Defecatory Dysfunction.

Normal defecation is a complex and coordinated physiologic process that involves the rectum, anus, anal sphincter complex, and pelvic floor muscles. Any alteration of this process can be considered defecatory dysfunction, a term that covers a broad range of disorders, including slow-transit constipation, functional constipation, and functional or anatomic outlet obstruction. Evaluation should include history, physical, and consideration of additional testing such as colonoscopy, colonic transit studies, defecography, and/or anorectal manometry. Depending on the etiology, management options can include conservative measures such as dietary or lifestyle modifications, medications, pelvic floor physical therapy, or surgical repair.

Chronic Pelvic Pain Patients Demonstrate Higher Catastrophizing in Association with Pelvic Symptoms and Comorbid Pain Diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the relationship between catastrophization and pelvic pain symptomatology in chronic pelvic pain (CPP) patients using standardized questionnaires. METHODS: CPP patients completed standardized questionnaires which included: genitourinary pain index, patient health questionnaire for anxiety and depression, interstitial cystitis symptom index, and pelvic floor distress inventory. Scores and number of comorbidities were compared to Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) by linear regression. Patients categorized as "extreme catastrophizing" (PCS score ≥30), traditionally associated with worse outcomes in the pain literature [10-11], were also analyzed separately. RESULTS: 184 patients were included (mean age 42 years, N = 23 male). Higher number of pain comorbidities was correlated to PCS (P < .001) as well as higher scores on all standardized questionnaires (P < .001). Forty-four percent of patients (81/184) were extreme catastrophizers and scored significantly worse on all standardized measures when compared to nonextreme catastrophizers. Mean scores for nonextreme vs extreme catastrophizers were: genitourinary pain index (25.7 ± 6.8 vs 32.7 ± 6.5, P < .001), interstitial cystitis symptom index (6.5 ± 4.7 vs 9.4 ± 5.8, P < .001), pelvic floor distress inventory (88.8 ± 52 vs 121.1 ± 62.8, P < .001), patient health questionnaire anxiety (1.7 ± 2.0 vs 3.6 ± 2.1, P < .001), and depression (1.4 ± 1.6 vs 3.3 ± 2.0, P < .001). Number of comorbidities was not significant predictor of extreme catastrophizing (3.5 vs 3.7 P = .22). CONCLUSION: Higher scores on standardized questionnaires and more comorbidities was associated with more catastrophizing in CPP patients. This study highlights the significance of standardized questionnaires, including the PCS, to predict which patients may be extreme catastrophizers and thus subject to worse outcomes. Future studies are needed to look at catastrophization as a potentially modifiable and treatable risk factor.

Unplanned Cesarean Birth: Can the Quality of Consent Affect Birth Experiences?

BACKGROUND: Unplanned cesarean birth is associated with high levels of patient dissatisfaction and negative birth experiences, which in turn can negatively impact birth outcomes. Previous research has demonstrated that issues of physician-patient communication, mistrust, fear of the operating room (OR), and loss of control contribute to patient dissatisfaction with unplanned cesarean birth. We hypothesized that altering the nature and structure of the informed consent prior to the surgery might improve patient satisfaction and birth experience. Specifically, we explored whether educating resident physicians in counseling skills could shift the focus of informed consent from a checklist merely informing the patient of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a discussion that informs the physician of the patient's concerns and fears. By approaching consent in this manner, the goal of informed consent expands beyond autonomy rights to include beneficence as well. Methods: Residents received education to discuss issues of communication, fear, mistrust, and loss of control when seeking consent for an unplanned cesarean birth. Patients were randomized to receive either additional counseling that encouraged a discussion or a standard informed consent for cesarean birth. Participants were interviewed two weeks later and scored their satisfaction using a Likert scale on the four themes: communication, mistrust, fear of OR, and loss of control. Results: Both groups had very high patient satisfaction scores; there was no statistical difference between them. Conclusions: Both groups exhibited significantly higher levels of birth satisfaction than present in prior research. Training residents to discuss these issues while seeking consent for an unplanned cesarean birth may have improved patient satisfaction for all participants in this study. This suggests that educating residents to engage patients in a dialogue during informed consent counseling is more important than a specific script.

Facilitating Timely Advance Care Planning: Discussions in the Ambulatory Setting With a Heart Failure Population.

This quality improvement project utilized a risk stratification process and an advance care planning (ACP) tool to identify patients at high risk of death and prompt ACP discussions and documentation of health care preferences in the electronic health record. Inherent uncertainty in heart failure (HF) prognostication and provider time constraints impede initiation of timely ACP discussions. In an effort to mitigate these obstacles, the Seattle Heart Failure Model was utilized to calculate mortality risk for 195 patients in an ambulatory HF clinic. Next, a HF-specific ACP tool, developed for this project, was used to prompt and guide ACP discussions with patients determined to have a prognosis of life expectancy of 3 years or less. The project yielded a 35% completion of ACP tools over 3 months, with 100% of these entered into the electronic health record. Postimplementation surveys suggest clinic staff believe a comprehensive and systematic approach to ACP services facilitates timely ACP discussions and decision making in the outpatient setting.

A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Persistent Postoperative Symptoms Following Synthetic Mid Urethral Sling Revision.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to describe the symptom profile of patients who presented to a tertiary care hospital for sling revision, define the efficacy of sling removal/revision in alleviating symptoms and identify what factors, if any, contribute to favorable surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent revision of a synthetic mid urethral sling at our institution between 2004 and 2016. Patients with a history of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse were excluded from analysis. The outcomes assessed were the AUASI (American Urological Association Symptom Index) score, the M-ISI (Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index) score, pad use, post-void residual urine volume, examination findings and subjective improvement. RESULTS: A total of 430 patients met study inclusion criteria, of whom 182, 172 and 40 received a transobturator tape, a retropubic mid urethral sling and a mini-sling, respectively. Patients presented with 4 primary complaints, including mesh exposure or erosion, pain or dyspareunia, incontinence and/or bladder outlet obstruction. Of the patients 77% presented with at least 2 categories of symptoms. Average followup was 15 months. Postoperatively the AUASI score decreased from 19.0 to 14.7 (p <0.001) and the bother score decreased from 5.0 to 3.4 (p <0.001). The M-ISI also improved from total and bother scores of 15.7 and 4.4 to a postoperative average of 13.2 and 3.1 (p = 0.002 and <0.001, respectively). During this time approximately 40% of patients who presented with pain had persistent postoperative discomfort, in 20% with obstruction that condition failed to resolve and recurrent mesh complaints developed in 5% with mesh exposure or erosion. On multivariate analysis preoperative narcotic use was a significant risk factor for persistent postoperative pain (OR 6.9). CONCLUSIONS: Despite complex patient presentations subjective and objective urological symptom measures significantly improve following mid urethral sling revision.

Cystoscopic findings: a video tutorial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Cystoscopy is frequently performed by gynecologists to ensure ureteral patency and to prevent bladder injury when performing concomitant gynecological procedures. Generally, there are no additional findings on cystoscopy; however, when abnormalities arise, they may require either observation or intervention. Our aim was to create a visual library of benign, malignant, and foreign-body pathological conditions incidentally encountered on cystoscopy. METHOD: Cystoscopic findings were videotaped at the time of routine surgical care. Regarding Institutional Review Board approval, individual consent was waived as the videos were de-identified and collected for educational purposes. RESULTS: Benign pathological conditions: squamous metaplasia, duplicated ureteral orifice, ureterocele, Hutch diverticulum, bladder trabeculation, urachal cyst, interstitial cystitis with and without Hunner's lesion, endometriosis in the bladder, port-wine stain due to Klippel-Trénaunay-Weber syndrome, nephrogenic (mesonephric) metaplasia, and cystitis glandularis (intestinal metaplasia). Malignant pathological conditions: papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP), carcinoma in situ (CIS), high-grade urothelial carcinoma, and urachal cancer. Foreign-body pathological conditions: edema from ureteral stents and stone-encrusted mesh. CONCLUSION: This video is intended to educate the audience on some incidental bladder findings seen on female cystoscopy. Many pathological conditions can be biopsied or treated immediately during the procedure; hence, early urology consultation is encouraged for most abnormalities.

Experiences during the first four years of a postpartum perineal clinic in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the characteristics of patients seen at a postpartum perineal clinic in the USA during the first 4 years of its existence, and to identify factors contributing to the clinic's success. METHODS: In a retrospective study, the charts of patients presenting to the clinic between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2011, were reviewed for presenting complaint, findings, treatment, number of visits, and referral source. Strategies that led to successful clinic implementation were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients were seen during the 4-year period. Indications for referral included lacerations, pain, urinary and fecal incontinence, and fistulas. The most common referral indication was a third- or fourth-degree laceration, which affected 154 (62.3%) patients. Overall, 53 (21.5%) patients required a procedure, of whom 20 (8.1%) underwent surgery. Most women were counseled about pelvic floor exercises, and 39 (15.8%) were referred for pelvic floor physical therapy. Nurse-led triage, patient education, and follow-up were key to the success of the program. CONCLUSION: The postpartum perineal clinic is sustainable and offers an opportunity for early assessment and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction after a complicated vaginal delivery.

Symptom resolution after operative management of complications from transvaginal mesh.

OBJECTIVE: Complications from transvaginal mesh placed for prolapse often require operative management. The aim of this study is to describe the outcomes of vaginal mesh removal. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients having surgery by the urogynecology group in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at our institution for a complication of transvaginal mesh placed for prolapse was performed. Demographics, presenting symptoms, surgical procedures, and postoperative symptoms were abstracted. Comparative statistics were performed using the χ or Fisher's exact test with significance at P<.05. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and April 2012, 90 patients had surgery for complications related to vaginal mesh and 84 had follow-up data. The most common presenting signs and symptoms were: mesh exposure, 62% (n=56); pain, 64% (n=58); and dyspareunia, 48% (n=43). During operative management, mesh erosion was encountered unexpectedly in a second area of the vagina in 5% (n=4), in the bladder in 1% (n=1), and in the bowel in 2% (n=2). After vaginal mesh removal, 51% (n=43) had resolution of all presenting symptoms. Mesh exposure was treated successfully in 95% of patients, whereas pain was only successfully treated in 51% of patients. CONCLUSION: Removal of vaginal mesh is helpful in relieving symptoms of presentation. Patients can be reassured that exposed mesh can almost always be successfully managed surgically, but pain and dyspareunia are only resolved completely in half of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Apical descent in the office and the operating room: the effect of prolapse size.

OBJECTIVES: The support of the uterine cervix with Valsalva or cough assessed in the clinic and the support of the uterine cervix with traction in the operating room often differs. The objectives of this study were to test the null hypothesis that the difference between preoperative and intraoperative values of pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) point C is not related to prolapse size and to determine if other factors exist that predict this difference. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of women who had a vaginal hysterectomy in the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery division between 2005 and 2011 and had preoperative and intraoperative POP-Q point C recorded. A difference of 5 cm was established by a panel of urogynecologists as clinically significant. Student t tests and χ analyses were used and a logistic regression performed. RESULTS: There were 206 subjects included. The mean difference in point C between the 2 clinical settings was 3.5 cm. A difference of 5 cm or greater was present in 33%. The mean difference in point C was larger for women with lesser stages of prolapse (stage 1, 5.8 cm; stage 2, 3.0 cm; stage 3/4, 1.4 cm; P<0.001). A difference of 5 cm or greater in point C was more often present in women with lesser stages of prolapse: 70.3% of women with stage 1 prolapse, 9.3% of women with stage 2 prolapse, and 8.5% of women with stage 3 prolapse (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We reject our null hypothesis. A difference of 5 cm or greater between POP-Q point C in the clinic and the POP-Q point C in the operating room occurred more frequently in women with lesser stages of prolapse.

Interdisciplinary simulation-based training to improve delivery room communication.

INTRODUCTION: Poor communication among obstetric and pediatric professionals is associated with adverse perinatal events leading to severe disability and neonatal mortality. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary simulation-based training (SBT) program to improve delivery room communication between obstetric and pediatric teams. METHODS: Obstetric and pediatric teams participated in an SBT annually during 3 academic years, 2008-2011 (Y1-Y3), in a prospective, observational study. Eligible participants (n = 228) included attendings, fellows, house staff, midlevel providers, and nurses involved in delivery room care. Simulations were videotaped and evaluated using a validated 20-item checklist of best communication practices. Checklist scores were compared across years with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Providers were also surveyed annually regarding communication during actual deliveries using a standardized questionnaire. Ratings were analyzed using two-way analysis of covariance. RESULTS: At least 60% of eligible providers participated in 1 or more SBT sessions and completed surveys annually. Checklist scores on communication during SBT improved from Y1 (median, 6; interquartile range, 4) to Y3 (median, 11; interquartile range, 6) (P < 0.001). Survey results showed the perception of improvement over time in interteam communication during actual deliveries by obstetric (P < 0.005) and pediatric (P < 0.0001) providers. The obstetric team also perceived improved provider communication with the family (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Communication during SBT as well as the perception of communication during actual deliveries improved across the study period. The potential of a checklist to standardize delivery room communication and improve patient outcomes merits further investigation.

Expectant management of cystotomy at the time of midurethral sling placement: a retrospective case series.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Cystotomy is one of the most common complications of retropubic midurethral sling placement. Some centers manage cystotomy with prolonged catheter drainage, and there are few published studies evaluating this practice. The purpose of this study is to review postoperative outcomes of patients who experienced cystotomy at the time of sling placement and did not undergo prolonged catheter drainage. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing midurethral sling placement complicated by a cystotomy at the University of Rochester between 2004 and 2009. Outpatient and inpatient records were reviewed and data collected include demographics, intraoperative details, voiding trial results, postoperative complications, and voiding function. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2009, 30 subjects experienced a cystotomy of the 374 subjects that had a midurethral sling placed, all by a suprapubic approach. There were 25 patients who underwent a voiding trial on the day of surgery and 20 (80 %) were discharged home without prolonged drainage. Five subjects (20 %) had urinary retention and were discharged with an indwelling catheter. All five successfully voided within 4 days of discharge. No subject required subsequent catheterization for any reason and at the 6-week postoperative evaluation all subjects denied voiding dysfunction or irritative bladder symptoms. No subject required additional intervention and postoperative complications were rare. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the majority of subjects experiencing a cystotomy during midurethral sling placement were successfully discharged home the day of surgery without catheter drainage. The results suggest that prolonged catheter drainage after a cystotomy during midurethral sling placement may be unnecessary.

Vaginal approach to vesicovaginal fistula and vaginal vault prolapse preserving sexual function by Latzko repair and sacrospinous suspension.

The combination of vesicovaginal fistula and complete vaginal vault prolapse is rare. The only published treatment recommendations concern partial colpocleisis, an option that precludes intercourse. In this case report, we describe successful repair of this problem with a Latzko fistula repair and a concomitant Michigan 4-wall sacrospinous ligament suspension: instead of curing the fistula, correcting the prolapse, and preserving sexual function.