Success of Helicobacter pylori Guideline-based Treatment of Newly Diagnosed and Previously Treated Patients During 2007-2021 in Edmonton, Alberta.

Background: Updated 2016 Helicobacter pylori consensus guidelines recommend treatment for 14 days with concomitant therapy (proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin-metronidazole-clarithromycin (PAMC) or bismuth-based quadruple therapy (PPI-bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline, PBMT)) as first line, PBMT or PPI-amoxicillin-levofloxacin (PAL) as second or third line, and PPI-amoxicillin-rifabutin (PAR) as fourth line for 10 days. Objectives: This was a retrospective cohort study to describe and compare the efficacy of anti-Helicobacter treatment regimens over the periods 2007-2015 and 2016-2021 as well as antibiotic resistance. Methods: A modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis was used to analyze the success rate of therapies. mITT includes all patients who were prescribed H. pylori treatment and had at least one follow-up test-of-cure. This included patients who could not complete treatment or were non-adherent with treatment. Risk factors for treatment failures were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Resistance testing was done in a small subset of patients. Results: H. pylori-positive patients who received treatment in Edmonton, Alberta were included in a mITT analysis: 334/387(86%) from 2007 to 2015 and 193/199 (97%) from 2016 to 2021. During 2016-2021, 78% (150/193) of patients underwent cumulative guideline-based treatment with a successful cure in 80% (120/150) of patients. In those who were newly diagnosed, the cure rate was 88% (52/59) versus those with previous treatment failure 75% (68/91) (P < 0.05, risk difference [RD] 14%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-26.3%). The most effective first-line regimens were PAMC for 14 days (87% [45/52]) in 2016-2021 and sequential therapy in 2007-2015 (83% [66/80]) (P = 0.535, RD 4%, 95% CI -8.5-16.5%). When other treatments failed, success with PAR was 50% (2/4) from 2007 to 2015 and 57% (21/37) from 2016 to 2021. Recent (2016-2021) resistance rates to clarithromycin and metronidazole are high at 78% (50/64) and 56% (29/52), respectively. From 2007 to 2015, clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance rates were 80% (36/45) and 83% (38/46), respectively. Levofloxacin resistance increased significantly from 2007-2015 to 2016-2021 (28% [13/46] to 61% [35/57], P < 0.05, RD 33%, 95% CI 11.6-54.4%). Conclusions: Algorithmic treatment with PAMC first line followed by PBMT, PAL, and PAR cures H. pylori in 88% of newly diagnosed patients. PAR therapy shows suboptimal cure rates (50-57% success) but can be considered as third instead of fourth line given increasing levofloxacin resistance rates. Antibiotic resistance in H. pylori is common to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin and frequently accounts for treatment failures.

Performance Characteristics of a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage is the preferred management of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). Optimizing drainage is important and there remains debate as to the choice of stent. A recent trend towards the use of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has emerged. AIM: To evaluate the performance characteristics of a LAMS based on a prospective protocol (CT scan 1 week after placement to assess for resolution and need for necrosectomy followed by stent removal within 3 weeks). METHODS: This is a descriptive prospective cohort study performed at a single centre. The primary outcome was clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure time, total number of endoscopic procedures with or without necrosectomy, stent indwell time, stent functionality and adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (21 males, mean age 46.5 years) underwent placement of LAMS for 41 PFCs (median size 12 cm). There were 18 pseudocysts and 23 walled-off necrosis. Clinical success was seen in 33 of 41 (80%) PFCs. Of the remaining eight patients, six underwent surgery and two patients died from underlying malignant disease (although their PFC had completely resolved). Technical success and stent functionality were 100%. The median procedure time was 14 min (interquartile range 11 min to 20 min). Of the 23 walled-off necrosis, 9 (39%) required necrosectomy. The median stent indwell time was 19 days (interquartile range 14 to 22 days). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol demonstrates excellent performance characteristics of LAMS. Their clinical efficacy and favourable safety profile suggest that they may be the preferred modality for endoscopic ultrasound-guided management of PFCs.

The Evolution of EUS-Guided Transluminal Drainage for the Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparison of Clinical and Cost Outcomes with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents, Conventional Metal Stents and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents.

BACKGROUND: While most pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) resolve spontaneously, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) may be necessary. EUS-TD has evolved from multiple double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) to fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). This study compares clinical attributes of DPPS, FCSEMS and LAMS. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective review of EUS-TD for PFCs. The primary outcome was clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, procedure time, hospital length of stay (HLOS), number of endoscopies, need for necrosectomy, adverse events (AEs) and overall cost. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (37 male, average age 49 years) underwent a total of 60 EUS-TD procedures for PFCs (average size 11.2 cm with 29 pseudocysts and 29 walled-off necrosis). Ten patients (17%) underwent EUS-TD with DPPS and 48 patients (83%) with metal stents (32 FCSEMS, 16 LAMS). Overall technical and clinical success was 100% and 84%, respectively. Lumen-apposing metal stents had shorter procedure times (14.9 versus 63.6 DPPS, 39.1 min FCSEMS, P < 0.001), and no difference in AEs (3 of 16 versus 4 of 10 DPPS, 12 of 34 FCSEMS, ns). Double-pigtail plastic stents required more endoscopies (3.7 versus 2.3 LAMS, 2.3 FCSEMS, P = 0.013) and necrosectomies (4 of 10 [40%]) compared with 5 of 34 [15%] in the FCSEMS group and 3 of 16 [19%] in the LAMS group, respectively, P = 0.001) to achieve clinical resolution. The overall cost and HLOS was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The use of LAMS for PFCs is not associated with any significant increase in cost despite technical (shorter procedure time) and clinical advantages (shorter indwell time, reduced need for necrosectomy and no increase in AEs).

Pancreatic pseudocyst-portal vein fistula with refractory hepatic pseudocyst: Two cases treated with EUS cyst-gastrostomy and review of the literature.

Background and study aims Pseudocysts are the most common pancreatic cystic lesions and they usually develop in association with pancreatitis of at least 4 weeks' duration. Extra-pancreatic pseudocysts, although reported, are relatively uncommon. Secondary liver pseudocysts are recognized within the literature, and most patients described have required percutaneous or surgical drainage due to infection or symptoms. The mechanism of hepatic pseudocyst formation is not entirely clear but it is postulated that this phenomenon may occur through pseudocyst-portal vein fistulization. We describe two cases of patients presenting with pancreatic pseudocysts invading the portal venous system with embolization of pancreatic fluid to the liver and subsequent hepatic pseudocyst formation. Interestingly, liver pseudocyst resolution was incomplete with antibiotics and percutaneous drainage alone, and only occurred following endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic cyst-gastrostomy and metal stent insertion. We have reviewed the current literature on the diagnosis and management of pseudocyst-portal vein fistula formation and we believe that our cases represent the first published within the literature to describe this treatment approach.

A Cholangioscopy-Based Novel Classification System for the Phenotypic Stratification of Dominant Bile Duct Strictures in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis-the Edmonton Classification.

BACKGROUND: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic inflammatory condition causing bile duct strictures. Differentiating inflammatory strictures from malignant transformation is challenging. Cholangioscopy allows direct visualization with the option to biopsy. We describe our experience of cholangioscopy in PSC and propose a novel stricture classification system based on cholangioscopic findings. METHODS: All patients with PSC and a dominant stricture referred for cholangioscopy were reviewed. Based on visual characteristics with direct cholangioscopy, we propose a novel classification system for the extrahepatic form of PSC. RESULTS: The proposed Edmonton Classification system for extrahepatic PSC strictures consists of the following phenotypes: 1) 'inflammatory type', with mucosal erythema and active inflammatory exudate, 2) 'fibro-stenotic type', with concentric fibrotic scars, and 3) 'nodular or mass-forming type', with a mass in the involved segment of extrahepatic bile duct. From 2011-2017, 30 patients with PSC and a dominant stricture (21 M, mean age 46 years) underwent 32 cholangioscopy procedures. Cholangioscopy was technically successful in 29 of 32 procedures (91%). In these 29 stricture cases, inflammatory type was seen in 16 (55%), fibro-stenotic type in seven (24%) and nodular or mass-forming type in five (17%). In one (4%) procedure, there was no stricture or abnormality identified. CONCLUSION: Cholangioscopy is effective and safe for the evaluation of dominant biliary strictures in PSC. Based on our experience with cholangioscopy, we propose a novel classification system of extrahepatic PSC phenotypes: the Edmonton Classification.

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary strictures using the SpyGlass system: a case series.

Peroral cholangioscopy is useful in differentiating benign from malignant biliary strictures. However, when conventional biliary access via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails, percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS) via the SpyGlass cholangioscopy system can be used to achieve a diagnosis. Four patients with biliary strictures in whom conventional ERCP was not possible and percutaneous brushings were either nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory were investigated with PTCS. The technique of PTCS involves insertion of the SpyGlass cholangioscope through a percutaneous transhepatic sheath, placed just prior to the procedure, to visualize the stricture and obtain biopsies with the SpyBite forceps. On the basis of our early observations, we conclude that PTCS using the SpyGlass cholangioscopy system for the assessment of biliary strictures is feasible, safe, and provides high diagnostic accuracy.

Diagnosis of Heyde's syndrome by abnormal closure times despite normal von Willebrand's activity.

Heyde's syndrome is characterized by iron deficiency anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding and calcific aortic stenosis. Patients with this syndrome have a bleeding diathesis due to a loss of the largest multimers of von Willebrand factor (vWF). Here we present a case of Heyde's syndrome diagnosed with abnormal closure times and normal vWF Ristocetin cofactor activity (vWF:Rco). In this case, a 79-year-old man with known aortic stenosis and recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding was cured of a life-threatening hemorrhage after the replacement of his stenotic aortic valve. Factor VIII activity (1.53  IU/ml), vWF antigen (1.26  IU/ml), vWF:Rco (1.11  IU/ ml), and the ratio of vWF antigen/vWF:Rco (0.88) were all within normal limits. Instead, to prove a defect in platelet aggregation, closure times measured with collagen/ADP and collagen/epinephrine were abnormal (>300  s). Postoperatively, these closure times normalized. What is unique about our current report is that we measured both vWF:Rco and closure times, the two readily available assays in most coagulation laboratories. vWF:Rco is a standard assay for measuring platelet activity but may miss defects in platelet aggregation that are only seen under high shear stress. As the closure times can detect such defects, it is perhaps more representative than traditional assays, and in situations such as our case, closure times may be the only method by which subtle abnormalities in vWF function could be detected.