Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 75
Filtrar
1.
Acad Med ; 99(6): 592-598, 2024 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442199

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: The importance of the clinician educator (CE) role in delivery of competency-based medical education is well recognized. There is, however, no formal mechanism to identify when faculty have the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be successful CEs. In 2020, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine convened a workgroup of 18 individuals representing multiple medical specialties and diverse institutions in the United States, including nonphysician educators, a medical student, and a resident, to develop a set of competencies, subcompetencies, and milestones for CEs.A 5-step process was used to create the Clinician Educator Milestones (CEMs). In step 1, the workgroup developed an initial CEM draft. Through brainstorming, 141 potential education-related CE tasks were identified. Descriptive statements for each competency and developmental trajectories for each subcompetency were developed and confirmed by consensus. The workgroup then created a supplemental guide, assessment tools, and additional resources. In step 2, a diverse group of CEs were surveyed in 2021 and provided feedback on the CEMs. In step 3, this feedback was used by the workgroup to refine the CEMs. In step 4, the second draft of the CEMs was submitted for public comment, and the CEMs were finalized. In step 5, final CEMs were released for public use in 2022.The CEMs consist of 1 foundational domain that focuses on commitment to lifelong learning, 4 additional domains of competence for CEs in the learning environment, and 20 subcompetencies. These milestones have many potential uses for CEs, including self-assessment, constructing learning and improvement plans, and designing systematic faculty development efforts. The CEMs will continue to evolve as they are applied in practice and as the role of CEs continues to grow and develop.


Asunto(s)
Educación Basada en Competencias , Docentes Médicos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Educación Basada en Competencias/métodos , Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Acreditación/normas , Competencia Profesional/normas
3.
Cureus ; 12(12): e12044, 2020 Dec 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33447474

RESUMEN

When the World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a global health emergency, Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (COMs) debated the role of medical students during this developing pandemic. Initially, the discussion included whether medical students were essential personnel contributing to meaningful patient care. Many questions arose regarding how COVID-19 would affect medical education and if the changes would be temporary or continue for a significant period of time. Due to the lack of availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) and a decreased focus on clinical education within many healthcare settings, in March the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) declared that medical students were not essential personnel and recommended that COMs take a 'pause' and remove students from the clinical environment. This 'pause' would allow COMs time to assess where medical education could continue, to define the critical pieces of clinical education that required a clinical environment and to address how medical students could contribute during the pandemic. The AACOM Clinical Educators group began to meet on a weekly basis during this time so that Clinical Deans from Osteopathic medical schools across the country could collaborate, share ideas, discuss current challenges, and co-create a system to deliver medical education realizing the limitations of in-person clinical training.

6.
Md Med ; 16(4): 11-2, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27156253
9.
PLoS One ; 11(4): e0152225, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27123934

RESUMEN

The release of biological agents, including those which could be used in biowarfare or bioterrorism in large urban areas, has been a concern for governments for nearly three decades. Previous incidents from Sverdlosk and the postal anthrax attack of 2001 have raised questions on the mechanism of spread of Bacillus anthracis spores as an aerosol or contaminant. Prior studies have demonstrated that Bacillus atrophaeus is easily transferred through simulated mail handing, but no reports have demonstrated this ability with Bacillus anthracis spores, which have morphological differences that may affect adhesion properties between spore and formite. In this study, equipment developed to simulate interactions across three generations of envelopes subjected to tumbling and mixing was used to evaluate the potential for cross-contamination of B. anthracis spores in simulated mail handling. In these experiments, we found that the potential for cross-contamination through letter tumbling from one generation to the next varied between generations while the presence of a fluidizer had no statistical impact on the transfer of material. Likewise, the presence or absence of a fluidizer had no statistically significant impact on cross-contamination levels or reaerosolization from letter opening.


Asunto(s)
Carbunco/microbiología , Bacillus anthracis/aislamiento & purificación , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Bioterrorismo/prevención & control , Contaminación de Equipos , Humanos , Servicios Postales , Esporas Bacterianas/aislamiento & purificación , Lugar de Trabajo
10.
Md Med ; 16(2): 5, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26470493
11.
Md Med ; 16(2): 30, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26470503
13.
J Am Osteopath Assoc ; 115(4): 232-5, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25830580

RESUMEN

The Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination-USA (COMLEX-USA) assesses the competence of osteopathic physicians in training. It is designed to protect the public by setting minimum competence standards. All osteopathic medical students must pass COMLEX-USA Level 1, Level 2-Cognitive Evaluation, and Level 2-Performance Evaluation before being allowed to graduate from an osteopathic medical school. Residency training programs use COMLEX-USA scores as a major factor in deciding whom they will interview and admit into their programs. In addition, colleges of osteopathic medicine use student COMLEX-USA scores as an external assessment of their success in educating students. Because COMLEX-USA is a high-stakes examination series, it is important to understand predictive factors for performance. The authors review the literature on the relationship between COMLEX-USA scores and correlated student variables. Results from the Council on Osteopathic Student Government Presidents' survey on students' preparation methods and performance are also provided.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Cognición/fisiología , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Licencia Médica , Medicina Osteopática/educación , Médicos Osteopáticos/psicología , Humanos , Médicos Osteopáticos/educación , Facultades de Medicina/normas , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA