Retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of daily paroxetine/tadalafil combination in patients with premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Premature ejaculation (PE) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are sexual dysfunction diseases affecting males. The phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors such as tadalafil are used to treat ED whereas selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are preferred for PE. Most of the patients with ED also suffer from PE simultaneously. The combined drug therapies are commonly preferred as they favor elevated intra-vaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) scores and improved sexual function. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daily paroxetine and tadalafil combination therapy in patients with PE and ED. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 81 PE patients with ED were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated with daily paroxetine 20 mg and tadalafil 5 mg for 4 weeks. Pre- and post-treatment IELT, premature ejaculation profile (PEP), and International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) scores of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean IELT and PEP index scores, and mean IIEF-EF values improved after combination therapy (p<0.001 for each). When lifelong and acquired PE+ED patients were compared, significant improvements were observed in IELT, PEP, and IIEF-EF scores in both groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Even though the treatment methods are different, combined therapies to treat simultaneous PE and ED presence are effective compared to monotherapies. However, there is still no definitive treatment that can cure all subtypes of PE or ED.

Exclusive manual perineal rehabilitation with lidocaine 2% gel in the treatment of provoked vestibulodynia: results from a single-arm interventional study.

As of now, there is no adequate therapeutic strategy for provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy (PFMT) is a widely used technique in general pelvic floor rehabilitation. The objective of this study is to examine the effects of exclusive manual perineal rehabilitation with lidocaine 2% gel on PVD. During the first session, recruited patients (n = 68; mean age 31 ± 8.6; range: 18-52) received a questionnaire (Q1) on general well-being and health, pain of the genital area, sexual function, and symptoms during vaginal penetration. This questionnaire was based on a generalised questionnaire on the quality of life, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item (SF-36), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A second identical questionnaire with an additional set of open-ended questions concerning the assessment of the treatment was collected after treatment (Q2). A total of 45 questionnaires were completed. Statistical results showed a significant improvement of all items before and after treatment (p < 0.001): perceived general well-being and health, perceived vulvar pain, perceived sexual function, and perceived vaginal penetration. In conclusion, exclusive manual perineal rehabilitation using lidocaine 2% gel seems to be a safe and effective treatment option for vulvodynia in women.

Modelo novedoso basado en los parámetros de la tomografía para predecir el éxito de la litotricia por ondas de choque en los cálculos ureterales de diferentes localizaciones / A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations

ObjetivoIncorporar los parámetros basados en la tomografía computarizada sin contraste (TCSC) a las características de los cálculos y de los pacientes comúnmente asociadas con el éxito de la litotricia por ondas de choque (LEOCH) para evaluar la efectividad de este nuevo modelo en la predicción del éxito de LEOCH en cálculos ureterales únicos situados en diferentes localizaciones.Materiales y métodosSe revisaron retrospectivamente los datos de los pacientes tratados con LEOCH por un único cálculo ureteral entre enero de 2017 y enero de 2019. Los parámetros basados en la TCSC se evaluaron junto con los parámetros demográficos de los pacientes y las características de los cálculos. Los parámetros basados en TCSC incluyeron la presencia o ausencia de hidronefrosis, trabeculación de la grasa perirrenal, edema periureteral, diámetro del uréter proximal, grosor de la pared ureteral (GPU) en el sitio del cálculo ureteral. Se utilizó el método de regresión logística para desarrollar un modelo predictivo útil. Posteriormente, se utilizó la curva ROC para determinar los puntos de corte, y se desarrolló un sistema de puntuación para la predicción del éxito de LEOCH.ResultadosLa tasa libre de cálculos fue del 77,1% (267/346) en toda la cohorte. El análisis univariante reveló que la edad, el volumen de los cálculos, la densidad, la trabeculación perirrenal, el diámetro del uréter proximal y el GPU se asociaron con el éxito de la LEOCH. En el análisis multivariante, la localización del cálculo ureteral proximal, el volumen del cálculo, la densidad y el GPU fueron predictores independientes del éxito de la LEOCH. La fórmula utilizada en el análisis de regresión logística fue: 1/[1+exp {-8,856+0,008(volumen del cálculo)+0,002 (densidad del cálculo)+0,673 (GPU)+1026 (cálculo ureteral proximal)}]. Las puntuaciones de 0, 1, 2, 3 y 4 se asociaron con un 97,8%, 83,4%, 60,8%, 33,2% y 11,1% de éxito, respectivamente, en el modelo de predicción basado en estos parámetros.

ObjectiveTo combine non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT)-based parameters with stone and patient characteristics that are already known to affect shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) success and assess this novel model's effectiveness in predicting SWL success for single ureteral stones in different locations.Materials and methodsData of patients treated by SWL for a single ureteral stone between January 2017 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic parameters of patients and stone characteristics were combined with NCCT-based parameters. NCCT-based parameters included the presence or absence of hydronephrosis, perinephric stranding, periureteral edema, diameter of the proximal ureter, ureteral wall thickness (UWT) at ureteral stone site. The logistic regression method was used for the development of a useful predictive model. Subsequently, the receiver operating curve was used to determine cut-off levels, and a scoring system was developed for prediction of SWL success.ResultsStone-free rate was 77,1% (267/346) in the entire cohort. Univariate analysis revealed that age, stone volume, density, perinephric stranding, diameter of proximal ureter, and UWT, were associated with SWL success. In multivariate analysis, proximal ureteral stone location, stone volume, density, and UWT were independent predictors of SWL success. The formula used during logistic regression analysis was: 1/[1+exp {-8.856+0.008(stone volume)+0.002 (stone density)+0.673 (UWT)+1026 (proximal ureteral stone)}]. The scores of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 were associated with 97,8%, 83,4%, 60,8%, 33,2% and 11,1% success rates, respectively, in the prediction model based on these parameters.ConclusionWe conclude that our model can facilitate decision-making for SWL treatment of ureteral stones in different locations (AU)

A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.

OBJECTIVE: To combine non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT)-based parameters with stone and patient characteristics that are already known to affect shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) success and assess this novel model's effectiveness in predicting SWL success for single ureteral stones in different locations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of patients treated by SWL for a single ureteral stone between January 2017 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic parameters of patients and stone characteristics were combined with NCCT-based parameters. NCCT-based parameters included the presence or absence of hydronephrosis, perinephric stranding, periureteral edema, diameter of the proximal ureter, ureteral wall thickness (UWT) at ureteral stone site. The logistic regression method was used for the development of a useful predictive model. Subsequently, the receiver operating curve was used to determine cut-off levels, and a scoring system was developed for prediction of SWL success. RESULTS: Stone-free rate was 77,1% (267/346) in the entire cohort. Univariate analysis revealed that age, stone volume, density, perinephric stranding, diameter of proximal ureter, and UWT, were associated with SWL success. In multivariate analysis, proximal ureteral stone location, stone volume, density, and UWT were independent predictors of SWL success. The formula used during logistic regression analysis was: 1/[1 + exp {-8.856 + 0.008 (stone volume) + 0.002 (stone density) + 0.673 (UWT) + 1026 (proximal ureteral stone)}]. The scores of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 were associated with 97,8%, 83,4%, 60,8%, 33,2% and 11,1% success rates, respectively, in the prediction model based on these parameters. CONCLUSION: We conclude that our model can facilitate decision-making for SWL treatment of ureteral stones in different locations.