Utility of d-dimer for diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in coronavirus disease-19 infection.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of d-dimer in excluding a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection, potentially limiting the need for venous duplex ultrasound examination. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients admitted to our institution with confirmed COVID-19 status by polymerase chain reaction between March 1, 2020, and May 13, 2020, and selected those who underwent both d-dimer and venous duplex ultrasound examination. This cohort was divided into two groups, those with and without DVT based on duplex ultrasound examination. These groups were then compared to determine the value of d-dimer in establishing this diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 1170 patients were admitted with COVID-19, of which 158 were selected for this study. Of the 158, there were 52 patients with DVT and 106 without DVT. There were no differences in sex, age, race, or ethnicity between groups. Diabetes and routine hemodialysis were less commonly seen in the group with DVT. More than 90% of patients in both groups received prophylactic anticoagulation, but the use of low-molecular-weight heparin or subcutaneous heparin prophylaxis was not predictive of DVT. All patients had elevated acute-phase d-dimer levels using conventional criteria, and 154 of the 158 (97.5%) had elevated levels with age-adjusted criteria (mean d-dimer 16,163 ± 5395 ng/mL). Those with DVT had higher acute-phase d-dimer levels than those without DVT (median, 13,602 [interquartile range, 6616-36,543 ng/mL] vs 2880 [interquartile range, 1030-9126 ng/mL], P < .001). An optimal d-dimer cutoff of 6494 ng/mL was determined to differentiate those with and without DVT (sensitivity 80.8%, specificity 68.9%, negative predictive value 88.0%). Wells DVT criteria was not found to be a significant predictor of DVT. Elevated d-dimer as defined by our optimal metric was a statistically significant predictor of DVT in both univariate and multivariable analyses when adjusting for other factors (odds ratio, 6.12; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-13.39; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: d-dimer levels are uniformly elevated in patients with COVID-19. Although standard predictive criteria failed to predict DVT, our analysis showed a d-dimer of less than 6494 ng/mL may exclude DVT, potentially limiting the need for venous duplex ultrasound examination.

Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Vascular Complications on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Femoral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become an accepted treatment modality in the management of select patients with cardiopulmonary failure. As a result, its use has increased significantly over the past decade. However, the effect of complications on mortality is not clearly established. We performed a comprehensive, up-to-date meta-analysis of peer-reviewed literature focusing on the effect of vascular complications (VCs) on the survival of patients receiving venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) with femoral cannulation. METHODS: A systematic search of 4 different databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) was conducted from their inception to mid-September of 2019. To keep the pooled analysis current, only studies published within the past 5 years were included. Mortality was analyzed based on presence or absence of VCs. Studies with less then 10 patients, with incomplete mortality data, and not accessible in the English language were excluded. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the analysis encompassing 1,643 patients over a 5-year period. There were 369 patients with a cumulative VC rate of 22.5% (range 9.4 to 43.9%). The pooled mortality rate for patients with and without VCs was 69.6% and 56.8%, respectively. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between VCs and mortality with a relative risk (RR) of 1.36 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.60; P = 0.0004). Covariate-adjusted meta-regression analysis revealed an inverse relationship between age and mortality for VCs, with an RR of 1.33 (95% CI, 1.15-1.54; P = 0.0184), and direct relationship between female gender and mortality from VCs, RR 1.39 (95% CI, 1.21-1.59; P = 0.0165). CONCLUSIONS: The most recently available data published in the literature demonstrate a significant correlation of VCs with mortality. Therefore, aggressive attempts should be made to minimize VCs in patients with femoral VA-ECMO cannulation.

The Effect of Acute Limb Ischemia on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Femoral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving modality increasingly used in the management cardiopulmonary failure. However, ECMO itself is not without major complications. Mortality remains high, and morbidity such as stroke, renal failure, and acute limb threatening ischemia (ALI) are common among surviving patients. We analyzed the effect of one of these complications, ALI, on the survival of patients receiving venoarterial ECMO (VA ECMO) with femoral cannulation. METHODS: Patients with cardiopulmonary failure supported by VA ECMO inserted through femoral cannulation at two institutions from December 2010 to December 2017 were enrolled in this study. Data were collected retrospectively. Our primary outcome was ALI and its effect on hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included six-month mortality, length of hospital stay, and other complications (stroke and renal failure); multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of ALI and hospital mortality. RESULTS: There were 71 patients included in this study. The overall VA ECMO hospital mortality was 53.5%. ALI was seen in 14 (19.7%) patients. Of these, four (5.6%) patients had fasciotomy, four patients (5.6%) had thrombectomy, and one underwent arterial repair (1.4%). Five additional patients (7.0%) with ALI expired and had no vascular intervention. None of the demographic and clinical characteristics significantly correlated with ALI except for stroke and renal failure requiring new-onset hemodialysis (HD). The rate of hospital and 6-month mortality in patients with and without vascular complications were 78.6%, 92.3% and 47.4%, 57.4%, respectively (P = 0.042 and P = 0.023). Multivariate analysis correlated hospital and six-month mortality with ALI, stroke, and new-onset HD. CONCLUSIONS: ALI correlates with higher mortality in VA ECMO patients with femoral cannulation. Although some of the contributing factors to mortality in these patients are related to the consequences of cardiopulmonary failure, strong efforts should be made to avoid ALI after femoral VA ECMO cannulation.

A Simple Scoring System to Predict Survival after Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Patients undergoing consideration for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) require an immediate risk profile assessment in the setting of incomplete or no information. A retrospective cohort study of 100 patients undergoing VA ECMO placement at three institutions was carried out. Variables strongly associated with survival to discharge were used to calculate a risk stratification score. Indications for VA ECMO support included postcardiotomy shock (24%), ischemic etiologies (33%), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (32%), and other etiologies (11%). Pre-VA ECMO arrest occurred in 69%, and 30% of patients underwent cannulation during arrest. Survival to discharge was 38%. Three variables demonstrated a strong trend toward predicting survival to discharge: lactate >10 mmol/L (p = .054), albumin <3 g/dL (p = .062), and platelet count <180 K/uL (p = .064), and these variables were included in a scoring system. The extremes of age and duration of pre-VA ECMO ventilation were associated with a dismal prognosis and were also included. These five variables were used to construct a mortality prediction score. A score of 0 was associated with 10% expected mortality, whereas a score of 4+ was associated with 100% expected mortality. Mortality increased in a stepwise fashion with increasing scores. The expected mortality closely paralleled the observed mortality. A simple scoring system composed of easily collected variables may help predict mortality. However, it is not intended to replace an experienced clinician's judgment, but to enhance it.

State of the art and meta-analysis of secondary open aortic procedure after abdominal endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: Secondary open aortic procedures (SOAP) treat complications of endovascular aneurysm repair, when further endovascular options are exhausted. We aimed at depicting the state of the art of SOAP with high-level evidence. METHODS: A systematic review of the SOAP literature, with a meta-analysis of its outcomes (primary outcome operative mortality; secondary outcome major morbidity) and metaregression of risk factors for mortality (PROSPERO 42017075631). RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies (1093 patients) were elected for analysis. SOAP was performed within the same hospitalization of or 30 days from domestic endovascular aneurysm repair (early SOAP) in 0.2% of the patients (85/40,256), and in a nonelective setting in 24.3% (95% confidence interval, 21.8-26.9). Most frequent indications were endoleak (44.4%; 95% confidence interval, 41.4-47.3) and rupture (12.7%; 95% confidence interval, 10.4-15.1). The most common procedures were infrarenal aortic replacement (85.2%; 95% confidence interval, 82.6-87.7) with high use of supravisceral clamping (suprarenal, 25% [95% confidence interval, 21.9-28.1] and supraceliac, 20.7% [95% confidence interval, 17.8-23.6]), and axillobifemoral bypass with stent explant (6.9%; 95% confidence interval, 5.1-8.7). Operative mortality (in-hospital or 30-day) was 10.9% (95% confidence interval, 8.7-13.5). The most frequent morbidities were respiratory (11.4%; 95% confidence interval, 8.1-15.9) and renal (9.5%; 95% confidence interval, 8.1-15.9). Risk factors for mortality were supravisceral clamping (Z = 3.007; Q = 9.044; P = .003) and nonelective status (Z = 3.382; Q = 11.440; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Endoleak is the main indication for SOAP, which mostly consists of infrarenal aortic replacement. Risk factors for operative mortality are nonelective status and supravisceral clamping.

Distal Perfusion Cannulation and Limb Complications in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

The utility of distal perfusion cannula (DPC) placement for the prevention of limb complications in patients undergoing femoral venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is poorly characterized. Patients undergoing femoral VA ECMO cannulation at two institutions were retrospectively assessed. Patients were grouped into those who did and those who did not receive a DPC at the time of primary cannulation. The primary outcome was any limb complication. Secondary outcomes included successfully weaning ECMO and in-hospital mortality. A total of 75 patients underwent femoral cannulation between December 2010 and December 2017. Of those, 65 patients (86.7%) had a DPC placed during primary cannulation and 10 patients (13.3%) did not. Baseline demographics, indications for ECMO, and hemodynamic perturbations were well matched between groups. The rate of limb complications was 14.7% (11/75) for the overall cohort and did not differ between groups (p = .6). Three patients (4%) required a four-compartment fasciotomy for compartment syndrome in the DPC group; no patients without a DPC required fasciotomy. Of the three patients who required a thrombectomy for distal ischemia, two were in the DPC group and one was in the no-DPC group (p = .3). Two patients (2.7%) underwent delayed DPC placement for limb ischemia with resolution of symptoms. The in-hospital morality rate was 59.5% and did not differ between groups (p = .5). Patients in the present study, undergoing femoral VA ECMO without preemptive DPC placement did not experience a higher rate of limb complications. However, the two patients who underwent delayed DPC placement for post-cannulation ischemia experienced resolution of symptoms, suggesting that a DPC may be used as an effective limb salvage intervention.

Endovascular Management of Tracheo-Subclavian Fistula.

Tracheoarterial fistula is a rare complication of tracheostomy with an incidence of less than 1%. Survival of this disease entity is low, and it likely results from a major open operation in a high-risk surgical group. In our review of the literature, a tracheoinnominate artery fistula is the most commonly reported arterial fistula. However, we present a rare case of tracheo-left subclavian artery fistula. We have identified 1 previous case of tracheo-left subclavian fistula as a source of massive tracheal bleeding. In our case report, we describe the successful management of this disease by endograft placement. Owing to its rarity, there are no guidelines on the management approach to tracheoarterial fistulas, but given the difficulty of controlling this problem via median sternotomy, the placement of a covered stent may be the best therapy. Initially, case reports showed a role for endograft placement as a temporizing measure, but the risk of infection may be sufficiently low to justify this approach as a definitive therapy. Upon a 6-month follow-up, our patient remains without recurrence of bleeding or infection, and computed tomography angiography of the chest with 3D reconstruction has shown patency of the endovascular stent with resolution of the associated pseudoaneurysm.

Guidelines for hospital privileges in vascular surgery and endovascular interventions: Recommendations of the Society for Vascular Surgery.

The Hospital Privileges Practice Guideline Writing Group of the Society for Vascular Surgery is making the following five recommendations concerning guidelines for hospital privileges for vascular surgery and endovascular therapy. Advanced endovascular procedures are currently entrenched in the everyday practice of specialized vascular interventionalists, including vascular surgeons, but open vascular surgery remains uniquely essential to the specialty. First, we endorse the Residency Review Committee for Surgery recommendations regarding open and endovascular cases during vascular residency and fellowship training. Second, applicants for new hospital privileges wishing to perform vascular surgery should have completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited vascular surgery residency or fellowship or American Osteopathic Association-accredited training program before 2020 and should obtain American Board of Surgery certification in vascular surgery or American Osteopathic Association certification within 7 years of completion of their training. Third, we recommend that applicants for renewal of hospital privileges in vascular surgery include physicians who are board certified in vascular surgery, general surgery, or cardiothoracic surgery. These physicians with an established practice in vascular surgery should participate in Maintenance of Certification programs as established by the American Board of Surgery and maintain their respective board certification. Fourth, we provide recommendations concerning guidelines for endovascular procedures for vascular surgeons and other vascular interventionalists who are applying for new or renewed hospital privileges. All physicians performing open or endovascular procedures should track outcomes using nationally validated registries, ideally by the Vascular Quality Initiative. Fifth, we endorse the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission recommendations for noninvasive vascular laboratory interpretations and examinations to become a Registered Physician in Vascular Interpretation, which is included in the requirements for board eligibility in vascular surgery, but recommend that only physicians with demonstrated clinical experience in the diagnosis and management of vascular disease be allowed to interpret these studies.

Factors Associated with Successful Thrombus Extraction with the AngioVac Device: An Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: The AngioVac (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY) device utilizes a venovenous bypass circuit for percutaneous venous thrombectomy and has been applied in the setting of iliocaval thrombosis as well as right heart thrombus and pulmonary emboli. We describe our experience with the AngioVac device in 12 patients with a variety of indications with the goal of identifying factors correlating with successful thrombectomy. METHODS: From August 2013 to June 2015, 12 patients underwent AngioVac percutaneous thrombectomy at our institution. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Indications for thrombectomy included iliocaval thrombosis in 33% (4), right heart thrombus in 42% (5), and pulmonary embolus in 25% (3). We experienced a 58% complete success rate. Partial success was achieved in 17%, and no thrombus was extracted in 25%. Iliocaval and right heart thrombi were the most amenable to AngioVac thrombectomy with 100% (4/4) and 60% (3/5) complete success rates, respectively. Pulmonary embolus was the least amenable to thrombectomy with a 33% partial success rate (1/3) and 67% failure rate (2/3). CONCLUSION: The AngioVac devices allow for percutaneous thrombectomy in the setting of iliocaval and right heart thrombus in patients for whom medical therapy fails or for those in whom surgical intervention is considered high risk. Pulmonary emboli are less amenable, likely due to limited steeribility of the device. Larger studies are needed to make more definitive conclusions, and newer iterations of the device will likely allow for improved outcomes.

A comparison of open and endovascular treatment strategies for the management of splenic artery aneurysms.

Splenic artery aneurysms are rare with an incidence of less than 0.8%. Evidence to support an endovascular management strategy over open surgical repair for SAA is limited. We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to compare open to endovascular SAA repair by assessing postoperative outcomes, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to determine predictors of postoperative complications. There were 2316 admissions with a diagnosis code for SAA [347 (14.9%) endovascular repair and 112 (4.8%) open surgery]. There was a statistically significant lower rate of cardiac (2.3% vs 6.9%, P = 0.05) and pulmonary (8.9% vs 16.1%, P = 0.05) complications for the endovascular repair group. The risk of surgical site infection was also lower (0.6% vs 5.1%, P = 0.01) in the endovascular group. Median in-hospital LOS was greater for open repairs (6 vs. 4 days, P = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences across procedures for renal complications (8.9%, P = 0.88) or in-hospital mortality (3%, P = 0.99). Regression analysis established procedure type to be independent predictor of postoperative complications. Endovascular repair of SAA is therefore associated with a lower complication rate and less resource utilization but no difference in mortality peri-operatively. This may justify an endovascular first treatment strategy in the management of SAA.

Impact of regional versus general anesthesia on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation (MLEA) for peripheral arterial disease are often elderly, debilitated, and fraught with medical comorbid conditions that place them at high risk for surgical intervention. Data from lower extremity revascularization surgeries are often extrapolated to determine which anesthetic modality to use for amputations, with preference given to regional anesthesia. However, there is little evidence to support the use of one mode of anesthesia over another. We conducted this study to determine the effect of anesthetic modality on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing above- or below-knee amputations. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent MLEA at a single center between 2002-2011. The study population was divided into 2 groups based on anesthetic modality (i.e., regional vs. general anesthesia). These groups were compared based on demographics and comorbidities. Major outcomes analyzed included death, myocardial infarction (MI), and pulmonary complications. Secondary outcome measures included cardiac arrhythmias, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and duration of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-three patients were identified; 56 patients were excluded for incomplete data, leaving 407 patients in the 2 groups combined. Of these, 259 patients underwent amputation under regional anesthesia; 148 underwent amputation under general anesthesia. Patients in the regional anesthesia group were older (76.6 vs. 71.6 years; P=0.001) and had a lower body mass index (25.2 vs. 26.9 kg/m2; P=0.013). They were also less likely to be on preoperative antiplatelet therapy (aspirin or clopidogrel) or anticoagulation (27% vs. 45%; P<0.001). Regional anesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of overall postoperative pulmonary complications (15% vs. 24%; P=0.02) and postoperative arrhythmia (14% vs. 25%; P=0.001). Duration of stay in the intensive care unit (1.92 vs. 3.85 days; P=0.001) and hospital (19.4 vs 23.1 days; P=0.037) were significantly longer in the group receiving general anesthesia. No significant differences in postoperative MI (12% vs. 9%; P=not significant [NS]), VTE (5% vs. 7%; P=NS) or mortality (10% vs. 13%; P=NS) was seen between groups. Controlling for procedure, above- versus below-knee amputation did not significantly alter these results. CONCLUSIONS: Regional anesthesia for patients undergoing MLEA is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and cardiac arrhythmias. It is also associated with lower resource use. As such, regional anesthesia should likely be the favored anesthetic modality for patients undergoing MLEA.

Endovascular treatment of a thrombosed intracardiac vena cava filter.

Intracardiac migration of a vena cava filter (VCF) is a rare but potentially fatal complication. We describe a unique case of intracardiac migration of a permanent VCF with extensive thrombus propagating into the inferior vena cava and right atrium. Percutaneous thrombectomy with the AngioVac (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY) device was performed, and the permanent VCF was percutaneously removed.

Aortic mural thrombus in the normal or minimally atherosclerotic aorta.

BACKGROUND: Aortic mural thrombus in a nonaneurysmal minimally atherosclerotic or normal aorta is a rare clinical entity and an uncommon cause of peripheral arterial embolization. Both anticoagulation therapy and aortic surgery are commonly used as primary treatment, but there are no consensuses or clinical guidelines to outline the best management strategy for this unusual problem. This systematic review compares the outcomes of these different strategies for the treatment of aortic mural thrombus. METHODS: An extensive search of the literature was conducted, and all relevant publications were reviewed, with individual patient data pooled in this meta-analysis. The outcome variables included were persistence or recurrence of aortic thrombus, recurrence of peripheral embolization, mortality, and a composite end point of complications consisting of stroke, limb loss, and bowel resection. Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to compare groups and to find any predictors of adverse outcome. RESULTS: Two hundred patients from 98 articles were considered. Of these, 112 patients received anticoagulation and 88 underwent aortic surgery as primary treatment. Smoking was more prevalent in the surgery group, but no other significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, or mode of presentation were seen between groups. The surgery group was more likely to have aortic thrombus located in the arch, but there were no differences in terms of the mobility or size of the thrombus between groups. Aortic thrombus persisted or recurred in 26.4% of the anticoagulation group and in 5.7% of the surgery group (P < 0.001). Recurrence of peripheral arterial embolization was seen in 25.7% of the anticoagulation group and 9.1% of the surgery group (P = 0.003). Mortality rates were similar at 6.2% and 5.7% for the anticoagulation group and the surgery group, respectively (P = 0.879). Complications were noted in 27% of the anticoagulation group and 17% of the surgery group (P = 0.07), and major limb amputation rates were 9% for the anticoagulation group and 2% for the surgery group (P = 0.004). Logistic regression analysis established thrombus location in the ascending aorta (odds ratio [OR]: 12.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-238.8) or arch (OR: 18.3; 95% CI: 2.6-376.7), mild atherosclerosis of the aortic wall (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1-6.4), and stroke presentation (OR: 11.8; 95% CI: 3.3-49.5) as important predictors of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our meta-analysis seem to favor the surgical management of aortic mural thrombus in the normal or minimally diseased aorta. Anticoagulation as primary therapy is associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence, a trend toward a higher incidence of complications, and a higher incidence of limb loss. Aortic surgery should be considered as primary treatment, particularly for those patients at high risk for recurrence considered to be good operative candidates.

Concurrent prophylactic placement of inferior vena cava filter in gastric bypass and adjustable banding operations in the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. However, the concurrent prophylactic placement of an inferior vena cava filter (CPIVCF) in patients undergoing bariatric operations remains controversial. This study used the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD) to establish associated characters and determine outcomes of CPIVCF for patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GB) and adjustable gastric banding (AB) surgeries. METHODS: We analyzed BOLD, a database of bariatric surgery patient information. GB and AB operations were categorized into open and laparoscopic approaches. Univariate logistic regressions were used to compare between non-CPIVCF and concurrent CPIVCF groups. Significant variables (P < .05) were subsequently input into multivariate regression models: CPIVCF was retained in each model. RESULTS: A total of 322 CPIVCFs (0.33%) were identified from 97,218 GB and AB operations performed between 2007 and 2010 in this retrospective registry study. Significant differences were identified in male gender (21.1% vs 31.4%; P < .001), preoperative body mass index (BMI; 44.5 ± 6.6 vs 45.3 ± 7; P < .001), and African-American race (10.5% vs 18%; P < .001) between non-CPIVCF and CPIVCF groups. The CPIVCF group had more patients with previous nonbariatric surgery (50% vs 43.6%; P = .02), a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE; 21.4% vs 3.1%; P < .001), impairment of functional status (7.8% vs 3.1%; P < .001), lower extremity edema (47.2% vs 27.1%; P < .001), obesity hypoventilation syndrome (7.1% vs 2.1%; P < .001), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (58.1% vs 43.3%; P < .001), and pulmonary hypertension (13% vs 4.1%; P < .001). Patients in the CPIVCF group were more likely to receive GB than gastric banding (77% vs 58.1%; P < .001) and an open surgical approach (21.4% vs 4.8%; P < .001). Operative duration was longer in the CPIVCF group (119 ± 67 vs 89 ± 52 minutes; P < .001). The CPIVCF group also had a longer length of hospital stay (3 ± 2 vs 2 ± 6 days; P = .048), was associated with higher incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT; 0.93% vs 0.12%; P < .001), and had a higher mortality (0.31% vs 0.03%; P = .003) from PE and indeterminate causes. In multivariate analysis, male gender, African-American race, previous nonbariatric surgery, a high BMI, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, history of VTE, lower extremity edema, and pulmonary hypertension were preoperative factors associated with CPIVCF. CONCLUSIONS: CPIVCF was associated with specific clinical features, increased health care resource utilization, and a higher mortality in patients undergoing bariatric operations. Although selected patient characteristics influence surgeons to perform CPIVCF, this study was unable to establish an outcome benefit for CPIVCF.

Comparison of conservative and operative treatment for blunt carotid injuries: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

OBJECTIVES: Blunt carotid injury (BCI) is uncommon but potentially devastating. The best treatment modality for this injury remains undetermined. We conducted this study to better understand the hospital course and treatment outcomes for patients with BCI who received different interventions. METHODS: BCI and related vascular procedures were identified by ICD-9-CM codes from the National Trauma Data Bank(1) using data gathered from 2002 to 2006. Conservative and operative treatment groups were compared by variables of patient demographics, initial assessment in the emergency department (ED), hospital course, and treatment outcomes. Open surgical and endovascular interventions were further compared. RESULTS: A total of 842 BCI were identified from 1,633,126 discharged blunt trauma patients (0.05%). Of these, 762 (90.5%) were treated conservatively and 80 (9.5%) received operative intervention. No differences in demographics were observed between these treatment groups. On initial assessment, no differences between conservative and operative treatment groups were noted with regard to vital signs, Glasgow coma scale, presence of drugs or alcohol in blood, or Trauma Related Injury Severity Score survival probability. Significant differences were seen in terms of the presence of a base deficit (-3.1 +/- 6.8 vs -7.6 +/- 8.3; P = .01), likelihood of a positive head computed tomography (CT) scan (58.6% vs 26.1%; P = .003), and total Injury Severity Score (29.8 +/- 13.3 vs 26.1 +/- 14.1; P = .02). Hospital course and treatment outcomes were comparable, with no differences in hospital length of stay (13.4 +/- 15.3 days vs 13.7 +/- 13.6 days; P = .86), total Functional Independence Measure (8.8 +/- 3.3 vs 9.3 +/- 3.1; P = .38), progression of original neurologic insult (7.5% vs 4.6%; P = .61) or mortality (28.1% vs 19%; P = .08). When comparing open surgical to endovascular interventions (46 open, 34 endovascular, including 3 combined), the only significant differences were in the total Injury Severity Score (22.4 +/- 12.2 vs 31.4 +/- 15.4; P = .01) and length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay (5.0 +/- 6.0 days vs 10.7 +/- 10.4 days; P = .01, and 10.3 +/- 9.2 days vs 19.3 +/- 17.7 days; P = .01). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that neither Functional Independence Measure (FIM) nor mortality was associated with conservative or operative treatment. CONCLUSION: BCI is rare and carries a poor prognosis. Operative intervention is not associated with functional improvement or a survival advantage. This study was unable to support that less invasive endovascular treatment improves treatment outcome when compared to open surgery.

Blood transfusion and its effect on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation.

BACKGROUND: Patients in need of lower extremity amputation are often debilitated and have coronary artery disease and underlying anemia. The transfusion of blood is a common practice in the perioperative management of these patients. However, blood transfusion has been reported to have a negative effect on the incidence of perioperative complications in other patient populations. We undertook this study to determine the effect of blood transfusion on the incidence of adverse postoperative events in patients undergoing major amputations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 300 consecutive patients undergoing either above-knee or below-knee amputation over a 5-year period at our institution. The demographic variables, medical comorbidities, need for blood transfusion, and clinical outcomes were recorded. The impact of blood transfusion on clinical outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients undergoing major amputation, 191 (64%) had one or more blood transfusions. The demographic variables and incidence of medical comorbidities were comparable between the two groups. Patients undergoing blood transfusion were 2.5 more likely to suffer from a postoperative cardiac arrhythmia, 12.8 times more likely to develop acute renal failure, 5.7 times more likely to have pneumonia, and 2.2 times more likely to have a urinary tract infection. Each of these adverse postoperative events was statistically more likely in the transfused group. The postoperative mortality was 13% for the transfused group and 6% for those not transfused, which was a nonsignificant difference. The intensive care unit stay and overall hospital stay were significantly longer in patients who had blood transfusions (difference of 2.1 and 5.4 days, respectively). CONCLUSION: Blood transfusion in patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation is associated with an increased incidence of adverse postoperative events and prolonged intensive care unit and hospital stays. We therefore suggest a restricted approach to blood transfusion in patients requiring major amputation.

Acute arterial occlusion after ultrasound-guided thrombin injection of a common femoral artery pseudoaneurysm with a wide, short neck.

Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection (UGTI) has emerged as the preferred treatment modality for pseudoaneurysms occurring as a result of percutaneous femoral arterial interventions. UGTI is safe and effective, with few complications. Native arterial thrombosis has been rarely reported in the literature following UGTI and has usually been attributed to excessive thrombin injection. We report a case of femoral arteria thrombosis occurring following UGTI of a 4 cm postcatherization pseudoaneurysm with a wide, short neck successfully treated by surgical intervention. The large size of the neck of this pseudoaneurysm likely contributed to the development of this complication.

The effect of systemic anticoagulation in patients undergoing angioaccess surgery.

The benefit of intravenous heparin as an anticoagulant to avoid thrombotic complications during angioaccess surgery for hemodialysis is unknown. We prospectively randomized 115 consecutive patients referred to our institution for permanent hemodialysis access to receive systemic anticoagulation or no anticoagulation during angioaccess surgery. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, procedure time, complications, and patency were recorded in accordance with standards recommended by the Society for Vascular Surgery. Of the 115 patients randomized, 58 received no anticoagulation and 57 received systemic anticoagulation with intravenous heparin. Arteriovenous fistulas were created in 84 patients and 31 arteriovenous grafts were inserted. Operative times were longer for grafts compared to fistulas, but there were no significant differences in operative times between patients receiving anticoagulation and those not (p = 0.31). Perioperative bleeding complications were more common in patients receiving heparin (p = 0.008). The primary 30-day patency was 84% for patients receiving heparin and 86% for those not (p = 0.79). The 3-month functional patency was 68% for both groups (p = 0.99). Age, gender, operative time, and incidence of bleeding complications had no impact on patency. In our experience, systemic anticoagulation for angioaccess surgery is associated with an increased incidence of bleeding complications and offers no advantage in terms of early patency.

Enlargement of previously ligated popliteal aneurysm causing venous bypass graft occlusion.

A 72-year-old male patient presented with a thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysm measuring 15 x 8 cm 12 years following ligation and saphenous vein bypass grafting through a medial approach. The giant aneurysm, which had grown and compressed the previously functional vein bypass graft to the point of graft thrombosis, was causing a knee contracture that impeded ambulation. Resection via a posterior approach was accomplished without neurovascular compromise or the need for revascularization. This case underscores the value of aneurysm decompression in cases of large popliteal aneurysms to prevent further growth and attendant complications. Duplex surveillance of ligated popliteal aneurysms is warranted to exclude the possibility of future aneurysm expansion.

Rapid foot and calf compression increases walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication: results of a randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our pilot study was to determine the usefulness of rapid, high-pressure, intermittent pneumatic calf and foot compression (IPCFC) in patients with stable intermittent claudication, with reference to the end points of improvement in initial claudication distance (ICD) (distance at which patient feels pain or discomfort in the legs), and improvement in absolute claudication distance (ACD) (distance at which patient stops walking because the pain or discomfort becomes severe). METHODS: Thirty male patients presenting with stable, intermittent claudication (ACD between 50 and 150 meters on treadmill testing at 3.8 km/h, 10 degrees gradient) were recruited into this pilot study from a single center. Fifteen patients were randomized to treatment with IPCFC (applied for 1 hour twice daily in the sitting position) and were also advised to have daily exercise, and 15 patients served as controls, who were advised exercise alone. All patients received aspirin and had resting and postexercise ankle/brachial index (ABI) measured at enrollment along with ICD and ACD on treadmill testing (3.8 km/h, 10 degrees gradient). The mean age, baseline ICD, and ACD of the treatment and control groups were 70.4 +/- 7 years and 70.7 +/- 9 years, 55.8 +/- 15 meters and 68.4 +/- 17 meters, and 86.7 +/- 19 meters and 103.9 +/- 27 meters, respectively. Both groups were equally matched for risk factors, including smoking, type II diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia. IPCFC was applied. The study protocol included follow-up visits at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12 months with the ABI, ICD and ACD being measured at every visit. RESULTS: The percent change from baseline for ICD and ACD for each patient visit and the mean +/- standard deviation (SD), standard error (SE), and median were calculated for the control and treatment groups. The percent change from baseline measurements (mean +/- SD) for ICD and ACD in the control group at 4, 6, and 12 months were 2.2 +/- 18 and 2.3 +/- 18, 2.9 +/- 17 and 5.2 +/- 20, and 3.6 +/- 18 and 5.8 +/- 20, respectively. In contrast, the changes in ICD and ACD at 4, 6, and 12 months in the treatment group were 137.1 +/- 128 (P < .01) and 84.3 +/- 82 (P < .01), 140.6 +/- 127 (P < .01) and 96.4 +/- 106 (P = .01), and 150.8 +/- 124 (P <0.01) and 101.2 +/- 104 (P <0.01), respectively. Although the ABI showed a slight increase in the treatment group, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study show that IPCFC improves walking distance in patients with stable intermittent claudication. A significant increase in ICD and ACD was seen at 4 and 6 months of treatment, respectively, and the improvement was sustained at 1 year. The combination of IPCFC with other treatment such as risk-factor modification and daily exercise may prove useful in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. It may be a useful first line of therapy in patients with disabling claudication who are unfit for major reconstructive surgery. Improved walking on long-term follow-up and experience from different centers may establish a role for this treatment modality in the future.