Factors that affect cost and clinical outcome of endovascular aortic repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of indication for use (IFU), additional graft components, and percutaneous closure of endovascular aortic repair (PEVAR) on clinical outcomes and cost of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS: Clinical and financial data were obtained for all elective EVARs completed at a university-affiliated medical center between January 2012 and June 2013. Data were analyzed by χ2, Student t-test for independent samples, and Kaplan-Meier survival. RESULTS: There were 67 elective EVARs. Additional cuffs/extensions were used in 37%, increasing the baseline graft cost by 36% (P < .001), total costs by 20% (P < .001), and negatively affecting the contribution margin. Aortic neck IFU (P = .02), failure of the index graft to seal the neck (P = .02), and need for an additional cuff (P = .008) were related to the need for reintervention for type Ia endoleak for graft B (Excluder; W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz), whereas limb IFU was related to the need for additional limb extension for graft A (Powerlink; Endologix, Irvine, Calif; P < .001). Limb extension (P = .06) and failure of the index graft to provide an adequate seal (P < .001) were associated with reintervention for type Ib endoleak. Reintervention-free rates at 24 months were 96% for graft A and 94% for graft B (P =.54), but different patterns in reintervention emerged: graft A required reoperation early (<2 months) then stabilized; graft B did not require reintervention until 24 months, but rates increased substantially by 25 months. PEVAR was attempted in 61 (91%): 49 (73%) bilaterally, 7 (10%) unilaterally, and 5 (8%) failed. The mean number of closure devices was four (range, 1-9): $1000 (3.5% of total cost). Bilateral PEVAR was associated with shorter operating time than unilateral PEVAR/failed PEVAR (P < .001) and lower operating room use costs (P = .005) and total hospital costs (P = .003) than failed PEVAR. The contribution margin was higher for bilateral PEVAR than unilateral PEVAR/failed PEVAR (P = .005). Patients with bilateral PEVAR and unilateral PEVAR were more often discharged on postoperative day 1 than those with failed PEVAR (P = .002). Hospital length of stay (P = .49), operating room duration (P = .31), and total costs (P = .72) were similar for unsuccessful PEVAR and EVAR completed with cutdown. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of reintervention occurred when EVAR was performed outside of IFU guidelines or when additional components were needed. Additions raised graft costs significantly above baseline. Notable differences in graft performance in complex anatomy and varied patterns of reoperation could be useful in the graft selection process to improve outcome and contain costs. Bilateral PEVAR was associated with lower costs and postoperative day 1 discharge. Attempting PEVAR may be reasonable unless there is serious concern for failure.

A retrospective review of basilic and cephalic vein-based fistulas.

This study compares outcomes of basilic and cephalic vein fistulas for hemodialysis. A retrospective review of arteriovenous fistulas in a university hospital system was performed using charts and hemodialysis records. Patency and demographic data were assessed with life table analysis. One hundred fifty-six patients (88 males; 68 females) underwent creation of 172 autogenous fistulas (mean age 61 years; mean follow-up 78 weeks). There were 101 basilic vein transpositions and 71 cephalic vein fistulas. Primary patency did not differ significantly, while assisted primary patency was significantly better for basilic vein fistulas at one year (73% versus 53%: P = 0.024). Secondary patency was significantly better for basilic fistulas through three years (58% versus 52%; P = 0.027). Primary failure (thrombosis before access or failed maturation) was significantly higher for cephalic than basilic fistulas (28% versus 13%; P = 0.01). Maturation time, usage time and complications were not significantly significant. Thirty-three (33%) basilic vein-based fistulas and 12 (17%) cephalic vein fistulas required revision during follow-up. Basilic vein-based fistulas perform as well as or better than cephalic vein-based fistulas in terms of patency, maturation time, and usage time and complication rates, though requiring more re-interventions.