Large method differences for free thyroid hormone assays in the hyperthyroid range can affect assessment of hyperthyroid status: Comparison of Abbott Alinity to Roche Cobas, Siemens Centaur and equilibrium dialysis LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Free T4 (FT4) determination is one of the most commonly performed biochemical tests in endocrinology. Treatment of thyroid dysfunctions is adjusted based on the severity of symptoms and biochemical test results. For Graves' hyperthyroidism, clinical guidelines recommend using FT4 as a (rough) guide to dose antithyroid drugs, together with other clinical information. It is well known that different platforms and methods give different FT4 results; however, large non-linear method differences at high FT4 concentrations are less well recognized. Current clinical guidelines do not make it clear that method differences in the hyperthyroid range can affect recommendations. METHOD: Serum samples from patients with very low (biochemically hypothyroid) to very high (hyperthyroid) concentrations of FT4 and/or free T3 (FT3) were analyzed using Abbott Alinity and compared to concentrations measured using Roche Cobas, Siemens ADVIA Centaur (FT4 only) and an in-house equilibrium dialysis liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. RESULTS: Alinity measured markedly lower FT4 and FT3 concentrations compared to the other methods, particularly at high FT4 concentrations. Regression analysis indicated that Alinity FT4 had a non-linear (curved) relationship to FT4 measured by the other methods. The method differences affected guideline-recommended treatments for hyperthyroidism. CONCLUSION: Measured free thyroid hormone concentrations are highly method-dependent, especially at high FT4 concentrations. Clinicians treating hyperthyroid patients should be aware that patients appear much less hyperthyroid from FT4-measurements performed using Alinity compared to Cobas or Centaur. Guideline-recommended antithyroid drug dosages based on FT4 (including multiples of the upper reference range) have to be adjusted to the FT4 method used. FT4 results from different methods should be clearly distinguished (e.g. separate lines) in medical records.

Analysis of free, unbound thyroid hormones by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: A mini-review of the medical rationale and analytical methods.

Measurement of hormones is important for the diagnosis and management of endocrine diseases. The thyroid hormones thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) are among the most commonly measured hormones in clinical laboratories, and it is the concentration of free (not bound to proteins) thyroid hormones that is clinically most relevant. Free thyroid hormones are commonly measured using automated immunoassays, however, these are known to produce erroneous results due to interferences for some patients. Measurement of free thyroid hormones using equilibrium dialysis or ultrafiltration combined with liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is considered a more accurate and robust method for free thyroid hormone analysis and overcomes many of the limitations of immunoassays. However, LC-MS/MS-based methods are often considered too technically difficult and not amendable to high throughput by clinical chemists and are not offered by many clinical laboratories. This mini-review aims to make it easier for clinical laboratories to implement LC-MS/MS-based measurement of free thyroid hormones. It describes the medical rationale for measuring free thyroid hormones, the benefits of LC-MS/MS-based methods with respect to interferences affecting immunoassay-based methods and physical separation methods. This mini-review highlights important parameters for ultrafiltration and equilibrium dialysis to obtain physiologically relevant free thyroid hormone concentrations and focuses on methods and devices used in clinical chemistry.

Endogenous anti-streptavidin antibodies causing erroneous laboratory results more common than anticipated.

All immunological methods are vulnerable to different kinds of interference. The purpose of this work was to study the cause and frequency of method-dependent interference in the Roche thyroid immunoassays. Serum samples with discordant thyroid function tests (TFT) were selected from samples sent to the Hormone Laboratory, Oslo University Hospital from June 2013 to September 2018. We identified 93 patients with discordant pathological TFT when analysed with the Roche methods and normal results when analysed with alternative methods. 42 of these samples were sent to Roche Diagnostics (Germany) for investigation of the interfering substance. Roche found interference to be caused by the presence of endogenous anti-streptavidin antibodies (ASA) (34 of 42 patients), ruthenium or the idiotype of the ruthenium labelled antibody (3 of 42 patients) and mouse antigens (1 of 42 patients). Method-dependent interference was estimated to affect 0.37% of the patients investigated in our laboratory. Interference due to the presence of endogenous ASA were further explored in other (non-thyroid) immunoassays by comparing analyte levels before and after pre-adsorption of the patients' sera with streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads. An underestimation of hormone levels was observed in sandwich immunoassays, while an overestimation was found in competitive assays. Method-dependent interference in Roche thyroid immunoassays is caused mainly by ASA and is not a very rare phenomenon. Misleading results may lead to misdiagnosis and inappropriate medical treatment. The supplier of the assay should be alerted when the available alternative methodology reveals method-dependent errors.