Positive- vs. negative-pressure extubation technique: a scoping review.

Objectives: This review aimed to summarize the recent literature on positive-pressure extubation. Design: A scoping review was conducted under the framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data sources: Web of Science, PubMed, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Wan Fang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and China Biology Medicine databases were searched for studies on adults and children. Study selection: All articles describing the use of positive-pressure extubation were considered eligible for inclusion. The exclusion criteria were articles not available in English or Chinese, and those without full text available. Data extraction and synthesis: The database searches identified 8,381 articles, 15 of which could be included in this review, with an aggregated patient number of 1,544. Vital signs, including mean arterial pressure, heart rate, R-R interval, and SpO2 before and after extubation; blood gas analysis indexes, including pH, oxygen saturation, PaO2, and PaCO2 before and after extubation; and incidence of respiratory complications, including bronchospasm, laryngeal edema, aspiration atelectasis, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia, were reported in the included studies. Results: The majority of these studies reported that the positive-pressure extubation technique can maintain stable vital signs and blood gas analysis indices as well as prevent complications during the peri-extubation period. Conclusions: The positive-pressure extubation technique has a safety performance similar to that of the traditional negative-pressure extubation technique and may lead to better clinical outcomes, including stable vital signs, arterial blood gas analysis, and a lower incidence of respiratory complications.

Short-term exposure to ambient fine particulate pollution aggravates ventilator-associated pneumonia in pediatric intensive care patients undergoing cardiovascular surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Ambient air pollutants can be hazardous to human health, especially for vulnerable children. The impact of ambient air pollutant exposure before and during intensive care unit (ICU) stays on the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill children has not been established. We aimed to determine the correlations between short-term exposures to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and VAP in pediatric cardiac surgery patients in the ICU, and explore the effect of delayed exposure. METHODS: The medical record of 1755 child patients requiring artificial ventilation in the ICU between December 2013 to December 2020, were analyzed. The daily average concentrations of particulate matters (PM2.5 and PM10), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone (O3) were calculated from public data. Interactions between these pollutants and VAP were simulated with the distributed lag non-linear model. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-eight cases (19.829%) of VAP were identified in this study, while the average concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, O3 and SO2 were 58, 118, 98 and 26 µg/m3, respectively. Exposure to increased levels of PM2.5 two days prior (lag 2-day) to VAP diagnosis is significantly correlated with an enhanced risk for VAP development. Even a slight increase of 10 µg/m3 in PM2.5 can translate to a 5.4% increase in VAP incidence (95% CI: 1.4%-9.5%) while the VAP incidence increased to 11.1% (95%CI: 4.5-19.5%) when PM2.5 concentration is well below the National Ambient Air Quality standard (NAAQS) of 50 µg/m3. The association was more pronounced in those aged below 3-months, with low body mass index or suffered from pulmonary arterial hypertension. CONCLUSION: Short-term PM2.5 exposure is a significant risk for development of VAP in pediatric patients. This risk is present even with PM2.5 levels below the NAAQS. Ambient PM2.5 may represent a previously unrecognized risk factor for pneumonia and the current environmental pollution standards need to be reevaluated to consider susceptible populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the National Clinical Trial Center: The correlation between ambient air pollution and the complications in ICU underwent cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000030507. Date of registration: March 5, 2020. URL of trial registry record: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx .

Precision implementation of early ambulation in elderly patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Although early ambulation (EA) is associated with improved outcomes in post-operative patients, implementation of EA in elderly patients is still a challenge. In this study, we aimed to design and assess a precision early ambulation program for cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized and controlled clinical trial in elderly patients aged over 60 years after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to a precision early ambulation (PEA) group or a routine ambulation (Control) group. Age-predicted maximal heart rate (APMHR) and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) were used as a reference to formulate and monitor the PEA regimen. The primary end-point was the postoperative length of stay in hospital (PLOS). The secondary end-points included 90-day mortality, incidence of early discharge, laboratory tests, length of ICU stay, the incidence of multiple organ complications and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Ambulation outcomes were also recorded. RESULTS: In total, 178 patients were enrolled (n = 89 per group). In the intent-to-treat analysis, PLOS in the PEA group was shorter than that in the Control group (9.04 ± 3.08 versus 10.09 ± 3.32 days, respectively. Mean difference 1.045 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.098-1.992; P = 0.031 in the unadjusted model; mean difference 0.957 days; CI 0.007-1.907; P = 0.048 in adjusted model). The incidence of early discharge differed significantly between the PEA and control groups (41[46.1%] versus 24[27.0%] patients, respectively. Odds ratio [OR] 0.432; CI 0.231-0.809; P = 0.009 in unadjusted model; OR 0.466; CI 0.244-0.889, P = 0.02 in adjusted model). The time of first bowel movement, partial pressure O2 and post-traumatic stress disorder score in the PEA group were better than those in the Control group. Participants walked much longer distances on day 3 in the PEA group than those in the Control group (76.12 ± 29.02 versus 56.80 ± 24.40 m, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: APMHR and VO2max are valuable for implementation of PEA according to an established security threshold. PEA after OPCAPG surgery is safe and reliable for elderly patients, not only reducing the hospital stay, but also improving their physiological and psychological symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a component of a protocol retrospectively registered: Application of ERAS in cardiovascular surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1800018167 . Date of registration: 3rd September, 2018. URL of trial registry record: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.