Therapeutic efficacy of ozenoxacin in animal models of dermal infection with Staphylococcus aureus.

AIM: To assess different concentrations and formulations of topical ozenoxacin using a mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus dermal infection for identification of the best formulation for treating patients with impetigo. MATERIALS & METHODS: The efficacy of ozenoxacin formulations was compared with vehicle control, mupirocin and retapamulin ointments in a mouse model. RESULTS: The most effective concentrations of ozenoxacin for reducing S. aureus counts after dermal application were 1 and 2%. Direct comparison of two batches of 1% ozenoxacin ointment and cream with 1% retapamulin and 2% mupirocin ointments in the mouse model showed superior efficacy of ozenoxacin. CONCLUSION: 1% ozenoxacin ointment and cream were the most effective formulations in significantly reducing bacterial load in S. aureus dermally infected mice.

A polypill strategy to improve adherence: results from the FOCUS project.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to evidence-based cardiovascular (CV) medications after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) is low after the first 6 months. The use of fixed-dose combinations (FDC) has been shown to improve treatment adherence and risk factor control. However, no previous randomized trial has analyzed the impact of a polypill strategy on adherence in post-MI patients. OBJECTIVES: The cross-sectional FOCUS (Fixed-Dose Combination Drug for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention) study (Phase 1) aimed to elucidate factors that interfere with appropriate adherence to CV medications for secondary prevention after an acute MI. Additionally, 695 patients from Phase 1 were randomized into a controlled trial (Phase 2) to test the effect of a polypill (containing aspirin 100 mg, simvastatin 40 mg, and ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10 mg) compared with the 3 drugs given separately on adherence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, as well as safety and tolerability over a period of 9 months of follow-up. METHODS: In Phase 1, a 5-country cohort of 2,118 patients was analyzed. Patients were randomized to either the polypill or 3 drugs separately for Phase 2. Primary endpoint was adherence to the treatment measured at the final visit by the self-reported Morisky-Green questionnaire (MAQ) and pill count (patients had to meet both criteria for adherence at the in-person visit to be considered adherent). RESULTS: In Phase 1, overall CV medication adherence, defined as an MAQ score of 20, was 45.5%. In a multivariable regression model, the risk of being nonadherent (MAQ <20) was associated with younger age, depression, being on a complex medication regimen, poorer health insurance coverage, and a lower level of social support, with consistent findings across countries. In Phase 2, the polypill group showed improved adherence compared with the group receiving separate medications after 9 months of follow-up: 50.8% versus 41% (p = 0.019; intention-to-treat population) and 65.7% versus 55.7% (p = 0.012; per protocol population) when using the primary endpoint, attending the final visit with MAQ = 20 and high pill count (80% to 110%) combined, to assess adherence. Adherence also was higher in the FDC group when measured by MAQ alone (68% vs. 59%, p = 0.049). No treatment difference was found at follow-up in mean systolic blood pressure (129.6 mm Hg vs. 128.6 mm Hg), mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (89.9 mg/dl vs. 91.7 mg/dl), serious adverse events (23 vs. 21), or death (1, 0.3% in each group). CONCLUSIONS: For secondary prevention following acute MI, younger age, depression, and a complex drug treatment plan are associated with lower medication adherence. Meanwhile, adherence is increased in patients with higher insurance coverage levels and social support. Compared with the 3 drugs given separately, the use of a polypill strategy met the primary endpoint for adherence for secondary prevention following an acute MI. (Fixed Dose Combination Drug [Polypill] for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention [FOCUS]; NCT01321255).

A single-dose, randomized, double-blind, double dummy, placebo and positive-controlled, five-way cross-over study to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of lorediplon in a phase advance model of insomnia in healthy Caucasian adult male subjects.

OBJECTIVE: A 5-h phase advance model of insomnia was used to evaluate the efficacy of lorediplon, a new non-benzodiazepine hypnotic. METHODS: Thirty-five male, healthy subjects were included in a five-way randomized cross-over study. During each of the periods, sleep was recorded, and residual effects were measured. All subjects received lorediplon 1, 5, and 10 mg, placebo, and zolpidem 10 mg (i.e., active control). RESULTS: Polysomnographic evaluation revealed that lorediplon (5 and 10 mg) significantly decreased wake after sleep onset (WASO) and increased total sleep time. Analysis by quarters of the night showed a progressive increasing effectiveness of lorediplon 10 mg across the first three quarters. Lorediplon increased non-rapid eye movement slow wave sleep and stage N2 sleep in the second and third quarters. The magnitude of these effects was dose related, with minimal effects seen with 1 mg. No residual effects were observed 13 h post dose. CONCLUSIONS: Lorediplon demonstrated a dose-dependent improvement in sleep, whereas zolpidem showed a more sustained WASO effect. No next-day hangover effects were observed. These sleep effects are also consistent with the pharmacokinetic profile of lorediplon. These results warrant clinical trials in patients with insomnia.