Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions.

AIMS: The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis (megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8° (SD 36°) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1° (SD 24°). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66). CONCLUSION: We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):733-740.

Extra-abdominal desmoid tumor fibromatosis: a multicenter EMSOS study.

BACKGROUND: Extra-abdominal desmoid tumor fibromatosis (DTF) is a rare, locally aggressive soft tissue tumour. The best treatment modality for this patient cohort is still object of debate. QUESTIONS/PURPOSE: This paper aimed to (1) to compare the outcomes of DTF after different treatment modalities, (2) to assess prognostic factors for recurrence following surgical excision, and (3) to assess prognostic factors for progression during observation. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study under the patronage of the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS). All seven centres involved were tertiary referral centres for soft tissue tumours. Baseline demographic data was collected for all patients as well as data on the diagnosis, tumour characteristics, clinical features, treatment modalities and whether they had any predisposing factors for DTF. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-eight patients (240 female, 140 male) with a mean age of 37.6 (±18.8 SD, range: 3-85) were included in the study. Two hundred fifty-seven patients (66%) underwent surgical excision of ADF, 70 patients (18%) were observed without therapy, the residual patients had different conservative treatments. There were no significant differences in terms of tumour recurrence or progression between the different treatment groups. After surgical excision, younger age, recurrent disease and larger tumour size were risk factors for recurrence, while tumours around the shoulder girdle and painful lesions were at risk of progression in the observational group. CONCLUSION: Local recurrence rate after surgery was similar to progression rates under observation. Hence, observation in DTF seems to be justified, considering surgery in case of dimensional progression in 2 consecutive controls (3 and 6 months) and in painful lesions, with particular attention to lesions around the shoulder girdle.

Multimodal Treatment in Pelvic Ewing Sarcoma: A Prognostic Factor Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although multidisciplinary therapies have improved local control and overall survival in Ewing sarcoma (ES), the prognosis of pelvic lesions remains markedly worse than that of limb ES. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the influence of the type of local treatment, margins, necrosis and sacrum involvement on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in a series of 21 non-metastatic pelvic ES. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 46.3 months (range 3-156). Only one patient had recurrence, at 11 months after surgery. Eight patients showed pulmonary metastasis and five showed bone metastases. Necrosis was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival at 5 years (p=0.0132) and disease-free survival (p=0.0086). Overall survival at 5 years was 40.1%. CONCLUSION: Local control in pelvic Ewing sarcoma is comparable for patients treated with surgery (S), surgery plus radiotherapy (S/RT), or definitive radiotherapy (RT). The combination of surgery plus radiotherapy could be indicated in cases of large tumor, a poor necrosis response (< 90%), or an inadequate margin with involvement of the sacrum. A poor response to neoadjuvant therapy is a significant risk factor for both local control and overall survival.

Liposarcoma: Clinico-pathological analysis, prognostic factors and survival in a series of 307 patients treated at a single institution.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Liposarcoma (LPS) is a malignant mesenchymal tumor and the most common soft tissue sarcoma. Four different subtypes are described: well differentiated (WD) LPS or atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT), dedifferentiated (DD) LPS, myxoid LPS, and pleomorphic LPS (PLS). The objective of the study was to investigate prognostic factors and clinical outcome of liposarcoma. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the clinico-pathological features of a series of 307 patients affected by Liposarcoma at a mean follow-up of 69 months (range 6-257). ALT/WD LPS were analyzed separately. The influence of site, size, type of presentation, grading, histotype and local recurrence on local and systemic control and survival was assessed. RESULTS: The statistical analysis indicated that only surgical margins represented a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence in ALT/WD LPS (P = 0.0007) and other subtypes of LPS (P = 0.0055). In myxoid, PLS and DD LPS, significant prognostic factors for metastasis free survival (MFS) were surgical margins (P = 0.0009), size of the tumor (P = 0.0358), histology (P = 0.0117) and local recurrence (P = 0.0015). In multivariate analysis, surgical margins (0.0180), size (0.0432) and local recurrence (0.0288) correlated independently with MFS. Margins (P = 0.0315), local recurrence (P = 0.0482) and metastases (P < 0.0001) were prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION: Marginal surgery can be an accepted treatment for ALT/WD LPS. In other liposarcoma subtypes (Myxoid, DD, PLS) wide or radical surgery is recommended as the margins significantly influence local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Local recurrence and metastases were significant prognostic factors for OS.

Allograft Reconstruction of the Extensor Mechanism after Resection of Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue tumors around the knee joint still pose problems for the excision and subsequent reconstruction. METHODS: In the 6 included patients the soft tissue sarcoma has its base on the anterior surface of the extensor mechanism and expands towards the skin. The entire extensor apparatus (quadriceps tendon, patella, and patellar tendon) was resected and replaced by a fresh-frozen allograft. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 6.7 years (range: 2-12.4 years). In two patients a local recurrence occurred, resulting in a 5-year local recurrence-free rate of 66.7% (95% CI: 19.5%-90.4%). Distant metastases were found in 4 patients resulting in a 5-year metastasis-free rate of 33.3% (95% CI: 4.6%-67.5%). Two patients underwent at least one revision surgery, including one patient in whom the allograft had to be removed. According to the ISOLS function score 24.7 points (range: 19-28 points) were achieved at the last follow-up. The mean active flexion of the knee joint was 82.5° (range: 25-120°) and a mean extension lag of 10° (range: 0-30°) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The replacement of the extensor mechanism by an allograft is a reasonable option, allowing wide margins and restoration of active extension in most patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The presented study is listed on the ISRCTN registry with trial number ISRCTN63060594.

Allograft-prosthetic composite versus megaprosthesis in the proximal tibia-What works best?

Modular megaprosthesis (MP) and allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) are the most commonly used reconstructions for large bone defects of the proximal tibia. The primary objective of this study was to compare the two different techniques in terms of failures and functional results. A total of 42 consecutive patients with a mean age of 39.6 years (range 15-81 years) who underwent a reconstruction of the proximal tibia between 2001 and 2012 were included. Twenty-three patients were given an MP, and 19 patients received an APC. There were nine reconstruction failures after an average follow-up of 62 months: five in the MP group and four in the APC group (p=0.957). The 10-year implant survival rate was 78.8% for the MP and 93.7% for the APC (p=0.224). There were no relevant differences between the two groups in functional results. Both MP and APC are valid and satisfactory reconstructive options for massive bone defects in the proximal tibia. In high-demanding patients with no further risk factors, an APC should be considered to provide the best possible functional result for the extensor mechanism.

Modular megaprosthesis reconstruction for oncological and non-oncological resection of the elbow joint.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of large bone defects around the elbow joint is surgically demanding due to sparse soft tissue coverage, complex biomechanics and the close proximity to neurovascular structures. Modular megaprostheses are established reconstruction tools for the elbow, but only small case series have been reported in the literature. METHODS: Thirty-six patients who underwent reconstruction of the elbow joint with a modular megaprosthesis were reviewed retrospectively. In 31 patients (86.1%), elbow replacement was performed after resection of a bone tumour, whereas five non-oncological patients (13.9%) underwent surgery because of a previous failed elbow reconstruction. Functional outcome, rate of complications and oncological results were considered as primary endpoints. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 25 months. The average achieved Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 77.08 (range 40-95) and the average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 22.9 (range 8-30). Six complications (16.7%) were observed: two radial palsies, one temporary radial nerve dysfunction, one ulnar palsy, one disassembling of the articular prosthesis component and one deep infection necessitating the only implant removal. The overall 5-year survival rate of the patients was poor (25.1%) because of rapid systemic progression of the oncological disease in patients with metastatic lesion. However, the 5-year survival rate of the implant was very satisfactory (93%). CONCLUSIONS: Modular megaprosthesis is a reliable and effective reconstruction tool in large bone defects around the elbow joint. The complication rates are lower than seen in osteoarticular allografts and allograft-prosthesis composites while the functional outcome is equal. In palliative situations with metastatic disease involving the elbow, modular megaprosthesis enables rapid recovery and pain relief and preserves elbow function.

Modular Endoprostheses for Nonneoplastic Conditions: Midterm Complications and Survival.

The use of modular endoprostheses is a viable option to manage both tumor resection and severe bone loss due to nonneoplastic conditions such as fracture sequelae, failed osteoarticular grafts, arthroplasty revisions, and periprosthetic fractures. We sought to investigate both midterm complications and failures occurred in 87 patients who underwent a megaprosthetic reconstruction in a nonneoplastic setting. After a mean follow-up of 58 (1-167) months, overall failure-free survival was 91.5% at 1 year, 80% at 2 years, 71.6% at 5 years, and 69.1% at 5 and 10 years. There was no significant difference in the survival rate according to the diagnosis at the index procedure (p = 0.921), nor to the reconstruction site (p = 0.402). The use of megaprostheses in a postneoplastic setting did not affect survival rate in comparison with endoprosthetic reconstruction of pure nonneoplastic conditions (p = 0.851). Perimegaprosthetic infection was the leading complication, occurring in 10 (11.5%) patients and implying a megaprosthetic revision in all but one case. Physicians should consider these results when discussing with patients desired outcomes of endoprosthetic reconstructions of a nonneoplastic disease.

Pre-operative diclofenac HPßCD for pain control of needle biopsy in musculoskeletal neoplasm: preliminary results.

Needle biopsy is the main standard method used for diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors of the limbs and superficial trunk. Pain control during this procedure is through the use of Local Anaestetic (L.A.). In order to achieve a complete pain control in our cases, recently we started using diclofenac HPßCD 50 mg via s.c. preoperativly. We present the clinical results of a non-randomized study of two eterogeneous groups of patients: "Experimental" Group (1): diclofenac HPßCD 50 mg via s.c. one hour before surgical procedure, local anesthesia and ev. diclofenac HPßCD 50 mg via s.c. 12 hours postoperative; "Conventional" Group (2): local anesthesia and ev. postoperative tramadol 100 mg via oral for pain control. In October 2014, at the Department of Orthopedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery of Florence, 37 musculoskeletal biopsies for a bone or a soft tissue lesion were performed. Exclusion criteria for this study were: known allergies to lidocaine, diclofenac, tramadol; known gastric or duodenal ulcers; known gastrointestinal bleed or perforation; refusal of the patients to collaborate. For one or more of these reasons, 6 patients were excluded from this study. In the Group 1, 10 patients (59%) referred no pain during the surgical procedure (8/14 biopsies on soft tissue and 2/3 on bone). In 5 cases (29%) no exacerbation of previous chronic pain, and in 2 cases (12%) a progression of local pain after biopsy (average 1 points higher in the VAS). In Group 2, only 6 patients (42%) did not have any pain during the procedure, 4 (29%) no exacerbation of previous chronic pain and 4 (29%) a progression of local pain (average 2 points higher in the VAS). Despite similar results in both Groups, Group 1 seemed to have a mild better control of perioperative pain. The use of diclofenac HPßCD 50 mg preoperative seems to be a rational approach for minimizing perioperative pain and the preliminary data of our study seem encouraging. Obviously many bias are present in this study (small numbers of cases, heterogeneity of diseases, association with local anesthetic, non-randomized study, comparison between preoperative versus postoperative treatment) and this cannot absolutely be considerate as definitive conclusions.

Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction popularity is increasing with the aim to reproduce native ACL anatomy and improve ACL reconstruction outcome. However, to date, only a few randomized clinical studies have been published. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the clinical results of single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Seventy patients with a chronic unilateral ACL rupture who underwent arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction using a hamstring graft were randomized to receive a single- (SB) or double-bundle (DB) reconstruction. Both groups were comparable with regard to preoperative data. A double-incision surgical technique was adopted in both groups. The graft was fixed by looping the hamstring tendons around a bony (DB) or a metallic (SB) bridge on the tibial side and with interference screws reinforced with a staple on the femur. The same rehabilitation protocol was adopted. Outcome assessment was performed by a blinded, independent observer using the visual analog scale (VAS) score, the new International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation. RESULTS: All the patients reached a minimum follow-up of 2 years. No differences between the 2 groups were observed in terms of KOOS and IKDC subjective score. A statistically significant difference in favor of the DB group was found with the VAS (P < .03). The objective IKDC final scores showed statistically significantly more "normal knees" in the DB group than in the SB group (P = .03). There was 1 stability failure in the DB group and 3 in the SB group. The KT-1000 arthrometer data showed a statistically significant decrease in the average anterior tibial translation in the DB group (1.2 mm DB vs 2.1 mm SB; P < .03). The incidence of a residual pivot-shift glide was 14% in DB and 26% in SB (P = .08). CONCLUSION: In the 2-year minimum follow-up, DB ACL reconstructions showed better VAS, anterior knee laxity, and final objective IKDC scores than SB. However, longer follow-up and accurate instrumented in vivo rotational stability assessment are needed.

Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis.

Proper femoral and tibial component rotational positioning in TKA is critical for outcomes. Several rotational landmarks are frequently used with different advantages and limitations. We wondered whether coronal axes in the tibia and femur based on the transepicondylar axis in the femur would correlate with anteroposterior deformity. We obtained computed tomography scans of 100 patients with arthritis before they underwent TKA. We measured the posterior condylar angle on the femoral side and the angle between Akagi's line and perpendicular to the projection of the femoral transepicondylar axis on the tibial side. On the femoral side, we found a linear relationship between the posterior condylar angle and coronal deformity with valgus knees having a larger angle than varus knees, ie, gradual external rotation increased with increased coronal deformity from varus to valgus. On the tibial side, the angle between Akagi's line and the perpendicular line to the femoral transepicondylar axis was on average approximately 0 degrees , but we observed substantial interindividual variability without any relationship to gender or deformity. A preoperative computed tomography scan was a useful, simple, and relatively inexpensive tool to identify relevant anatomy and to adjust rotational positioning. We do not, however, recommend routine use because on the femoral side, we found a relationship between rotational landmarks and coronal deformity.

Total knee arthroplasty using a pie-crusting technique for valgus deformity.

UNLABELLED: Valgus deformity correction with total knee arthroplasty is challenging. We hypothesized selective release of the tight lateral structures (pie-crusting technique), and of the lateral retinaculum in case of patellar maltracking, would obtain and maintain correction of the frontal plane deformity, restore patellar tracking and function, and avoid the complications of the extensive releases, including lateral condyle avascularity and residual lateral instability. We followed 48 patients with 53 valgus knees who underwent TKA and were followed a minimum of 5 years (mean, 8 years; range, 5-12 years). Soft tissue balancing of the lateral structures was performed with the pie-crusting technique. We employed either a fixed posterior stabilized or a mobile implant. A lateral release was performed in 67% of the cases. We observed one postoperative complication, a transient postoperative peroneal nerve palsy that spontaneously completely recovered. In 51 of the 53 knees (96%) we achieved alignment within 5 degrees from neutral. One patient had varus instability in extension. No component was revised. The pie-crusting technique reliably corrects moderate to severe fixed valgus deformities with a low complication rate and reasonable mid-term results. The multiple punctures allow gradual stretching of the lateral soft tissues and preservation of the popliteus tendon reducing the risk of posterolateral instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The effects of different tensioning strategies on knee laxity and graft tension after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction replicates the 2 functional bundles of the native ligament, the posterolateral and the anteromedial, to control anteroposterior and rotational laxity. HYPOTHESIS: Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction laxity should be affected by the way grafts are tensioned. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Fourteen intact cadaveric knees were instrumented in a 6 degree of freedom rig, and kinematics throughout flexion-extension were recorded with an electromagnetic system under a 90-N anterior force or a 5-N.m internal rotation torque. Anteromedial and posterolateral bundle bovine extensor tendon grafts were fixed to load cells on the tibia, and tension was adjusted to match the intact knee anteroposterior laxity with 3 different protocols: (1) anteromedial bundle first and then posterolateral bundle at 90 degrees and 20 degrees of flexion, respectively; (2) posterolateral bundle first and then anteromedial bundle at 20 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion, respectively; and (3) both bundles together at 20 degrees of flexion. Finally, a single-bundle graft positioned at 10 o'clock was tensioned at 20 degrees of flexion. RESULTS: Lower graft tensions were required to match intact knee laxity in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Tension patterns with knee flexion were independent from the tensioning protocol. Protocols 1 and 2 overconstrained anteroposterior laxity, whereas protocol 3 matched intact knee anteroposterior laxity throughout the range of motion. The single-bundle reconstructions had excess anteroposterior laxity in flexion. Rotations were better restored with double-bundle protocols 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: Knee laxity after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is affected by the sequence in which the grafts are tensioned. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction ensures better laxity restoration than does single bundle when both bundles are fixed together.

Double-bundle "anatomic" anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of tunnel positioning with a transtibial technique.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine whether a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a transtibial approach could position the tibial and femoral tunnels accurately in the native bundle attachments. METHODS: In 21 fresh-frozen knees the tibial and femoral attachments of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles were outlined. The AM tibial tunnel guidewire was drilled with the 65 degree Howell tibial guide (Arthrotek, Warsaw, IN) located against the femur in the extended knee. The PL tibial wire was drilled through a prototype attachment to the Howell guide. Of the knees, 14 were available for the femoral part of the study. The AM femoral guidewire used an aimer offset 3 mm from the over-the-top position. The PL wire was drilled transtibially at 70 degrees of flexion, with external rotation and posterior drawer loads being applied. The plateaus and condyles were photographed and the wire positions measured. RESULTS: With regard to the tibia, 17 of 21 AM wires were in the AM bundle attachment (at 61% and 36% of the natural ACL posteroanterior and mediolateral length, respectively) and 19 of 21 PL wires were in the PL bundle attachment (at 28% and 36% of the posteroanterior and mediolateral length, respectively). With regard to the femur, 12 of 14 AM wires and 9 of 14 PL wires were in the correct native bundle attachment. The AM wire was 3% more shallow than the center of the AM attachment (P = .03) and 6% more superior (P < .001), where 100% was the diameter of the posterior lateral condyle. The PL wire was 4% more shallow than the center of the PL attachment (P = .026) and 6% more superior (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic and reproducible tibial guidewire positioning was achieved. Femoral wires were reproducibly positioned, but both were superior to and more shallow than the natural ACL bundle attachments, so further development or a different approach is appropriate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The double-bundle reconstruction aims to restore anterior drawer and rotational stability. This technique ensures anatomic tibial positioning. Further improvements are needed with regard to the femur.

Single-and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is intended to replicate the anatomy and the function of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the native ACL to improve patients' satisfaction and knee stability. We prospectively assigned 75 consecutive patients with an isolated ACL lesion to one of three sequential groups of 25 patients each. Group I received a single-bundle, single-incision transtibial ACL reconstruction. Groups II and III received a double-bundle reconstruction with a single-incision transtibial technique or a double-bundle, twoincision outside-in technique, respectively. We obtained subjective International Knee Documentation Committee and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score evaluations and objective International Knee Documentation Committee scores and KT-1000 measurements preoperatively and at followup. All patients reached a minimum followup of 2 years. KT side-to-side difference in Groups I, II, and III were 2.4, 1.6 and 1.4 mm, respectively. Group III had fewer patients with a positive pivot shift than Group I. The double-bundle double-incision outside-in ACL reconstruction resulted in improved anteroposterior stability and less residual pivot shift than single-incision single-bundle technique.

Validation of the 65 degrees Howell guide for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To study in cadaver knees the position of the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the 65 degrees Howell guide (Arthrotek, Ontario, CA). TYPE OF STUDY: Controlled laboratory study in vitro. METHODS: Twenty-one fresh-frozen cadaver knees were used. The ACL was resected and its tibial attachment was demarcated. To drill the guidewire, we used the Howell 65 degrees tibial guide, which references off of the intercondylar roof in extension to avoid impingement. The intra-articular position of the wire was digitized with a digital camera and referred to a transverse axis passing through the over-the-back position and a sagittal axis passing through the lateral aspect of the medial spine. The percentage position of the wire within the ACL attachment was also calculated, taking the posterior and medial limits as the 0% positions. RESULTS: All the wires were within the ACL attachment: 17 were in the ACL posterolateral bundle attachment and the other 4 in the anteromedial. The average distance of the wire from the transverse and sagittal axes was 12 mm (SD, 3 mm) anterior and 1 mm (SD, 1 mm) lateral, respectively. The wire was positioned at 38% (SD, 16%) of the length of the ACL attachment and at 40% (SD, 17%) of the width. Eighty percent of the wires were positioned at between 35% and 48% of the attachment length. CONCLUSIONS: The 65 degrees Howell guide, which positions the tibial tunnel in extension to avoid roof impingement, ensures anatomic positioning of the graft on the tibial side and reproducibility can be expected. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study proves that a commonly used drill guide succeeds in placing the ACL graft in the tibial anatomic attachment.

Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most popular orthopaedic procedures. Correct tunnel positioning is a prerequisite to success. Current surgical techniques are unable to duplicate the complex anatomy and function of the native ACL. Surgery mainly aims at restoring anteroposterior laxity. The ACL is not isometric and only a few fibers are nearly isometric over the full range of motion. However, a nearly isometric behaviour of the ACL graft is desirable. Isometry is mainly influenced by femoral attachment; thus the femoral tunnel position has a greater effect than the tibial on graft length changes. The purpose of this article is to describe the anatomy of the femoral ACL insertion and to discuss the surgical techniques used to replicate it.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft directly fixed to cortical bone: 5-year results.

Forty-three patients who had undergone an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a doubled semitendinosus and gracilis graft were prospectively reviewed at 5-year follow-up. All had suffered subacute or chronic tears of the ligament. At surgery, the femoral tunnel was drilled first through the antero-medial portal. The correct position of the femoral and tibial guide wire was checked fluoroscopically. A cortical fixation to the bone was achieved in the femur with a Mitek anchor, directly passing the two tendons in the slot of the anchor, and in the tibia with an RCI screw, supplemented with a spiked washer and bicortical screw. Rehabilitation was aggressive, controlled and without braces. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, KT-1000 arthrometer, and Cybex dynamometer were employed for clinical evaluation. A radiographic study was also performed. At the 5-year follow-up all the patients had recovered full range of motion and 2% of them complained of pain during light sports activities. Four patients (9.5%) reported giving-way symptoms. The KT-1000 side-to-side difference was on average 2.1 mm at 30 lb, and 68% of the knees were within 2 mm. The final IKDC score showed 90% satisfactory results. There was no difference between the 2-year and 5-year evaluations in terms of stability. Extensor and flexor muscle strength recovery was almost complete (maximum deficit 5%). Radiographic study showed a tunnel widening in 32% of the femurs and 40% of the tibias. A correlation was found between the incidence of tibial tunnel widening and the distance of the RCI screw from the joint (the closer the screw to the joint, the lower the incidence of widening). In conclusion, we can state that, using a four-strand hamstring graft and a cortical fixation at both ends, we were able to achieve satisfactory 5-year results in 90% of the patients.