Prognostic value of Morise clinical score, calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and Morise clinical score in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 722 patients (480 men; 62.7±10.9 years) who were referred for further cardiac evaluation underwent CACS and contrast-enhanced CTCA to evaluate the presence and severity of CAD. Of these, 511 (71%) patients were without previous history of CAD. Patients were stratified according to the Morise clinical score (low, intermediate, high), to CACS (0-10, 11-100, 101-400, 401-1,000, >1,000) and to CTCA (absence of CAD, nonsignificant CAD, obstructive CAD). Patients were followed up for the occurrence of major events: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina and revascularisation. RESULTS: Significant CAD (>50% luminal narrowing) was detected in 260 (36%) patients; nonsignificant CAD (<50% luminal narrowing) in 250 (35%) and absence of CAD in 212 (29%). During a mean follow-up of 20±4 months, 116 events (21 hard) occurred. In patients with normal coronary arteries on CTCA, the major event rate was 0% vs. 1.7% in patients with nonsignificant CAD and 7.3% in patients with significant CAD (p<0.0001). Three hard events (14%) occurred in patients with CACS≤100 and two (9.5%) in patients with intermediate Morise score; one revascularisation was observed in a patient with low Morise score. At multivariate analysis, diabetes, obstructive CAD and CACS >1,000 were significant predictors of events (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An excellent prognosis was noted in patients with a normal CTCA (0% event rate). CACS ≤100 and low-intermediate Morise score did not exclude the possibility of events at follow-up.

Left ventricular ejection fraction: real-world comparison between cardiac computed tomography and echocardiography in a large population.

PURPOSE: This study compared cardiac computed tomography (CT) and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (ECC) for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using real-world data from a large patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 450 patients (284 males; mean age 64±12 years; range 12-88) who underwent CT and ECC due to suspected coronary artery disease. For CT, we used multiphase short-axis reconstructions and evaluated them with a dedicated software tool that uses Simpson's rule to compute LV volumes. For ECC, computation was based on the biplane Simpson's method. Results in terms of EF were compared with the paired Student's t test, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: EF was 52%±15% for CT and 55%±13% for ECC. Statistically significant differences, albeit with good correlation, were observed between the measurements (r=0.71; p<0.05). ECC showed a slight tendency to overestimate EF. When the population was divided into subgroups according to EF, this was underestimated by ECC in the subgroup with EF >50% and overestimated in those with EF 35%-50% and <35%, with consistently significant differences between ECC and CT (p<0.05) and progressively lower levels of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world assessment of EF, ECC provides significantly different data from CT, with a bias that increases proportionally to LV systolic dysfunction.

Impact of tube current in the quantitative assessment of acute reperfused myocardial infarction with 64-slice delayed-enhancement CT: a porcine model.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the impact of tube current (mAs) in delayed-enhancement computed tomography (CT) imaging for assessing acute reperfused myocardial infarction in a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five domestic pigs (mean weight 24 kg), the circumflex coronary artery was balloon-occluded for 2 h and then reperfused. After 5 days, CT imaging was performed following administration of iodinated contrast material. A 64-slice CT system was used to perform first-pass coronary angiography with a tube current of 15 mAs/kg [Arterial Phase (ART)] followed by two delayed-enhancement (DE) scans 15 min after contrast material administration, with a tube current of 15 mAs/kg and 37.5 mAs/kg, respectively (DE(1) and DE(2)). The mean heart rate decreased to 51±9 beats/min after administration of zatebradine (10 mg/kg IV). The data set was reconstructed during the end-diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle. Areas with DE, no reflow and remote myocardium [remote left ventricular (LV)] were calculated. CT values expressed in Hounsfield units (HU) were measured using five regions of interest (ROI): DE, no reflow, remote LV, LV cavity (LV lumen) and in air, respectively. Differences, correlations, image quality [signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)] and contrast resolution [contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] were calculated. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between attenuation of areas of DE, no reflow and remote LV (p<0.001) within the different scans. There was a fair correlation between DE and no-reflow attenuation (r=0.6; p<0.001). In DE(1) vs. DE(2), areas of DE and no reflow were not significantly different (p>0.05). The SNR and CNR were not significantly different in DE(1) vs. DE(2) (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tube current does not significantly affect infarction area, image quality or contrast resolution of DE imaging with CT.

Functional parameters of the left ventricle: comparison of cardiac MRI and cardiac CT in a large population.

PURPOSE: The authors sought to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for assessing left ventricular (LV) function parameters in a large patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 181 patients who underwent cardiac MRI and cardiac CT for various indications. For MRI, we used two-dimensional cine balanced steady-state free precession (b-SSFP) sequences, and for CT we used multiphase short-axis reconstructions. Volume data sets were evaluated with dedicated software. Results were compared with a paired, two-tailed Student's t test, Pearson's correlation (r), and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: A high level of concordance was observed between cardiac MRI and CT. Ejection fraction (EF) was 53+/-14% for MRI vs. 53%+/-15% for CT. There was good correlation for EF (r=0.71; p>0.05) and end-systolic volume (r=0.74; p>0.05). End-diastolic volume (74+/-23 ml at MRI vs. 71+/-19 ml at CT; r=0.58; p<0.05) and myocardial mass (63+/-20 g at MRI and 56+/-18 g at CT; r=0.89; p<0.01) showed statistically significant differences, although the discrepancy had no clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: MRI and CT show a good level of agreement in assessing LV function parameters, and both can be used interchangeably in clinical practice.

Impact of contrast material volume on quantitative assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction using delayed-enhancement 64-slice CT: experience in a porcine model.

PURPOSE: Our purpose in this study was to compare the impact of contrast material volume in delayed-enhancement computer tomography (CT) imaging for assessing acute reperfused myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five domestic pigs (20-30 kg), the circumflex coronary artery (CX) was balloon-occluded for 2 h followed by reperfusion. After 5 days, CT imaging was performed after intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml; Bracco, Italy). A 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) (Sensation 64, Siemens) scanner was used for imaging, with standard angiography characteristics. Three scans were performed: first, coronary angiography at first pass with 1.25 gI/kg of contrast material (ART); and remaining delayed-enhancement (DE(1)-DE(2)) 15 min after administration of 1.25 (DE(1)) and 15 min after additional administration of 2.50 gI/kg (=total 3.75 gI/kg - DE(2)). Mean heart rate decreased to 51+/-9 bpm after intravenous administration of Zatebradine (10 mg/kg). Data sets were reconstructed during the end-diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle. Areas of infarction-enhanced (DE), no-reflow (no-reflow) and remote myocardial [remote left ventricle (LV)] were manually contoured. CT attenuation values (Hounsfield units) were measured using five regions of interest: DE, no-reflow, remote LV, left ventricular cavity (lumen LV) and in air. Differences, correlations, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. RESULTS: We found significant differences between the attenuation of DE, no-reflow and remote LV (p<0.001). DE and no-reflow size were assessed accurately with DEMDCT. In particular, SNR and CNR showed higher values in DE(2) (approximately 6.0 and 3.5, respectively; r(2)=0.90) vs. DE(1) (approximately 4.0 and 2.2, respectively; r(2)=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The increase of contrast material volume determines a significant improvement in myocardial infarction image quality with DE-MDCT.

Stress-ECG vs. CT coronary angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a "real-world" experience.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of stress electrocardiogram (ECG) and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis (> or =50%) in the real world using conventional CA as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 236 consecutive patients (159 men, 77 women; mean age 62.8+/-10.2 years) at moderate risk and with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled in the study and underwent stress ECG, CTCA and CA. The CTCA scan was performed after i.v. administration of a 100-ml bolus of iodinated contrast material. The stress ECG and CTCA reports were used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared with CA in the detection of significant stenosis > or =50%. RESULTS: We excluded 16 patients from the analysis because of the nondiagnostic quality of stress ECG and/or CTCA. The prevalence of disease demonstrated at CA was 62% (n=220), 51% in the population with comparable stress ECG and CTCA (n=147) and 84% in the population with equivocal stress ECG (n=73). Stress ECG was classified as equivocal in 73 cases (33.2%), positive in 69 (31.4%) and negative in 78 (35.5%). In the per-patient analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of stress ECG was sensitivity 47%, specificity 53%, positive predictive value (PPV) 51% and negative predictive value (NPV) 49%. On stress ECG, 40 (27.2%) patients were misclassified as negative, and 34 (23.1%) patients with nonsignificant stenosis were overestimated as positive. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA was sensitivity 96%, specificity 65%, PPV 74% and NPV 94%. CTCA incorrectly classified three (2%) as negative and 25 (17%) as positive. The difference in diagnostic accuracy between stress ECG and CTCA was significant (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CTCA in the real world has significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared with stress ECG and could be used as a first-line study in patients at moderate risk.