RESUMEN
Cutaneous manifestation of cancers is a rare occurrence, even more so for bladder cancer, with a limited number of published reports. Iatrogenic implantation has been a major cause for it. With no clear distinction pattern from other common dermatological lesions, scattered occurrence, and poor survival; no definitive strategies are present for the management of these dermal manifestations. The present article describes a case of scalp lesion consistent with metastatic urothelial carcinoma along with a review of the literature.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , HumanosRESUMEN
Carcinosarcoma is an extremely rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma characterized by biphasic histology defined by epithelial and mesenchymal components. Because of the aggressive nature, early risk of metastasis, and high mortality, this tumor is associated with poor prognosis. Surgery is considered as the main modality of treatment, although radiotherapy can be discussed in inoperable cases. The present paper describes a rare case of carcinosarcoma of buccal mucosa.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Carcinosarcoma , Humanos , Mucosa Bucal/patología , Carcinosarcoma/diagnóstico , Carcinosarcoma/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background: Neuroethics is a subsection of ethics which allows us to express our concerns with advances in neurotechnology, threat to human race, our freedom of expression, autonomy, and justice. Objectives: Aim of the review is to familiarize readers about the concept of neuroethics and alarming threats with newer neurotechnology and to sensitize them about our responsibilities as neuroscientists. Materials and Methods: Systematic literature search was conducted from 2010 to 2021 in PubMed to look at previously published review articles related to neuroethics. Relevant filters were added addressing autonomy and consent. Of the 426 articles, only 12 addressed the issue of autonomy and neuroethics and two on consent and neuroethics. Results and Conclusions: International literature has expressed limited concern on the scope of neuroethics. Newer threats are getting added on with advancing technology, and as neuroscientists, we all need to understand and educate neuroscientists about our social responsibilities in curtailing an out-of-reach situation for the mankind.