An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Pediatric Chronic Home Invasive Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Children with chronic invasive ventilator dependence living at home are a diverse group of children with special health care needs. Medical oversight, equipment management, and community resources vary widely. There are no clinical practice guidelines available to health care professionals for the safe hospital discharge and home management of these complex children. PURPOSE: To develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the hospital discharge and home/community management of children requiring chronic invasive ventilation. METHODS: The Pediatric Assembly of the American Thoracic Society assembled an interdisciplinary workgroup with expertise in the care of children requiring chronic invasive ventilation. The experts developed four questions of clinical importance and used an evidence-based strategy to identify relevant medical evidence. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to formulate and grade recommendations. RESULTS: Clinical practice recommendations for the management of children with chronic ventilator dependence at home are provided, and the evidence supporting each recommendation is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative generalist and subspecialist comanagement is the Medical Home model most likely to be successful for the care of children requiring chronic invasive ventilation. Standardized hospital discharge criteria are suggested. An awake, trained caregiver should be present at all times, and at least two family caregivers should be trained specifically for the child's care. Standardized equipment for monitoring, emergency preparedness, and airway clearance are outlined. The recommendations presented are based on the current evidence and expert opinion and will require an update as new evidence and/or technologies become available.

The influence of pulmonary function testing on the management of asthma in children.

OBJECTIVE: To assess how often in a single encounter that pulmonary function tests (PFTs) influenced management decisions in children with asthma, beyond what was obtained from history and physical examination alone. STUDY DESIGN: Children with asthma (n = 367, age 4 to 18 years) performed spirometry before clinical evaluation. Physicians and nurse practitioners in the outpatient pulmonary office evaluated the children and made initial treatment recommendations before reviewing the spirometry results. Any changes based on the test results were documented. RESULTS: Spirometry was abnormal in 45% of the visits, related to underlying asthma severity but not to clinical findings. PFT results changed management decisions in 15% of visits. This frequency was not affected by the patient's age, disease severity, symptom control, or exam findings. When spirometry did not change treatment decisions, the provider was more likely to maintain therapy (58%) than to increase (17%) or decrease (24%) therapy. In contrast, when spirometry did change treatment decisions, the provider was more likely to increase therapy (75%) than to maintain (20%) or decrease (5%) therapy. CONCLUSION: Without PFTs, providers often overestimated the degree of asthma control. This incorrect assessment could have resulted in suboptimal therapy.