Retrosigmoid versus middle fossa approach for hearing and facial nerve preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery: A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors arising from vestibular nerve's Schwann cells. Surgical resection via retrosigmoid (RS) or middle fossa (MF) is standard, but the optimal approach remains debated. This meta-analysis evaluated RS and MF approaches for VS management, emphasizing hearing preservation and Cranial nerve seven (CN VII) outcomes stratified by tumor size. METHODS: Systematic searches across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase identified relevant studies. Hearing and CN VII outcomes were gauged using the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gardner Robertson, and House-Brackmann scores. RESULTS: Among 7228 patients, 56 % underwent RS and 44 % MF. For intracanalicular tumors, MF recorded 38 % hearing loss, compared to RS's 54 %. In small tumors (<1.5 cm), MF showed 41 % hearing loss, contrasting RS's lower 15 %. Medium-sized tumors (1.5 cm-2.9 cm) revealed 68 % hearing loss in MF and 55 % in RS. Large tumors (>3cm) were only reported in RS with a hearing loss rate of 62 %. CONCLUSION: Conclusively, while MF may be preferable for intracanalicular tumors, RS demonstrated superior hearing preservation for small to medium-sized tumors. This research underlines the significance of stratified outcomes by tumor size, guiding surgical decisions and enhancing patient outcomes.

Assessing the safety and efficacy of EVOH Pre-Embolization in head and neck paraganglioma tumors: A comprehensive analysis of current literature.

BACKGROUND: Head and Neck Paragangliomas are characterized by having a rich blood supply. Presurgical embolization with Onyx as a neoadjuvant treatment is not a consensus regarding its efficacy and safety. Our study aimed to answer this matter through a single-arm meta-analysis. METHODS: We systematically reviewed 4 databases. Sixteen studies were described and suitable papers were selected for meta-analysis of estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL), percentage of tumor devascularization, and complications associated with embolization. RESULTS: The study identified 198 patients with 203 tumors, aged between 8 and 70 years. Commonly reported symptoms included neck mass perception and cranial nerve impairment. Carotid Body Tumors were most prevalent (127, 62.5 %), followed by jugular (48, 23.6 %), or vagal (29, 14.2 %) tumors. Eight studies reported estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL) averaging 261.89 ml (95 %CI: 128.96 to 394.81 ml). In an analysis of 9 studies, 99 % (95 %CI: 96 to 100 %) achieved 70 % or more devascularization, and 79 % (95 %CI: 58 to 100 %) achieved 90 % or more devascularization. Complications from endovascular procedures were observed in 3 % (95 %CI: 0 to 8 %) of 96 patients across 10 studies, including 4 facial nerve deficits. Eighteen postoperative neurological deficits were reported across 15 articles. CONCLUSION: Despite acknowledged limitations, with refined indications, EVOH, especially Onyx embolization may significantly bolster patient safety, decreasing EBL and easing surgical resection. Further research with larger studies will refine criteria, optimize techniques, and improve patient care and treatment outcomes in the management of head and neck paragangliomas.

EFFECTIVENESS OF VISCOSUPPLEMENTATION IN THE TREATMENT OF HEMOPHILIC ARTHROPATHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Objective: To describe the efficacy of using viscosupplementation in patients with hemophilic arthropathy (HA), on pain, limb functionality, and quality of life. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed following the PRISMA guidelines without limitations of language or year of publication. The search was performed on the following medical databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, BVS/BIREME, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and PROQUEST in April 2020. The search used the following word: (hemophilia AND joint diseases) OR (haemophilic arthropathy OR hemophilic arthropathy) AND viscosupplementation. Results: The systematic review identified 127 articles, 10 of which were selected for data extraction and qualitative analysis. The 10 selected articles included 297 joints with HA in 177 hemophilic subjects. Our review showed positive results in alleviating pain and improving functional capacity, and quality of life. No major adverse effects were observed. Conclusion: There is a lack of scientific evidence regarding viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid, but the results presented in this research suggest that it is an effective and safe therapeutic option to alleviate pain and improve functional capacity in patients with HA. Level of Evidence II, Systematic Review.

Objetivo: Descrever o uso da viscossuplementação com ácido hialurônico em pacientes com artropatia hemofílica (HA), sua eficácia na dor, a funcionalidade do membro e a qualidade de vida após sua aplicação. Métodos: Revisão sistemática da literatura (RSL) que seguiu as diretrizes PRISMA, sem limitação de idioma ou ano de publicação. A pesquisa foi realizada em abril de 2020 nas seguintes bases de dados médicas: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, BVS/BIREME, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost e ProQuest. A estratégia de pesquisa foi: (hemofilia AND joint disease) OR (artropatia hemofílica OU artropatia hemofílica) E viscossuplementação. Resultados: A RSL identificou 127 artigos, dos quais 10 foram selecionados para extração de dados e análise qualitativa. Os 10 artigos selecionados incluíram 297 articulações com AH em 177 indivíduos hemofílicos. Nossa revisão mostrou resultados positivos na melhora da dor, na capacidade funcional e na qualidade de vida. Não foram observados efeitos adversos importantes. Conclusão: A evidência científica atual a respeito da viscossuplementação com ácido hialurônico é escassa, mas os resultados apresentados nesta pesquisa sugerem que é uma opção terapêutica eficaz e segura para diminuir a dor e melhorar a capacidade funcional em pacientes com AH. Nível de Evidência II, Revisão Sistemática.

Survival in patients with surgically treated spinal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Despite the various treatment protocols available, survival evaluation is a fundamental criterion for the definition of surgical management; there are still many inconsistencies in the literature on this topic, especially in terms of the value of surgery and its morbidity in patients with very short survival. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to analyze the association of clinical, oncological, and surgical factors in the survival of patients undergoing spinal surgery for spinal metastases (SM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of forty patients who were surgically treated at our institution for SM between 2010 and 2018 were included in the study. We applied the prognostic scales of Tomita and Tokuhashi in each patient and evaluated the systemic status using Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale. Survival rate in months was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curve, with death considered as primary outcome and, for the evaluation of the association between the variables, the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Fisher-Freeman-Halton test was applied for better survival. The level of statistical significance was considered as 5% (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The mean survival was 8.4 months. Patients with KPS <70 had a mean survival of 6.36 months, while those with KPS >70 had a mean survival of 14.48 months (P = 0.04). The mean survival of patients classified as ECOG 2 was 7.05 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4-10.7), and that of patients classified as ECOG 3 and 4 was 1.24 months (95% CI: 0.8-1.59). The mean survival rate among the patients with unresectable metastases in other organs was 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.9-8.9), while the survival rate of those who did not have metastases was 13.8 months (95% CI: 10.0-17.68; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Survival was associated with the preoperative functional status defined by the KPS and ECOG scales and with the presence of nonresectable visceral metastases.

Reliability of the New AOSpine Classification System for Upper Cervical Traumatic Injuries.

BACKGROUND: The new AOSpine Upper Cervical Classification System (UCCS) was recently proposed by the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma team to standardize the treatment of upper cervical traumatic injuries (UCI). In this context, evaluating its reliability is paramount prior to clinical use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of the new AOSpine UCCS. METHODS: A total of 32 patients with UCI treated either nonoperatively or with surgery by one of the authors were included in the study. Injuries were classified based on the new AO UCCS according to site and injury type using computed tomography scan images in 3 planes by 8 researchers at 2 different times, with a minimum interval of 4 wk between assessments. Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed using the kappa index (K). Treatment options suggested by the evaluators were also assessed. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement for sites ranged from 0.830 to 0.999, 0.691 to 0.983 for types, and 0.679 to 0.982 for the recommended treatment. Interobserver analysis at the first assessment was 0.862 for injury sites, 0.660 for types, and 0.585 for the treatment, and at the second assessment, it was 0.883 for injury sites, 0.603 for types, and 0.580 for the treatment. These results correspond to a high level of agreement of answers for the site and type analysis and a moderate agreement for the recommended treatment. CONCLUSION: This study reported an acceptable reproducibility of the new AO UCCS and safety in recommending the treatment. Further clinical studies with a larger patient sample, multicenter and international, are necessary to sustain the universal and homogeneity quality of the new AO UCCS.

Neurological Outcome and Complications in Patients With Surgically Treated Spinal Metastases.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the epidemiology of surgical patients with spinal metastases, identify the complications, and evaluate their neurological prognoses. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The development of new oncological treatments and screening tests have increased the survival of oncologic patients, and consequently, the incidence of metastatic lesions of the spine. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of 40 patients surgically treated at the Hospital de Clínicas of UNICAMP for spinal metastases from January 2010 to September 2018, after diagnosis of symptomatic spinal cord compression and/or mechanical instability of the spine. Retrospectively analyzed patient charts applied the SINS score to evaluate the presence of mechanical instability. Neurological function was classified based on the Frankel index preoperative and postoperatively. To evaluate the association between variables, the Chi-square test, Fisher exact test, or Fisher-Freeman-Halton test was applied. For evaluating the improvement of neurological status between the Frankel scores before and after surgery, the McNemar test was applied for categorical and qualitative variables. In both the tests, variables with values of P > 0.05 were considered. RESULTS: Pain as the reason for the first visit presented an odds ratio (OR) = 2.44 (95% [CI]: 1.14-5.2) for instrumentation need (P = 0.024). A higher SINS score corresponded to the indication for instrumentation surgery due to the instability of the spine (P = 0.004). Within 30 days postoperative, five patients (11.1%) had complications. There was a statistically significant neurological improvement in patients who underwent surgery (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Pain as the first symptom was related to mechanical instability of the spine and surgical instrumentation. Patients treated with surgery presented improvement of the neurological function in the postoperative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.