RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Strictures are a common complication in Crohn's disease (CD), found in more than 50% of patients. They are characterized by the excessive deposition of extracellular proteins in the tissue as a result of the chronic inflammatory process. The effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood. AIM: To investigate whether the degree of intestinal inflammation and fibrosis is correlated with preoperative anti-TNF-α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood. METHODS: This unblinded, prospective, single tertiary center, pilot cohort study included all adult patients with CD who underwent elective, laparoscopic, or open intestinal resection. Preoperative investigations included measurement of blood TNF-α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood. RESULTS: Histopathological specimens from 10 patients with CD who underwent ileocecal or ileocolic resections were retrieved. Four of those patients were on anti-TNF-α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood. α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood. α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood. p=0.01). Anti-TNF-α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood. α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood. α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent preoperative anti-TNF-α treatment had a higher fibrosis score than controls.α) therapy on the development of fibrosis is not yet fully understood.
RESUMEN
Wild-type status of KRAS and the NRAS gene (exon 2, 3, and 4) in the tumor should be determined before treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with EGFR-targeting agents. There is a large variation in test methods to determine RAS status, and more sensitive detection methods were recently introduced. Data from quality assessment programs indicate substantial error rates. This study assessed the completeness and correctness of RAS testing in European laboratories that successfully passed external quality assessment (EQA). Participants were requested to send material of their most recent ten patients with mCRC who had been tested for RAS status. Isolated DNA, a hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue slide with a marked area for macrodissection and accompanying patient reports were requested. Samples were reevaluated in a reference laboratory by using a next-generation sequencing approach. In total, 31 laboratories sent in the requested material (n = 309). Despite regulations for anti-EGFR therapy, one institute did not perform full RAS testing. Reanalysis was possible for 274 samples with sufficient DNA available. In the hotspot codons of KRAS and NRAS, seven discordant results were obtained in total, five of them leading to a different prediction of anti-EGFR therapy efficacy (2%; n = 274). Results show that oncologists can rely on the quality of laboratories with good performance in EQA. Oncologists need to be aware that the testing laboratory participates successfully in EQA programs. Some EQA providers list the good performing laboratories on their website.