Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 46(4): 102339, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38176680

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Assessing dienogest's efficacy in endometriosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). DATA SOURCES: Systematic search in databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar) until 1 October 2022. STUDY SELECTIONS: Randomized trials and observational studies comparing extended dienogest pre-treatment, no pre-treatment, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist pre-treatment in endometriosis-linked IVF. OUTCOME MEASURES: live birth, clinical pregnancy rates, oocytes collected, miscarriage rate, gonadotropin consumption. DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESES: Two authors independently assessed eligibility. Dichotomous variables were analyzed via a random-effect model and Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate weighted estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI). I2 statistic gauged study heterogeneity; GRADE criteria evaluated evidence quality. CONCLUSIONS: Out of 191 publications, five studies with 723 participants were included. Uncertainty persists on whether prolonged dienogest affects live birth (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.29 to 6.84; 3 studies, n = 289; I2 86%) and clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.31 to 5.65; 3 studies, n = 289; I2 86%) compared to conventional IVF. Moreover, uncertainty remains regarding intervention impact on live birth (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.37; 1 study, n = 34) and clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.23; 3 studies, n = 288; I2 0%) versus long-term GnRH agonist therapy before IVF. Given limited data and very low evidence quality, doubts arise about the benefits of long-term dienogest pre-treatment before conventional IVF in endometriosis patients.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis , Fertilización In Vitro , Nandrolona , Nandrolona/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Femenino , Nandrolona/uso terapéutico , Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Antagonistas de Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Hormonas/administración & dosificación , Nacimiento Vivo
3.
Minerva Obstet Gynecol ; 75(5): 468-481, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36255164

RESUMEN

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is used as a frequent add-on for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to improve clinical outcomes. The purpose is to select a euploid embryo following chromosomal testing on embryo biopsies. The current practice includes comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) technology applied on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies. Despite its widespread use, PGT-A remains a controversial topic mainly because all of the RCTs comprised only good prognosis patients with 2 or more blastocysts available; hence the results are not generalizable to all groups of patients. Furthermore, with the introduction of the highly-sensitive platforms into clinical practice (i.e. next-generation sequencing [NGS]), a result consistent with intermediate copy number surfaced and is termed "Mosaic," consistent with a mixture of euploid and aneuploid cells within the biopsy sample. The optimal disposition and management of embryos with mosaic results is still an open question, as many 'mosaics' generated healthy live births with no identifiable congenital anomalies. The present article provides a complete and comprehensive up-to-date review on PGT-A. It discusses in detail the findings of all the published RCTs on PGT-A with CCS, comments on the subject of "mosaicism" and its current management, and describes the latest technique of non-invasive PGT-A.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Diagnóstico Preimplantación/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Aneuploidia , Blastocisto/patología , Mosaicismo
4.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 49(1): 103738, 2023 Nov 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701633

RESUMEN

This article considers the addition of comprehensive 24-chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of products of conception (POC) to a standard evaluation for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) to help direct treatment towards expectant management versus IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). The review included retrospective data from 65,333 miscarriages, a prospective evaluation of 378 couples with RPL who had CMA testing of POC and the standard workup, and data from an additional 1020 couples who were evaluated for RPL but did not undergo CMA testing of POC. Aneuploidy in POC explained the pregnancy loss in 57.7% (218/378) of cases. In contrast, the full RPL evaluation recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine identified a potential cause in only 42.9% (600/1398). Combining the data from the RPL evaluation and the results of genetic testing of POC provides a probable explanation for the loss in over 90% (347/378) of women. Couples with an unexplained loss after the standard evaluation with POC aneuploidy accounted for 41% of cases; PGT-A may be considered after expectant management. Conversely, PGT-A would have a limited role in those with a euploid loss and a possible explanation after the standard workup. Categorizing a pregnancy loss as an explained versus unexplained loss after the standard evaluation combined with the results of CMA testing of POC may help identify patients who would benefit from expectant management versus PGT-A.

5.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 34(3): 101-106, 2022 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35645007

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although elective single embryo transfer has significantly reduced, the rate of multiple pregnancy in IVF cycles, this rate is still relatively high in gonadotropin-insemination cycles. Patients who fail to ovulate or to conceive with oral agents and have constraints for IVF are usually candidates for gonadotropin injections. The current review article provides an up-to-date summation of the different strategies that can be adopted to reduce the risk of multiple pregnancies in gonadotropin-stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gonadotropin-insemination treatments should be used judiciously by experienced providers. One should always start with the lowest effective gonadotropin dose (∼37.5 IU), monitor closely the ovarian response, and consider cycle cancellation or conversion to IVF whenever a high response is encountered. Therefore, every infertility practice should define its own cancellation and 'rescue IVF' criteria depending on the number of mature ovarian follicles and the age of the female partner. SUMMARY: These preventive measures amongst others should mitigate the risk of multiple pregnancies that can arise from gonadotropin-insemination cycles.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad , Inseminación Artificial , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Gonadotropinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infertilidad/terapia , Embarazo , Embarazo Múltiple
6.
Case Rep Womens Health ; 34: e00409, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35433281

RESUMEN

Ptyalism gravidarum is a disorder characterized by significant hypersalivation during pregnancy, which affects and interferes with quality of life. No published data has demonstrated an effective approach to treat this condition. This case study reports the use of clonidine hydrochloride, an alpha-2-adrenergic receptor agonist that is typically used as an anti-hypertensive agent, to treat the excessive sialorrhea typical of this disorder. The patient who was treated with this medication saw significant improvement in her symptoms and did not experience any subsequent adverse effects throughout her pregnancy. As a result, we believe that further investigation into this potential treatment for ptyalism gravidarum is necessary ahead of medical guideline incorporation and clinical implementation.

9.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 43(1): 120-126, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33926784

RESUMEN

Genetic testing of products of conception (POC) has been proposed as a tool to be used in the evaluation of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Following a complete RPL evaluation, POC results may reveal an aneuploidy and provide an explanation for the miscarriage in more than 55% of cases. When the cytogenetic result of the pregnancy loss reveals a euploid pregnancy, management should be directed towards the identification of treatable abnormalities. Furthermore, the results of POC testing might better define a subgroup of patients with unexplained RPL who may benefit from expectant management versus preimplantation genetics (aneuploid unexplained RPL) or investigational therapy (euploid unexplained RPL).


Asunto(s)
Aborto Habitual/patología , Feto/patología , Pruebas Genéticas , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 137(3): 528-534, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33543903

RESUMEN

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was developed as an invasive embryo-selection technique and is extensively used in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Around 95,000 preimplantation genetic testing cycles were carried out in the United States between 2014 and 2016, the majority of which were performed for aneuploidy. The objective of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is to select for transfer a euploid embryo, after embryo biopsy and cytogenetic analysis. The current technique consists of applying comprehensive chromosome screening on trophectoderm cells after blastocyst-stage embryo biopsy. This article reviews all the published randomized controlled trials on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy with comprehensive chromosome screening and comments on the subject of embryo mosaicism detected by this technique. Most of these trials have been criticized because they only included good prognosis patients having normal ovarian reserve producing a high number of embryos available for biopsy. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy does not improve ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle started when routinely applied on the general IVF population but seems to be a good tool of embryo selection for a selected category of patients with normal ovarian reserve, yet should be only practiced by experienced IVF clinics. If no euploid embryo is available after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, a low-level mosaic embryo can be considered and prioritized for transfer after appropriate genetic counseling.


Asunto(s)
Aneuploidia , Análisis Citogenético , Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Humanos , Mosaicismo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
11.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 30(19): 2315-2323, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27734747

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Public Health initiatives, such as the "Safe to Sleep" campaign, have traditionally targeted infants' risk factors for the prevention of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). However, controversy remains regarding maternal and obstetrical risk factors for SIDS. In our study, we sought out to determine both modifiable and non-modifiable obstetrical and maternal risk factors associated with SIDS. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the CDC's Linked Birth-Infant Death data from the United States for the year 2010. The impact of several obstetrical and maternal risk factors on the risk of overall infant mortality and SIDS was estimated using unconditional regression analysis, adjusting for relevant confounders. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 4,007,105 deliveries and 24,174 infant deaths during the first year of life, of which 1991 (8.2%) were due to SIDS. Prominent risk factors for SIDS included (OR [95% CI]): black race, 1.89 [1.68-2.13]; maternal smoking, 3.56 [3.18-3.99]; maternal chronic hypertension, 1.73 [1.21-2.48]; gestational hypertension, 1.51 [1.23-1.87]; premature birth <37 weeks, 2.16 [1.82-2.55]; IUGR, 2.46 [2.14-2.82]; and being a twin, 1.81 [1.43-2.29], p < 0.0001. Relative to a cohort of infants who died of other causes, risk factors with a predilection for SIDS were maternal smoking, 2.48 [2.16-2.83] and being a twin, 1.52 [1.21-1.91], p < 0.0001. Conclusions for practice: While certain socio-demographic and gestational characteristics are important risk factors, maternal smoking remains the strongest prenatal modifiable risk factor for SIDS. We recommend the continuation of Public Health initiatives that promote safe infant sleeping practices and smoking cessation during and after pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita del Lactante/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 37(8): 686-687, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26474223
15.
Fertil Steril ; 104(6): 1503-12, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26385405

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study whether preimplantation genetic screening with comprehensive chromosome screening (PGS-CCS) improves clinical implantation rates (IR) and sustained IR (beyond 20 weeks) compared with routine care for embryo selection in IVF cycles. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs). SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Infertile couples undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): PGS-CCS with the use of different genetic platforms performed on polar body (PB), cleavage embryo, or blastocyst following embryo biopsy. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Clinical IR and sustained IR in RCTs as well as OSs comparing PGS-CCS and routine care were determined after a complete review of the literature. Pooled estimates of risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to a fixed-effects model with the use of the Mantel-Haenszel method were calculated after the meta-analysis. Forest plots are provided for comparative purposes. RESULT(S): Out of 763 citations identified, 29 articles met initial eligibility criteria and were further analyzed. Of these, only three RCTs and eight OSs met full inclusion criteria, allowing direct comparison of PGS-CCS and routine IVF care based on embryo morphology selection. In the RCTs, all embryo biopsies were performed on day 5-6 of embryo development. In the OSs, biopsies were performed on different stages of embryo development, including PB, day 3, or day 5-6. Meta-analysis of the RCTs (3 studies; n = 659) showed that PGS-CCS was associated with a significantly higher clinical IR, with a pooled RR of 1.29 (95% CI 1.15-1.45), as well as a significantly higher sustained IR, with a pooled RR of 1.39 (95% CI 1.21-1.60). Similar findings were shown in the OSs, where the pooled RR for clinical IR was 1.78 (95% CI 1.60-1.99; 7 studies; n = 2,993) and for sustained IR was 1.75 (95% CI 1.48-2.07; 4 studies; n = 1,124). Statistical heterogeneity (I(2)) was minimal for RCTs and substantial among OSs. CONCLUSION(S): PGS with the use of CCS technology increases clinical and sustained IRs, thus improving embryo selection, particularly in patients with normal ovarian reserve. Results from ongoing RCTs conducted on different patient populations (e.g., decreased ovarian reserve) and different embryo stage biopsy (e.g., PB, day 3) may further clarify the role of this technology.


Asunto(s)
Blastocisto/patología , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Transferencia de Embrión , Fertilización In Vitro/efectos adversos , Pruebas Genéticas , Diagnóstico Preimplantación/métodos , Biopsia , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Cultivo de Embriones , Desarrollo Embrionario , Fertilización In Vitro/economía , Pruebas Genéticas/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Oportunidad Relativa , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Diagnóstico Preimplantación/economía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
16.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 28(6): 502-7, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26255096

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether similar odds of cesarean delivery (C/S), preterm birth (PTB), and low birth weight (LBW) are observed among adolescents compared with body mass index (BMI)-equivalent adults in cases of adequate gestational weight gain. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective, population-based, cohort study using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's birth data files from the United States for 2012. We selected from the cohort all singleton, cephalic pregnancies and stratified them according to maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, and gestational weight gain following the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations. The effect of adequate gestational weight gain among adolescents relative to adults of equivalent BMI on the risk of C/S, PTB, and LBW was estimated using logistic regression analysis, adjusting for relevant confounders. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 3,960,796 births, of which 1,036,646 (26.1%) met the inclusion criteria. In adolescents and adults, likelihood of achieving ideal gestational weight gain decreased with greater prepregnancy BMI. Relative to adults, the overall odds of C/S in all adolescents were (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) 0.61 (0.58 to 0.63). When comparing equivalent BMI categories, these odds were unchanged (P < .0001). The overall adjusted odds ratio of LBW was 1.15 (1.13 to 1.16). These odds were significantly higher when BMI stratification took place, decreasing with advancing BMI categories, from 1.23 (1.14 to 1.33) among the underweight, to nonsignificant differences in the obese classes (P < .05). Finally, when including only those achieving ideal weight gain, the overall odds of premature delivery (1.17 [1.14 to 1.20]) were higher among nonobese adolescents, while they were not found among the obese. CONCLUSION: When ideal gestational weight gain is attained, only nonobese adolescents exhibit a greater risk of LBW and preterm birth relative to adults of similar BMI, whereas the risk of C/S remains lower for all adolescents, independent of BMI. This information may be useful in the counseling of adolescent pregnancies.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Embarazo en Adolescencia/fisiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Aumento de Peso , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Obesidad , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Delgadez , Estados Unidos
17.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 37(5): 451-63, 2015 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26168107

RESUMEN

This document has been archived because it contains outdated information. It should not be consulted for clinical use, but for historical research only. Please visit the journal website for the most recent guidelines.


Ce document a été archivé, car il contient des informations périmées. Il ne devrait pas être consulté pour un usage clinique, mais uniquement pour des recherches historiques. Veuillez consulter le site web du journal pour les directives les plus récentes.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas , Diagnóstico Preimplantación , Biopsia , Canadá , Análisis Citogenético , Embrión de Mamíferos/patología , Femenino , Asesoramiento Genético , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Preimplantación/métodos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Factores de Riesgo , Translocación Genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...