Subtypes of irritable bowel syndrome in children: prevalence at diagnosis and at follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) subtypes in childhood at diagnosis and their changes over 1 year. STUDY DESIGN: This is an observational, prospective, multicenter study. Consecutive pediatric patients with IBS, according to Rome III criteria, were enrolled over a 1-year period. Parents recorded weekly stool frequency and consistency and gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in a diary. Stool consistency was scored according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale. Children were evaluated after 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 100 children with IBS (median age 9.9 years, range 4.2-16.7 years, 52 girls and 48 boys). At time of enrollment, constipation-IBS was the prevalent subtype (45%), with a prevalence of girls at 62% (P < .005); diarrhea-IBS was reported in 26% of children, with a prevalence of boys at 69% (P < .005); and alternating-IBS was described in 29% of children, without a difference between sexes. During the follow-up, 10% of patients changed their IBS subtypes at 2 months, 9% at 3 months, 7% at 6 months, and 6.3% at 12 months. Twenty-four percent of patients changed IBS subtype between the time of enrollment and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Constipation-IBS is the prevalent subtype in children, with a higher frequency in girls. In boys, diarrhea-IBS is the most common subtype. It is important to acquire knowledge about IBS subtypes to design clinical trials that may eventually shed new light on suptype-specific approaches to this condition.

Therapeutic approach to bronchiolitis: why pediatricians continue to overprescribe drugs?

BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis guidelines suggest that neither bronchodilators nor corticosteroids, antiviral and antibacterial agents should be routinely used. Although recommendations, many clinicians persistently prescribe drugs for bronchiolitis. AIM OF THE STUDY: To unravel main reasons of pediatricians in prescribing drugs to infants with bronchiolitis, and to possibly correlate therapeutic choices to the severity of clinical presentation. Also possible influence of socially deprived condition on therapeutic choices is analyzed. METHODS: Patients admitted to Pediatric Division of 2 main Hospitals of Naples because of bronchiolitis in winter season 2008-2009 were prospectively analyzed. An RDAI (Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument) score was assessed at different times from admission. Enrollment criteria were: age 1-12 months; 1st lower respiratory infection with cough and rhinitis with/without fever, wheezing, crackles, tachypnea, use of accessory muscles, and/or nasal flaring, low oxygen saturation, cyanosis. Social deprivation status was assessed by evaluating school graduation level of the origin area of the patients. A specific questionnaire was submitted to clinicians to unravel reasons of their therapeutic behavior. RESULTS: Eighty-four children were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 3.5 months. Forty-four per cent of patients presented with increased respiratory rate, 70.2% with chest retractions, and 7.1% with low SaO2. Mean starting RDAI score was 8. Lung consolidation was found in 3.5% on chest roentgenogram. Data analysis also unraveled that 64.2% matched clinical admission criteria. Social deprivation status analysis revealed that 72.6% of patients were from areas "at social risk". Evaluation of length of stay vs. social deprivation status evidenced no difference between "at social risk" and "not at social risk" patients. Following therapeutic interventions were prescribed: nasal suction (64.2%), oxygen administration (7.1%), antibiotics (50%), corticosteroids (85.7%), bronchodilators (91.6%). Statistically significant association was not found for any used drug with neither RDAI score nor social deprivation status. The reasons of hospital pediatricians to prescribe drugs were mainly the perception of clinical severity of the disease, the clinical findings at chest examination, and the detection of some improvement after drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly confirm the large use of drugs in bronchiolitis management by hospital pediatricians. Main reason of this wrong practice appears to be the fact that pediatricians recognize bronchiolitis as a severe condition, with consequent anxiety in curing so acutely ill children without drugs, and that sometimes they feel forced to prescribe drugs because of personal reassurance or parental pressure. We also found that social "at risk" condition represents a main reason for hospitalization, not correlated to clinical severity of the disease neither to drug prescription. Eventually, we suggest a "step-by-step" strategy to rich a more evidence based approach to bronchiolitis therapy, by adopting specific and shared resident guidelines.