[Wide awake hand surgery based on application examples]. / Wide-awake-Technik in der Handchirurgie anhand von Anwendungsbeispielen.

OBJECTIVE: Anesthesiologic method with low bleeding level, risk level, and complication rate for surgical procedures on the hand without a tourniquet on an unsedated patient with the possibility for functional testing during surgery. INDICATIONS: Surgical procedures of the hand can be carried out using the wide awake technique depending on the patient's suitability and preference considering individual risk factors. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Absolute contraindications are allergies to the local anesthetic or its components. Relative contraindications are severe hepatic or renal insufficiency, infections in the injection area, acute circulatory disorders, or higher cardiac function impairment. INJECTION TECHNIQUE: Infiltration of a lidocaine/epinephrine mixture with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate in a ratio of 10:1.5 at least 30 min prior to surgery. Perpendicular puncture of the skin and slow injection. Continue injection until reaching a pale skin area of at least 1 cm around the entire operating area. If the needle tip always remains in a cushion of local anesthetic, a "hole-in-one" anesthesia can be achieved (only the first needle puncture is felt). POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Elevated care and awareness for numb body parts by the patient because of impaired sensation. Follow-up treatment according to the surgeon's specifications. Postoperative use of painkillers. RESULTS: Of 38 patients, 32 felt that the procedure was not stressful, 6 rated it as a bit stressful. Pain perception on a visual analog scale (0 = no pain, 10 = severe pain) scored an average of 1.6 during infiltration, 0.5 during the operation, 3.5 during the reduction of the anesthesia, and 2.9 on the following day. All patients would undergo surgery again using the wide awake technique.

Warm winter is associated with low incidence of ST elevation myocardial infarctions and less frequent acute coronary angiographies in an alpine country.

BACKGROUND: Weather conditions influence symptoms in chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether the ongoing climate change, with continuous and rapid temperature increases, also has an impact on the incidence and outcome of non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) and ST elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarctions referred for acute coronary angiography (CA) is less clear. METHODS: According to weather data from the Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, Innsbruck University, the 2005/2006 winter was very cold (CW) and the 2006/2007 winter extraordinarily warm (WW). As the overall invasive management of patients with acute coronary syndromes did not change substantially within these winters, we compared patients referred for acute CA suffering an acute STEMI or NSTEMI, their risk factors and in-hospital mortality rates between these two consecutive winters. RESULTS: As expected, the average temperature was lower (- 1.6 vs. + 5.9°C; p < 0.001) and humidity was higher (82 vs. 79%; p < 0.012) in CW compared to WW, with no significant differences in other weather conditions (rainfall: 59 vs. 39 days; sunshine: 3.9 vs. 4.3 h/day; air pressure: 713.04 vs. 713.76 hPa). There were no differences in the number of overall CA (987 vs. 983) between these two winters, whereas the number of acute CA (12.9 vs. 10.4% of overall CA; p = 0.046) and the diagnosis of STEMI as an indication of acute CA (74.0% vs. 62.7%; p = 0.046) were higher in CW. Furthermore, patients in CW were younger (58.2 ± 12.4 vs. 61.7 ± 11.7 years; p < 0.03), had higher LDL cholesterol (134.8 ± 44.6 vs. 116.7 ± 36.0 mg/dl; p < 0.003) and were less frequently hypertensives (52.8 vs. 70.6%; p < 0.01). Other traditional risk factors were not different between WW and CW. In addition, there were no differences in in-hospital mortality rates in invasively diagnosed CAD, patients' nationalities (Austrians: 78.0 vs. 77.5%) and time from pain to arrival in the cath lab in STEMI patients (3.9 ± 3.5 vs. 3.8 ± 3.1 h). CONCLUSION: The average temperature increase of 7.5°C from the cold to the warm winter was associated with a decrease in acute coronary angiographies, in particular due to a lower incidence of STEMI referred for primary percutaneous intervention.

Safety and efficacy of femoral artery closure with the FemoSeal(R) device after coronary angiography using a 7 French sheath.

Post-cardiac catheterization femoral artery hemostasis can be accomplished with several mechanisms, including the FemoSeal® hemostasis device which has been designed and approved for closure of 6 French (F) arterial puncture sites. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the FemoSeal® vascular closure device can effectively and safely seal 7F arterial puncture sites after diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterizations. Femoral artery puncture sites of 50 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were closed with the FemoSeal® vascular closure device, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Efficacy endpoints were time to hemostasis and successful ambulation. Safety endpoints included bleeding complications, vessel occlusion and pseudoaneurysms. Mean time to hemostasis was 57.8±26.3 seconds (0-125 seconds). Hemostasis was achieved in 100 percent of the 50 patients. One patient suffered minor bleeding the next day, i.e. local hematoma. This clinical study demonstrates that the FemoSeal® vascular closure device, initially approved for closure of 6F arterial puncture sites, shows promising efficacy and safety to seal a larger (7F) femoral arterial puncture sites after diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterizations.

Occurrence of acute myocardial infarction in winter tourists: data from a retrospective questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Every year millions of tourists spend their vacation in Tyrol, Austria during the winter season. They often perform sports at high altitudes and at low temperatures, factors that might cause acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of first physical activity and the onset of AMI in winter tourists. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine III at the Medical University of Innsbruck with the diagnosis of an AMI between 2006 and 2010. We identified 172 patients as potential candidates for the questionnaire. We successfully contacted 110 patients (mean age: 60 ± 10 years). The location of visit, duration of stay, time of arrival, first sportive activity and onset of symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: During the first 2 days of physical activity , 56% of AMIs occurred. In tourists who suffered AMI during, or within 1 h after cessation of activity (52%), the mean time from the start of the activity to the onset of symptoms was 2.0 ± 1.7 h. 56% of patients performed less than 2.5 h of sport per week before their vacation and 70% had ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors. Although the mean planned vacation time was 8.3 ± 3.7 days, 39% of the patients suffered from AMI on the day of arrival or the day after. CONCLUSION: The majority of AMIs in winter tourists happens within the first 2 days after arrival and within the first 2 days of physical activity.

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease in 5641 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: Although high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are well-established predictors for future cardiovascular events, little information is available regarding their correlation with the prevalence and severity of angiographically evaluated coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five thousand six hundred forty-one consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for the evaluation of CAD were analysed. Cardiovascular risk factors were assessed by routine blood chemistry and questionnaire. CAD severity was graded by visual estimation of lumen diameter stenosis with significant stenoses defined as lumen diameter reduction of >or= 70%. Coronary angiograms were graded as one-, two- or three-vessel disease, as nonsignificant CAD (lumen irregularities < 70%) or non-CAD. RESULTS: HDL-C (60.3 +/- 18.5 vs. 51.9 +/- 15.3 mg dL(-1); P < 0.001) was higher and CRP was lower (0.65 +/- 1.68 vs. 1.02 +/- 2.38 mg dL(-1); P < 0.001) in non-CAD (n = 1517) compared to overall CAD patients (n = 4124). CAD patients were older (65.2 +/- 10.5 years vs. 59.9 +/- 11.4 years), more often diabetics (19.2% vs. 10.6%) and hypertensives (79.2% vs. 66.0%) and included more smokers (18.8% vs. 16.5%) (all P < 0.005). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (124.5 +/- 38.3 vs. 126.0 +/- 36.3 mg dL(-1); P = NS) was similar in overall CAD and non-CAD patients with more statin users (43.4% vs. 27.9%; P < 0.001) among CAD patients. Comparing non-CAD with different CAD severities using analysis of variance, results did not change substantially. In a multivariate analysis, HDL-C and CRP remained independently associated with the prevalence of CAD. In addition, HDL-C is also a potent predictor for the severity of CAD. CONCLUSIONS: In this large consecutive patient cohort, HDL-C and CRP are independently associated with the prevalence of CAD. In this analysis, HDL-C is an even stronger predictor for CAD than some other major classical risk factors.