Hemophilia and non-accidental head trauma in two siblings: lessons and legal implications.

Non-accidental head trauma (NAHT) is a common cause of traumatic brain injury in childhood, origin of profound and disabling neurological sequalae, and in the most disgraceful cases, ultimately death.Subdural hematoma (SDH) is the most common intracranial finding in NAHT. On the other hand, congenital bleeding disorders are a minor but a significant cause of ICH in the neonate and toddler. Not uncommonly, intracranial bleeding is the first sign of a severe inherited coagulation disorder. In the presence of an unexpected intracranial bleeding after a minor trauma or without a clear history of the related events, physicians and caregivers may be confronted to the dilemma of a possible child abuse. It must be bear in mind that physical abuse and bleeding disorders can co-exist in the same child.We report here the case of two siblings in whom a diagnosis of hemophilia coexisted with the presumption of a non-accidental head trauma. Child abuses were inflicted in both children with a spare time of 2 years. A diagnosis of mild hemophilia was prompted in the first sibling after initial NAHT, while inflicted trauma was evident in the second sibling after neuroimaging findings and concomitant lesions. Lessons from this case in co-existing bleeding disorders and inflicted trauma and legal implications derived will be discussed thereafter.The possibility of a bleeding disorder should be considered in all children presenting with unexplained bleeding at a critical site in the setting of suspected physical maltreatment, particularly intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

Endoscopic endonasal surgery to treat intrinsic brainstem lesions: correlation between anatomy and surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been proposed as an alternative in the surgical removal of ventral brainstem lesions. However, the feasibility and limitations of this approach to treat such pathologies are still poorly understood. This study aimed to report our experience in five consecutive cases of intrinsic brainstem lesions that were managed via an EEA, as well as the specific anatomy of each case. METHODS: All patients were treated in a single center by a multidisciplinary surgical team between 2015 and 2019. Before surgery, a dedicated anatomical analysis of the brainstem safe entry zone was performed, and proper surgical planning was carried out. Neurophysiological monitoring was used in all cases. Anatomical dissections were performed in three human cadaveric heads using 0° and 30° endoscopes, and specific 3D reconstructions were executed using Amira 3D software. RESULTS: All lesions were located at the level of the ventral brainstem. Specifically, one mesencephalic cavernoma, two pontine ca- vernomas, one pontine gliomas, and one medullary diffuse midline glioma were reported. Cerebrospinal fluid leak was the major complication that occurred in one case (medullary diffuse midline glioma). From an anatomical standpoint, three main safe entry zones were used, namely the anterior mesencephalic zone (AMZ), the peritrigeminal zone (PTZ, used in two cases), and the olivar zone (OZ). Reviewing the literature, 17 cases of various brainstem lesions treated using an EEA were found. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this was the first preliminary clinical series of intrinsic brainstem lesions treated via an EEA presented in the literature. The EEA can be considered a valid surgical alternative to traditional transcranial approaches to treat selected intra-axial brainstem lesions located at the level of the ventral brainstem. To achieve good results, surgery must involve comprehensive anatomical knowledge, meticulous preoperative surgical planning, and intraoperative neurophysiological moni- toring.

Stroke units could be a valid alternative to intensive care units for patients with low-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: According to current guidelines, patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) are mostly managed in intensive care units (ICUs) regardless of baseline severity. We aimed to assess the prognostic and economic implications of initial admission of patients with low-grade aSAH into a stroke unit (SU) compared to initial ICU admission. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively registered data from consecutive aSAH patients with a World Federation of Neurosurgery Societies grade <3, admitted to our Comprehensive Stroke Centre between April 2013 and September 2018. Clinical and radiological baseline traits, in-hospital complications, length of stay (LOS) and poor outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score > 2) were compared between the ICU and SU groups in the whole population and in a propensity-score-matched cohort. RESULTS: Of 131 patients, 74 (56%) were initially admitted to the ICU and 57 (44%) to the SU. In-hospital complication rates were similar in the ICU and SU groups and included rebleeding (10% vs. 7%; P = 0.757), angiographic vasospasm (61% vs. 60%; P = 0.893), delayed cerebral ischaemia (12% vs. 12%; P = 0.984), pneumonia (6% vs. 4%; P = 0.697) and death (10% vs. 5%; P = 0.512). LOS did not differ between groups (median [interquartile range] 22 [16-30] vs. 19 [14-26] days; P = 0.160). In adjusted multivariate models, the location of initial admission was not associated with long-term poor outcome either in the whole population (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-4.19; P = 0.825) or in the matched cohort (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.24-4.06; P = 0.974). CONCLUSIONS: A dedicated SU, with care from a multidisciplinary team, might be an optimal alternative to ICU for initial admission of patients with low-risk aSAH.