Cardiac amyloidosis: a significant blind spot of the H2FPEF score.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) often mimics heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Due to very different treatment strategies, an exact diagnosis and differentiation between pure HFpEF and CA-related heart failure (HF) is important. In the present study, we assessed the recently published H2FPEF score in patients with pure HFpEF, transthyretin (ATTR), as well as light chain (AL) amyloidosis-related HFpEF and tested whether it differentiates between these entities. METHODS: The H2FPEF scores consists of easy-to-assess clinical (Body Mass Index, number of hypertensive drugs, presence of atrial fibrillation, age) and echocardiographic (systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, E/E´) parameters. It can be computed in a categorical way resulting in scores between 0 and 9 points (0-1: HFpEF rule out, 2-5: further testing required, 6-9: HFpEF rule in), or in a continual way providing an exact percentage of a patient's HFpEF probability. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and χ2-tests. Diagnostic accuracy was computed from 2x2 tables. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves. A P value of <0.05 was set as the level of significance. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients with pure HFpEF, 53 patients with ATTR, and 34 patients with AL CA were included in the present study. Median age (HFpEF: 71.5 years; ATTR CA: 77.0 years; AL CA: 60.0 years; P<0.001), gender distribution (HFpEF [female]: 73.0%, ATTR (female): 18.9%, AL [female]: 38.2%; P<0.001), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (HFpEF: 1045pg/mL; ATTR CA: 1927pg/mL; AL CA: 4308pg/mL; P<0.001) differed significantly between study cohorts. Median H2FPEF scores were highest among HFpEF (categorical: 5.0 points; continual: 95.1%), followed by ATTR (categorical: 4.0 points; continual: 89.0%), and AL CA (categorical: 3.0 points; continual: 31.2%). Respective P values were <0.001. Low H2FPEF scores (0-1 points) were found among patients in the AL CA cohort (29.4%), but not among HFpEF or ATTR CA patients (P<0.001). The majority of patients, irrespective of disease entity were in the intermediate score range (2-5 points, HFpEF: 80.0% ATTR CA: 94.3%, AL CA: 67.9%; P=0.006). High scores (6-9 points) were most often found among HFpEF patients (20.0%), followed by ATTR CA (5.7%) and AL CA (2.9%), (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The H2FPEF score should be used with caution, as there is a significant overlap between HFpEF and CA-related HF.

Prognostic implications of psoas muscle area in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incremental prognostic value of the psoas muscle area in patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: A total of 1076 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at 2 centres between 2010 and 2017 were prospectively included in this study. Computed tomography-derived cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle was measured at the superior border of the third (L3) and fourth (L4) lumbar vertebra and indexed to body surface area (PMAi) as well as stratified into tertiles. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the value of PMAi as a predictor of 30-day and cumulative mortality. The incremental prognostic value of PMAi over the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was assessed using a net reclassification analysis. RESULTS: The rate of 30-day mortality was 5.8% (n = 62). PMAi at the level of L3 [odds ratio 0.082, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.011-0.589; P = 0.013] and L4 (odds ratio 0.049, 95% CI 0.005-0.536; P = 0.013) was independently associated with 30-day mortality. During a median follow-up of 435 days (interquartile range 139-904), 292 patients (27.1%) died. PMAi of L3 (hazard ratio 0.200, 95% CI 0.083-0.482; P < 0.001) and L4 (hazard ratio 0.083, 95% CI 0.029-0.235; P < 0.001) was independently associated with mortality during follow-up. The addition of PMAi to the STS score led to a net reclassification improvement for 30-day and cumulative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: PMAi emerged as a valuable outcome predictor in patients undergoing TAVI. The addition of PMAi to the established STS score led to an increase in its prognostic ability.