Prevention of congenital chagas disease by trypanocide treatment in women of reproductive age: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Maternal-foetal transmission of Chagas disease (CD) affects newborns worldwide. Although Benznidazole and Nifurtimox therapies are the standard treatments, their use during pregnancy is contra-indicated. The effectiveness of trypanocidal medications in preventing congenital Chagas Disease (cCD) in the offsprings of women diagnosed with CD was highly suggested by other studies. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for CD in women of childbearing age and reporting frequencies of cCD in their children. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and LILACS databases were systematically searched. Statistical analysis was performed using Rstudio 4.2 using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. Heterogeneity was examined with the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Six studies were included, comprising 744 children, of whom 286 (38.4%) were born from women previously treated with Benznidazole or Nifurtimox, trypanocidal agents. The primary outcome of the proportion of children who were seropositive for cCD, confirmed by serology, was signigicantly lower among women who were previously treated with no congenital transmission registered (OR 0.05; 95% Cl 0.01-0.27; p = 0.000432; I2 = 0%). In women previously treated with trypanocidal drugs, the pooled prevalence of cCD was 0.0% (95% Cl 0-0.91%; I2 = 0%), our meta-analysis confirms the excellent effectiveness of this treatment. The prevalence of adverse events in women previously treated with antitrypanocidal therapies was 14.01% (95% CI 1.87-26.14%; I2 = 80%), Benznidazole had a higher incidence of side effects than Nifurtimox (76% vs 24%). CONCLUSION: The use of trypanocidal therapy in women at reproductive age with CD is an effective strategy for the prevention of cCD, with a complete elimination of congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in treated vs untreated infected women.

High-Dose versus Low-Dose Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background/Objectives: Although oxytocin administration is recommended for delayed labor progress, there is no consensus over the preferred optimal dose of oxytocin. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes comparing high-dose versus low-dose oxytocin regimens for augmentation of delayed labor. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies comparing high-dose with low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation from inception up to May 2023. The outcomes assessed were cesarean rate, instrumental delivery rate, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal death, and uterine tachysystole. Subgroup analysis was performed with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Rstudio. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics, and a random-risk effect was used if I2 > 50%. Results: Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, and eighteen were RCTs. A total of 14.834 patients were included, of whom 7.921 (53.3%) received high-dose and 6.913 (46.6%) received low-dose oxytocin during labor augmentation. No statistical differences were found in cesarean delivery, neonatal mortality, postpartum hemorrhage and vaginal instrumentation rate. However, uterine tachysystole incidence was significantly higher with high-dose oxytocin (95% Cl, 1.30-1.94, p = 0.3; 0.6; I2 = 9%). Conclusions: Labor augmentation with a low-dose oxytocin regimen is effective as with a high-dose regimen, but with significantly less uterine tachysystole events, which can lead to intrauterine and neonatal complications. Our findings suggest that a low-dose regimen may be safe and effective for labor augmentation in medical practice.

Malignant Neoplasms Arising in the Cardiac Pacemaker Cavity: A Systematic Review.

Cancer is the abnormal proliferation of physiologically inadequate cells. Studies have identified the cardiac pacemaker pocket as a site of rare neoplasms. To evaluate the clinical outcomes, treatment, prognosis, and individualized management of tumors originating in the cardiac pacemaker pocket, a systematic review was conducted using case reports and case series available in the PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Cochrane Central, LILACS, and Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo) databases. Pacemaker pocket tumors affected patients with a mean age of 72.9 years, with a higher incidence in males (76.9%, n = 10). The average time for neoplasm development was 4.4 years (54.07 months). The most prevalent model was Medtronic (38.4%, n = 5), with titanium (83.3%) being the most common metal composition. Chemotherapy was the most performed procedure among patients (38.4%), followed by radiation therapy (38.4%) and surgical tumor resection (30.7%). Six analyzed cases (46.1%) resulted in death, and four patients (30.7%) achieved a cure. Patients with pacemakers should be routinely evaluated for the occurrence of malignant tumors at the site of device implantation.