Evaluation of resuscitation with angiography, percutaneous techniques and operative repair (RAPTOR): hybrid suite introduction and initial use at a level I urban trauma centre.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the utilization of the RAPTOR suite (hybrid theatre) for trauma patients. Ideally, this is used to achieve haemorrhage control in time-critical patients that may require damage control surgery (DCS) and/or interventional radiological (IR) procedures concurrently. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective study identifying all trauma patients that were treated at the level I trauma centre during 2011-2016 was performed. Patients that underwent treatment in the RAPTOR suite were described. Subgroup analyses were performed for trauma patients that underwent interventions within 60 min and patients who underwent a combination of DCS + angioembolization in the RAPTOR suite or in other locations (OR, radiology). RESULTS: Since its introduction in 2011, 1% of all procedures performed in the RAPTOR suite were trauma related. From 2011 until 2016, 43 trauma patients underwent treatment in the RAPTOR suite. The majority of patients (81%) suffered blunt injury. Most patients were male (70%), with a mean age of 43 years. The mean ISS was 38. In 56% (n = 24) the MTP was activated and in 40% (n = 17) a CT scan was performed prior to treatment. Damage control surgery alone, angioembolization alone and a combination of DCS and angioembolization were performed in 37% (n = 16), 23% (n = 10) and 40% (n = 17) of patients, respectively. Median time to the hybrid suite, procedure time and total time were 56 min (15-704), 160 min (42-404), and 251 min (93-788), respectively. CONCLUSION: In the first 5 years following introduction of a hybrid theatre in an urban level I trauma centre, only 1% of patients using the resource has injury-related pathology. Earlier identification of patients requiring this facility may improve timely access and management for this select group of patients needing urgent control of bleeding.

Introduction of the Abbreviated Westmead Post-Traumatic Amnesia Scale and Impact on Length of Stay.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mild traumatic brain injury is a common presentation to Emergency Departments. Early identification of patients with cognitive deficits and provision of discharge advice are important. The Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale provides an early and efficient assessment of post-traumatic amnesia for patients with mild traumatic brain injuries, compared with the previously used assessment, the Modified Oxford Post-traumatic Scale. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study reviewed 270 patients with mild traumatic brain injury assessed for post-traumatic amnesia over a 2-year period between February 2011 and February 2013. It identified those assessed with Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale versus Modified Oxford Post-traumatic Scale, the outcomes of these post-traumatic amnesia assessments, the hospital length of stay for patients, and their readmission rates. RESULTS: The Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale was used in 91% of patient cases (and the Modified Oxford Post-traumatic Scale in 7%), and of those assessed with the Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale, 94% cleared post-traumatic amnesia testing within 4 h. Of those assessed with the Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale, 56% had a shorter length of stay than had they been assessed with the Modified Oxford Post-traumatic Scale, resulting in 295 bed-days saved. Verbal and written discharge advice was provided to those assessed for post-traumatic amnesia to assist their recovery. In all, 1% of patients were readmitted for monitoring of mild post-concussion symptoms. CONCLUSION: The Abbreviated Westmead Post-traumatic Amnesia Scale provides an effective and timely assessment of post-traumatic amnesia for patients presenting to the Emergency Department with mild traumatic brain injury compared with the previously used assessment tool. It helps identify patients with cognitive impairment and the need for admission and further investigation, resulting in appropriate access to care. It also results in a decreased length of stay and decreased hospital admissions, with subsequent cost savings to the hospital.

The ROARI project - Road Accident Acute Rehabilitation Initiative: a randomised clinical trial of two targeted early interventions for road-related trauma.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of an Early Rehabilitation Intervention (ERI ) versus a Brief Education Intervention (BEI) following road trauma. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: return to work or usual activities at 12 weeks (for minor/moderate injury) and 24 weeks for major injury. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Reduction in pain, anxiety, depression, disability and incidence of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and improved quality of life. DESIGN: A multi-site single-blinded stratified randomized clinical trial (RCT). METHODS: 184 patients (92 in each arm) were recruited over 18 months and followed for 12 weeks (minor/moderate injury) and 24 weeks (major injury). Screening questionnaires at 2-4 weeks and follow-up interviews by phone for all outcome measures were undertaken. For those in the ERI group with a positive screen for high risk of persistent symptoms, an early assessment and intervention by a Rehabilitation Physician was offered. Those in the BEI group were sent written information and advised to see their GP. RESULTS: 89.4% of injuries were mild in this cohort. At 12 weeks 73.8% and 69.1% of patients in the ERI and the BEI groups respectively had returned to work or usual activities. There were no significant differences between the two intervention groups with respect to the primary or any secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSION: This is the first RCT of an ERI following road trauma in Australia. A targeted ERI is as effective as a BEI in assisting those with mild/moderate trauma to return to work or usual activities.

Early screening to identify patients at risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.

BACKGROUND: To develop a screening tool to identify patients at risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) within 24 h of a patient's admission to intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Prospective, observational study of 403 consecutively enrolled patients with an indwelling catheter, admitted to a mixed medical-surgical ICU in a tertiary referral, university hospital. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured at least twice daily and IAH and ACS defined as per consensus definitions. RESULTS: Thirty-nine per cent of patients developed IAH and 2% developed ACS. Abdominal distension, hemoperitoneum/pneumoperitoneum/intra-peritoneal fluid collection, obesity, intravenous fluid received > 2.3 l, abbreviated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score > 4 points and lactate > 1.4 mmol/l were identified as independent predictors of IAH upon admission to ICU. The presence of three or more of these risk factors at admission identified patients that would develop IAH with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 76%, the development of grades II, III and IV IAH with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 62%. Patients that developed IAH required a significantly longer duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU care. Patients that developed grades II-IV IAH had a significantly higher rate of ICU mortality. CONCLUSION: IAH is a common clinical entity in the intensive care setting that is associated with morbidity and mortality. A screening tool, based on data readily available within a patient's first 24 h in ICU, was developed and effectively identified patients that required intra-abdominal pressure monitoring.

Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: pathophysiological and non-operative management.

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are conditions that commonly manifest in critically ill patients. They are associated with a multiplicity of pathophysiological disturbances. This study retrospectively reviewed literature relating to IAH and ACS published in the last two decades to consolidate an understanding of the epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and non-operative management of these conditions. Additionally, the authors of this study have recently conducted a large study on intra-abdominal pressures of consecutive catheterised patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (N.=403). A preliminary analysis of this study has also been included.

Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

PURPOSE: To update the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) consensus definitions and management statements relating to intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We conducted systematic or structured reviews to identify relevant studies relating to IAH or ACS. Updated consensus definitions and management statements were then derived using a modified Delphi method and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines, respectively. Quality of evidence was graded from high (A) to very low (D) and management statements from strong RECOMMENDATIONS (desirable effects clearly outweigh potential undesirable ones) to weaker SUGGESTIONS (potential risks and benefits of the intervention are less clear). RESULTS: In addition to reviewing the consensus definitions proposed in 2006, the WSACS defined the open abdomen, lateralization of the abdominal musculature, polycompartment syndrome, and abdominal compliance, and proposed an open abdomen classification system. RECOMMENDATIONS included intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement, avoidance of sustained IAH, protocolized IAP monitoring and management, decompressive laparotomy for overt ACS, and negative pressure wound therapy and efforts to achieve same-hospital-stay fascial closure among patients with an open abdomen. SUGGESTIONS included use of medical therapies and percutaneous catheter drainage for treatment of IAH/ACS, considering the association between body position and IAP, attempts to avoid a positive fluid balance after initial patient resuscitation, use of enhanced ratios of plasma to red blood cells and prophylactic open abdominal strategies, and avoidance of routine early biologic mesh use among patients with open abdominal wounds. NO RECOMMENDATIONS were possible regarding monitoring of abdominal perfusion pressure or the use of diuretics, renal replacement therapies, albumin, or acute component-parts separation. CONCLUSION: Although IAH and ACS are common and frequently associated with poor outcomes, the overall quality of evidence available to guide development of RECOMMENDATIONS was generally low. Appropriately designed intervention trials are urgently needed for patients with IAH and ACS.

Temporary abdominal closure.

The increasing recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome's adverse effect on patient outcome has been coupled with our expanding knowledge of techniques of temporary abdominal closure. Temporary abdominal closure can be used prophylactically to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome developing and more commonly in the treatment of patients with progressing or advanced abdominal compartment syndrome. The preferred technique involves a negative suction dressing protecting the fascial and skin edges, collecting intraperitoneal fluid and reducing contamination. Attempts of early closure will facilitate recovery.

Temporary abdominal closure.

The increasing recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome's adverse effect on patient outcome has been coupled with our expanding knowledge of techniques of temporary abdominal closure. Temporary abdominal closure can be used prophylactically to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome developing and more commonly in the treatment of patients with progressing or advanced abdominal compartment syndrome. The preferred technique involves a negative suction dressing protecting the fascial and skin edges, collecting intraperitoneal fluid and reducing contamination. Attempts of early closure will facilitate recovery.

Prospective study to evaluate the influence of FAST on trauma patient management.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have concentrated on the accuracy of Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST), but evaluation of whether FAST changes subsequent management has not been fully assessed. METHODS: This prospective study compared 419 trauma admissions in two groups, FAST and no-FAST, for demographics, time of resuscitation, and action after resuscitation. The 194 patients undergoing FAST had their management plan specified before, and confirmed after, FAST was performed to assess for change in management. To ensure scan consistency and to minimize bias, criteria were established to define an adequate FAST. RESULTS: FAST was performed in 194 patients (46%), assessing for free fluid. Management was changed in 59 cases (32.8%) after FAST. Laparotomy was prevented in 1 patient, computed tomography was prevented in 23 patients, and diagnostic peritoneal lavage was prevented in 15 patients. Computed tomography rates were reduced from 47% to 34% and diagnostic peritoneal lavage rates were reduced from 9% to 1%. CONCLUSIONS: FAST plays a key role in trauma, changing subsequent management in an appreciable number of patients.

Damage control surgery and the abdomen.

There is a complex interplay between primary injury, particularly major abdominal injury in the multi-system trauma patient, and secondary injury, which relate to patient physiology, decision making and surgical technique. Analysis of outcomes is further confounded by the variety of surgical techniques used. The challenge is to match the correct operation, for a critically injured patient, with the patient's physiology. Excellence in general surgery does not equate with excellence in trauma surgery, and a clear understanding of damage control is essential.

Initial management of the poly-trauma patient: a practical approach in an Australian major trauma service.

The initial management of the poly-trauma patient is of vital importance to minimizing both patient morbidity and mortality. We present a practical approach to the early management of a severely injured patient as practiced at Liverpool Hospital in Sydney, Australia. Specific attention is paid to innovations in care and specific controversies in early management as well as local solutions to challenging problems.

Major intrahepatic bile duct injuries detected after laparotomy: selective nonoperative management.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal trauma causing major intrahepatic bile duct injury is a relatively uncommon occurrence. Most authorities recommend operative, usually resectional, management of these injuries when recognized, citing increased risks of complications and mortality with nonoperative management. However, very few data have been published to document the optimal management of these challenging injuries. METHODS: We present a series of five patients with significant hepatic injury and documented major bile duct injury managed at a single provincial trauma center. All of these patients had first- or second-order bile duct injuries diagnosed using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and had developed complications caused by the ductal injury. RESULTS: In all patients, the bile duct injury and resulting complication were successfully managed by a combination of endoscopic drainage procedures and interventional radiology techniques. Average length of hospital stay for these patients was 45 days. All patients eventually attained preinjury functional status. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative techniques can be used to successfully manage selected patients and represent a reasonable alternative to operative intervention and resectional therapy, especially in the compromised patient. Extended length of stay is to be expected, but good outcomes can be achieved.

Paclitaxel loaded poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres for the prevention of intraperitoneal carcinomatosis after a surgical repair and tumor cell spill.

A controlled release delivery system for paclitaxel was developed using poly(L-lactic acid) to provide local delivery to the peritoneal cavity. Microspheres were made in 1-40 and 30-120 microm size ranges. In an in vitro release study, 30-120 microm microspheres loaded with 10, 20 and 30% paclitaxel exhibited a burst phase of release for 3 days followed by an apparently zero-order phase of release. At all loadings, 20-25% of the original load of paclitaxel was released after 30 days. The effect of microsphere size on retention in the peritoneal cavity was assessed. Control 1-40 microm microspheres were injected intraperitoneally in rats. The rats received either insufflation of the peritoneal cavity using 11 mmHg CO2 or no further treatment. After sacrifice, microspheres with diameters less than 24 microm were observed in the lymphatic system after being cleared from the peritoneal cavity through fenestrations in the diaphragm. Insufflation of the peritoneal cavity had no effect on the size of microspheres that were cleared. Efficacy studies were carried out using 30-120 microm microspheres that were of sufficient size to be retained in the peritoneal cavity. In a model of a tumor cell spill after a cecotomy repair, 100 mg of 30-120 microm microspheres containing 30% paclitaxel were effective in preventing growth of tumors in the peritoneal cavity at both 2 and 6 weeks post-surgery. No gross or histologically evident tumor growth was observed on any peritoneal surfaces or in the surgical wound site. Rats receiving control microspheres all showed tumor cell implantation and growth after 2 weeks.