Long-term safety in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with niraparib versus placebo: Results from the phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial.

OBJECTIVE: Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor approved for use in heavily pretreated patients and as maintenance treatment in patients with newly-diagnosed or recurrent ovarian cancer following a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. We present long-term safety data for niraparib from the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of niraparib for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either once-daily niraparib 300 mg or placebo. Two independent cohorts were enrolled based on germline BRCA mutation status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, reported previously. Long-term safety data were from the most recent data cutoff (September 2017). RESULTS: Overall, 367 patients received niraparib 300 mg once daily. Dose reductions due to TEAEs were highest in month 1 (34%) and declined every month thereafter. Incidence of any-grade and grade ≥ 3 hematologic and symptomatic TEAEs was also highest in month 1 and subsequently declined. Incidence of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia decreased from 28% (month 1) to 9% and 5% (months 2 and 3, respectively), with protocol-directed dose interruptions and/or reductions. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were reported in 2 and 6 niraparib-treated patients, respectively, and in 1 placebo patient each. Treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs were <5% in each month and time interval measured. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the importance of appropriate dose reduction according to toxicity criteria and support the safe long-term use of niraparib for maintenance treatment in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01847274.

Ovarian cancer in elderly patients: carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in late relapse: a Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CALYPSO sub-study.

BACKGROUND: CALYPSO (CAeLYx in Platinum Sensitive Ovarian) patients compared carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (C-PLD) with carboplatin-paclitaxel (C-P) in patients with late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). We analyzed outcomes in patients ≥70 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred and seventy-six patients with taxane-pretreated ROC relapsing >6 months after first- or second-line platinum-based therapy were randomly assigned to 4-weekly C area under the curve (AUC) 5 plus PLD 30 mg/m(2) or 3-weekly C AUC 5 plus P 175 mg/m(2) for six or more cycles. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven (16%) patients ≥70 years (median: 74 years, C-PLD; 73 years, C-P; range 70-82 years) were included (n = 71, C-PLD; n = 86, C-P). In comparing elderly and younger, elderly patients experienced fewer grade ≥2 allergic reactions (P = 0.005) but more grade ≥2 sensory neuropathy (P = 0.007). Myelosuppression did not differ with age. Elderly patients completed planned treatment as frequently as younger (79%, C-PLD; 82%, C-P). In comparing arms within elderly patients, C-P was associated with more grade ≥2 alopecia, sensory neuropathy, arthralgia/myalgia (P < 0.001 for all), severe leukopenia plus febrile neutropenia; C-PLD was associated with more grade ≥2 hand-foot syndrome (P = 0.005). Median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (C-PLD) and 10.3 months (C-P; P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Patients ≥70 years experienced more neuropathy, with a higher incidence in the C-P arm. Similar to all study patients, C-PLD provided a better therapeutic index with less toxicity than C-P in elderly women with platinum-sensitive ROC.

Screening for familial ovarian cancer: poor survival of BRCA1/2 related cancers.

AIM: To assess the effectiveness of annual ovarian cancer screening (transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 estimation) in reducing mortality from ovarian cancer in women at increased genetic risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 3532 women at increased risk of ovarian cancer was screened at five European centres between January 1991 and March 2007. Survival from diagnosis of ovarian cancer was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared for proven BRCA1/2 carriers with non-carriers and whether the cancer was detected at prevalence or post-prevalent scan. Screening was performed by annual transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 measurement. RESULTS: 64 epithelial ovarian malignancies (59 invasive and 5 borderline), developed in the cohort. 26 tumours were detected at prevalent round; there were 27 incident detected cancers and 11 interval. 65% of cancers were stage 3 or 4, however, stage and survival were little different for prevalent versus post-prevalent cancers. Five year and 10 year survival in 49 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 58.6% (95% CI 50.9% to 66.3%) and 36% (95% CI 27% to 45%), which was significantly worse than for 15 non-BRCA carriers (91.8%, 95% CI 84% to 99.6%, both 5 and 10 year survival p = 0.015). However, when borderline tumours were excluded, the difference in survival between carriers and non-carriers was no longer significant. CONCLUSION: Annual surveillance, by transvaginal ultrasound scanning and serum CA125 measurement, in women at increased familial risk of ovarian cancer is ineffective in detecting tumours at a sufficiently early stage to influence substantially survival in BRCA1/2 carriers.

A new approach to treatment of early-stage cervical carcinoma: entire laparoscopic abdominal radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy without vaginal cuff closure--case reports.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe a new technique of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy without vaginal cuff closure. METHODS: Three patients underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection using an Argon Beam Coagulator. Four trocars were used: umbilical port for the camera, two ports for the operating surgeon and a fourth port for use by the surgical assistant. RESULTS: All patients were clinically staged IB1. Ages were 53, 64 and 58 and BMI was 19.5, 25.2 and 21.4, respectively. Duration of surgery was 375, 325 and 335 minutes, respectively, from first trocar insertion to last closing stitch. Estimated blood loss was 300, 100 and 400 ml and removed pelvic lymph nodes 18, 15 and 26, respectively. The patients tolerated the surgical technique and recovered satisfactorily. CONCLUSION: These are the first three cases of early-stage cervical carcinoma patients who have been treated with entirely laparoscopic abdominal radical hysterectomy (LARH) and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy (BPL) without vaginal cuff closure. To our knowledge, this has not been previously described in the literature. It is feasible and was well tolerated in this small series of patients.

Yo antibodies in ovarian and breast cancer patients detected by a sensitive immunoprecipitation technique.

Onconeural antibodies are found in patients with cancer and are associated with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS). The objective of the present study was to assess the frequency of Yo antibodies in ovarian and breast cancer using a sensitive immunoprecipitation technique, and to look for any association of Yo antibodies with neurological symptoms and prognostic factors. A multiwell adapted fluid-phase immunoassay using radiolabelled recombinant cerebellar degeneration related protein (cdr2), produced by coupled in vitro transcription/translation was used for the detection of Yo antibodies. This technique combines high specificity and sensitivity with high sample analysing capacity for the antibody in question. Sera or EDTA-blood from 810 ovarian (n = 557) and breast cancer (n = 253) patients were analysed for Yo antibodies by immunoprecipitation, as well as immunofluorescence and immune blots. Two hundred healthy blood donors and sera from 17 patients with paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration and Yo antibodies served as controls. Immunoprecipitation was more sensitive in detecting Yo antibodies than immunofluorescence and immune blots. The prevalence of Yo antibodies was 13/557 (2.3%) in ovarian cancer and 4/253 (1.6%) in breast cancer using immunoprecipitation. Yo antibodies were not correlated with specific histological subgroups. The Yo index of ovarian cancer patients in FIGO stage IV was higher compared to FIGO stage I-III. The prevalence of Yo antibodies was 3 times higher in patients with stage III breast cancer than in stage I and II. Only 2/17 (11.8%) patients with Yo antibodies detected during the screen of 810 cancer patients had PNS. The results show that the prevalence of Yo antibodies is low in ovarian and breast cancer. Yo antibodies may be associated with advanced cancer, but less often with PNS.

BRCA1 mutations in ovarian cancer and borderline tumours in Norway: a nested case-control study.

The aims of the present study were to find the frequency of the most common BRCA1 mutations in women with ovarian tumours identified from a population-based cancer registry and in the general population, to estimate the relative risk of ovarian tumours among the mutation carriers, and to explore the value of using CA125 as a prediagnostic test. The study was designed as a nested case-control study within a cohort mainly consisting of participants in population-based health examinations. The data files of The Cancer Registry of Norway and the Janus serum bank were linked to identify cases with ovarian cancer and borderline tumours. Hereditary BRCA1 mutations were determined using archived serum samples and capillary electrophoresis. Altogether 478 ovarian cancer patients and 190 patients with borderline tumours were identified, and 1421 and 568 matching controls were selected. Odds ratios (OR) of developing ovarian cancer and borderline tumours in the presence of BRCA1 mutations and CA125 level were derived from conditional logistic regression models. Among the 478 ovarian cancer patients, 19 BRCA1 mutations were identified (1675delA, 1135insA, 816delGT and 3347delAG), none among the patients with borderline tumours. Only two of the 1989 controls were BRCA1 mutation carriers (0.10%). The risk of ovarian cancer among the mutation carriers was strongly elevated (OR=29, 95% CI=6.6-120). CA125 was a marker for ovarian cancer, but the sensitivity was low. This study showed that BRCA1 mutation carriers have a very high risk of ovarian cancer. However, since the prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in the Norwegian population was low, the proportion of ovarian cancers due to BRCA1 mutations seemed to be low, about 4%. The sensitivity of using CA125 only as a screening test for ovarian cancer was low.

[Screening for ovarian cancer]. / Ovarialcancerscreening.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is a common malignant neoplasm in affluent societies. Although the prognosis has continuously improved since the 1950s, it is still poor, with five-year relative survival rates of about 40%. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The paper discusses the potential use of screening for early ovarian cancer detection. RESULTS: The disease is a suitable candidate for screening because the prognosis is strongly dependent on the stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. Ovarian cancer does not, however, meet all the prerequisites for successful screening; there is no preclinical stage that can be detected, and the tests are not sensitive and specific enough to be effective. Furthermore, there is so far no direct evidence that screening would decrease mortality from ovarian cancer, though recent data suggest that screening may increase survival. INTERPRETATION: Screening women at higher risk of developing ovarian cancer might be beneficial.

[Hereditary breast cancer in Norway]. / Arvelig brystkreft i Norge.

Women at risk for inherited breast cancer have been evaluated in two collaborating Norwegian cancer genetics centres and offered follow-up in the out-patient clinics of all major Norwegian hospitals for the last 11 years. The families were identified on the basis of clinical criteria. The breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 were identified in 1994-95. Even though several hundred different mutations in these genes have been described, a significant proportion of Norwegian families with breast cancer appears to have a few frequent mutations. This most probably is a result of the changes in the population structure of Norway as the population went through a genetic bottleneck during the Black Death, which was followed by rapid population expansion. Mutation analysis has now been put in use to identify Norwegian breast cancer families. Such analysis should be offered to all Norwegian patients with breast or ovarian cancers regardless of age of onset or positive family history. For the time being, analysis should be restricted to the detection of the demonstrated frequent mutations in BRCA1.

BRCA1 1675delA and 1135insA account for one third of Norwegian familial breast-ovarian cancer and are associated with later disease onset than less frequent mutations.

A total of 845 women from breast-ovarian cancer kindreds were enrolled in a clinical follow-up program for early disease diagnosis; 35 women were prospectively identified with cancer. In order to estimate the role of genetic factors for cancer predisposition in this well-defined set of patients, considered as representative for familial breast-ovarian cancer in the Norwegian population, the BRCA1 gene was investigated for germline mutations. The entire coding region of BRCA1 was analysed using a protein truncation test, direct sequencing and a screen for known large genomic deletions and insertions. Twenty one (60%) of the 35 patients were identified as carriers of 11 distinct BRCA1 mutations. Two previously described founder mutations, 1675delA and 1135insA, were found to account for more than half (11/21) of all BRCA1 cases and for almost one third (11/35) of all breast and ovarian cancers. Supported by a previous population-based analysis of these founder mutations in ovarian cancer, our findings suggest that a significant proportion of women at risk for developing inherited breast and ovarian cancer can be identified. This is particularly obvious in certain geographic regions where these founder mutations are prevalent. Women carrying the two founder mutations had a significantly older age of disease onset as compared to women with other BRCA1 mutations. This observation indicates that BRCA mutation penetrance estimates from populations with strong founder effects may be biased. One reason why some deleterious mutations are allowed to prevail in a population may be coupled to penetrance and the fact that they seldom induce disease in women in child-bearing ages. Eleven out of 12 (92%) breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers were estrogen receptor negative, versus 4 out of 9 (44%) in mutation negative patients (p = 0.03). Histopathological characteristics of the prospectively detected cancers indicated an unfavourable prognosis in mutation carriers.

Prospectively detected cancer in familial breast/ovarian cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and treatment are shown to improve survival of breast and ovarian cancer. Identification and medical follow-up of high-risk groups may be important for early diagnosis. METHODS: A prospective study of 845 women from breast/ovarian- and ovarian cancer kindreds who were classified according to pre-set inclusion criteria (Table I), were offered genetic counseling and annual medical examinations of breasts and ovaries. The material consisted of three series: 1) 754 unaffected women, 2) 49 women with breast cancer, and 3) 42 women with ovarian cancer. RESULTS: In series 1) nine ovarian cancers and 20 breast cancers, in series 2) seven ovarian cancers, and in series 3) three breast cancers were found. All but one of the ovarian cancers were 40 years or older, and 4/16 (25%) were Borderline cancer. All breast cancers were 30 years or older, and 89% were detected before spread. CONCLUSIONS: This is to our knowledge the first prospective report of the combined breast/ovarian cancer findings in breast/ovarian cancer kindreds. A woman with both breast and ovarian cancer is the hallmark of inherited breast/ovarian cancer, and 50% of the ovarian cancers were detected in these families. Borderline ovarian cancer may represent a manifestation of this syndrome. If prophylactic oophorectomy prevents ovarian cancer, oophorectomy at age 45 would have prevented 75% of such cancers. Based on these results we revised our protocol for annual follow-up in these kindreds: 1) clinical breast examination and mammography (ultrasound/cytology if indicated) from 30 years of age, 2) gynecologic examination (including vaginal ultrasound, serum-CA125) from 35 years of age, and 3) discuss oophorectomy at 45 years of age.

Three per cent of Norwegian ovarian cancers are caused by BRCA1 1675delA or 1135insA.

Our aim was to determine the prevalence of two Norwegian BRCA1 founder mutations in ovarian cancer patients, to identify carriers and their families for medical follow-up, and to study histopathological factors. Of a cohort of 727 ovarian cancer patients, 615 gave informed consent to testing. 2.9% (18/615) of the tested patients were found to be carriers of BRCA1 1675delA (n = 13) or 1135insA (n = 5). The total frequency of the mutations was 4.7% (8/171) in patients below 50 years of age, and zero (0/144) in patients above 70 years of age. In patients below 70 years of age, the frequency of 1675delA and 1135insA mutations was 2.8% and 1.0%, respectively. Out of 13 patients with 1675delA mutation, 4 had breast cancer. 14/16 (87.5%) families fulfilled clinical criteria for familial breast-ovarian cancer. Median age of onset of ovarian and breast cancer was 51 years and 37 years, respectively. Mutation carriers tended to have tumours with unfavourable prognostic factors. This is, to our knowledge, the highest reported frequency of founder mutations in a national ovarian cancer cohort (less than in the Ashkenazis). It seems justified to offer such testing to ovarian cancer patients below 70 years of age in Norway, identify their risk of breast cancer and offer medical follow-up to the families.

Penetrances of BRCA1 1675delA and 1135insA with respect to breast cancer and ovarian cancer.

For genetic counseling and predictive testing in families with inherited breast-ovarian cancer, penetrances and expressions of the underlying mutations should be known. We have previously reported two BRCA1 founder mutations in the Norwegian population. Index cases for the present study were found two different ways: through a series of consecutive ovarian cancers (n=16) and through our family cancer clinic (n=14). Altogether, 20 of the patients had BRCA1 1675delA, and 10 had 1135insA. Their relatives were described with respect to absence/presence of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Of 133 living female relatives, 83 (62%) were tested for the presence of a mutation. No difference, in penetrance and expression, between the two mutations were found, whereas differences according to method of ascertainment were seen. The overall findings were that disease started to occur at age 30 years and that by age 50 years 48% of the mutation-carrying women had experienced breast and/or ovarian cancer. More ovarian cancers than breast cancers were recorded. Both penetrance and expression (breast cancer vs. ovarian cancer) were different from those in reports of the Ashkenazi founder mutations. Whether the reported differences reflect true differences and/or methodological problems is discussed. An observed excess of mutation carriers could not be accounted for by methodological problems; possible explanations were a "true" low penetrance or preferential segregation.

Therapy effect of either paclitaxel or cyclophosphamide combination treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and relation to TP53 gene status.

Cell death after treatment with chemotherapy is exerted by activation of apoptosis, and the p53 protein has been shown to actively participate in this process. This recent focus on TP53 status as a possible determinant of cancer therapy response has raised the question of whether or not mutations in the TP53 gene have an influence on paclitaxel therapy. The TP53 status has been analysed at the DNA level in tumours from 45 ovarian cancer patients randomized to treatment with paclitaxel and cisplatin or cyclophosphamide and cisplatin. Therapy response was obtained for 38 patients with clinically evaluable disease after initial surgery. The positive response rate to the paclitaxel/cisplatin therapy was 85% vs 61% for the patients who received the cyclophosphamide/cisplatin regimen. A significant difference in relapse-free survival in favour of paclitaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy was found (P = 0.001). A total of 33 tumour samples (73%) had detectable sequence alterations in the TP53 gene. When relapse-free survival was estimated for all patients with TP53 alterations in their tumours, a significant better outcome for the paclitaxel/cisplatin group was found compared with the patient group receiving cyclophosphamide and cisplatin therapy (P = 0.002). We did not observe an association between TP53 tumour status and prognosis for patients who received paclitaxel/cisplatin combination treatment, indicating that the effect of this therapy is not influenced by this parameter.

Oral contraceptives and the risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Clinical Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Women with mutations in either the BRCA1 or the BRCA2 gene have a high lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Oral contraceptives protect against ovarian cancer in general, but it is not known whether they also protect against hereditary forms of ovarian cancer. METHODS: We enrolled 207 women with hereditary ovarian cancer and 161 of their sisters as controls in a case-control study. All the patients carried a pathogenic mutation in either BRCA1 (179 women) or BRCA2 (28 women). The control women were enrolled regardless of whether or not they had either mutation. Lifetime histories of oral-contraceptive use were obtained by interview or by written questionnaire and were compared between patients and control women, after adjustment for year of birth and parity. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio for ovarian cancer associated with any past use of oral contraceptives was 0.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.8). The risk decreased with increasing duration of use (P for trend, <0.001); use for six or more years was associated with a 60 percent reduction in risk. Oral-contraceptive use protected against ovarian cancer both for carriers of the BRCA1 mutation (odds ratio, 0.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.9) and for carriers of the BRCA2 mutation (odds ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Oral-contraceptive use may reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women with pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene.

Constant denaturant gel electrophoresis (CDGE) in BRCA1 mutation screening.

Screening for mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1, is complicated by the wide spectrum of mutations found in this large gene. In the present study a constant denaturant gel electrophoresis (CDGE) mutation screening strategy was established for approximately 80% of the genomic coding sequence (exons 2, 11, 13-16, 20, 24). This strategy was applied to screen genomic DNA from 50 familial breast and/or ovarian cancer patients who had previously been examined for BRCA1 mutations by SSCP. A total of 14 carriers of 12 distinct disease-associated mutations and 7 carriers of 6 distinct rare substitutions leading to amino acid substitutions were identified. The SSCP failed to detect 40% of the different deletions/insertions (4/10) and 75% (6/8) of the different base substitutions leading to terminating codons or rare amino acid changes. SSCP did, however, identify one rare base substitution that could not be detected in the CDGE screening. To evaluate the CDGE mutation screening strategy further, 25 unrelated patients from Norwegian breast and/or ovarian cancer families were examined for BRCA1 mutations using a combined genomic DNA/cDNA approach covering the entire coding sequence of the gene. A total of six mutation carriers were detected, all of whom had cases of ovarian cancer in their families. Three patients from independent families carried an 1135insA mutation in exon 11, two others had a Gly484ter and an 1675delA mutation, respectively, and the sixth carried a splice mutation (5194-2 a-->c) causing deletion of exon 18. CDGE may become an efficient tool in diagnostic and population based screening for BRCA1 mutations.

The problem of skipped generation and subclinical disease in familial breast-ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: The major gene for inherited breast ovarian cancer families shows high penetrance in female carriers. Daughters of living unaffected women in these families are supposed to have a low risk of cancer. Linkage analyses may be used to determine the probability that such families are linked to BRCA1 and, subsequently, to identify mutation carriers in such families. Linkage analyses are dependent upon correct diagnoses of all family members. METHODS: We report one breast-ovarian cancer family, prospectively observed, in which a mother and her daughter contracted ovarian and breast cancer almost simultaneously. Linkage analyses indicated that they both had the same BRCA1 mutation. The mother's sister had a possible premalignant lesion at oophorectomy. DISCUSSION: We discuss the problems raised by the pathological classification of possible premalignant lesions, that linkage analyses are sensitive to misclassification of diagnoses, and probability for skipped generation.

A BRCA1 founder mutation, identified with haplotype analysis, allowing genotype/phenotype determination and predictive testing.

We searched for a founder mutation in a population from one geographic region of Norway with prevalent breast/ovarian cancer families. We sampled 33 breast/ovarian cancer families and determined haplotypes of four markers linked to the BRCA1 region. Of the affected 33 index women, 13 (39.4%) shared one haplotype. In five (15% of total), an identical mutation was indicated by an abnormal truncated protein test (PTT) of exon 11 and shown to represent a 1675delA mutation. In the other index women, PTT of exon 11 showed no abnormality. No other BRCA1 founder mutation of this prevalence is likely because no other haplotype was more frequent in affecteds than in controls. All families with the 1675delA mutation in this geographic region may be considered as part of one large kindred. This allows a genotype-phenotype correlation to be precisely determined and used in genetic counselling for predictive testing within this kindred. Identification of identical haplotypes between unrelated affected individuals may be used to estimate the extent of founder effects for any mapped disease, without knowledge of the specific founder mutation.

Early detection of familial ovarian cancer.

When ovarian cancer is detected at an early stage, prognosis is good, which has led to discussion of a screening programme. The aim of this study was to identify and examine women at high risk of familial ovarian cancer, and to evaluate the inclusion criteria and the diagnostic methods for early detection of ovarian cancer. We report the first round screening findings in a prospective study of 180 women (mean age 43.4 years) considered to be at high risk of ovarian cancer based on family history. They were subjected to gynaecological examination with transvaginal ultrasound (TVU), CA125 and breast examination. Of these, 13 women with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer had therapeutic oophorectomy and the ovaries were histologically examined. Among 180 women examined, nine ovarian cancers (among them two found at oophorectomy because of breast cancer) (mean age 49.0 years), seven benign tumours of the ovary (mean age 48.1 years), one cancer of the cervix, and four breast cancers were diagnosed. The prevalence of ovarian cancers (5%) was significantly more than in any previous series. TVU as a diagnostic method proved useful and detected 7/9 cancers, whereas CA125 was elevated in 4/9 cancers. To our knowledge, this is the first programme which has successfully delineated a high risk group and prospectively demonstrated their high prevalence of ovarian cancer. Possible biases are discussed.

Inherited predisposition to breast carcinoma. Results of first round examination of 537 women at risk.

Five hundred and thirty seven women at risk for breast carcinoma were identified. Family history was detailed and each woman given genetic counselling. Diagnostic examination for breast carcinoma was performed at the major hospitals of Norway, and included physical examination by expert surgeon, mammography and/or ultrasonography, and fine needle aspiration cytology when appropriate. Altogether 8 carcinomas and 5 cases of atypical hyperplasia were found, compared with 1.6 and 0.3 expected, respectively, from population studies. The finding exceeded the expected numbers described by autosomal dominant inheritance. In addition we found one carcinoma in situ. It is concluded that the methods employed are suitable to identify and examine women at risk for breast carcinoma. It is suggested that atypical hyperplasia may be the precancerous lesion, and should be treated as such.