Low input capture Hi-C (liCHi-C) identifies promoter-enhancer interactions at high-resolution.

Long-range interactions between regulatory elements and promoters are key in gene transcriptional control; however, their study requires large amounts of starting material, which is not compatible with clinical scenarios nor the study of rare cell populations. Here we introduce low input capture Hi-C (liCHi-C) as a cost-effective, flexible method to map and robustly compare promoter interactomes at high resolution. As proof of its broad applicability, we implement liCHi-C to study normal and malignant human hematopoietic hierarchy in clinical samples. We demonstrate that the dynamic promoter architecture identifies developmental trajectories and orchestrates transcriptional transitions during cell-state commitment. Moreover, liCHi-C enables the identification of disease-relevant cell types, genes and pathways potentially deregulated by non-coding alterations at distal regulatory elements. Finally, we show that liCHi-C can be harnessed to uncover genome-wide structural variants, resolve their breakpoints and infer their pathogenic effects. Collectively, our optimized liCHi-C method expands the study of 3D chromatin organization to unique, low-abundance cell populations, and offers an opportunity to uncover factors and regulatory networks involved in disease pathogenesis.

Clonal heterogeneity and rates of specific chromosome gains are risk predictors in childhood high-hyperdiploid B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the commonest childhood cancer. High hyperdiploidy (HHD) identifies the most frequent cytogenetic subgroup in childhood B-ALL. Although hyperdiploidy represents an important prognostic factor in childhood B-ALL, the specific chromosome gains with prognostic value in HHD-B-ALL remain controversial, and the current knowledge about the hierarchy of chromosome gains, clonal heterogeneity and chromosomal instability in HHD-B-ALL remains very limited. We applied automated sequential-iFISH coupled with single-cell computational modeling to identify the specific chromosomal gains of the eight typically gained chromosomes in a large cohort of 72 primary diagnostic (DX, n = 62) and matched relapse (REL, n = 10) samples from HHD-B-ALL patients with either favorable or unfavorable clinical outcome in order to characterize the clonal heterogeneity, specific chromosome gains and clonal evolution. Our data show a high degree of clonal heterogeneity and a hierarchical order of chromosome gains in DX samples of HHD-B-ALL. The rates of specific chromosome gains and clonal heterogeneity found in DX samples differ between HHD-B-ALL patients with favorable or unfavorable clinical outcome. In fact, our comprehensive analyses at DX using a computationally defined risk predictor revealed low levels of trisomies +18+10 and low levels of clonal heterogeneity as robust relapse risk factors in minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative childhood HHD-B-ALL patients: relapse-free survival beyond 5 years: 22.1% versus 87.9%, P < 0.0001 and 33.3% versus 80%, P < 0.0001, respectively. Moreover, longitudinal analysis of matched DX-REL HHD-B-ALL samples revealed distinct patterns of clonal evolution at relapse. Our study offers a reliable prognostic sub-stratification of pediatric MRD-negative HHD-B-ALL patients.

Recomendaciones para el uso de microarrays en el diagnóstico prenatal / Recommendations for the use of microarrays in prenatal diagnosis

La tecnología de microarrays, de reciente implantación en el diagnóstico prenatal internacional, se ha convertido en uno de los pilares de este diagnóstico en cuanto a su capacidad de detección y objetividad de resultados. La presente guía comprende una exposición general de la tecnología, incluyendo aspectos técnicos y diagnósticos a tener en cuenta. En concreto, se definen: los distintos tipos de muestras prenatales que se van a utilizar (biopsia de vellosidades coriónicas, líquido amniótico, sangre procedente de cordón umbilical o material procedente de restos abortivos) así como las particularidades de cada una de ellas; qué puntos hay que tener en cuenta de cara a la elaboración de un consentimiento informado y de la emisión de un informe de microarray prenatal, especialmente en el caso de la posible definición de variantes de significado incierto; las limitaciones inherentes a la técnica que deben ser tenidas en cuenta a la hora de recomendar su uso diagnóstico; así como un algoritmo pormenorizado de situaciones clínicas, donde se recomienda el uso de microarrays y su incorporación a la rutina clínica en el contexto de otras pruebas genéticas, incluyendo embarazos con antecedentes familiares o hallazgos sugerentes de un síndrome concreto, translucencia nucal incrementada en el primer trimestre o cardiopatía congénita en el segundo trimestre y hallazgos ecográficos no relacionados con un síndrome conocido o específico. Esta guía ha sido coordinada por la Asociación Española de Diagnóstico Prenatal (AEDP), la Asociación Española de Genética Humana (AEGH) y la Sociedad Española de Genética Clínica y Dismorfología (SEGCyD) (AU)

Microarray technology, recently implemented in international prenatal diagnosis systems, has become one of the main techniques in this field in terms of detection rate and objectivity of the results. This guideline attempts to provide background information on this technology, including technical and diagnostic aspects to be considered. Specifically, this guideline defines: the different prenatal sample types to be used, as well as their characteristics (chorionic villi samples, amniotic fluid, fetal cord blood or miscarriage tissue material); variant reporting policies (including variants of uncertain significance) to be considered in informed consents and prenatal microarray reports; microarray limitations inherent to the technique and which must be taken into account when recommending microarray testing for diagnosis; a detailed clinical algorithm recommending the use of microarray testing and its introduction into routine clinical practice within the context of other genetic tests, including pregnancies in families with a genetic history or specific syndrome suspicion, first trimester increased nuchal translucency or second trimester heart malformation and ultrasound findings not related to a known or specific syndrome. This guideline has been coordinated by the Spanish Association for Prenatal Diagnosis (AEDP, «Asociación Española de Diagnóstico Prenatal»), the Spanish Human Genetics Association (AEGH, «Asociación Española de Genética Humana») and the Spanish Society of Clinical Genetics and Dysmorphology (SEGCyD, «Sociedad Española de Genética Clínica y Dismorfología») (AU)

Recommendations for the use of microarrays in prenatal diagnosis. / Recomendaciones para el uso de microarrays en el diagnóstico prenatal.

Microarray technology, recently implemented in international prenatal diagnosis systems, has become one of the main techniques in this field in terms of detection rate and objectivity of the results. This guideline attempts to provide background information on this technology, including technical and diagnostic aspects to be considered. Specifically, this guideline defines: the different prenatal sample types to be used, as well as their characteristics (chorionic villi samples, amniotic fluid, fetal cord blood or miscarriage tissue material); variant reporting policies (including variants of uncertain significance) to be considered in informed consents and prenatal microarray reports; microarray limitations inherent to the technique and which must be taken into account when recommending microarray testing for diagnosis; a detailed clinical algorithm recommending the use of microarray testing and its introduction into routine clinical practice within the context of other genetic tests, including pregnancies in families with a genetic history or specific syndrome suspicion, first trimester increased nuchal translucency or second trimester heart malformation and ultrasound findings not related to a known or specific syndrome. This guideline has been coordinated by the Spanish Association for Prenatal Diagnosis (AEDP, «Asociación Española de Diagnóstico Prenatal¼), the Spanish Human Genetics Association (AEGH, «Asociación Española de Genética Humana¼) and the Spanish Society of Clinical Genetics and Dysmorphology (SEGCyD, «Sociedad Española de Genética Clínica y Dismorfología¼).

Mosaicos cromosómicos en vellosidad corial / Chromosomal mosaicism in chorionic villi

Introducción. El estudio de vellosidades coriales comprende realizar 2 cultivos celulares que pueden no tener resultados coincidentes. Estas discrepancias pueden ser debidas a mosaicos citogenéticos de origen in vivo o in vitro. En este trabajo nos planteamos analizar los cariotipos en mosaicos, ligado con los rendimientos de los cultivos celulares y los resultados citogenéticos. Material y métodos. Se han analizado 2.360 muestras prenatales y 510 de vellosidades de abortos. Con las muestras prenatales se efectúan rutinariamente 2 cultivos celulares, cultivo corto y cultivo largo, y para los abortos además se han estudiado muestras de restos fetales. Resultados. El porcentaje de muestras con resultado citogenético para el grupo prenatal fue del 99,9% y para el grupo de abortos del 87,1%. El porcentaje de anomalías cromosómicas en el grupo prenatal fue del 10,6% siendo las aneuploidías comunes (trisomías 13, 18, y 21) las más frecuentes, y para el grupo de abortos fue del 55,1% siendo las aneuploidías no-comunes las más frecuentes. El porcentaje de cariotipos en mosaico para el grupo prenatal fue del 3,1% y para el grupo de abortos del 6,8%. El mosaico confinado a la placenta tipo ii fue el más frecuente. Conclusiones. Para el estudio de los mosaicos en vellosidades coriales la mejor estrategia es realizar los 2 cultivos paralelos en muestras prenatales y los 3 cultivos en muestras de abortos. Teniendo en cuenta el riesgo que asume la pareja ante una prueba invasiva, es nuestro deber dar el resultado citogenético más completo posible(AU)

Introduction. The study of chorionic villus samples comprises performing two cell cultures that may not have matching results. These discrepancies may be due to cytogenetic mosaics of in vivo or in vitro origin. This study included analysing the karyotypes in mosaics, associated with the cell culture and cytogenetic results. Material and methods. Prospective study based on the analysis of 2,360 chorionic villus samples and 510 spontaneous abortion samples. Two cultures were routinely performed on the prenatal samples (short and long), as well as on the abortion samples. Results. The success rate was 99.9% in the prenatal group, and 87.1% in the abortion group. The percentage of chromosomal anomalies in the prenatal group was 10.6%, with the common aneuploidies (trisomy 13, 18, and 21) being the most frequent. In the abortions group there 55.1% anomalies, with uncommon aneuploidy the most frequent. The percentage of mosaicism in the prenatal group was 3.1%, and it was 6.8% in the abortion group. The confined placental mosaicism type ii was the most frequent. Conclusions. For the study of the mosaicism in chorionic villi samples the best strategy is to perform 2 prenatal samples cultures in parallel, and 3 abortion samples cultures. Given the risk to the mother and child using this invasive test, it is our duty to give the most comprehensive cytogenetic results achievable(AU)

Non-mosaic trisomy 20 of paternal origin in chorionic villus and amniotic fluid also detected in fetal blood and other tissues.

Trisomy 20 mosaicism is a common abnormality found in prenatal diagnosis. Its clinical significance remains unclear since approximately 90-93% of cases result in normal phenotype. Only 5 cases of non-mosaic trisomy 20 in amniotic fluid culture surviving beyond the first trimester have been reported. Moreover, trisomic cells are generally not detectable in blood and have only been reported in three cases. We present a case of non-mosaic trisomy 20 found in chorionic villi sample and amniotic fluid culture in a fetus with minor abnormalities not detected by ultrasound examination. Pathological examination of the fetus only revealed right pulmonary isomerism and camptodactily, and no major malformations were disclosed. Trisomic lineage was also detected in fetal blood, kidney, skin and brain tissue cultures. Molecular analysis revealed that the extra chromosome 20 was originated in paternal meiosis. To our knowledge, we report the first prenatal case of non-mosaic trisomy 20 of paternal origin that has been confirmed in several fetal tissues, including blood, in a fetus with minor malformations not detected prenatally.