Prescripción potencialmente inadecuada: utilidad de los criterios STOPP/START versión 2 a nivel poblacional en Cataluña / Potentially inappropriate prescribing: Usefulness of STOPP/START criteria version 2 in Catalonian elderly population

Objetivo: Analizar la prevalencia de la prescripción potencialmente inadecuada (PPI) en ancianos en Cataluña, utilizando los criterios Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) versión 2. Evaluar la asociación de la PPI con diversas variables (polimedicación, sexo, edad y características sociodemográficas). Material y métodos: Diseño: estudio descriptivo retrospectivo transversal. Emplazamiento: Ámbito de Atención Primaria. Cataluña, España. Participantes Se analizan los datos de la población de 70 años o más atendida en los Centros de Salud de Cataluña en 2014 (700.058 pacientes). Mediciones principales: Cincuenta y cinco indicadores STOPP, y 19 START. Se ajustan modelos de regresión logística para evaluar su asociación con diversas variables. Resultados: La edad media es de 79,2±6,5 años. El 58,5% son mujeres. El 38,7% tiene 7 o más fármacos prescritos, y más del 50% acumulan más de 10 visitas anuales. Los indicadores STOPP que acumulan una mayor PPI son los relacionados con el uso de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos, antiagregantes, anticoagulantes, y benzodiacepinas. En cuanto a los criterios START destaca la omisión de suplementos de vitamina D y calcio, antidepresivos, y fármacos relativos al sistema cardiovascular. La PPI es mayor en mujeres, pacientes institucionalizados y domiciliarios, y en aquellos con mayor número de fármacos y número de visitas. Conclusiones: Se detectó una PPI poblacional con una alta prevalencia (89,6%). La PPI se relaciona de forma más significativa con determinadas condiciones del paciente y grupos farmacológicos. El conocimiento de esta asociación es trascendental para la futura implementación de medidas de seguridad en prescripción farmacológica (AU)

Objective: To measure the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) among the elderly population in Catalonia using criteria Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) version 2. In addition, to evaluate the association between PIP and several factors (polypharmacy, gender, age and sociodemographic conditions). Materials and methods: Design: Retrospective cross sectional population study. Settings: Primary Health Care, Catalonia, Spain. Participants: The study population comprised of participants 70 years old and over, who attended primary health care centres in Catalonia in 2014 (700.058 patients). Main analysis: 55 STOPP and 19 START criteria are applied to analyse PIP prevalence. Logistic regression models are adjusted to determine PIP association with several factors. Results: The mean age is 79. 2±6.5. 58.5% being female. 38.7% of patients have 7 or more prescribed drugs, whereas 50% go to a primary care centre 10 or more times during one year. The most frequent PIP among STOPP criteria are related to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake, antiplatelet and anticoagulants use, and benzodiazepines. According to START, the most frequent omissions are vitamin D and calcium supplements, antidepressants, and cardiovascular medications. Factors that increase PIP are: female gender, living in a nursing home, receiving home health care, polypharmacy and frequent visits to primary care centres. Conclusions: The overall prevalence of PIP is 89.6%. PPI is significantly related to certain drugs and patient's conditions. The knowledge of this association is important for the implementation of security measures for medical prescription (AU)

[Potentially inappropriate prescribing: Usefulness of STOPP/START criteria version 2 in Catalonian elderly population]. / Prescripción potencialmente inadecuada: utilidad de los criterios STOPP/START versión 2 a nivel poblacional en Cataluña.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) among the elderly population in Catalonia using criteria Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) version 2. In addition, to evaluate the association between PIP and several factors (polypharmacy, gender, age and sociodemographic conditions). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Design: Retrospective cross sectional population study. SETTINGS: Primary Health Care, Catalonia, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: The study population comprised of participants 70 years old and over, who attended primary health care centres in Catalonia in 2014 (700.058 patients). MAIN ANALYSIS: 55 STOPP and 19 START criteria are applied to analyse PIP prevalence. Logistic regression models are adjusted to determine PIP association with several factors. RESULTS: The mean age is 79. 2±6.5. 58.5% being female. 38.7% of patients have 7 or more prescribed drugs, whereas 50% go to a primary care centre 10 or more times during one year. The most frequent PIP among STOPP criteria are related to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake, antiplatelet and anticoagulants use, and benzodiazepines. According to START, the most frequent omissions are vitamin D and calcium supplements, antidepressants, and cardiovascular medications. Factors that increase PIP are: female gender, living in a nursing home, receiving home health care, polypharmacy and frequent visits to primary care centres. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of PIP is 89.6%. PPI is significantly related to certain drugs and patient's conditions. The knowledge of this association is important for the implementation of security measures for medical prescription.

Encuesta sobre el conocimiento y manejo de los pacientes con ataque isquémico transitorio entre médicos y enfermería de Atención Primaria / Survey of the knowledge and management of transient ischemic attacks among primary care physicians and nurses

Introducción: La principal fuente de consulta de los pacientes con ataque isquémico transitorio (AIT) agudo en nuestra área sanitaria son los centros de salud de Atención Primaria. Existen muy pocos estudios sobre el conocimiento del AIT y su manejo entre profesionales de la medicina comunitaria y de familia.Objetivo: Estimar el conocimiento del AIT, su manejo y las pruebas complementarias necesarias entre médicos y personal de enfermería de Atención Primaria de nuestra área de influencia. Para ello se envió una encuesta electrónica cerrada a 640 profesionales con 7 preguntas sobre el AIT.Resultados: Se obtuvo una alta tasa de respuestas: 285 (46,7% médicos). 239 (83,9%) participantes mostraron un conocimiento adecuado de la duración del AIT. Sólo 40 (14%) de la sintomatología. Mientras que el 67% contestó adecuadamente que es necesaria una prueba de neuroimagen urgente. Sólo el 42,5% reconoció la necesidad una exploración con dúplex de troncos supraórticos precoz. Únicamente, el 35,4% conocía qué es un doppler transcraneal, mientras que el 78,2% supo que era más adecuado enviar a estos pacientes a urgencias hospitalarias. El predictor independiente de mejor conocimiento fue ser un médico de Atención Primaria (MAP) (odds ratio [OR]: 2,138; IC 95%: 1,124-4,067; p = 0,021) pero no hubo diferencias entre MAP y enfermería en el conocimiento del manejo de estos pacientes. En enfermería fue peor el conocimiento en el ámbito rural (OR: 0,410; IC 95%: 0,189-0,891; p = 0,024). Conclusión: El conocimiento de la actitud ante un AIT es correcto en la mayoría de casos, sin embargo es necesario mejorar el conocimiento de la sintomatología de los AIT (AU)

Introduction: Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients often report that Primary Care physicians(PCPs) and nurses are their main medical contacts after onset of symptoms in our healtharea. There are few studies on the knowledge and management of TIA among Community andFamily Medicine professionals.Material and methods: Our aim was to study the current knowledge and practice in the managementof TIA patients among Primary Care physicians and nurses. A cross-sectional survey withseven questions about TIA was conducted among 640 PCPs and nurses from Primary Care centresin our health area.Results: In total, 285 (46.7% PCPs) took participate in the study. Of these, 239 (83.9%) participantsknew the duration of a TIA. However only 40 (14%) recognised all clinical symptoms.An urgent neuroimaging was preferred by 67%. Only 42.5% agreed that an urgent cervicalduplex would be useful in these patients. Transcranial Doppler was recognised by only 35.4%.A majority (78.2%) of participants agreed that TIA patients must be admitted to hospital. PCPshad the best knowledge of TIA (odds ratio [OR] 2.138; 95% CI 1.124-4.067; P = 0.021) but therewere no differences between physicians and nurses on the management of these patients.Nurses from rural Primary Care centers had the worst level of knowledge (OR 0.410; 95% CI0.189-0.891; P = 0.024).Conclusion: TIA was well recognized as a medical emergency. However, knowledge of clinicalsymptoms of TIA must be improved (AU)

Survey of the knowledge and management of transient ischemic attacks among primary care physicians and nurses.

INTRODUCTION: Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients often report that Primary Care physicians (PCPs) and nurses are their main medical contacts after onset of symptoms in our health area. There are few studies on the knowledge and management of TIA among Community and Family Medicine professionals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our aim was to study the current knowledge and practice in the management of TIA patients among Primary Care physicians and nurses. A cross-sectional survey with seven questions about TIA was conducted among 640 PCPs and nurses from Primary Care centres in our health area. RESULTS: In total, 285 (46.7% PCPs) took participate in the study. Of these, 239 (83.9%) participants knew the duration of a TIA. However only 40 (14%) recognised all clinical symptoms. An urgent neuroimaging was preferred by 67%. Only 42.5% agreed that an urgent cervical duplex would be useful in these patients. Transcranial Doppler was recognised by only 35.4%. A majority (78.2%) of participants agreed that TIA patients must be admitted to hospital. PCPs had the best knowledge of TIA (odds ratio [OR] 2.138; 95% CI 1.124-4.067; P = 0.021) but there were no differences between physicians and nurses on the management of these patients. Nurses from rural Primary Care centers had the worst level of knowledge (OR 0.410; 95% CI 0.189-0.891; P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: TIA was well recognized as a medical emergency. However, knowledge of clinical symptoms of TIA must be improved.

[A basic health care center. Care oriented at the community]. / Examen de salud de un área básica. Enfermería orientada a la comunidad.

Principle problems of a basic health care area (Lérida) are identified. This area, which has a patient case load of 22,244 people, was studied during the winter of 1993-94 by using information from various sources. Results indicate that the population of this community are basically young, urban, have a high cultural and social level, and are mostly employed. The principle causes of mortality are the same as in the rest of Cataluña. Diseases that cause the most working days lost to illness are: respiratory, mental and bone-joint problems. The most frequent diseases seen in the clinic are: hypertension, respiratory infections, endocrine and mental. An overall look at the state of health of these patients show that the principle problems are: tobacco use, high blood pressure, arthritis, lumbago, depression, stroke, diabetes and breast cancer.