Colectomy without mechanical bowel preparation in the private practice setting.

BACKGROUND: Despite randomized trials and meta-analyses demonstrating the safety of omitting mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before colorectal surgery, private practice surgeons may hesitate to eliminate MBP for fear of being outside community standards. This study evaluated the safety of eliminating MBP before colectomy in a private practice setting. METHODS: This prospective observational study included elective abdominal colorectal operations from one surgeon's practice from October 2008 to June 2011. MBP was not routinely utilized after November 2009. Postoperative 30-day complication rates and length of hospital stay were compared in patients with and without MBP. Multivariable regression models were developed to compare outcomes among study groups, adjusting for demographics, diagnoses, procedures, and year. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were analyzed. Demographics were similar between groups. Laparoscopic procedures were more common in patients without MBP due to increased laparoscopy over time (43 vs. 61 %, p = 0.03). As regards complications, infection rates were similar between groups (MBP 10.5 % vs. no MBP(NMBP) 11.4 %, adj p = 0.57). Patients without MBP had a shorter length of hospital stay (median: 6 vs. 5 days, p = 0.01), but those differences were not statistically significant after adjustment (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Private practice surgeons should embrace evidence-based practice changes and make efforts to quantitatively evaluate the safety of those changes. Omission of MBP for most elective colectomy procedures appears to be safe with no significant increase in complications or length of hospital stay. Because MBP has substantial drawbacks, there is little justification for its routine use in the majority of elective abdominal colorectal procedures.

E2F4 regulates a stable G2 arrest response to genotoxic stress in prostate carcinoma.

The retinoblastoma (pRB) family proteins regulate the E2F transcription factors; their complexes regulate critical transitions through the cell cycle. The function of these pRB family/E2F complexes, which includes p130/E2F4, in response to genotoxic agents, is not well understood. We investigated the role of E2F4 in the genotoxic stress response. Following radiation treatment, E2F4 colocalized with p130 in the nucleus during a radiation-induced stable G(2)-phase arrest. Arrested cells had significantly decreased expression of Cyclins A2 and B1 and decreased phosphorylation of mitotic protein monoclonal-2 (MPM-2) mitotic proteins. Small interference RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of E2F4 sensitized cells to subsequent irradiation, resulting in enhanced cellular DNA damage and cell death, as determined by caspase activation and decreased clonogenic cell survival. Downstream E2F4 targets potentially involved in the progression from G(2) into M phase were identified by oligonucleotide microarray expression profiling. Chromatin immunoprecipitation localized E2F4 at promoter regions of the Bub3 and Pttg1 mitotic genes following irradiation, which were among the downregulated genes identified by the microarray. These data suggest that in response to radiation, E2F4 becomes active in the nucleus, enforces a stable G(2) arrest by target gene repression, and thus provides increased cell survival ability by minimizing propagation of cells that have irreparable DNA damage.

Inter-examiner reliability in fundal height measurement.

The inter-examiner reliability of fundal height measurements is essential in settings where patients are not examined by the same clinician at each prenatal visit. This preliminary study evaluated the inter-examiner reliability of two fundal height measurement techniques: tape measure and calliper. Four examiners obtained both measurements from 22 subjects who were between 25 and 30 weeks of gestation. The cumulative percentage of differences of less than or equal to 1.0, less than or equal to 2.0, and less than or equal to 3.0 cm for the four examiners was 13.6%, 13.6%, and 54.5% for tape measurements and 9.1%, 45.5% and 59.1% for the calliper measurements, respectively. The mean range of differences between the four examiners for the tape measure and calliper techniques were 3.68 and 3.31 cm, respectively. Clinicians are advised to be cautious in their interpretation of fundal height measurements in situations where the measurements are obtained by multiple examiners.