The effect of rapid and delayed insemination on reproductive outcome in conventional insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in vitro fertilization cycles.

PURPOSE: The precise timing of insemination after oocyte retrieval is sometimes challenging. In this study, we have assessed the effect of the variation in insemination timing on reproductive outcome for both conventional insemination (CI) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort data analysis was performed on 6559 patients (9575 oocyte retrievals) from January 2017 to July 2019. The main outcome measured was live birth rates. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate per all oocytes retrieved, blastocyst utilization, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. The time interval between oocyte retrieval and insemination was analyzed in eight categories: 0 (0- < 0.5 h), 1 (0.5- < 1.5 h), 2 (1.5- < 2.5 h), 3 (2.5- < 3.5 h), 4 (3.5- < 4.5), 5 (4.5- < 5.5), 6 (5.5-6.5), and 7 (6.5- < 8 h). The number of retrievals in each group (0-7) was 586, 1594, 1644, 1796, 1836, 1351, 641, and 127 respectively. RESULTS: The mean fertilization rate for CI ranged from 54.1 to 64.9% with a significant difference between time categories 0 and 5 (p < 0.001) and 1 and 5 (p < 0.0.001). The mean fertilization rate for ICSI ranged from 52.8 to 67.3% with no significant difference between time categories. Blastocyst rate for CI and ICSI was not significantly different. Miscarriage and clinical pregnancy rates in CI and ICSI were not significantly different. Live birth rates differed significantly (p < 0.05) in CI with time categories 0 and 7 representing the lowest rates, but not in the ICSI group. CONCLUSION: If performing CI or ICSI before 1.5 h and > 6.5 h, any detrimental effects are moderate on fertilization but do not affect blastocyst usage and birth rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institutional Review Board Approval from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre [IRB Protocol #: 2015P000122].

Incorporating medium fidelity simulation in a practical nurse education program.

We frequently hear the word simulation in nursing educatioh. Research has been done on the use of high fidelity simulation in registered nursing programs. High fidelity simulators are expensive and require more than one faculty to facilitate. The question remains: Does every nursing program require a high fidelity simulation laboratory? This article will define the three levels of fidelity and describe the incorporation of a medium fidelity simulation into a practical nursing program and will describe the benefits of simulation use. The article will assist the faculty and students new to simulation, and allow them to choose the equipment and scenarios that will be most advantageous for their individual programs. The choice of equipment, scenarios, and fidelity often depends upon the space, time, funds, and faculty available. Simulation adds an important component to nursing education. Using simulation wisely helps students practice in a controlled environment without danger to living patients. The lessons learned will someday play into a "life or death" scenario, and the patient will not be a simulation mannequin.

The role of assisted reproductive technology in the management of recurrent pregnancy loss.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Description of genetic screening of preimplantation embryos as a means of reducing miscarriages in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. RECENT FINDINGS: That the promise of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for ameliorating recurrent pregnancy loss has been fulfilled is controversial. An array of comparative studies has suggested a positive effect of PGS on implantation rate, but these have been balanced by studies showing no effect or a negative effect, highlighting the need for more rigorously designed studies and randomized controlled trials. Emerging technologies may provide more information from the embryo biopsies even as the mosaicism of the embryo and its implications for interpreting PGS data are recognized. SUMMARY: Through the screening of embryos for abnormality in chromosome number or structure and selecting only normal embryos for transfer, PGS was envisioned and applied as a therapeutic tool for improving implantation and live birth rates from in-vitro fertilization and providing a means of attenuating pregnancy loss in recurrent pregnancy loss patients. An array of reports on the effects of PGS on embryo implantation and live birth rates has been made since its introduction, showing, variously, increases, decreases or no changes in these parameters. Various factors may influence the efficacy of PGS, including the patient population to which it is applied, technical aspects such as embryo biopsy, the genetic analysis and embryo culture environment, the current limitation of the genetic analysis (a subset of, rather than all, the 24 chromosomes) and the mosaicism of the embryo and blastocyst. Collectively, these contribute to the challenge of optimizing PGS and understanding how the screening result reflects the ultimate genetic constitution of the conceptus. Emerging cytogenetic and molecular technologies such as comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis may provide a broader appraisal of the embryo for a more comprehensive evaluation of developmental potential and prognosis for live birth.

Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with immune reconstitution.

We report a case of acute Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) associated with a prompt and vigorous immune reconstitution and decrease in the virus load noted during treatment with a potent regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy. We hypothesize that GBS may have been due to an aberrant immune response or an adverse drug reaction in association with preexisting peripheral neurologic disease.