Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Talanta ; 152: 378-91, 2016 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26992534

RESUMEN

This paper reports the first application of the silica based mesoporous material MCM-41 as a sorbent in solid phase extraction, to pre-concentrate pharmaceuticals of very different polarity (atenolol, nadolol, pindolol, timolol, bisoprolol, metoprolol, betaxolol, ketoprofen, naproxen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, tolfenamic acid, flufenamic acid and meclofenamic acid) in surface waters. The analytes were extracted from 100mL water samples at pH 2.0 (containing 10(-3) mol/L of sodium chloride) by passing the solution through a cartridge filled with 100 mg of MCM-41. Following elution, the pharmaceuticals were determined by micro-liquid chromatography and triple quadrupole-mass spectrometry. Two selected reaction monitoring transitions were monitored per compound, the most intense one being used for quantification and the second one for confirmation. Matrix effect was found in real waters for most analytes and was overcome using the standard addition method, which compared favorably with the matrix matched calibration method. The detection limits in solvent (acetonitrile:water 10:90, v/v) ranged from 0.01 to 1.48 µg/L and in real water extracts from 0.10 to 3.85 µg/L (0.001-0.0385 µg/L in the water samples). The quantitation limits in solvent were in the range 0.02-4.93 µg/L, whereas in real water extracts were between 0.45 and 10.00 µg/L (0.0045 and 0.1000 µg/L in the water samples). When ultrapure water samples were spiked at two concentration levels of each pharmaceutical (0.1 and 0.2 µg/L) and quantified using solvent based calibration graphs, recoveries were near 100%. However, recoveries for most pharmaceuticals were comparable or better than de described above, when river water samples (spiked at the same concentration levels) were quantified by the standard addition method and slightly worse using the matrix matched calibration method. Five real samples (two rivers, one dam and two fountain water samples) were analyzed by the developed method, atenolol, timolol, betaxolol, nadolol and diclofenac being found in some of them, at levels higher than their quantitation limits.


Asunto(s)
Cromatografía Liquida/métodos , Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/análisis , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/aislamiento & purificación , Dióxido de Silicio/química , Extracción en Fase Sólida/métodos , Agua/química , Límite de Detección , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/química , Porosidad , Ríos/química , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/química , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/aislamiento & purificación
2.
J Chromatogr A ; 1297: 17-28, 2013 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23726087

RESUMEN

The present paper describes a solid-phase extraction by packed multi-walled carbon nanotubes, followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, method for the determination of some of the most consumed drugs including four ß-blockers and eight non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, in river and wastewater samples. High extraction efficiency was found for most drugs due to the large specific surface area and high adsorption capacity of this nanomaterial compared with other conventional solid-phase extraction sorbents, and matrix effect was present only for two of the twelve studied drugs. Only 20mg of carbon nanotubes was enough to preconcentrate the analytes with recoveries from 68% to 107% for most of them. The pharmaceuticals were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to a hybrid triple quadrupole-linear ion trap-mass spectrometer at ultra-trace levels. Data acquisition was carried out in selected reaction monitoring mode, using two transitions for simultaneous identification and quantification of the analytes. Additionally, an information dependent acquisition scan was performed to carry out the identification of those analytes whose second transition was absent or was present at low intensity. The analytical performance of the whole method was evaluated in two environmental water matrices (river and wastewaters). Matrix effect was not found in river water, quantitation being carried out with calibration graphs built with solvent based standard. On the contrary, matrix effect was present in wastewater for some of the target drugs and, therefore, quantitation was carried out using the standard addition method. Limits of detection and quantitation in river waters were in the range of 9-36 and 23-121ngL(-1), respectively and the relative standard deviation of the full method was less than 17%. The proposed methodology was applied to the analysis of three river water and two wastewater (influent and effluent) samples, all of them from Almería (Spain). Some pharmaceuticals were found in river water at concentration levels near to or lower than their quantitation limits, whereas the most consumed pharmaceuticals were found at high concentration levels in influent wastewater and were not detected or were found at lower levels in the effluent wastewater sample.


Asunto(s)
Cromatografía Liquida/métodos , Nanotubos de Carbono/química , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/análisis , Ríos/química , Extracción en Fase Sólida/métodos , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Aguas Residuales/química , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Límite de Detección , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/aislamiento & purificación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...