new vs established), and provider seen. RESULTS: There were 2791 clinical appointments evaluated over a 12-month period at 2 rhinology clinics involving 4 fellowship-trained rhinologists. Ninety-two percent of patients kept their appointments, while 8% did not. Sex, season of visit, time of visit (am vs pm), type of visit, provider sex, provider location, or provider's experience (<10 years vs ≥10 years) were not associated with patient's attendance status. Univariate analysis showed that patient's age ≤50 ( P = .001) and primary insurance type ( P < .001) were associated with nonattendance. Medicaid as the primary insurance type was associated with clinic nonattendance. Multivariable analysis showed that age ≤ 50 years, odds ratio (OR) 1.62 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.30), P = .007, and primary insurance type (Medicaid: OR 3.75 [95% CI 2.58-5.45], P < .001) remained significant predictors of nonattendance. CONCLUSION: Patients younger than 50 years and patients with Medicaid as the primary insurance types are associated with risk of missing rhinology clinic appointments. As a subspecialty, delivery of timely care and clinical efficiency could be improved by interventions directed toward improving attendance among this population.

What is the optimal management of chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Over the past four decades, the average life expectancy for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has increased from 13 to 37 years of age. With increasing survival and improved pulmonary management, otolaryngologists are now seeing an increasing number of CF patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although CRS is a commonly treated disease process, there are a number of subtleties specific to CF. As the life expectancy of CF patients increases, quality of life issues gain importance. It is essential for otolaryngologists to understand the current therapeutic modalities to treat this challenging subset of CRS patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The sinonasal mucosa of CF patients has distinct differences including impaired mucociliary clearance and a predominantly neutrophilic polyp profile. Performing more aggressive surgical intervention, especially in the setting of revision cases may lead to improved outcomes. A recent study demonstrated that extensive sinus surgery with postoperative management can eradicate pathogenic bacteria from the sinuses of CF patients for up to 1 year. SUMMARY: With increasing life expectancy in CF, patients will require long-term follow-up with an otolaryngologist. Understanding the intricacies of the presentation of this disease in patients with CF is important for optimizing management.

Gastric volvulus complication in an infant with undiagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia presenting with acute respiratory distress.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is an embryologic defect that creates a passage for herniation of abdominal structures into the thoracic cavity. This can lead to a variety of complications, including gastric volvulus that can present acutely with epigastric distention and vomiting. In cases of late-onset congenital diaphragmatic hernia, symptoms may be vague and often necessitate further investigation. CASE: Our patient is a 12-month-old previously healthy female infant who presented to the emergency department with a history of vomiting and acute onset respiratory distress. Her SaO(2) was 94% to 98% on room air, her respiratory rate was in the 80s breaths per minute, and she was noted to have severe retractions. Her chest examination revealed absent breath sounds on the left side. Her abdominal examination was unremarkable. The acute presentation of respiratory distress was initially concerning for a foreign body aspiration, but a chest radiograph demonstrated left-sided opacification and mediastinal shift to the right. The patient required intubation for respiratory decompensation and a subsequent computed tomographic scan showed diaphragmatic hernia with gastric volvulus. CONCLUSIONS: This patient's presentation highlights one of the complications that may occur owing to congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Computed tomographic scan is the confirmatory test for diaphragmatic hernia and, in this case, also uncovered a concomitant gastric volvulus. Treatment includes early resuscitation, a definitive airway, and emergent surgery to prevent ischemic necrosis of the stomach owing to strangulation, gastric perforation, and serious cardiorespiratory decompensation.