Diagnostic accuracy of PET for recurrent glioma diagnosis: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies have assessed PET by using various tracers to diagnose disease recurrence in patients with previously treated glioma; however, the accuracy of these methods, particularly compared with alternative imaging modalities, remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively synthesize the diagnostic accuracy of PET and compare it with alternative imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and Scopus (until June 2011), bibliographies, and review articles. Two reviewers extracted study characteristics, validity items, and quantitative data on diagnostic accuracy. We performed meta-analysis when ≥5 studies were available. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were eligible. Studies were heterogeneous in treatment strategies and diagnostic criteria of PET; recurrence was typically suspected by CT or MR imaging. The diagnostic accuracies of (18)F-FDG (n = 16) and (11)C-MET PET (n = 7) were heterogeneous across studies. (18)F-FDG PET had a summary sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85) and specificity of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.54-0.91) for any glioma histology; (11)C-methionine PET had a summary sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.50-0.84) and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.44-1.0) for high-grade glioma. These estimates were stable in subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Data were limited on (18)F-FET (n = 4), (18)F-FLT (n = 2), and (18)F-boronophenylalanine (n = 1). Few studies performed direct comparisons between different PET tracers or between PET and other imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDG and (11)C-MET PET appear to have moderately good accuracy as add-on tests for diagnosing recurrent glioma suspected by CT or MR imaging. Studies comparing alternative tracers or PET versus other imaging modalities are scarce. Prospective studies performing head-to-head comparisons between alternative imaging modalities are needed.

EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number as a potential biomarker of survival for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving single-agent treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: We systematically identified articles investigating EGFR gene copy number by fluorescent or chromogenic in situ hybridization in patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with the TKIs erlotinib or gefitinib, (last search: 31 June 2009). Eligible studies had to report on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or time-to-progression (TTP), stratified by EGFR gene copy number. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Among 255 identified studies, 20 (1689 patients, 594 with increased gene copy number), 10 (822 patients, 290 with increased gene copy number) and 5 (294 patients, 129 with increased gene copy number) were eligible for the OS, PFS and TTP meta-analyses, respectively. Increased EGFR gene copy number was associated with increased OS (HR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.89; P = 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.46-0.79; P<0.001) and TTP (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.28-0.91; P = 0.02). Among predominantly white populations, increased EGFR gene copy number was strongly associated with improved survival (HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.59-0.82; P<0.001), whereas it did not influence survival in East Asians (HR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.82-1.50; P=0.50). This difference was statistically significant (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Among TKI-treated patients, increased EGFR gene copy number appears to be associated with improved survival outcomes. The effect on OS appears to be limited to patients of non-Asian descent.