RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Person-centered breastfeeding counseling is a key but often overlooked aspect of high-quality services. We explored women's experiences of the Breastfeeding Heritage and Pride™ program, an evidence-based breastfeeding peer counseling program serving women with low incomes in the United States. METHODS: This study was conducted through an equitable community-clinical-academic partnership and guided by the World Health Organization (WHO) quality of care framework for maternal and newborn health, which highlights three domains of positive experiences of care: effective communication; respect and dignity; and emotional support. In-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women participating in the Breastfeeding Heritage and Pride™ program. Women were asked to describe their experiences with the program including examples of when good quality counseling was or was not provided. Each interview was conducted in English or Spanish, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Once themes were generated, they were organized according to the three care experience domains in the WHO quality of care framework. RESULTS: Twenty-eight in-depth interviews were conducted with a racially/ethnically and socio-economically diverse sample of women. Three themes described effective communication practices of peer counselors: tailoring communication to meet women's individual needs; offering comprehensive and honest information about infant feeding; and being timely, proactive, and responsive in all communications across the maternity care continuum. Two themes captured why women felt respected. First, peer counselors were respectful in their interactions with women; they were courteous, patient, and non-judgmental and respected women's infant feeding decisions. Second, peer counselors showed genuine interest in the well-being of women and their families, beyond breastfeeding. The key theme related to emotional support explored ways in which peer counselors offered encouragement to women, namely by affirming women's efforts to breastfeed and by providing reassurance that alleviated their worries about breastfeeding. These positive experiences of counseling were appreciated by women. CONCLUSIONS: Women described having and valuing positive experiences in their interactions with peer counselors. Efforts to expand access to high-quality, person-centered breastfeeding counseling should, as part of quality assurance, include women's feedback on their experiences of these services.
Asunto(s)
Consejeros , Servicios de Salud Materna , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Lactancia Materna/psicología , Consejo , Pobreza , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We explored associations between night eating and health outcomes in Latinos with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Participants (nâ¯=â¯85) completed surveys, were measured for anthropometrics, provided blood samples, and wore Holter monitors for 24 hours to assess heart rate variability. RESULTS: Participant mean age was 60.0 years, hemoglobin A1c was 8.7%, most preferred Spanish (92%), and had less than a high school education (76%). Compared with their counterparts who denied night eating, night eaters had lower heart rate variability in the low (Cohen's dâ¯=â¯-0.55; Pâ¯=â¯0.04) and very-low-frequency bands (dâ¯=â¯-0.54, Pâ¯=â¯0.05), and reported more emotional eating (dâ¯=â¯0.52, Pâ¯=â¯0.04), and poorer sleep quality (Cohen's hâ¯=â¯0.64). They did not differ on beverage intake or depressive symptoms. In regression that included depressive symptoms, associations between night eating and outcomes became nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Night eaters demonstrated worse health outcomes. If results are replicated, nutrition education for this population might focus on night eating.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Ingestión de Alimentos , Ingestión de Alimentos/psicología , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sueño/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Background: The Breastfeeding Heritage and Pride program (BHP) provides evidence-based breastfeeding peer counseling to low-income women. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, BHP shifted from delivering in-person and virtual services to providing only virtual services. Program adaptations can impact implementation success, which could influence program effectiveness. We documented program adaptations and explored their impacts on implementation outcomes, guided by the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact. Methods: Through a community-clinical-academic partnership, we conducted in-depth interviews with 12 program implementers and peer counselors and conducted a rapid qualitative analysis. To efficiently capture information on adaptations over time, we collected and analyzed information from program meetings and extracted data from a program report. We then triangulated data from these multiple sources. Results: Peer counselors received training on virtual service delivery and increased supportive supervision. They recruited women via phone instead of in hospitals, which was viewed as feasible. In-person counseling visits at hospitals and clients' homes were replaced with phone and video calls. Examples of changes to the content delivered included breastfeeding education in the context of the pandemic such as the latest COVID-related infant feeding guidance, provision of face masks, and more assistance with social and economic challenges. Although peer counselors increasingly adopted video calls as a substitute for in-person visits, they emphasized that in-person visits were better for relationship building, helping with breastfeeding problems like latching, and identifying barriers to breastfeeding in the home environment like limited familial support. While adaptations were reactive in that they were made in response to the unanticipated COVID-19 pandemic, most were made with clear goals and reasons such as to ensure the safety of peer counselors and clients while maintaining service delivery. Most adaptations were made through a systematic process based on program implementers' expertise and best practices for peer counseling and were largely but not fully consistent with BHP's core functions. Discussion: BHP was able to shift to virtual service delivery for continued provision of breastfeeding counseling during the pandemic. Overall, virtual services worked well but were less optimal for several aspects of counseling. Evaluations of program effectiveness of virtual services are still needed.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the United States, Black and Hispanic mothers have lower breastfeeding rates compared with White mothers. To address breastfeeding inequities, the Breastfeeding Heritage and Pride program (BHP) provides breastfeeding support for predominately low-income minority mothers in Connecticut and Massachusetts. We described the process of designing BHP, the program model, and its impact on breastfeeding outcomes. METHODS: This BHP case study is based on in-depth interviews with BHP designers and implementers, peer counselors, and clients; a literature review of BHP impact evaluation studies; and a review of BHP materials. To guide the analysis and organize results, we used the Community Energy Balance Framework, an equity-oriented, multi-level framework for fostering healthy lifestyles. RESULTS: The Hispanic Health Council designed BHP to address barriers to breastfeeding identified through formative qualitative research with the Latino community, namely lack of role models, limited social support, embarrassment when breastfeeding in public, lack of breastfeeding knowledge, and a norm of formula feeding. According to the BHP model, clients receive education and support through in-person home and hospital visits supplemented by phone calls, beginning prenatally and continuing through one year postpartum. Counseling is delivered by peer counselors, women who have successfully breastfed, have similar cultural roots and life experiences as the clients they serve, and have completed intensive training on lactation management and communication skills. International Board Certified Lactation Consultants provide clinical guidance and ongoing training to peer counselors, as well as direct support to clients, if more specialized knowledge and clinical expertise is needed. Clients facing housing and food insecurity or other socio-economic obstacles that may negatively influence breastfeeding and health and well-being more broadly are connected to other health and social services needed to address their social determinants of health needs, including health care access and food and rent assistance programs. To continuously improve service delivery, BHP has a robust monitoring and evaluation system. In two randomized-controlled trials, BHP was shown to improve breastfeeding initiation and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: BHP highlights the importance of community-engaged formative research for informing breastfeeding program design. It also provides an evidence-based example of a program model that offers a continuum of breastfeeding support, considers cultural-contextual influences on breastfeeding and social determinants of health, and incorporates continuous quality improvement.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Consejo , Promoción de la Salud , Madres , Grupo Paritario , Adolescente , Adulto , Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Consejo/métodos , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Madres/psicología , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Household food insecurity (HFI) is a stressor that is associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, little is known about HFI and the insulin resistance (IR) underlying T2D, and the mechanisms involved. OBJECTIVE: We examined the cross-sectional association between HFI and IR among low-income Latinos with T2D and tested whether inflammation and stress hormones mediated this association. METHODS: HFI was measured with the 6-item US Household Food Security Survey module. IR was calculated from fasting plasma blood glucose and serum insulin. Inflammation was indicated by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and stress hormones included urinary cortisol, metanephrine, and normetanephrine. To test for an indirect effect of HFI on homeostasis model assessment of IR, a parallel multiple mediation model was run with biological markers that significantly differed between food security status-entered as mediators in the model. We used 95% bias-corrected bootstrap CIs, with 10,000 bootstrap samples, to assess the significance of the indirect effects. RESULTS: The 121 participants with T2D were primarily Puerto Rican (85.8%), aged mean = 60.7 y, and 74% were female. Eighty-two (68%) were classified as food insecure. Compared with food-secure individuals, food-insecure individuals had a significantly higher IR [mean difference (Δ) = 7.21, P = 0.001], insulin (Δ = 9.7, P = 0.019), glucose (Δ = 41, P < 0.001), hsCRP (Δ = 0.8, P = 0.008), cortisol (Δ = 21, P = 0.045), and total cholesterol (Δ = 29, P = 0.004). Groups did not differ on other lipids, metanephrine, normetanephrine, or A1c. The mediation model showed a significant direct effect of HFI on hsCRP (P = 0.020) and on cortisol (P = 0.011). There was a direct effect of cortisol (P = 0.013), hsCRP (P = 0.044), and HFI on IR (P = 0.015). The total combined indirect effect of HFI through cortisol and hsCRP indicated partial mediation. CONCLUSIONS: Among Latinos with T2D, HFI is associated with IR partially through inflammation and stress hormones. Interventions to ameliorate HFI and mitigate its effects on inflammation, stress, and IR are warranted. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01578096.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Resistencia a la Insulina/fisiología , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/orina , Estudios Transversales , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Mediadores de Inflamación/orina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés FisiológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer coaching smoking cessation program in a high-risk Medicaid population. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: In this manuscript, we present an evaluation of a pilot program. Participants (N = 138) were recruited out of a larger smoking cessation program administered statewide and funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The participant sample was diverse, with 52% self-identifying as White, 39% as Black, and 56% Latino ethnicity (any race). METHODS: Motivational interviewing techniques were utilized by peer coaches in clinical and community settings to achieve smoking cessation using face-to-face, telephone, and text/email encounters over a period of 6 months. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in the number of participants who had quit smoking from program enrollment to discharge (5.1%-18.5%, p = 0.02). Number of peer coaching encounters predicted quitting in program participants. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the literature that community-based smoking cessation services led by peer coaches can be effective in a diverse, high-risk population.
Asunto(s)
Tutoría , Grupo Paritario , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adulto , Correo Electrónico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar/etnología , Teléfono , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The study aims were to (i) identify determinants of Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) use and (ii) describe the association between NFP use and dietary intake among Latinos with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Baseline cross-sectional data from a clinical trial were used to assess the association between NFP use and dietary intake. Diet was measured using two methods: (i) a diet quality score (the Healthy Eating Index-2010) derived from a single 24 h recall and (ii) dietary pattern (exploratory factor analyses) from an FFQ. Multivariable logistic and non-parametric quantile regressions were conducted, as appropriate. Settings Hartford County, Connecticut, USA. SUBJECTS: Latino adults (n 203), ≥21 years of age, with diagnosed type 2 diabetes, glycosylated Hb≥7 %, and without medical conditions limiting physical activity. RESULTS: Participants' education level, diabetes-related knowledge and English speaking were positively associated with NFP use. At the higher percentiles of diet quality score, NFP use was significantly associated with higher diet quality. Similarly, NFP users were more likely to consume a 'healthy' dietary pattern (P=0·003) and less likely to consume a 'fried snack' pattern (P=0·048) compared with NFP non-users. CONCLUSIONS: The association between reported NFP use and diet quality was positive and significantly stronger among participants who reported consuming a healthier diet. While NFP use was associated with a healthier dietary pattern, not using NFP was associated with a less-healthy, fried snack pattern. Longitudinal studies are needed to understand whether improving NFP use could be an effective intervention to improve diet quality among Latinos with type 2 diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/dietoterapia , Dieta para Diabéticos , Dieta Saludable , Análisis de los Alimentos , Etiquetado de Alimentos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Cooperación del Paciente , Anciano , Connecticut , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Dieta para Diabéticos/etnología , Dieta Saludable/etnología , Dieta Alta en Grasa/efectos adversos , Dieta Alta en Grasa/etnología , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Preferencias Alimentarias/etnología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación Nutricional , Valor Nutritivo , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Bocadillos/etnologíaRESUMEN
Background: Food insecurity (FI), diabetes prevalence, and poor diabetes outcomes all disproportionately affect Latinos in the United States. Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects autonomic tone, is associated with glycemic control, and predicts mortality in type 2 diabetes. It is unknown whether FI is related to HRV and, if so, whether glycemic control accounts for this association. Objective: This exploratory cross-sectional study examined FI and HRV among US Latinos with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Participants reported demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, and FI, including the 6-item USDA food security module and a 1-item measure of diabetes-specific food security. Participants wore an ambulatory electrocardiogram monitor for 24 h. In the time domain, HRV was assessed with the SD of the R-R interval (SDNN). In the frequency domain, the power spectrum was integrated over 3 frequency bands-very low frequency (VLF), low frequency (LF), and high frequency (HF)-and then natural log transformed. Unadjusted ANOVA and ANCOVA adjusted for age, sex, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and indicators of socioeconomic status compared food security groups on HRV. Results: Participants' mean ± SD age was 59.7 ± 10.9 y, and 73% were women. Of the 94 participants, 63 reported FI according to the USDA food security module and 46 reported FI according to the diabetes-specific measure. Mean ± SD HbA1c was 8.6% ± 1.7% and was marginally higher among those reporting diabetes-specific FI than those reporting diabetes-specific food security. Participants who reported diabetes-specific FI had lower SDNN, VLF, LF, and HF HRV with effect sizes in the small-to-medium range. Differences remained significant even after controlling for age, sex, socioeconomic hardship, and HbA1c. The 6-item USDA food security module was not associated with HRV. Conclusions: Diabetes-specific FI may be a unique risk factor for poor health outcomes among US Latinos. Efforts to address FI could benefit diabetes outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence increasingly indicates that poor sleep quality is a major public health concern. Household food insecurity (HFI) disproportionately affects Latinos and is a novel risk factor for poor sleep quality. Psychological distress may be a potential mechanism through which HFI affects sleep quality. Sleep, food insecurity, and distress are linked to type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: We examined the relations between HFI, psychological distress, and sleep quality and tested whether psychological distress mediates the relation between HFI and sleep in people with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Latinos with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 121) who completed baseline assessments for the CALMS-D (Community Health Workers Assisting Latinos Manage Stress and Diabetes) stress management intervention trial completed the US Household Food Security Survey, and measures of depressive symptoms [Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)], anxiety symptoms [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-short], diabetes distress [Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire (PAID-5)], and sleep quality [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)]. Psychological distress was operationalized with the PHQ-8, PROMIS-short, and PAID-5 scales. We used unadjusted and adjusted indirect effect tests with bias-corrected bootstrapped 95% CIs on 10,000 samples to test both relations between variables and potential mediation. RESULTS: Mean age was 61 y, 74% were women, and 67% were food insecure. Experiencing HFI was associated with both greater psychological distress and worse sleep quality (P < 0.05). Depressive symptoms (adjusted R2: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.27, 3.42), anxiety symptoms (adjusted R2: 1.70, 95% CI: 0.87, 2.85), and diabetes mellitus distress (adjusted R2: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.11, 1.32) each mediated the relation between HFI and worse sleep quality with and without adjustment for age, education, income, marital status, and employment status. CONCLUSIONS: Household food insecurity is a common and potent household stressor that is associated with suboptimal sleep quality through psychological distress. Efforts to improve food security and decrease psychological distress may yield improved sleep in this high-risk population. The CALMS-D stress management trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01578096.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Sueño , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Anciano , Ansiedad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/complicaciones , Depresión/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estrés Psicológico/complicaciones , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIMS: To test the efficacy of a community health worker (CHW) delivered stress management (SM) intervention on psychosocial, glycemic, and cortisol outcomes among U.S. Latinos with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial compared CHW-delivered diabetes education (DE; one group session) to DE plus CHW-delivered SM (DE+SM; 8 group sessions). Psychosocial variables and urinary cortisol were measured at baseline and posttreatment. HbA1c was measured at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: In intent to treat analysis, compared to DE (n=46), DE+SM (n=61) showed significantly improved symptoms of depression, anxiety, and self-reported health status. There were no significant group effects for HbA1c, diabetes distress, or urinary cortisol. However, there was a dose response effect for HbA1c and diabetes distress; increasing attendance at SM sessions was associated with greater improvements in HbA1c and diabetes distress. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized, controlled trial demonstrating that CHWs can improve psychological symptoms and self-reported health among Latinos with type 2 diabetes. Efforts to increase intervention attendance may improve HbA1c and diabetes distress.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Anciano , Ansiedad/terapia , Glucemia , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Consejo , Depresión/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Psicológico/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Identify barriers and facilitators to improve prenatal fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake among Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)-eligible Latinas using the Health Action Process Approach framework. DESIGN: Qualitative data were collected via audiotaped in-depth interviews as part of a larger study to design an intervention to increase prenatal F&V intake. SETTING: Hartford, Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five WIC-eligible Latinas completed the study. Included women were: ≥ 18 years old; in 2nd or 3rd trimester; having a singleton pregnancy; overweight or obese (ie, pregravid body mass index ≥ 25); not on a restricted diet; nonsmokers. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Prenatal factors that promote and hinder F&V intake. ANALYSIS: Transcripts were independently read and coded, and a consensus was reached about emerging themes. RESULTS: Ten factors influenced prenatal F&V intake: social support, family structure, F&V access, F&V preferences, F&V knowledge, F&V health outcome expectations, self-efficacy, intentions, F&V action/coping planning strategies, and maternal health status. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Social support from family/friends emerged as the primary distal factor driving prenatal F&V intake. Interventions designed to empower pregnant Latinas to gain the access, confidence, knowledge, and strategies necessary to consume more F&Vs must consider strengthening support to achieve the desired outcome.
Asunto(s)
Dieta , Frutas , Educación en Salud/métodos , Hispánicos o Latinos , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Verduras , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Asistencia Alimentaria , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/educación , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Embarazo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Latinos have high rates of diabetes and mental distress, but lack appropriate services. A study was designed to compare enhanced standard diabetes care with enhanced standard care plus community health worker (CHW) delivered stress management for Latinos with type 2 diabetes. This paper reports intervention design and process outcomes. A formative process was used to develop and implement an eight-session, group stress management intervention. One hundred twenty-one participants completed baseline assessments; n = 107 attended diabetes education and were then randomized. Recruits reported high credibility and treatment expectancies. Treatment fidelity was high. Participants reported high treatment satisfaction and therapeutic alliance and their diabetes knowledge and affect improved over the short term. Retention and attendance at group sessions was challenging but successful relative to similar trials. This comprehensive and culturally sensitive stress management intervention, delivered by a well-trained CHW, was successfully implemented.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Latinos with type 2 diabetes (T2D) face major healthcare access and disease management disparities. We examined the impact of the Diabetes Among Latinos Best Practices Trial (DIALBEST), a community health worker (CHW)-led structured intervention for improving glycemic control among Latinos with T2D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 211 adult Latinos with poorly controlled T2D were randomly assigned to a standard of healthcare (n = 106) or CHW (n = 105) group. The CHW intervention comprised 17 individual sessions delivered at home by CHWs over a 12-month period. Sessions addressed T2D complications, healthy lifestyles, nutrition, healthy food choices and diet for diabetes, blood glucose self-monitoring, and medication adherence. Demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, anthropometric, and biomarker (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and lipid profile) data were collected at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months (6 months postintervention). Groups were equivalent at baseline. RESULTS: Participants had high HbA1c at baseline (mean 9.58% [81.2 mmol/mol]). Relative to participants in the control group, CHWs had a positive impact on net HbA1c improvements at 3 months (-0.42% [-4.62 mmol/mol]), 6 months (-0.47% [-5.10 mmol/mol]), 12 months (-0.57% [-6.18 mmol/mol]), and 18 months (-0.55% [-6.01 mmol/mol]). The overall repeated-measures group effect was statistically significant (mean difference -0.51% [-5.57 mmol/mol], 95% CI -0.83, -0.19% [-9.11, -2.03 mmol/mol], P = 0.002). CHWs had an overall significant effect on fasting glucose concentration that was more pronounced at the 12- and 18-month visits. There was no significant effect on blood lipid levels, hypertension, and weight. CONCLUSIONS: DIALBEST is an effective intervention for improving blood glucose control among Latinos with T2D.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia/metabolismo , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Adulto , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Atención a la Salud/normas , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/sangre , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/etnología , Humanos , Hipertensión/etiología , Estilo de Vida , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Mondelez International Foundation hosted a seven country Healthy Lifestyles Program Evaluation Workshop in Granada, Spain, 13-14 September 2013. OBJECTIVE: To present the Workshop Evaluation Manual developed to support the work of the participants before, during and after the workshop. METHODS: The manual presents a brief introduction to program evaluation, a section on the Program Impact Pathways (PIP) framework using a USA school-based healthy lifestyle education program as an example, and a section on how to select PIP-informed indicators of the programs' impact on healthy lifestyles. The manual was refined using feedback received from the users before, during, and after the workshop. RESULTS: As illustrated in additional articles in this Supplement chronicling the workshop, all seven countries benefited from and were successful at using the PIP manual presented here to develop their own PIP analyses and identify their suite of indicators of the programs' impact on healthy lifestyles to improve the evaluation of their programs. CONCLUSION: The PIP analyses were central for systematically identifying strengths and weaknesses of each country's program, as well as the key program activities, processes and impact indicators that need to be monitored to improve them.
Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud , Estilo de Vida , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Niño , Ciencias de la Nutrición del Niño/educación , Protección a la Infancia , Preescolar , Connecticut , Dieta , Educación en Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , EspañaRESUMEN
To characterize metabolic syndrome (MetS) prevalence and cardiometabolic risk, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), plasma lipids, blood pressure, BMI, and waist circumference were measured in 211 Latino adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants were obese (BMI=33.7±7.8 kg/m2) and had poor glycemic control (HbA1c=9.6±1.8 %; FPG=190±85 mg/dL), but normal LDL and HDL cholesterol concentrations (98±38 mg/dL, and 52±14 mg/dL, respectively). Relative to the lowest, participants in the highest quintile of plasma triglycierides had higher total cholesterol (23%; p<.0001), FPG (47%; p<.0001), systolic blood pressure (3%; p<.05) and diastolic blood pressure (6%; p<.05), and lower HDL cholesterol (23%; p<.01). Comparable relationships were observed in an age-adjusted regression model. Framingham risk was equivalent to 9.4±6.4% and 12.2±9.6% 10-year CHD risk in men and women, respectively (p<.05). Cardiometabolic risk in this population is associated with a high prevalence of the MetS despite the relatively low cholesterol concentrations. Triglyceride screening may help identify individuals at higher risk.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Hispánicos o Latinos , Síndrome Metabólico/sangre , Medición de Riesgo , Triglicéridos/sangre , Presión Sanguínea , Colesterol/sangre , Connecticut , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a specialized breastfeeding peer counseling (SBFPC) intervention promoting exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) among overweight/obese, low-income women. METHODS: We recruited 206 pregnant, overweight/obese, low-income women and randomly assigned them to receive SBFPC or standard care (controls) at a Baby-Friendly hospital. SBFPC included 3 prenatal visits, daily in-hospital support, and up to 11 postpartum home visits promoting EBF and addressing potential obesity-related breastfeeding barriers. Standard care involved routine access to breastfeeding support from hospital personnel, including staff peer counselors. Data collection included an in-hospital interview, medical record review, and monthly telephone calls through 6 months postpartum to assess infant feeding practices, demographics, and health outcomes. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The intervention had no impact on EBF or breastfeeding continuation at 1, 3, or 6 months postpartum. In adjusted posthoc analyses, at 2 weeks postpartum the intervention group had significantly greater odds of continuing any breastfeeding (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-13.22]), and giving at least 50% of feedings as breast milk (aOR: 4.47 [95% CI: 1.38-14.5]), compared with controls. Infants in the intervention group had significantly lower odds of hospitalization during the first 6 months after birth (aOR: 0.24 [95% CI: 0.07-0.86]). CONCLUSIONS: In a Baby-Friendly hospital setting, SBFPC targeting overweight/obese women did not impact EBF practices but was associated with increased rates of any breastfeeding and breastfeeding intensity at 2 weeks postpartum and decreased rates of infant hospitalization in the first 6 months after birth.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna/etnología , Lactancia Materna/métodos , Obesidad/etnología , Sobrepeso/etnología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Atención Posnatal/métodos , Adulto , Lactancia Materna/tendencias , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Obesidad/terapia , Sobrepeso/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/tendencias , Atención Posnatal/tendencias , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Atención Prenatal/tendencias , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Racial/ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected by barriers to health care access and utilization. The primary objective was to test for an independent association between household food insecurity and health care access/utilization. In this cross-sectional survey, 211 Latinos (predominantly, Puerto-Ricans) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were interviewed at their homes. Factor analyses identified four barriers for health care access/utilization: enabling factor, doctor access, medication access and forgetfulness. Multivariate logistic regression models examined the association between each of the barrier factors and food insecurity controlling for sociodemographic, cultural, psychosocial, and diabetes self-care variables. Higher food insecurity score was a risk factor for experiencing enabling factor (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.17-1.82), medication access (OR = 1.26; 95 CI% = 1.06-1.50), and forgetfulness (OR = 1.22; 95 CI% = 1.04-1.43) barriers. Higher diabetes management self-efficacy was protective against all four barriers. Other variables associated with one or more barriers were health insurance, perceived health, depression, blood glucose, age and education. Findings suggest that addressing barriers such as food insecurity, low self-efficacy, lack of health insurance, and depression could potentially result in better health care access and utilization among low income Puerto-Ricans with T2D.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Glucemia/análisis , Connecticut , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puerto Rico/etnología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Autoeficacia , Apoyo Social , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
This qualitative research project explores how poverty, the built environment, education, working conditions, health care access, food insecurity and perceived discrimination are experienced by Puerto Rican Latinas through the course of their lives. Five focus groups were conducted with the primary objective of documenting community experiences and perspectives regarding: 1) stress, including perceived discrimination based on race/ethnicity (racism); 2) the impact of stress on Puerto Rican women of reproductive age, their families, and/or their community; and 3) stressors that affect maternal health. Focus groups were conducted in English and Spanish in the two cities with the highest rates of premature birth and low infant birthweight in the state of Connecticut. Focus group findings indicate that participants perceived poverty, food insecurity, lack of access to quality education, and unsafe environments as significant life stressors affecting maternal and child health.
Asunto(s)
Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Bienestar Materno/etnología , Bienestar Materno/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Connecticut , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/etnología , Prejuicio , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Puerto Rico/etnología , Investigación Cualitativa , Factores de Riesgo , Medio Social , Apoyo Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Prevalence of depression is high among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The objective of the current study was to identify the socio-demographic, psychosocial, cultural, and clinical risk factors that predispose to depression, and resources that protect from depression among low income Latinos with T2D. Participants (N = 211) were interviewed in their homes upon enrollment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with depressive symptoms based on a score of ≥21 on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale. Lower household income, interference of diabetes with daily activities, and more T2D clinical symptoms were associated with depression risk in the multivariate analyses. At each level of food insecurity the risk of depression was lower the higher the level of social support (P < 0.05). Findings suggest that social support buffers against the negative influence of household food insecurity on depression risk. A comprehensive approach is necessary to address the mental health needs of low income Latinos with T2D.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to identify demographic, socio-economic, acculturation, lifestyle, sleeping pattern, and biomedical determinants of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), among Latinos with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Latino adults (N = 211) with T2D enrolled in the DIALBEST trial were interviewed in their homes. Fasting blood samples were also collected in the participants' homes. Because all participants had poor glucose control, above-median values for FPG (173 mg/dl) and HbA1c (9.2%) were considered to be indicative of poorer glycemic control. Multivariate analyses showed that receiving heating assistance (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 0.96-4.96), and having a radio (3.11, 1.16-8.35), were risk factors for higher FPG levels, and lower income (10.4, 1.54-69.30) was a risk factor for higher HbA1c levels. Lower carbohydrate intake during the previous day (0.04; 0.005-0.37), as well as regular physical activity (0.30; 0.13-0.69), breakfast (2.78; 1.10-6.99) and dinner skipping (3.9; 1.03-14.9) during previous week were significantly associated with FPG concentrations. Being middle aged (2.24, 1.12-4.47), 30-60 min of sleep during the day time (0.07, 0.01-0.74) and having medical insurance (0.31, 0.10-0.96) were predictors of HbA1c. Results suggest that contemporaneous lifestyle behaviors were associated with FPG and contextual biomedical factors such as health care access with HbA1c. Lower socio-economic status indicators were associated with poorer FPG and HbA1c glycemic control.