A case of linear porokeratosis treated with photodynamic therapy with confocal microscopy surveillance.

Linear porokeratosis (LP) is a rare clinical porokeratosis variant, which typically presents at birth, but can also develop in adulthood. Differential diagnosis includes linear lichen planus, lichen striatus, linear verrucous epidermal nevus, incontinentia pigmenti and linear Darier's disease. An LP lesion has an increased risk of transformation into a squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma. The treatment of LP is contradictory and disappointing in general. We present a case of a 16-year-old girl with multiple reddish-brown macules and depressions on the medial aspect of her right arm, localized from the palmar joint up to shoulder region in a linear pattern. We performed confocal microscopy (CLSM) of multiple lesions and a punch biopsy after receiving informed consent to confirm the diagnosis. After diagnosis confirmation, we performed Photodynamic therapy (PDT). Methyl aminolevulinate cream in a 160 mg/g concentration (Metvix crm) was applied under occlusion on the previously cleaned surface of every single lesion for 3 hours. The lesions were subsequently illuminated with a dose of 37 J/cm(2) (Aktilite, PhotoCure ASA, Norway). Two months after the first PDT treatment, the patient came for a third PDT session. Treatment follow-up was performed 6 months after the initial PDT session. A CLSM image proved an increase in the width of the stratum spinosum to 42-48 µm, mild post-inflammatory changes were also present. Cosmetic and clinical response up to date at the time of last follow-up (1 year) was satisfactory. No progression was observed.

Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The main goal of this study was to compare the hair removal efficacy of three methods: intense pulsed light (IPL), a combination of IPL and radio frequency (RF) and diode laser (810 nm). METHODS: Forty participants were treated within three standardized squares on lateral sites on their legs. Each of these squares was treated twice with an interval of 4-6 weeks. The fourth square was left as a control. A blinded physician counted the hairs in each square before the first treatment and 8 months after the second treatment. Immediate and delayed side effects as well as pain scores were recorded. RESULTS: The mean hair count reduction achieved by the diode laser, IPL and IPL+RF was 49.90%, 39.16% and 47.15%, respectively. This study did not show any serious side effects and the number of side effects was minimal. The mean pain scores for the first and second treatments by diode laser, IPL and IPL+RF were 4.65 and 4.58, 2.43 and 2.53, and 3.95 and 4.03, respectively. At the end of the study, a free hair removal treatment for both legs was chosen by patients in the proportion 20 diode laser, 10 IPL and eight IPL+RF. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of RF and optical energies proved its safety and efficacy for hair removal, which is comparable with diode lasers and approximately 20% more efficient than 'pure' IPL.