Prenatal Care Adherence and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission or Stillbirth among Women with Gestational and Preexisting Diabetes Mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there was an association between prenatal care adherence and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission or stillbirth, and adverse perinatal outcomes in women with preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM) and gestational DM (GDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study among women with DM and GDM at a Diabetes in Pregnancy Program at an academic institution between 2006 and 2014. Adherence with prenatal care was the percentage of prenatal appointments attended divided by those scheduled. Adherence was divided into quartiles, with the first quartile defined as lower adherence and compared with the other quartiles. RESULTS: There were 443 women with DM and 499 with GDM. Neonates of women with DM and lower adherence had higher rates of NICU admission or stillbirth (55 vs. 39%; p = 0.003). A multivariable logistic regression showed that the lower adherence group had higher likelihood of NICU admission (adjusted odds ratio: 1.61 [1.03-2.5]; p = 0.035). Those with lower adherence had worse glycemic monitoring and more hospitalizations. Among those with GDM, most outcomes were similar between groups including NICU admission or stillbirth. CONCLUSION: Women with DM with lower adherence had higher rates of NICU admission and worse glycemic control. Most outcomes among women with GDM with lower adherence were similar.

Insulin Delivery Method and Admission for Glycemic Control in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there was a difference in glycemic control admissions or perinatal outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with multiple daily injections (MDIs) versus continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with type 1 DM with a singleton gestation who delivered between 2006 and 2014 at a tertiary hospital and received care at a dedicated DM clinic. Women who used MDI were compared with those who used CSII. The primary outcome was glycemic control admission during pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included adverse perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: There were a total of 156 women; 107 treated with MDI and 49 with CSII. Women treated with MDI had higher rates of glycemic control admissions versus those treated with CSII (68.2 vs. 30.6%, p < 0.001). Adjusting for age, ethnicity, public insurer, duration of DM, first recorded hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and DM comorbidities, the likelihood of admission remained higher in women on MDI versus CSII (AOR 5.9 [1.7-20.6]). Women treated with MDI had higher rates of postprandial hypoglycemia. Other perinatal outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: Women with type 1 DM treated with MDI were more likely to have glycemic control admissions and postprandial hypoglycemia than those treated with CSII.

Prediction of abnormal postpartum glucose tolerance testing in mild gestational diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the liikelihood of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)--who are at increased risk for developing overt diabetes--undergoing postpartum testing, and the patient characteristics associated with abnormal postpartum glucose tolerance testing (GTT) in mild GDM. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review that included mild GDM patients, defined as those with fasting plasma glucose levels < 95 mg/dL on a 3-hour 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Patients who underwent postpartum testing were assessed and predictive factors for abnormal results evaluated. RESULTS: Mild GDM was diagnosed in 414 (39.6%) women, 201 (48.6%) of whom completed a postpartum 2-hour 75-g OGTT. Abnormal testing was seen in 69 (34.3%), with diabetes in 6 (3%); those with abnormal testing had been diagnosed with GDM at an earlier gestational age, had higher 1-hour 50-g OGTT values, and were also more likely to require pharmacologic therapy. Combining several variables produced a predictive model with positive and negative predictive values of 50% and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Antenatal factors (alone or in combination) do not allow for prediction of abnormal postpartum OGTT results in mild GDM patients. Patients with mild GDM are at a slightly decreased postpartum risk of developing diabetes and prediabetes as compared to other patients with GDM.

Impact of an intensive follow-up program on the postpartum glucose tolerance testing rate.

OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a strong risk factor for the development of diabetes. We assessed the impact of a 1-year intensive follow-up demonstration program, using direct nurse and outreach worker case management, aimed at increasing compliance with postpartum oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT). STUDY DESIGN: During the year of implementation, a nurse or bilingual outreach worker contacted patients to encourage attendance at their scheduled postpartum 2-h 75-g OGTT and assisted in overcoming obstacles to testing. All patients with GDM seen in our specialty clinic the previous year served as a control group for comparison. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients treated during the year prior to implementation were compared to the 207 in the demonstration program. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. After the program's implementation, postpartum OGTT adherence increased from 43.1 to 59.4 % (p < 0.01, hazard ratio 1.59; 95 % confidence interval 1.20-2.12). Had the program been in place the previous year, we calculated that 12 additional cases of diabetes or prediabetes would have been detected, increasing the total number from 33 to 45 such cases. CONCLUSION: Implementation of direct nurse and outreach worker case management leads to a modest, but important increase in adherence to postpartum OGTT testing.

Predicting the need for medical therapy in patients with mild gestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The enforcement of a one-step gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis would capture more patients with milder forms of glucose intolerance thereby increasing the incidence. We propose to identify characteristics predicting the need for medical therapy in such patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients with mild GDM, defined as a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 95 mg/dL on the 3-hour 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Patients requiring medical therapy for glucose control were compared with diet-controlled patients. A predictive model was constructed with variables of significance. RESULTS: Included were 143 patients requiring medical therapy and 224 diet-treated patients. Mean FPG on 3-hour OGTT, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), and BMI at 26 to 30 weeks were all significantly higher in patients requiring therapy. Combining several variables produced a predictive model with 76% sensitivity, 52% specificity, 48% positive predictive value, and 78% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal factors (alone or in combination) do not allow for prediction of the possible need for therapy in mild GDM patients.

Treatment of severe insulin resistance in pregnancy with 500 units per milliliter of concentrated insulin.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with severe insulin resistance treated with 500 units/mL concentrated insulin. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of gravid women with severe insulin resistance (need for greater than 100 units of insulin per injection or greater than 200 units/d) treated with either 500 units/mL concentrated insulin or conventional insulin therapy. We performed a two-part analysis: 1) between gravid women treated with and without 500 units/mL concentrated insulin; and 2) among gravid women treated with 500 units/mL concentrated insulin, comparing glycemic control before and after its initiation. RESULTS: Seventy-three pregnant women with severe insulin resistance were treated with 500 units/mL concentrated insulin and 78 with conventional insulin regimens. Patients treated with 500 units/mL concentrated insulin were older and more likely to have type 2 diabetes mellitus. Average body mass index was comparable between both groups (38.6 compared with 40.4, P=.11) as were obstetric and perinatal outcomes and glycemic control during the last week of gestation. Within the 500 units/mL concentrated insulin cohort, after initiation of this medication, fasting and postprandial blood glucose concentrations improved. However, the rates of blood glucose values less than 60 mg/dL and less than 50 mg/dL were higher in the 500 units/mL concentrated insulin group after initiation than before, 4.8% compared with 2.0% (P<.01) and 2.0% compared with 0.7% (P<.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of 500 units/mL concentrated insulin in severely obese insulin-resistant pregnant women confers similar glycemic control compared with traditional insulin regimens but may increase the risk of hypoglycemia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Comparing daily versus less frequent blood glucose monitoring in patients with mild gestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing. This study was designed to determine if different frequencies in blood glucose (BG) monitoring, without regard to other variables, would allow timely detection of hyperglycemia requiring pharmacologic treatment in mild GDMs. METHODS: Retrospective chart review, limited to self-glucose monitoring values, of 120 mild GDM patients who required pharmacologic therapy. Three data sets were constructed from each patient's BG log: (1) all available BG; (2) every other day's BG blocked; (3) only every third day's BG available for review. The blocked BG datasets were compared with daily values. RESULTS: 95% and 97% of subjects were started on pharmacologic therapy before or within 7 d of the reference date using every other day and every third day BG logs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based exclusively on BG values, without regard to other clinical information, every other day or every third day BG monitoring in mild GDM does not delay the initiation of pharmacologic therapy.