[ANMCO/FADOI/SIAARTI/SIC/SIMG/SIMI/SIMEU consensus document: The clinical care pathway of acute heart failure patients from symptom onset to discharge from the emergency department]. / Documento di consenso ANMCO/FADOI/SIAARTI/SIC/SIMG/SIMI/SIMEU: Il percorso clinico-diagnostico e terapeutico del paziente con scompenso cardiaco acuto dal domicilio alla dimissione dal Pronto Soccorso/ Dipartimento di Emergenza-Accettazione.

Acute heart failure (AHF) represents a relevant burden for emergency departments worldwide. AHF patients have markedly worse long-term outcomes than patients with other acute cardiac diseases (e.g. acute coronary syndromes); mortality or readmissions rates at 3 months approximate 33%, whereas 1-year mortality from index discharge ranges from 25% to 50%.The multiplicity of healthcare professionals acting across the care pathway of AHF patients represents a critical factor, which generates the need for integrating the different expertise and competence of general practitioners, emergency physicians, cardiologists, internists, and intensive care physicians to focus on care goals able to improve clinical outcomes.This consensus document results from the cooperation of the scientific societies representing the different healthcare professionals involved in the care of AHF patients and describes shared strategies and pathways aimed at ensuring both high quality care and better outcomes. The document describes the patient journey from symptom onset to the clinical suspicion of AHF and home management or referral to emergency care and transportation to the hospital, through the clinical diagnostic pathway in the emergency department, acute treatment, risk stratification and discharge from the emergency department to ordinary wards or home. The document analyzes the potential role of a cardiology fast-track and Observation Units and the transition to outpatient care by general practitioners and specialist heart failure clinics.The increasing care burden and complex problems generated by AHF are unlikely to be solved without an integrated multidisciplinary approach. Efficient networking among emergency departments, intensive care units, ordinary wards and primary care settings is crucial to achieve better outcomes. Thanks to the joint effort of qualified scientific societies, this document aims to achieve this goal through an integrated, shared and applicable pathway that will contribute to a homogeneous care management of AHF patients across the country.

Home care for heart failure: can caregiver education prevent hospital admissions? A randomized trial in primary care.

AIM: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a low-complexity, low-cost model of caregiver education in primary care, targeted to reduce hospitalizations of heart failure patients. METHODS: A cluster-randomized, controlled, open trial was proposed to general practitioners, who were invited to identify patients with heart failure, exclusively managed at home and continuously attended by a caregiver. Participating general practitioners were then randomized to: usual treatment; caregiver education (educational session for recognizing early symptoms/signs of heart failure, with recording in a diary of a series of patient parameters, including body weight, blood pressure, heart rate). The patients were observed at baseline and during a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirteen patients were enrolled (163 in the intervention, 150 in the usual care group), 63% women, mean age 85.3 ±â€Š7.7 years. At the end of the 12-month follow-up, a trend towards a lower incidence of hospitalizations was observed in the intervention group (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.53-1.01 P = 0.061). Subgroup analysis showed that for patients with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation, age less than 90 years or Barthel score equal to or greater than 50 a significant lower hospital admission rate occurred in the intervention group (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% CI 0.39-0.99; P = 0.048, hazard ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.45-0.97; P = 0.036 and hazard ratio 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.89; P = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSION: Caregivers training for early recognition of symptoms/signs of worsening heart failure may be effective in reducing hospitalizations, although the benefit was evident only in specific patient subgroups (with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation, age <90 years or Barthel score ≥ 50), with only a positive trend in the whole cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03389841.

Hyponatremia associated with long-term medication use in the elderly: an analysis in general practice.

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of hyponatremia, its association with long-term medication use and underlying chronic conditions, the rate of hospitalisation and death within 3 months from its discovery and its management in community-dwelling older people. METHODS One year of data for ~5635 patients aged >65 years was extracted from the databases of 19 general practitioners (GPs); 2569 (45.6%) were checked for hyponatremia. RESULTS Hyponatremia occurred in 205 (8.0%) of 2569 checked individuals: 78.5% (161/205) had hypertension, 31.2% (64/205) diabetes, 23.9% (49/205) chronic renal failure; 38.0% (78/205) received diuretics, 36.6% (75/205) renin-angiotensin system antagonists (ACE-I/ARB) and 9.8% (20/205) serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Drug consumption was higher in hyponatremic patients, although only diuretics, ACE-I/ARB, anti-arrhythmics and opioids were significantly associated with hyponatremia. The likelihood of hyponatremia trebled when four drugs were taken, and it was seven-fold higher with the use of six drugs. Hyponatremia was associated with a higher prevalence of chronic illnesses and higher rate of hospitalisation (13.7% vs 7.7%, P = 0.005) and death (3.9% vs 1.8%, P < 0.035). The use of at least one long-term medication was associated with hospitalisation or death in hyponatremic patients (10% vs 6.3%, P = 0.010). Less than 20% of hyponatremic patients had their sodium level checked again after 1 month. DISCUSSION Hyponatremia is not uncommon among community-living older patients, especially in patients taking medications potentially causing hyponatremia. Hyponatremic patients are likely to encounter more serious events, including hospitalisation and death. Targeted training of GPs is desirable to improve their practice.

[Natriuretic peptides for the management of patients with heart failure: a bridge between primary care and cardiology?]. / I peptidi natriuretici per la gestione dei pazienti con scompenso cardiaco: un ponte fra Medicina Generale e Cardiologia?

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of heart failure (HF) mandates the establishment of shared strategies between primary care physicians (PCP) and cardiologists to offer patients continuity of care. Easily available, low-cost biomarkers hold potential to facilitate this process. Data on the diffusion of natriuretic peptides (NP), a major novelty in the HF field in the last decade, in primary care are scarce. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Area of the Italian General Practice Society led a web survey among its members to investigate knowledge, perceptions and use of NP for HF management among Italian PCP. RESULTS: Over 700 PCP took part in the survey, three out of four declared they never or only occasionally prescribed NP assays. Among participating PCP, 86% reported that PN values were not regularly mentioned in discharge summaries of their patients hospitalized for acute HF. Conversely, only 4% reported to receive regularly PN prescription by cardiologists for their outpatients with chronic HF. One of five respondents ignored whether the assay was reimbursed by the National Health Service. The high negative predictive value for HF of elevated NP levels, the strongest evidence-based indication of NP, was correctly pointed out only by 13% of PCP. CONCLUSIONS: In our PCP sample, we documented a marginal use of NP in the management of HF patients. This is likely, at least in part, linked to a perceived scarce indication of NP values in discharge summaries and limited prescription in HF outpatients by cardiologists. Overall, PCP knowledge of the evidence on NP assay use for diagnosis, risk stratification and guided therapy of HF was limited. Two expert cardiologists were asked to comment on these findings and on the controversial aspects of the current use of NP in HF patients to better define their role as a tool for shared care between cardiologists and PCP.

[Patients with heart failure in the last year of their life: the primary care perspective]. / I pazienti con scompenso cardiaco nell'ultimo anno di vita: il punto di vista della Medicina Generale.

BACKGROUND: The care of end-stage patients with heart failure (HF) represents a substantial cost and a relevant workload for health professionals and caregivers. Studies performed in out-of-hospital settings are limited. We aimed to provide data about management in primary care and professional needs of general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: One hundred fifty-one GPs provided information about patients with HF who died (whatever the cause) in the previous 365 days: a) where they died, b) cause of death, c) number and cause of hospital admission, d) who was mainly in charge of the patient during the year preceding death, e) place where patients were mainly cared for, f) relevant diseases other than HF. GPs were also requested to express their personal opinion about their professional needs. RESULTS: GPs identified 245 patients (mean age 83.8 ± 8.76 years, range 48-103, 53.9% female). The place of death was hospital (46.5%), home (42.9%), nursing home (4.9%), hospice (1.6%). Fifty percent of patients died of worsening HF, 14% of sudden death, 23% of noncardiovascular diseases. In the last year of life, 193 (78.8%) patients were hospitalized, 149 (60.8%) for HF. GPs were responsible for care in the majority of patients. Total number of hospitalizations was the only variable significantly associated with death in hospital. GPs reported clinical or organizational problems in 58.4% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The care of HF patients is mostly home-based and provided by families and GPs. GPs often need simple and inexpensive cardiological and organizational support.

Stroke prophylaxis in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: rhythm vs. rate control strategy.

PURPOSE: "Rhythm" and "Rate" control strategies require partially different organization, and a different involvement of Specialists and General Practitioners; we verified whether the strategy assignment modified the approach to stroke prophylaxis. METHODS: Survey in general practice: 233 GPs identified all patients with codified atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis, checked the diagnosis (ECG/hospital discharge document), and filled a structured questionnaire on stroke risk-factors, prophylactic therapy, and reasons for warfarin non prescription in CHADS ≥2 patients. Data were collected as an "aggregate." RESULTS: Population observed: 295,906 patients aged >14; 6,036 with confirmed AF; 5,888 with complete data about anti-thrombotic prophylaxis are analyzed here. In the "rhythm strategy" group 45.6% of the CHADS score ≥2 patients (594) were on warfarin, vs. 73.2% (1,741) in the "rate strategy" group (p<0.0001). Overall reasons for warfarin non-use were significantly different in the two groups: clinical contraindications (12.3% vs. 19.7%), side effects (5.5% vs. 8.5%), patients' refusal (12.2% vs. 15.2%), unreliable patient/care-giver (14.4% vs. 25.9%); reasons were unknown to the GP in 55.6% in rhythm control vs. 30.9% in rate control group. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-thrombotic prophylaxis in CHADS ≥2 patients is different in subjects assigned to the Rhythm vs. the Rate control strategy, as well as reported reasons for warfarin non use. GPs do not know why warfarin is not used in a large percentage of cases, mainly in the rhythm control strategy group. Improving efforts should probably be differently tailored for patients assigned to the "rhythm" or the "rate" control strategy.

Frequency, patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and resource usage of atrial fibrillation (from the Italian Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Management [ISAF] study).

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is 1 of the most important healthcare issues and an important cause of healthcare expenditure. AF care requires specific arrhythmologic skills and complex treatment. Therefore, it is crucial to know its real affect on healthcare systems to allocate resources and detect areas for improving the standards of care. The present nationwide, retrospective, observational study involved 233 general practitioners. Each general practitioner completed an electronic questionnaire to provide information on the clinical profile, treatment strategies, and resources consumed to care for their patients with AF. Of the 295,906 patients screened, representative of the Italian population, 6,036 (2.04%) had AF: 20.2% paroxysmal, 24.3% persistent, and 55.5% permanent AF. AF occurred in 0.16% of patients aged 16 to 50 years, 9.0% of those aged 76 to 85 years, and 10.7% of those aged ≥85 years. AF was symptomatic despite therapy in 74.6% of patients and was associated with heart disease in 75%. Among the patients with AF, 24.8% had heart failure, 26.8% renal failure, 18% stroke/transient ischemic attack, and 29.3% had ≥3 co-morbidities. The rate control treatment strategy was pursued in 55%. Of the 6,036 patients with AF, 46% received anticoagulants. The success rate of catheter ablation of the AF substrate was 50%. In conclusion, in our study, the frequency of AF was 2 times greater than previously reported (approximately 0.90%), rate control was the most pursued treatment strategy, anticoagulants were still underused, and the success rate of AF ablation was lower than reported by referral centers.

Opportunistic prostate-specific antigen screening in Italy: 6 years of monitoring from the Italian general practice database.

The practice of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has been increasing in Italy despite uncertain scientific evidence and contrary recommendations from most scientific societies. In 2002, a survey of PSA screening diffusion among general practices was performed, looking for screening frequency and age pattern of screened individuals. The objective of this study was to assess whether the features of PSA screening did change after 6 years in the same considered setting. Using the data obtained from 500 Italian general practitioners providing information to the Health Search/CSD Patient database, we selected, for the study purpose 351,091 male individuals. We assumed PSA prescriptions performed during 2005-2008 in individuals without prostate cancer, or benign prostate disease, or urological symptoms history to have a screening purpose. Screening frequency was analyzed in the overall series, by year and by patient's age. Exposure to PSA screening (at least on PSA test in the considered period) of males aged over 50 years raised from 31.4% (confidence interval 95% 31.08-31.70%) during 2002 to 46.4% (confidence interval 95% 46.19-46.68%) during 2008. The highest yearly exposure to PSA screening (55%) and the highest frequency of repeat testing was observed in the 70-79 age range. PSA screening practice has continued to increase in Italy and is often performed in elderly people without any scientific rationale.

Identification of patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: 'real practice' results in primary care.

AIMS: Asymptomatic systolic left ventricular dysfunction (ASLVD) fulfills the essential criteria to screen for a disease. In Italy, echocardiography screening has been suggested for high-risk patients, albeit not tested in 'real practice'. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the feasibility and the results of such a strategy in primary care. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy Italian GPs first identified all their 50- to 74-year-old patients with coronary heart disease and/or hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus and/or renal damage, then randomly selected 1405 individuals (one-tenth). In this group, 217 (15%) hypertensive and diabetic patients had no end organ damage evaluation, could not be classified as high/non-high-risk and had no prescription for echocardiogram; 390 individuals [27.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 25.4-30%) resulted as high risk. A recent echocardiogram was already available in 129 (33.1%) patients, 122 (31.3%) underwent echocardiography and 139 (35.6%) did not comply with this prescription. Non-compliance and difficult access to echocardiography were the main reasons not to undergo the prescribed echocardiogram. Among the 261 evaluable subjects, 26 (10.8%; 95% CI 7-14.6%) had a

Pharmacological treatment after acute myocardial infarction from 2001 to 2006: a survey in Italian primary care.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacological preventive therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is strictly recommended because of its great efficacy. Little is known about long-term utilization of drugs related to cardiovascular secondary prevention in everyday practice. DESIGN: A population-based cohort study on the basis of an Italian general practice database. METHODS: Searching a large primary-care Italian database (Health Search), we selected five cohorts of patients with first occurrence of AMI from 2001 to 2005, respectively, and analyzed prescriptions of antithrombotic agents, beta-blockers, statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) from 2001 to 2006 (follow-up ranging from 1 to 5 years). RESULTS: We identified 4764 patients (mean age 67; 35% female) discharged from hospital after first-ever AMI. The prescription rate in the first year after AMI was suboptimal (beta-blockers 35.1%, aspirin or warfarin 75.0%, ACE-inhibitors or ARBs 61.6%, statins 52.8%) but showed a continuous improvement from 2001 to 2005. The prescription rate decreased slightly during the follow-up, but showed a complex pattern with a variable but significant number of patients discontinuing or resuming the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of recommended drugs after AMI has increased from 2001 to 2006 in Italy, but the prescription rate remains largely unsatisfactory. Therapeutic continuity is also suboptimal.

Improving nonalcoholic fatty liver disease management by general practitioners: a critical evaluation and impact of an educational training program.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The epidemic diffusion of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents an emerging problem in family medicine. General Practitioners (GPs) should pay attention to patients with fatty liver, look at associated conditions, identify causal factors and patients at risk of evolution. This study aimed to assess GPs' knowledge and practice and a training project impact about NAFLD: METHODS: 56 GPs filled a questionnaire before and after attending a tailored workshop on NAFLD, and performed a clinical survey in patients with persistent hypertransaminasemia including screening and liver biopsy when indicated. Four months after a training workshop, GPs were questioned again about their practice changes with NAFLD: RESULTS: At baseline, less than 30% of GPs considered NAFLD as a cause of persistent hypertransaminasemia; over two-thirds thought that NAFLD had a prevalence of 5-10% in the general population; about 50% considered hypertransaminasemia as the main indication for liver biopsy in NAFLD; their main approach included a low lipid-content diet. Comparison of pre/post workshop questionnaires showed significant improvements, despite knowledge on diet composition and steatogenic drugs remained poor. Among screened patients with hypertransaminasemia, NAFLD had a prevalence of 36% and was associated with the metabolic syndrome in more than 50%. Liver biopsy was obtained in 8% of NAFLD: Chronic viral hepatitis was better diagnosed than NAFLD (biopsy performed in 86% of cases). The training workshop resulted in practice changes concerning screening of risk patients, search for NASH and managing NAFLD in chronic viral hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: GPs' knowledge about NAFLD appears barely adequate, thus targeted training is essential to improve their knowledge and practice.