Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Healthc Risk Manag ; 38(1): 48-53, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29752833

RESUMEN

The report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care calls for collaboration between professional liability insurance carriers and health care providers to identify opportunities to improve diagnostic performance. We used this collaborative approach and involved risk management/patient safety professionals and emergency medicine physician reviewers to analyze diagnosis-related emergency medicine closed claims from a large malpractice insurer. Our aim was to identify opportunities for risk reduction and to develop an approach for improving at-risk processes. Analysis of these cases revealed several missed opportunities in the diagnostic process. A collaborative approach offered greater insight into diagnosis process failures that may not have been evident if cases were reviewed in silos. Focused review findings led to a multidisciplinary improvement collaborative to develop clinical guidelines for improving at-risk practices and informed a simulation-based training initiative.


Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Medicina de Emergencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Responsabilidad Legal , Mala Praxis/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Burn Care Res ; 29(1): 158-65, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18182915

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to describe a draft response plan for the tiered triage, treatment, or transportation of 400 adult and pediatric victims (50/million population) of a burn disaster for the first 3 to 5 days after injury using regional resources. Review of meeting minutes and the 11 deliverables of the draft response plan was performed. The draft burn disaster response plan developed for NYC recommended: 1) City hospitals or regional burn centers within a 60-mile distance be designated as tiered Burn Disaster Receiving Hospitals (BDRH); 2) these hospitals be divided into a four-tier system, based on clinical resources; and 3) burn care supplies be provided to Tier 3 nonburn centers. Existing burn center referral guidelines were modified into a hierarchical BDRH matrix, which would vector certain patients to local or regional burn centers for initial care until capacity is reached; the remainder would be cared for in nonburn center facilities for up to 3 to 5 days until a city, regional, or national burn bed becomes available. Interfacility triage would be coordinated by a central team. Although recommendations for patient transportation, educational initiatives for prehospital and hospital providers, city-wide, interfacility or interagency communication strategies and coordination at the State or Federal levels were outlined, future initiatives will expound on these issues. An incident resulting in critically injured burn victims exceeding the capacity of local and regional burn center beds may be a reality within any community and warrants a planned response. To address this possibility within New York City, an initial draft of a burn disaster response has been created. A scaleable plan using local, state, regional, or federal health care and governmental institutions was developed.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/prevención & control , Defensa Civil , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Sistemas de Socorro , Servicios Urbanos de Salud , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Transferencia de Pacientes , Triaje , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA