Timing of Intraoperative Transitions of Care Among Anesthesiologists Is Not Associated With Postoperative Adverse Outcomes: Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The majority of published research suggests that anesthesia handovers during major surgical procedures are associated with unintended harmful consequences. It is still unclear if the number or quality of the transition of care is the main driver of the adverse outcomes. There is even less data if the timing of the anesthesiologist handovers during the critical portion of the anesthetic continuum (induction or emergence versus surgical period) plays a role in patient outcomes. Therefore, we investigated if the anesthesiologist handovers during induction and emergence are associated with adverse patient outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective investigation included noncardiac surgical procedures occurring between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2019 that had exactly 1 attending anesthesiologist handover. We categorized transitions of care between attending anesthesiologists as being before incision, between incision and closing, and after closing. Our primary outcome was a composite of 6 categories of surgical complications and in-hospital mortality. We created logistic generalized estimating equation models to estimate the average relative effect odds ratio between each pair of the 3 transition timing groups across the components of the composite outcome. Inverse probability of treatment weights were used to mitigate confounding on a host of baseline variables. We used Bonferroni correction to adjust for multiple comparisons between the transition groups. RESULTS: In total, we studied 36,937 procedures with exactly 1 attending anesthesiologist handover. Of these records, 4370 had the transition during induction, 24,999 between incision and closure, and 7568 during emergence. No differences were found between the transition periods and the composite outcome. The estimated average relative effect odds ratio (98.3% confidence interval [CI]) across the components of the composite outcome was as follows: (1.0002 [0.81-1.24], P = .99) between the induction and surgical period; (1.10 [0.87-1.40], P = .32) between the induction and emergence periods; and (0.91 [0.79-1.04], P = .08) between the emergence and surgical periods. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of intraoperative handover among attending anesthesiologists during noncardiac surgery is not associated with adverse patient outcomes.

Intraoperative hypotension during liver transplantation and postoperative outcomes: Retrospective cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the association between intraoperative hypotension (IOH) and important postoperative outcomes after liver transplant such as incidence and severity of acute kidney injury (AKI), MACE and early allograft dysfunction (EAD). DESIGN: Retrospective, single institution study. SETTINGS: Operating room. PATIENTS: 1576 patients who underwent liver transplant in our institution between January 2005 and February 2022. MEASUREMENTS: IOH was measured as the time, area under the threshold (AUT), or time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP) less than certain thresholds (55,60 and 65 mmHg). Associations between IOH exposures and AKI severity were assessed via proportional odds models. The odds ratio from the proportional odds model estimated the relative odds of having higher stage of AKI for higher exposure to IOH. Associations between exposures and MACE and EAD were assessed through logistic regression models. Potential confounding variables including patient baseline and surgical characteristics were adjusted for all models. MAIN RESULTS: The primary analysis included 1576 surgeries that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those, 1160 patients (74%) experienced AKI after liver transplant surgery, with 780 (49%), 248(16%), and 132 (8.4%) experiencing mild, moderate, and severe injury, respectively. No significant association between hypotension exposure and postoperative AKI (yes or no) nor severity of AKI was observed. The odds ratios (95% CI) of having more severe AKI were 1.02 (0.997, 1.04) for a 50-mmHg·min increase in AUT of MAP <55 mmHg (P = 0.092); 1.03 (0.98, 1.07) for a 15-min increase in time spent under MAP <55 mmHg (P = 0.27); and 1.24 (0.98, 1.57) for a 1 mmHg increase in TWA of MAP <55 mmHg (P = 0.068). The associations between IOH and the incidence of MACE or EAD were not significant. CONCLUSION: Our results did not show the association between IOH and investigated outcomes.

Anesthetic management in patients having catheter-based thrombectomy for acute pulmonary embolism: A narrative review.

Pulmonary embolism is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death. Novel percutaneous catheter-based thrombectomy techniques are rapidly becoming popular in high-risk pulmonary embolism - especially in the presence of contraindications to thrombolysis. The interventional nature of these procedures and the risk of sudden cardiorespiratory compromise requires the presence of an anesthesiologist. Facilitating catheter-based thrombectomy can be challenging since qualifying patients are often critically ill. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide guidance to anesthesiologists for the assessment and management of patients having catheter-based thrombectomy for acute pulmonary embolism. First, available techniques for catheter-based thrombectomy are reviewed. Then, we discuss definitions and application of common risk stratification tools for pulmonary embolism, and how to assess patients prior to the procedure. An adjudication of risks and benefits of anesthetic strategies for catheter-based thrombectomy follows. Specifically, we give guidance and rationale for use monitored anesthesia care and general anesthesia for these procedures. For both, we review strategies for assessing and mitigating hemodynamic perturbations and right ventricular dysfunction, ranging from basic monitoring to advanced inodilator therapy. Finally, considerations for management of right ventricular failure with mechanical circulatory support are discussed.

Artificial Intelligence for Perioperative Medicine: Perioperative Intelligence.

The anesthesiologist's role has expanded beyond the operating room, and anesthesiologist-led care teams can deliver coordinated care that spans the entire surgical experience, from preoperative optimization to long-term recovery of surgical patients. This expanded role can help reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality, which are regrettably common, unlike rare intraoperative mortality. Postoperative mortality, if considered a disease category, will be the third leading cause of death just after heart disease and cancer. Rapid advances in technologies like artificial intelligence provide an opportunity to build safe perioperative practices. Artificial intelligence helps by analyzing complex data across disparate systems and producing actionable information. Using artificial intelligence technologies, we can critically examine every aspect of perioperative medicine and devise innovative value-based solutions that can potentially improve patient safety and care delivery, while optimizing cost of care. In this narrative review, we discuss specific applications of artificial intelligence that may help advance all aspects of perioperative medicine, including clinical care, education, quality improvement, and research. We also discuss potential limitations of technology and provide our recommendations for successful adoption.

New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to identify predictors of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) during the initial 90 days following liver transplantation, and to assess the association between POAF in-hospital and 1-year mortality. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: At a university hospital between 2005 and 2017. PATIENTS: Adults without a history of preoperative atrial fibrillation who underwent orthotopicliver transplantation. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors assessed the univariate association between new-onset of POAF in the postoperative period and each potential factor through a logistic regression model. Moreover, they explored predictors for POAF through stepwise selection. Finally, the authors assessed the relationship between POAF and in-hospital and 1-year mortality using logistic regression models, and whether the duration of atrial fibrillation was associated with in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Among 857 patients, 89 (10.4%) developed POAF. Using only preoperative variables, pulmonary hypertension, age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and White race were identified as the most important predictors. Model discrimination was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80), and incorporating intraoperative variables was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.82). In-hospital mortality was observed in 7.2% (6/83) of patients with new-onset of POAF, and in 2.8% (22/768) without, with confounder-adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.00 (97.5% CI: 0.29,3.45; p = 0.996). One-year mortality was 22.4% (20/89) in patients who developed POAF and 8.3% (64/768) in patients who did not, confounder-adjusted OR 2.64 (97.5% CI: 1.35-5.16; p = 0.001). The duration of POAF did not affect long-term postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION: Preoperative, mostly unmodifiable comorbidities are important risk factors for new-onset POAF after liver transplantation. The POAF was not associated with in-hospital mortality, but with increased 1-year mortality. Once developed, the duration of POAF did not affect long-term mortality after a liver transplant.

Effect of intraoperative subhypnotic infusion of propofol on postoperative nausea and vomiting: A retrospective analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To measure the possible association between subhypnotic propofol infusion during general balanced anesthesia and the incidence of PONV. DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching. SETTING: Postanesthesia care unit and inpatient unit. PATIENTS: Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-IV, undergoing non-cardiac surgery lasting >2 h were included. Patients were excluded if transferred to the intensive care unit after surgery or received ketamine. Initially 70,976 patients were screened, and a cohort of 51,707 eligible adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general balanced anesthesia between 2015 and 2019 were included. Using a propensity score matching, 3185 patients who received subhypnotic propofol during general balanced anesthesia were matched with 5826 patients who did not receive subhypnotic propofol in a 1:2 ratio. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV during PACU stay. The secondary outcome was the incidence of PONV within the first 24 h after surgery. Exploratory outcomes were time-to-extubation and length of hospital stay. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 9011 patients were included (3185 patients who received propofol infusion, and 5826 patients who did not receive propofol infusion) after propensity score matching. The adjusted odds ratio for PONV incidence was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.18; p = 0.635) in PACU, and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.23; P = 0.50) within 24 h after surgery. The length of hospital stay was 6 h shorter (ratio of means (95% CI) of 0.92, 0.89, 0.94), p < 0.001) and time-to-extubation was 2 min longer (ratio of means 1.24 (1.20, 1.28), p < 0.001) in patients receiving subhypnotic propofol infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that subhypnotic propofol infusion during general balanced anesthesia is not associated with a reduction in the incidence of PONV during PACU stay and within the first 24 h after surgery. However, it is associated with decreased LOS and increased time-to-extubation, but differences in neither outcome were clinically important.

Hypotension Prediction Index for Prevention of Hypotension during Moderate- to High-risk Noncardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Hypotension Prediction Index is a commercially available algorithm, based on arterial waveform features, that predicts hypotension defined as mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg for at least 1 min. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that index guidance reduces the duration and severity of hypotension during noncardiac surgery. METHODS: We enrolled adults having moderate- or high-risk noncardiac surgery with invasive arterial pressure monitoring. Participating patients were randomized to hemodynamic management with or without index guidance. Clinicians caring for patients assigned to guidance were alerted when the index exceeded 85 (range, 0 to 100) and a treatment algorithm based on advanced hemodynamic parameters suggested vasopressor administration, fluid administration, inotrope administration, or observation. Primary outcome was the amount of hypotension, defined as time-weighted average mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg. Secondary outcomes were time-weighted mean pressures less than 60 and 55 mmHg. RESULTS: Among 214 enrolled patients, guidance was provided for 105 (49%) patients randomly assigned to the index guidance group. The median (first quartile, third quartile) time-weighted average mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg was 0.14 (0.03, 0.37) in guided patients versus 0.14 (0.03, 0.39) mmHg in unguided patients: median difference (95% CI) of 0 (-0.03 to 0.04), P = 0.757. Index guidance therefore did not reduce amount of hypotension less than 65 mmHg, nor did it reduce hypotension less than 60 or 55 mmHg. Post hoc, guidance was associated with less hypotension when analysis was restricted to episodes during which clinicians intervened. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot trial, index guidance did not reduce the amount of intraoperative hypotension. Half of the alerts were not followed by treatment, presumably due to short warning time, complex treatment algorithm, or clinicians ignoring the alert. In the future we plan to use a lower index alert threshold and a simpler treatment algorithm that emphasizes prompt treatment.

Quality improvement during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, quality improvement teams at Cleveland Clinic initiated a number of measures to guide the care of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection and protect care givers. This included increasing the frequency of team meetings from monthly to daily or weekly and creating task forces to create protocols for patient transport, airway management, and management of personal protective equipment and medications in short supply. Enterprise wide, we postponed non-essential surgeries, set up an overflow intensive care unit onsite, created a web-based COVID-19 toolkit for all care givers, and sent daily emails about the most recent developments, decisions, and recommendations from national and international societies.

Perioperative anesthesia care for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19.

The operating room environment is very dynamic with many unique challenges for anesthesia teams caring for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Specific recommendations by national organizations and institution specific step-by-step guidelines and education materials are required to maintain safety for both patients and caregivers perioperatively, with transport, and medication management.

Can pretransplant TIPS be harmful in liver transplantation? A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt has been established as an effective treatment for complicated portal hypertension. This retrospective study investigated the effect of pretransplant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement on intraoperative graft hemodynamics and surgical outcomes after liver transplantation. METHODS: Of 1,081 patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 2007 and June 2017 at Cleveland Clinic (OH, USA), 130 patients had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement before liver transplant. We performed a 1:2 propensity score matching to compare intraoperative graft hemodynamics and surgical outcomes between the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group (n = 130) and the no-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group (n = 260). RESULTS: The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt did not increase operative time, the volume of blood transfusion, duration of hospital stay, or complication rates. Graft and patient survivals were similar between the groups. Mean intraoperative cardiac output and graft portal flow in the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group were greater than in the no-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group (P = .03 and P = .003, respectively). In multivariate analysis, male sex, younger age, low platelet count, absence of portal vein thrombosis, and pretransplant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement were independently associated with increased portal flow volume (P < or = 0.03 each). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition was observed in 17 patients (13.1%). The 1-year patient survival was 70.6% with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition and 92.0% without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that pretransplant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement increases graft portal flow but does not compromise surgical outcomes after liver transplantation. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition, however, is not uncommon and may increase the complexity of transplantation.

Resources Utilization After Liver Transplantation in Patients With and Without Hepatopulmonary Syndrome: Cleveland Clinic Experience.

Patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) reportedly experience posttransplant morbidity and require more resources to care during perioperative period. The exact incremental increase of resources utilization compared with non-HPS population remains unknown. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective investigation, we compared the perioperative resources utilization of HPS patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant (n = 28) to cohort without HPS (n = 739). Potential confounding variables were adjusted in the analysis and the multivariable log-linear regression were used. RESULTS: The overall hospital costs for HPS patients were about 27% higher compared with non-HPS patients (the ratio of geometric means, 1.27; 98.3% confidence interval, 1.09-1.47; P < 0). HPS diagnosis was independently associated with both longer intensive care unit stay (P < 0.001) and hospital stay (P < 0.001). The odds of being discharged to extended care facility were about 15 times higher for HPS patients comparing to non-HPS patients (odds ratio, 14.9; 97.5% confidence interval, 4.98-44.29; P < 0.001). There were no differences observed in odds of being readmitted to the hospital within 6 mo after the transplant (P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: HPS diagnosis was associated with longer intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and increased hospital cost, together with higher odds of being discharged to extended care facility compared with non-HPS patients.

Vasopressor Infusion During Prone Spine Surgery and Acute Renal Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hypotension is associated with acute kidney injury, but vasopressors used to treat hypotension may also compromise renal function. We therefore tested the hypothesis that vasopressor infusion during complex spine surgery is not associated with impaired renal function. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort analysis, we considered adults who had complex spine surgery between January 2005 and September 2014 at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus. Our primary outcome was postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate. Secondarily, we evaluated renal function using Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. We obtained data for 1814 surgeries, including 689 patients (38%) who were given intraoperative vasopressors infusion for ≥30 minutes and 1125 patients (62%) who were not. Five hundred forty patients with and 540 patients without vasopressor infusions were well matched across 32 potential confounding variables. RESULTS: In matched patients, vasopressor infusions lasted an average of 173 ± 100 minutes (SD) and were given a median dose (1st quintile, 3rd quintile) of 3.4-mg (1.5, 6.7 mg) phenylephrine equivalents. Mean arterial pressure and the amounts of hypotension were similar in each matched group. The postoperative difference in mean estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with and without vasopressor infusions was only 0.8 mL/min/1.73 m (95% CI, -0.6 to 2.2 mL/min/1.73 m) (P = .28). Intraoperative vasopressor infusion was also not associated with increased odds of augmented acute kidney injury stage. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not avoid typical perioperative doses of vasopressors for fear of promoting kidney injury. Tolerating hypotension to avoid vasopressor use would probably be a poor strategy.

A Randomized Trial of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring During Noncardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative mortality. Early detection of hypotension by continuous hemodynamic monitoring might prompt timely therapy, thereby reducing intraoperative hypotension. We tested the hypothesis that continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring reduces intraoperative hypotension. METHODS: Patients ≥45 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status III or IV having moderate-to-high-risk noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia were included. All participating patients had continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring using a finger cuff (ClearSight, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) and a standard oscillometric cuff. In half the patients, randomly assigned, clinicians were blinded to the continuous values, whereas the others (unblinded) had access to continuous blood pressure readings. Continuous pressures in both groups were used for analysis. Time-weighted average for mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg was compared using 2-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Hodges Lehmann estimation of location shift with corresponding asymptotic 95% CI. RESULTS: Among 320 randomized patients, 316 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. With 158 patients in each group, those assigned to continuous blood pressure monitoring had significantly lower time-weighted average mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg, 0.05 [0.00, 0.22] mm Hg, versus intermittent blood pressure monitoring, 0.11 [0.00, 0.54] mm Hg (P = .039, significance criteria P < .048). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring nearly halved the amount of intraoperative hypotension. Hypotension reduction with continuous monitoring, while statistically significant, is currently of uncertain clinical importance.

Ringer's lactate solution enhances the inflammatory response during fluid resuscitation of experimentally induced haemorrhagic shock in rats.

INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhagic shock leads to systemic oxygen deficit (hypoxaemia) that results in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), a recognised cause of late mortality in this case. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of fluid resuscitation, using two Ringer solutions, on the microcirculation changes that take place during experimentally induced haemorrhagic shock. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A model of the rat cremaster muscle was used to assess microcirculation in vivo. The experimental groups (n = 10 each) included: control (CTRL); shock (HSG); Ringer's acetate (RAG); and Ringer's lactate (RLG). Microhaemodynamic parameters were measured during the experiment. RESULTS: A statistically significantly higher level of leukocytes, both those attached to the endothelium and those located in the extravascular space (p < 0.05), was reported in the lactate Ringer (LR) group compared with the AR group. There were significant differences in the activity of A3 arterioles compared with A1 and A2 arterioles. Ringer's lactate solution seemed to the inflammation response during fluid resuscitation from haemorrhagic shock. A3 arterioles are likely to play a role as a pre-capillary sphincter in the skeletal muscle. CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed that fluid resuscitation with Ringer's lactate solution exacerbates inflammation in the skeletal muscle. It is worth noting that Ringer's acetate solution reduces local inflammation and could therefore be recommended as the "first line" crystalloid of the fluid resuscitation during haemorrhagic shock.

Systolic heart failure after liver transplantation: Incidence, predictors, and outcome.

Although most patients presenting for liver transplantation have normal left ventricular function, some develop left ventricular failure after transplantation. The primary objective of our study was to determine the predictors of systolic heart failure (HF) occurring immediately after liver transplantation. Its etiology, prospects of recovery, and factors associated with nonrecovery were also studied. Liver transplantations performed at our institution from January 2006 to February 2015 were evaluated using prospectively collected institutional registries. Patients with echocardiographically documented decline in ejection fraction to <45% within 6 months after liver transplantation were identified. Four controls were chosen per case: matched for age, gender, transplant year, and model for end-stage liver disease score. Conditional multivariable logistic regression was used for primary analysis and nonparametric tests for comparison between groups. In a cohort of 1284 adult patients, 45 cases and 180 controls were identified. Diastolic dysfunction (DD) was an independent predictor (OR 5.26, 95% CI 1.03-28.57, P = .04) of systolic HF in multivariable analysis. Stress-induced cardiomyopathy was the most common etiology. Left ventricular function recovered in 21 patients. Pretransplant DD decreased the chances of recovery (P = .05). In conclusion, patients with pretransplant DD need close post-transplant follow-up for timely identification of HF.

Effect of various durations of smoking cessation on postoperative outcomes: A retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative smoking cessation is commonly advised in an effort to improve postoperative outcomes. However, it remains unclear for how long smoking cessation is necessary, and even whether a brief preoperative period of abstinence is helpful and well tolerated. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated associations between various periods of preoperative smoking cessation and major morbidity and death. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Adults who had noncardiac surgery at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus between May 2007 and December 2013. PATIENTS: A total of 37 511 patients whose smoking history was identified from a preoperative Health Quest questionnaire. Of these patients, 26 269 (70%) were former smokers and 11 242 (30%) were current smokers. Of the current smokers, 9482 (84%) were propensity matched with 9482 former smokers (36%). We excluded patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status exceeding four, patients who did not have general anaesthesia, and patients with missing outcomes and/or covariables. When multiple procedures were performed within the study period, only the first operation for each patient was included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between smoking cessation and in-hospital morbidity/mortality. RESULTS: The incidence of the primary composite of in-hospital morbidity/mortality was 6.9% (656/9482) for all former smokers; the incidence was 7.8% (152/1951) for patients who stopped smoking less than 1 year before surgery, 6.3% (118/1977) for 1 to 5 years, 7.2% (115/1596) for 5 to 10 years and 6.9% (271/3457) for more than 10 years. CONCLUSION: Smoking cessation was associated with reduced in-hospital morbidity and mortality which was independent of cessation interval.

The SLUScore: A Novel Method for Detecting Hazardous Hypotension in Adult Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgical Procedures.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that longer-term postsurgical outcome may be adversely affected by less than severe hypotension under anesthesia. However, evidence-based guidelines are unavailable. The present study was designed to develop a method for identifying patients at increased risk of death within 30 days in association with the severity and duration of intraoperative hypotension. METHODS: Intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure recordings of 152,445 adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery were analyzed for periods of time accumulated below each one of the 31 thresholds between 75 and 45 mm Hg (hypotensive exposure times). In a development cohort of 35,904 patients, the associations were sought between each of these 31 cumulative hypotensive exposure times and 30-day postsurgical mortality. On the basis of covariable-adjusted percentage increases in the odds of mortality per minute elapsed of hypotensive exposure time, certain sets of exposure time limits were calculated that portended certain percentage increases in the odds of mortality. A novel risk-scoring method was conceived by counting the number of exposure time limits that had been exceeded within each respective set, one of them being called the SLUScore. The validity of this new method in identifying patients at increased risk was tested in a multicenter validation cohort consisting of 116,541 patients from Cleveland Clinic, Vanderbilt and Saint Louis Universities. Data were expressed as 95% confidence interval, P < .05 considered significant. RESULTS: Progressively greater hypotensive exposures were associated with greater 30-day mortality. In the development cohort, covariable-adjusted (age, Charlson score, case duration, history of hypertension) exposure limits were identified for time accumulated below each of the thresholds that portended certain identical (5%-50%) percentage expected increases in the odds of mortality. These exposure time limit sets were shorter in patients with a history of hypertension. A novel risk score, the SLUScore (range 0-31), was conceived as the number of exposure limits exceeded for one of these sets (20% set). A SLUScore > 0 (average 13.8) was found in 40% of patients who had twice the mortality, adjusted odds increasing by 5% per limit exceeded. When tested in the validation cohort, a SLUScore > 0 (average 14.1) identified 35% of patients who had twice the mortality, each incremental limit exceeded portending a 5% compounding increase in adjusted odds of mortality, independent of age and Charlson score (C = 0.73, 0.72-0.74, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The SLUScore represents a novel method for identifying nearly 1 in every 3 patients experiencing greater 30-day mortality portended by more severe intraoperative hypotensive exposures.

Impact and persistence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy after liver transplantation.

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy causes variable degree of systolic and diastolic dysfunction (DD) and conduction abnormalities. The primary aim of our study was to determine whether pre-transplant DD and prolonged corrected QT (QTc) predict a composite of mortality, graft failure, and major cardiovascular events after liver transplantation. We also evaluated the reversibility of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy after transplantation. Adult patients who underwent liver transplantation at our institution from January 2007 to March 2009 were included. Data were obtained from institutional registry, medical record review, and evaluation of echocardiographic images. Among 243 patients, 113 (46.5%) had grade 1 DD, 16 (6.6%) had grade 2 DD, and none had grade 3 DD. The mean pre-transplant QTc was 453 milliseconds. After a mean post-transplant follow-up of 5.2 years, 75 (31%) patients satisfied the primary composite outcome. Cox regression analysis did not show any significant association between DD and the composite outcome (P=.17). However, longer QTc was independently associated with the composite outcome (HR: 1.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.02, P=.05). DD (P<.001) and left ventricular mass index (P=.001) worsened after transplantation. In conclusion, QTc prolongation appears to be associated with worse outcomes. Although DD did not impact outcomes, it significantly worsened after transplantation.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate better predicts 30-day mortality after non-cardiac surgery than serum creatinine: a retrospective analysis of 92,888 patients.

BACKGROUND: Serum creatinine is the most commonly used indicator of renal function, but its derivative, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), has been shown to be superior in non-surgical settings. It remains unknown if eGFR better predicts postoperative mortality in non-cardiac surgical patients. We thus tested the hypothesis that eGFR predicts 30-day mortality after non-cardiac surgery better than serum creatinine. METHODS: We evaluated patients who had inpatient non-cardiac surgery of at least one hour duration during January 2006 to December 2011 at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus and whose preoperative serum creatinine was measured within 30 days before surgery. The eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Preoperative eGFR was compared in a multivariable analysis with preoperative serum creatinine (both assessed as continuous variables) on the ability to predict 30-day mortality in all patients. Secondarily, the comparison was made within subgroups based on amount of blood loss, blood transfusion, and sex. RESULTS: There were 92,888 patients included in the final analysis. The eGFR was a modestly better discriminator of 30-day mortality than serum creatinine, with an estimated c-statistic (95% confidence interval) of 0.67 (0.65 to 0.68) for eGFR vs 0.61 (0.59 to 0.63) for serum creatinine (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the eGFR was consistently a better discriminator of 30-day mortality across blood loss, transfusion, and sex groups. Reclassification analyses suggested improved individual predictions of 30-day mortality using eGFR compared with serum creatinine. Nevertheless, a multivariable combination of baseline characteristics of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, age, and body mass index (all P < 0.001) discriminated 30-day mortality with a c-statistic of 0.850. Adding eGFR to the model improved the c-statistic to only 0.851, while separately adding serum creatinine did not change the c-statistic. CONCLUSION: The eGFR is a modestly better predictor of 30-day mortality than serum creatinine in patients having inpatient non-cardiac surgery. Given that eGFR is often reported by clinical laboratories and is otherwise easy to calculate, it should generally be used in preference to creatinine alone.