Use of Antibiotic-Impregnated Absorbable Beads and Tissue Coverage of Complex Wounds.

The treatment of complex wounds is commonplace for plastic surgeons. Standard management is debridement of infected and devitalized tissue and systemic antibiotic therapy. In cases where vital structures are exposed within the wound, coverage is obtained with the use of vascularized tissue using both muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps. The use of nondissolving polymethylmethacrylate and absorbable antibiotic-impregnated beads has been shown to deliver high concentrations of antibiotics with low systemic levels of the same antibiotic. We present a multicenter retrospective review of all cases that used absorbable antibiotic-impregnated beads for complex wound management from 2003 to 2013. A total of 104 cases were investigated, flap coverage was used in 97 cases (93.3%). Overall, 15 patients (14.4%) required reoperation with the highest groups involving orthopedic wounds and sternal wounds. The advantages of using absorbable antibiotic-impregnated beads in complex infected wounds have been demonstrated with minimal disadvantages. The utilization of these beads is expanding to a variety of complex infectious wounds requiring high concentrations of local antibiotics.

Long-term mortality of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and stenting with drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined differences in long-term mortality between coronary artery bypass graft surgery and stenting with drug-eluting stents (DES) for multivessel disease without left main coronary artery stenosis. This study compares the risks of long-term mortality between these 2 procedures during a follow-up of up to 5 years. METHODS: Patients who underwent isolated bypass surgery (n=13,212) and stenting with DES (n=20,161) between October 2003 and December 2005 in New York State were followed for their vital status through 2008. To control for treatment selection bias, bypass and stenting patients were matched on age, number of diseased coronary vessels, presence of proximal or nonproximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery disease, and propensity of undergoing bypass surgery. Five-year survival rates for the 2 procedures were compared and hazard ratios for death of bypass surgery compared with stenting were obtained. RESULTS: The respective 5-year survival rates in the 8,121 pairs of matched bypass and stenting patients were 80.4% and 73.6% (p<0.001), and the risk of death after bypass surgery was 29% lower than for stenting (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 0.77, p<0.001). Significantly lower risks of death for bypass surgery were observed in patients with LAD artery disease but not in patients without LAD artery disease. Significantly lower risks of death for bypass surgery were also found in all patient subgroups defined by the presence of selected baseline risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Bypass surgery is associated with lower risk of death than stenting with DES for multivessel disease without left main stenosis.

Risk score for predicting in-hospital/30-day mortality for patients undergoing valve and valve/coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: Risk scores are simplified linear formulas for predicting mortality or other adverse outcomes at the bedside without personal digital assistants or calculators. Although risk scores are available for valve surgery, they do not predict short-term mortality (within 30 days of surgery) after hospital discharge. METHODS: New York's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System 2007 to 2009 data were matched to vital statistics data to identify valve surgery with and without concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery deaths occurring in the index admission or within 30 days after the procedure in any location. Risk scores were created to easily predict these outcomes by modifying more complicated logistic regression models. RESULTS: There were 13,455 isolated valve surgery patients and 8,373 valve/CABG surgery patients in the study. The respective in-hospital/30-day mortality rates were 4.03% and 6.60%. There are 11 risk factors comprising the isolated valve surgery score, with risk factor scores ranging from 1 to 8, and the highest observed total score is 28. There are 14 risk factors comprising the valve/CABG surgery score, with risk factor scores ranging from 1 to 6, and the highest observed total score is 19. The scores accurately predicted mortality in 2007 to 2009 as well as in 2004 to 2006, and were strongly correlated with complications and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The risk scores that were developed provide quick and accurate estimates of patients' chances of short-term mortality after cardiac valve surgery.

The New York risk score for in-hospital and 30-day mortality for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: Simplified risk scores for coronary artery bypass graft surgery are frequently in lieu of more complicated statistical models and are valuable for informed consent and choice of intervention. Previous risk scores have been based on in-hospital mortality, but a substantial number of patients die within 30 days of the procedure. These deaths should also be accounted for, so we have developed a risk score based on in-hospital and 30-day mortality. METHODS: New York's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System was used to develop an in-hospital and 30-day logistic regression model for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 2009, and this model was converted into a simple linear risk score that provides estimated in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates for different values of the score. The accuracy of the risk score in predicting mortality was tested. This score was also validated by applying it to 2008 New York coronary artery bypass graft data. Subsequent analyses evaluated the ability of the risk score to predict complications and length of stay. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital and 30-day mortality rate for the 10,148 patients in the study was 1.79%. There are seven risk factors comprising the score, with risk factor scores ranging from 1 to 5, and the highest possible total score is 23. The score accurately predicted mortality in 2009 as well as in 2008, and was strongly correlated with complications and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The risk score is a simple way of estimating short-term mortality that accurately predicts mortality in the year the model was developed as well as in the previous year. Perioperative complications and length of stay are also well predicted by the risk score.

Risk score for predicting long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: No simplified bedside risk scores have been created to predict long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: The New York State Cardiac Surgery Reporting System was used to identify 8597 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in July through December 2000. The National Death Index was used to ascertain patients' vital statuses through December 31, 2007. A Cox proportional hazards model was fit to predict death after CABG surgery using preprocedural risk factors. Then, points were assigned to significant predictors of death on the basis of the values of their regression coefficients. For each possible point total, the predicted risks of death at years 1, 3, 5, and 7 were calculated. It was found that the 7-year mortality rate was 24.2 in the study population. Significant predictors of death included age, body mass index, ejection fraction, unstable hemodynamic state or shock, left main coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, congestive heart failure, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, and history of open heart surgery. The points assigned to these risk factors ranged from 1 to 7; possible point totals for each patient ranged from 0 to 28. The observed and predicted risks of death at years 1, 3, 5, and 7 across patient groups stratified by point totals were highly correlated. CONCLUSION: The simplified risk score accurately predicted the risk of mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and can be used for informed consent and as an aid in determining treatment choice.

A comparison of long-term mortality for off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: The survival difference between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery for follow-up longer than 5 years is not well-understood. The objective of this study is to examine the difference in 7-year mortality after these 2 procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: The state of New York's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System was used to identify the 2640 off-pump and 5940 on-pump patients discharged from July through December 2000. The National Death Index was used to ascertain patients' vital statuses through 2007. A logistic regression model was fit to predict the probability of receiving an off-pump procedure using baseline patient characteristics. Off-pump and on-pump patients were matched with a 1:1 ratio based on the probability of receiving an off-pump procedure. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the 2 procedures were compared using the propensity-matched data, and the hazard ratio for death for off-pump in comparison with on-pump procedures was obtained. In subgroup analyses, the significance of interactions between type of surgery and baseline risk factors was tested. In this study, 2631 pairs of off-pump and on-pump patients were propensity matched. The 7-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 71.2% and 73.4% (P=0.07) for off-pump and on-pump surgery, respectively. The hazard ratio for death (off-pump versus on-pump) was 1.10 (95% confidence interval: 0.99 to 1.21, P=0.07). No statistical significance was detected for the interaction terms between the type of surgery and a number of different baseline risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in long-term mortality between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery is not statistically significant.

Minimally invasive valve surgery with antegrade perfusion strategy is not associated with increased neurologic complications.

BACKGROUND: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons' publication recently associated "minimally invasive" approaches with increased neurologic complications; this proposed association was questionable due to imprecise definitions. To critically reevaluate this issue, we reviewed a large minimally invasive valve experience with robust definitions. METHODS: From November 1995 to January 2007, 3,180 isolated, non-reoperative valve operations were performed; 1,452 (45.7%) were aortic replacements and 1,728 (54.3%) were mitral valve procedures. Surgical approach was standard sternotomy (28%) or minimally invasive technique (72%). Antegrade arterial perfusion was used in 2,646 (83.2%) patients and retrograde perfusion in 534 (16.8%). Aortic clamping was direct in 83.4%, with endoclamp in 16.4% and no clamp in 0.2%. Patients were prospectively followed in a proprietary database and the New York State Cardiac Surgery Reporting System (mandatory, government audited). A neurologic event was defined as a permanent deficit, a transient deficit greater than 24 hours, or a new lesion on cerebral imaging. RESULTS: Hospital mortality for aortic valve replacement was 4.0% (sternotomy [5.1%] versus minimally invasive [3.4%] p = 0.13); for mitral procedures it was 2.4% (sternotomy [4.8%] versus minimally invasive [1.8%] p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that age, female gender, renal disease, ejection fraction less than 0.30, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and emergent operation were risk factors for mortality. Stroke occurred in 71 patients (2.2%) (sternotomy [2.1%] versus minimally invasive [2.3%] p = 0.82). Multivariate analysis of neurologic events revealed that cerebrovascular disease, emergency procedure, no-clamp, and retrograde perfusion were risk factors. In patients 50 years old or younger (n = 662), retrograde perfusion had no significant impact on neurologic events (1.6% vs 1.1%, p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive approach with antegrade perfusion does not result in increased neurologic complications. Retrograde perfusion, however, is associated with increased neurologic risk in older patients.

Long-term mortality of coronary artery bypass grafting and bare-metal stenting.

BACKGROUND: There is little information on relative survival with follow-up longer than 5 years in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting. This study tested the hypothesis that CABG is associated with a lower risk of long-term (8-year) mortality than is stenting with bare-metal stents for multivessel coronary disease. METHODS: We identified 18,359 patients with multivessel disease who underwent isolated CABG and 13,377 patients who received bare-metal stenting in 1999 to 2000 in New York and followed their vital status through 2007 using the National Death Index (NDI). We matched CABG and stent patients on the number of diseased coronary vessels, proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery disease, and propensity of undergoing CABG based on numerous patient characteristics and compared survival after the 2 procedures. RESULTS: In the 7,235 pairs of matched patients, the overall 8-year survival rates were 78.0% for CABG and 71.2% for stenting (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.74; p < 0.001). For anatomic groups classified by the number of diseased vessels and proximal LAD involvement, the HRs ranged from 0.53 (p < 0.001) for patients with 3-vessel disease involving proximal LAD artery disease to 0.78 (p = 0.05) for patients with 2-vessel disease but no disease in the LAD artery. A lower risk of death after CABG was observed in all subgroups stratified by a number of baseline risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with a lower risk of death than is stenting with bare metal stents for multivessel coronary disease.

30-day readmissions after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify reasons for and predictors of readmission. BACKGROUND: Short-term readmissions have been identified as an important cause of escalating health care costs, and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is 1 of the most expensive procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 30-day readmissions for 33,936 New York State patients who underwent CABG surgery between January 1, 2005, and November 30, 2007. The main reasons for readmission (principal diagnoses) and the significant independent predictors of readmission were identified. The hospital-level relationship between risk-adjusted mortality rate and risk-adjusted readmission rate was explored to determine the value of readmission rate as a complementary measure of quality. RESULTS: The most common reasons for readmission were post-operative infection (16.9%), heart failure (12.8%), and "other complications of surgical and medical care" (9.8%). Increasing age, female sex, African-American race, higher body mass index, numerous comorbidities, 2 post-operative complications (renal failure and unplanned cardiac reoperation), Medicare or Medicaid status, discharges to a skilled nursing facility, saphenous vein grafts, and longer lengths of stay were all associated with higher rates of readmission. The correlation between the risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rate of hospitals and risk-adjusted in-hospital/30-day mortality rate was 0.32 (p = 0.047). The range across hospitals in the readmission rate was from 8.3% to 21.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day readmission rate for CABG surgery remains high, despite decreases in short-term mortality. Patients with any of the numerous risk factors for readmission should be closely monitored. Hospital readmission rates are not highly correlated with mortality rates and might serve as an independent quality measure.

Predictors of postoperative hematocrit and association of hematocrit with adverse outcomes for coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of low intensive care unit (ICU) admission hematocrit, and to determine if low hematocrit is associated with postoperative outcomes for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 8417 patients who underwent CABG surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass in New York in 2007. Patients with very low ICU admission hematocrit (≤ 21.9%) and low ICU admission hematocrit (22.0% to 25.9%) were identified. Significant independent predictors of low and very low ICU admission hematocrit, and the independent impact of each of these states on adverse outcomes were identified. RESULTS: A total of 1.1% had very low hematocrit and 8.3% had low hematocrit. Significant independent predictors for either low or very low hematocrit included older age, females, lower body surface area, lower ventricular function, Hispanic ethnicity, non-Caucasian race, high creatinine, previous cardiac surgery, absence of left main disease, and emergency transfer to the operating room following catheterization or percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with hematocrit ≤ 21.9% had significantly higher risk-adjusted rates of postoperative bleeding (adjusted OR = 4.37, 95% CI [1.97, 9.68, respiratory failure (adjusted OR = 2.85, 95% CI [1.45, 5.63]), and one or more complications than patients with normal hematocrit. Patients with hematocrit between 22.0% and 25.9% also had higher complication rates. CONCLUSION: It is important for cardiovascular surgical teams to be aware of risk factors that predispose patients to unacceptable hematocrit values, to monitor values closely, and to treat accordingly in the operating room when low values occur.

Reoperative valve surgery in the elderly: predictors of risk and long-term survival.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients requiring reoperative cardiac surgery for valve disease are considered high risk for immediate outcomes, but little is known about their long-term survival. It is often conjectured that medical therapy provides equivalent late survival in this population, which may dissuade both patient and surgeon from considering reoperation. We analyzed a cohort of such patients undergoing reoperative valve surgery to determine their long-term survival. METHODS: From 1992 through 2007, 363 patients aged 75 years or more underwent reoperative isolated valve surgery; 211 (58%) had aortic valve replacement and 152 (42%) had mitral valve surgery. Mean age was 80.5 years. Hospital outcomes were prospectively recorded. Survival from all-cause death was determined from the Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 13.8% (12.8% for aortic and 15.1% for mitral valve operations; p = 0.52). Multivariable predictors of hospital death were New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure (odds ratio = 3.19, p = 0.012), dialysis (odds ratio = 15.63, p = 0.003), and more than one reoperation (odds ratio = 2.59, p = 0.058). At 5 years, overall survival was 62% ± 3% for all patients (66% ± 4% for aortic and 56% ± 4% for mitral valve patients). For aortic valve patients aged 80 years or more, 5-year survival was 60% ± 0.6%. Life expectancy table analysis predicted a 5-year survival of 57% for an age-matched and sex-matched comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative surgery for elderly patients with isolated aortic or mitral valve pathology is associated with excellent long-term survival, particularly when treating aortic valve disease. While in-hospital mortality is higher among the elderly than among younger patients, specific predictors of poor outcome can be identified preoperatively to risk stratify these patients.

The relationship between perioperative temperature and adverse outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine predictors of hypothermia and hyperthermia, and the impact of hypothermia and hyperthermia on postoperative outcomes for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 2294 patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in New York in 2007. Patients were classified as moderately to severely hypothermic (< or = 34.5 degrees C), mildly hypothermic (34.6 degrees C-35.9 degrees C), or mildly hyperthermic (37.5 degrees C-38.8 degrees C) after leaving the operating room. Significant independent predictors of these temperature states and the independent impact of each of these states on in-hospital mortality and complications were identified. RESULTS: A total of 37.7% of patients were mildly hypothermic, 9.0% of patients were moderately to severely hypothermic, and 5.6% of patients were mildly hyperthermic. Significant independent predictors for postoperative hypothermia included older age, female gender, lower body surface area, congestive heart failure, higher ventricular function, non-Hispanic ethnicity, single/double-vessel disease, low postoperative hematocrit, previous cardiac surgery, race other than white or black, and organ transplant. Patients with moderate to severe hypothermia had significantly higher risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality than patients with normothermia (adjusted odds ratio 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-8.08). Patients with mild hyperthermia also had significantly higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio 5.04; 95% confidence interval,1.18-21.55). Patients with either mild or moderate to severe hypothermia had significantly higher rates of respiratory failure and unplanned operations, and patients with mild hyperthermia had a significantly higher rate of respiratory failure than normothermic patients. CONCLUSION: It is important to maintain normal postsurgical core temperatures in patients who have undergone cardiac surgery to minimize or avoid death and complications.

Retrograde arterial perfusion, not incision location, significantly increases the risk of stroke in reoperative mitral valve procedures.

BACKGROUND: A recent report suggested that a thoracotomy approach for reoperative mitral valve (MV) procedures was associated with an equivalent mortality and an unacceptable risk of stroke. We assessed these outcomes in a single institution's experience. METHODS: From 1992 through 2007, 905 patients underwent reoperative MV procedures. The approach was a median sternotomy in 612 (67.6%), right anterior thoracotomy in 242 (26.7%), and left posterior thoracotomy in 51 (5.6%). Concomitant procedures in 411 patients (67.6%) included aortic procedures in 189, tricuspid procedures in 170, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 90. Hypothermic fibrillation was used in 65 patients. Logistic analysis was used to analyze risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 12.7% (115 of 905), 6.7% (25 of 371) for first time isolated MV reoperations, and 10.1% (50 of 494) for all isolated MV operations. Overall incidence of stroke was 3.8% (34 of 905); 10.9% (9 of 82) with retrograde arterial perfusion and 3.0% (25 of 824) with central aortic cannulation (p < 0.001). For isolated MV reoperations, the incidence of stroke was 4.3% (21 of 494): 2.9% (7 of 241) for antegrade perfusion and 5.5% (14 of 253) for retrograde perfusion (p = 0.15). Risk factors for death were age (p < 0.001), renal failure (p < 0.01), tricuspid valve disease (p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 4.9; p < 0.001), emergency procedure (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.9; p = 0.02), and ejection fraction less than 0.30 (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.3, p = 0.018). Risk factors for stroke were retrograde perfusion (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.8 to 10.3; p < 0.01) and ejection fraction below 0.30 (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 5.0; p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of stroke in reoperative MV operations is associated with perfusion strategies, not with the incisional approach. Reoperative sternotomy and minithoracotomy with central cannulation are both useful for reoperative MV procedures and are associated with low stroke rates.

A decade of minimally invasive mitral repair: long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Short-term results with minimally invasive approaches for mitral valve repair in degenerative disease have been encouraging, with potential for diminishing blood loss and hospital length of stay. Little is known, however, about the long-term efficacy of this approach. This report analyzes a single institution's results over 12 years with minimally invasive mitral repair. METHODS: Since 1986, 3,057 patients have undergone mitral valve repair; 1,601 patients had degenerative disease and are the subject of this report. Minimally invasive mitral repair was done in 1071 patients with a right anterior minithoracotomy and direct vision. Clinical and echocardiographic variables were entered prospectively into a database. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 2.2% for all patients (36 of 1601); 1.3% for isolated minimally invasive (9 of 712) and 1.3% (3 of 223) for isolated sternotomy mitral valve repair; and 3.6% (24 of 666) for valve repair plus a concomitant cardiac procedure. For isolated valve repair, 8-year freedom from reoperation was 91% +/- 2% for sternotomy and 95% +/- 1% for minimally invasive (p = 0.24), and 8-year freedom from reoperation or severe recurrent insufficiency was 90% +/- 2% for sternotomy and 93% +/- 1% for minimally invasive (p = 0.30). Eight-year freedom from all valve-related complications was 86% +/- 3% for sternotomy and 90% +/- 2% for minimally invasive (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that long-term outcomes after minimally invasive mitral repair are excellent and equivalent to results achieved with sternotomy. In view of previously published advantages of short-term morbidity, minimally invasive approaches to mitral valve surgery deserve expanded use.

Aortic valve replacement for patients with severe aortic stenosis: risk factors and their impact on 30-month mortality.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported population-based outcomes for aortic valve replacement patients. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2005, were included in the study. Statistical models were developed to identify significant risk factors for mortality, to compare survival for patients with and without selected risk factors, and to compare survival to an age- and sex-matched group from US life tables. RESULTS: There was total of 6,369 patients in the study. The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 3.97% for aortic valve replacement and 5.69% for aortic valve replacement with concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Significant risk factors for 30-month mortality included concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery, advancing age, lower body surface area, emergency status, low ejection fraction, congestive heart failure, previous heart surgery, and several comorbidities. The 64.3% of patients with isolated aortic valve replacement who had neither congestive heart failure, ejection fraction less than 0.40, acute myocardial infarction less than 24 hours, nor hemodynamic instability had a risk-adjusted survival of 89.9% compared with the 90.0% survival rate of the age- and sex-matched general population (p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: For the large number of patients without high-risk conditions, the 30-month survival is essentially as high as that of an age- and sex-matched group of the US population.

c-Met gene amplification is associated with advanced stage colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

The c-Met proto-oncogene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase (TK) that promotes invasive tumor growth and metastasis. Recent studies show that the presence of c-Met gene amplification is predictive for selective c-Met TK inhibitors in gastric cancer and lung cancer. In this study, we utilized a highly quantitative PCR/ligase detection reaction technique to quantify c-Met gene copy number in primary colorectal cancer (CRC) (N=247), liver metastases (N=147), and paired normal tissues. We identified no differences in c-Met gene copy number between normal colonic mucosa and liver tissue. However, mean c-Met gene copy number was significantly elevated in CRC compared with normal mucosa (P<0.001), and in liver metastases compared with normal liver (P<0.001). Furthermore, a significant increase in c-Met was seen in liver metastases compared with primary CRC (P<0.0001). c-Met gene amplification was observed in 2% (3/177) of localized cancers, 9% (6/70) of cancers with distant metastases (P<0.02), and 18% (25/147) of liver metastases (P<0.01). Among patients treated by liver resection, there was a trend toward poorer 3-year survival in association with c-Met gene amplification (P=0.07). Slight increases in c-Met copy number can be detected in localized CRCs, but gene amplification is largely restricted to Stage IV primary cancers and liver metastases. c-Met gene amplification is linked to metastatic progression, and is a viable target for a significant subset of advanced CRC.