Risk of hyperkalemia in women taking ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and other oral contraceptives.

BACKGROUND: The oral contraceptive ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg/drospirenone 3 mg (EE/DRSP) contains a progestin component that possesses potassium-sparing diuretic activity similar to spironolactone. We sought to determine whether EE/DRSP use might lead to adverse effects possibly attributable to hyperkalemia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a matched cohort study in which we identified oral contraceptive (OC) initiators between July 2001 and June 2004 within a large, US health plan. We matched EE/DRSP initiators to other OC initiators in a 1:2 ratio on the basis of a prediction model (propensity score) of EE/DRSP initiation that incorporated dozens of characteristics. We identified insurance claims mentioning hyperkalemia, related clinical outcomes (electrolyte disturbances, arrhythmia, syncope, myocardial infarction) and verified the underlying condition through medical record review. RESULTS: There were 22,429 EE/DRSP initiators matched to 44,858 other OC initiators, with an average follow-up of 7.6 months. A composite clinical surrogate hyperkalemia end point occurred with equal frequency in the compared groups [118 cases in EE/DRSP and 260 in comparators; rate ratio (RR) 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-1.1]. The individual hyperkalemia surrogate end points exhibited similar results. One EE/DRSP initiator and four comparators were diagnosed specifically with hyperkalemia (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.0-4.9). The results were not different when we accounted for changes in OC use during follow-up. CONCLUSION: EE/DRSP initiators are no more likely than other OC initiators to experience hyperkalemia or related clinical outcomes which could be caused by hyperkalemia during follow-up.

Risk of thromboembolism in women taking ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and other oral contraceptives.

OBJECTIVE: The oral contraceptive ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg/drospirenone 3 mg contains a progestin component that differs from other oral contraceptives. Case reports and prescription event monitoring suggested that ethinylestradiol/drospirenone might be associated with an elevated risk of thromboembolism. We sought to estimate the association between ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and risk of thromboembolism relative to the association among other oral contraceptives. METHODS: We identified ethinylestradiol/drospirenone initiators and a twofold larger group of other oral contraceptive initiators between June 2001 and June 2004 within a U.S. health insurer database. The comparison group was selected to have demographic and health care characteristics preceding oral contraceptive initiation that were similar to ethinylestradiol/drospirenone initiators. Thromboembolism during the follow-up of the cohorts was identified through claims for medical services, and only medical record-confirmed cases were included in analyses. The primary (as-matched) analysis used proportional hazards regression, whereas a secondary (as-treated) analysis accounted for changes in oral contraceptives during follow-up using Poisson regression. RESULTS: The 22,429 ethinylestradiol/drospirenone initiators and 44,858 other oral contraceptive initiators were followed for an average of 7.6 months, and there were 18 cases of thromboembolism in ethinylestradiol/drospirenone initiators and 39 in the comparators (rate ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.5-1.6). More than 9,000 women would need to be prescribed oral contraceptives to observe a difference of one case of thromboembolism. Results of the as-treated analysis were similar to those of the as-matched analysis. CONCLUSION: Ethinylestradiol/drospirenone initiators and initiators of other oral contraceptives are similarly likely to experience thromboembolism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The risk of coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetic patients exposed to thiazolidinediones compared to metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) differs among adult diabetic patients treated with thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and similar patients treated with combined oral metformin and sulfonylurea (M + S) therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 25 140 diabetic patients aged 18 and older who had at least one pharmacy claim for a TZD or combined M + S therapy between 1 January 1999 and 30 June 2002. We used propensity score matching to adjust for observable differences between initiators of combined M + S therapy and TZD initiators. The data were analyzed in two ways: first based on the original matched groups, 'as balanced', without accounting for switching to another medication during follow-up, and second based on actual antidiabetic drug use during follow-up, 'as treated'. Cox proportional hazards regression and multivariable Poisson regression were performed to compare the risk of CHD events. RESULTS: In the 'as balanced' analysis, the risk for CHD among TZD users relative to combination drug users was close to the null value (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.87-1.20). In the 'as treated' analysis, the risk of CHD was similar for periods of current use of TZDs compared to periods of non-use (incidence rate ratio: 1.10, 95%CI: 0.96-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: These results do not suggest a cardioprotective or deleterious effects of TZDs compared with combined M + S oral therapy on the short-term CHD event risk in persons with type 2 diabetes after accounting for the greater baseline CHD risk in TZD initiators.

The comparative safety of rosuvastatin: a retrospective matched cohort study in over 48,000 initiators of statin therapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare incidence rates of hospitalization associated with rhabdomyolysis, myopathy, renal, or hepatic dysfunction, and of in-hospital death, between initiators of rosuvastatin and other statins. METHODS: This was a matched cohort study of statin initiators from the administrative database of a large health insurer in the US, during the first 6 months of rosuvastatin availability with up to 18 months of follow-up. All outcome events were verified by medical record review. Incidence rates, risk ratios, and associated 95% confidence intervals were estimated. RESULTS: From an initial pool of 12,217, 11,249 eligible rosuvastatin initiators were matched to 37,282 initiators of other statins. The incidence rate (IR) per 1000 person-years for rhabdomyolysis was 0.10 [0.00, 0.55] for rosuvastatin initiators (n = 1) and 0.06 [0.01, 0.22] for other statin initiators (n = 2), for a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.98 [0.18, 21.90]. The IR for myopathy was 0.20 [0.02, 0.71] for rosuvastatin initiators (n = 2) and 0.00 [0.00, 0.09] for other statin initiators (n = 0). The IR for renal dysfunction was 1.18 [0.61, 2.06] for rosuvastatin initiators (n = 12) and 1.26 [0.91, 1.71] for other statin initiators (n = 42), for a HR of 0.90 [0.47, 1.73]. The IR for hepatic dysfunction was 0.20 (0.02, 0.71) for rosuvastatin initiators (n = 2) and 0.24 (0.10, 0.47) for other statin initiators (n = 8), for a HR of 0.87 (0.18, 4.14). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no difference between rosuvastatin and the other statins in the incidence of hospitalizations associated with renal or hepatic events, or death. The absolute incidence rates of rhabdomyolysis and myopathy were reassuringly low among all statin initiators but remain too small for firm conclusions to be drawn on any difference between the statins.

The incidence of abdominal and pelvic surgery among patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Rates of abdominopelvic surgery, with a particular focus on gallbladder procedures, were measured in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (n = 108,936) and compared with those in a general population sample (n = 223,082). The patient sample was selected from persons who were members of a managed care organization during the years 1995-2000. Medical records from a randomly selected subset of IBS patients were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis. Crude and standardized rates and adjusted rate ratios for surgery were calculated. The incidence of abdominopelvic surgery, excluding gallbladder procedures, was 87% higher in patients with IBS than that for the general population. The incidence of gallbladder surgery was threefold higher in IBS patients than the general population. Patients with IBS have an increased risk for abdominopelvic and gallbladder surgery and, thus, an associated risk for experiencing morbidity and mortality associated with these surgical procedures.