Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transplantation ; 101(4): 804-810, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27755504

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most pediatric liver transplantation (LT) centers administer long courses of prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) without evidence of benefit and with significant drug exposure and costs. We aimed at evaluating overall outcomes, direct and putative indirect effects of CMV, possible impact of viremia and risk factors for CMV infection in pediatric LT recipients managed with ganciclovir-based preemptive therapy (PET). METHODS: The records of all the children who underwent LT between 2008 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred children were included. Three children had CMV disease; no CMV-related death or graft loss was recorded. The only identified risk factor for CMV infection was the donor/recipient serostatus (odds ratio, 17.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-157.87; P = 0.012), while viremia per se did not worsen LT outcomes, such as the incidence of acute rejection, Epstein-Barr virus infection, sepsis, biliary and vascular complications, nor graft dysfunction/loss or death at 3 and 5 years after LT. When compared with a historical cohort of children receiving ganciclovir prophylaxis, PET did not differ from prophylaxis for any of the selected outcomes, but was rather associated with lower antiviral drug exposure (6.4 ± 13 days vs 38.6 ± 14 days, P < 0.0001) and cost per patient (2.2 ± 3.9 k&OV0556; vs 6.6 ± 8.2 k&OV0556;, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PET is effective in controlling CMV in children receiving LT, with lower costs and lower exposure to antivirals.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Ganciclovir/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Antivirales/economía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Preescolar , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/economía , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/virología , Esquema de Medicación , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Ganciclovir/efectos adversos , Ganciclovir/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Italia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Trasplante de Hígado/economía , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Transplantation ; 100(2): 437-45, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26270449

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains to be defined due to heterogeneity of this condition and lack of predictors of the outcome. Here we report our experience with pediatric PTLD nonresponsive to immunosuppression (IS) withdrawal, managed after stratification into high and low risk according to the presenting features. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review of prospectively enrolled patients. From 2001 to 2011, 17 children were diagnosed with severe B-lineage, CD20+, PTLD after a median of 37 months (range, 5-93) from liver (12), heart (4), or multiorgan (1) transplantation. Treatment was tailored on 2 risk groups: (1) standard-risk (SR) patients received IS reduction and rituximab; (2) high-risk (HR) patients received IS discontinuation, rituximab and polychemotherapy. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of rejection at 1 and 5 years after the diagnosis of PTLD was 35% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 18-69%) and 53% (33-85%), respectively, whereas the disease-free survival at 1 and 5 years was 94% (95% CI, 65-99%) and 75% (45-90%), respectively. Three children died, PTLD-free, from different transplant-related complications: primary nonfunction after retransplantation (liver), cytomegalovirus disease 21 months after PTLD treatment (liver), graft dysfunction 25 months after PTLD (heart). CONCLUSIONS: Severe B-lineage PTLD after solid organ transplantation may be classified as SR or HR and treated accordingly with a tailored protocol obtaining a satisfactory long-term outcome. This approach accomplishes the control of lymphoproliferation in severe forms as well as the minimization of toxicity in milder PTLDs.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos B/inmunología , Linaje de la Célula , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/inmunología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Italia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/mortalidad , Masculino , Trasplante de Órganos/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...