Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 66(6): 1226-1232, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29608779

RESUMEN

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex, multisymptom, neurodegenerative disease affecting primarily older adults. With progression, many individuals become homebound and removed from coordinated, expert care, resulting in excess morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures in acute care settings and institutions. Home visit care models have achieved the triple aim of improving individual and population health while reducing costs in many frail, community-dwelling geriatric cohorts. This study details a novel, interdisciplinary home visit program specifically designed for individuals with PD and related disorders and their family caregivers built upon best practice principles in the care of multimorbid older adults. At each quarterly home visit, a movement disorders-trained neurologist, social worker, and nurse work in parallel with the individual and caregiver to complete a history, physical, detailed medication reconciliation, psychosocial needs assessment, and home safety assessment. A comprehensive, person-centered plan is agreed upon, referrals to community resources are made, standardized documentation is shared, and follow-up communication is instituted. In the first 2 years, 272 visits were conducted with 85 individuals who represent one of the oldest, most disabled PD populations reported. Satisfaction with and retention in the program were high. This study represents the first translation of the success of interdisciplinary and home-based geriatric care models to a population with a specific neurological disease. Preliminary evidence supports the need for such programs in vulnerable populations. Future studies will prospectively assess person-centered outcomes, the effect of using telemedicine on sustainability, and cost effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Visita Domiciliaria , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/terapia , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Femenino , Anciano Frágil , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Personas Imposibilitadas , Humanos , Vida Independiente/normas , Masculino , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/psicología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados Unidos
2.
Neurology ; 87(18): 1907-1915, 2016 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27708129

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether multifocal, high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of motor and prefrontal cortex benefits motor and mood symptoms in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). METHODS: Patients with PD and depression were enrolled in this multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group study of real or realistic (electric) sham rTMS. Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 groups: bilateral M1 ( + sham dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [DLPFC]), DLPFC ( + sham M1), M1 + DLPFC, or double sham. The TMS course consisted of 10 daily sessions of 2,000 stimuli for the left DLPFC and 1,000 stimuli for each M1 (50 × 4-second trains of 40 stimuli at 10 Hz). Patients were evaluated at baseline, at 1 week, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Primary endpoints were changes in motor function assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III and in mood with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 1 month. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients planned for recruitment, 85 were screened, 61 were randomized, and 50 completed all study visits. Real M1 rTMS resulted in greater improvement in motor function than sham at the primary endpoint (p < 0.05). There was no improvement in mood in the DLPFC group compared to the double-sham group, as well as no benefit to combining M1 and DLPFC stimulation for either motor or mood symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PD with depression, M1 rTMS is an effective treatment of motor symptoms, while mood benefit after 2 weeks of DLPFC rTMS is not better than sham. Targeting both M1 and DLPFC in each rTMS session showed no evidence of synergistic effects. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01080794. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that in patients with PD with depression, M1 rTMS leads to improvement in motor function while DLPFC rTMS does not lead to improvement in depression compared to sham rTMS.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Humor/etiología , Trastornos del Humor/terapia , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Corteza Prefrontal/fisiología , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...