RESUMEN
Introduction: Global, national, and local studies revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly reduced institutional childbirth. However, it is not well understood how the COVID-19 epidemic affected institutional childbirth service utilization. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate COVID-19 related impediments to institutional childbirth service uptake during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 20/2020-June 20/2020) in the rural Arsi zone of Ethiopia. Methods: A community-based Phenomenological study was conducted from January 10-25/2022, among mothers who gave birth in the Arsi zone during the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic (March 20/2020-June 20/2020) in Ethiopia. Data was collected by the primary author and a university graduated Midwives with experience in qualitative data collection. Eight focus group discussions and six in-depth interviews were conducted among mothers who gave birth in selected rural areas of the Arsi zone during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nine key informant interviews were also conducted among Midwives, Maternity Ward Heads, and Community Health Extension Workers. Data was transcribed, translated, and analyzed thematically using Atlas Ti.7 version. Results: Four major themes and eleven sub-themes emerged regarding the barriers to institutional childbirth during the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 related fear was a reason for avoiding institutional childbirth for almost all participants. COVID-19 restrictions such as transportation bans, market bans and public transport price doubling were also critical concerns to seeking institutional childbirth. Perceived Poor quality of institutional childbirth care during the curfew was also an impeding factor. Poor communication, incomplete care components and absenteeism were mentioned under this theme. Unbalanced mass media tragedies and rumors of unknown sources were COVID -19 related infodemics found affecting the practice of institutional childbirth. Conclusions: COVID-19 related fears, COVID-19 restrictions, Perceived Poor quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic and the COVID-19 Infodemic were the main reasons for reduced institutional childbirth service utilization during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia. Therefore, strategies must be designed proactively to maintain essential maternal health services, particularly institutional childbirth, during pandemics like COVID-19 and similar future epidemics.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the fertility period aids women in refraining and engaging in sexual intercourse to avoid and to get pregnant, respectively. The effect of community-level factors on knowledge of the fertility period was not yet known in Kenya. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the community- and individual-level determinants of knowledge of fertility period among women of childbearing age in Kenya. METHODS: The 2022 Kenyan Demography and Health Survey data was used for the current study. This study included 16,901 women of reproductive age. To account for the clustering effects of DHS data and the binary nature of the outcome variable, a multilevel binary logistic regression model was applied. An adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported to declare the statistical significance. In addition, the model that had the lowest deviance was the one that best fit the data. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of knowledge of the fertility period among Kenyan women was 38.1% (95%CI = 37.3, 38.9). Women's age, women's education status, heard FP, contraceptive use, media exposure, and distance from health facility significant individual factors while place of residence, and community-level education, were all of factors were found to be strongly associated with knowledge of fertility period. CONCLUSION: As per the findings of our study, Knowledge of the fertility period among reproductive women was low in Kenya. In the era of increasing refusal of hormone-based family planning, fertility-awareness-based family planning methods may be an option. Promoting the correct fertility period through education and media outreach may be helpful strategies for enhancing fertility decision-making.
RESUMEN
Background: An emergency cesarean section requires prompt delivery to reduce the risk for a pregnant woman or newborn. Studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcomes, but the findings are contradictory. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the average of decision-to-delivery time of an emergency cesarean section and its effect on adverse neonatal outcomes at East Gojjam Zone Public Hospital. Methods: A multicenter prospective study design would be carried out between November 2022 and January 2023. Using the consecutive method, a sample of 352 mother-newborn pairs was studied. Direct observation and face-to-face interviews were undertaken to gather the data using a semi-structured questionnaire. For both data input and analysis, Epi Data version 4.6 and Stata version 14 software were used. Both the crude and adjusted odds ratios were computed. Measure of significance was based on the adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval and a p-value of less than 0.05. Results: Decision-to-delivery time interval within 30 minute was seen in 21.9% of emergency cesarean delivery. The study found a significant relationship between the first-minute low Apgar score and the delayed decision-to-delivery time interval (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1-6, p = 0.03). In addition, determinant factors for poor 1st-minute Apgar scores include danger signs during pregnancy (AOR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1-7.8, p = 0.03), women referred from another facility (AOR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.5-4.6, p = 001), and non-reassuring fetal heart rate (AOR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.1-17, p = 0.04). A delayed decision-to-delivery time interval is not statistically significantly associated with a low 5th-minute Apgar score or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Conclusion: The study found unfavorable 1st-minute Apgar score and a longer decision-to-delivery period than recommended. This duration and negative newborn outcomes may be reduced by increasing and involving comprehensive obstetric and neonatal care facilities with skilled emergency obstetric surgeons, such as clinical midwife, integrated emergency surgeon officers, and physician.
RESUMEN
Background: The decision to delivery time is the interval between the decision and the childbirth by emergency caesarean delivery. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend that the decision to delivery time interval is less than 30 min. Additionally, the decision to delivery time varies across institutions and countries. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the decision to delivery time and its predictors among women who underwent emergency cesarean delivery at selected hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia, 2023. Methods: An institutional-based prospective cohort study was conducted at selected hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia, among women who underwent emergency cesarean delivery from November 1 to January 30, 2023. A total of 285 participants were enrolled, and data collected using structured and pre-tested questionnaires. A systematic sampling technique was used. Data were entered into Epi-Data version 4.6 and then exported to STATA 15 for further analysis. The log rank test was utilized to compare group differences. The time is estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis was carried out to determine the predictors. Results: From 285 participants, 56 (21.8%) women delivered within the recommended 30 min. The overall median survival time was undetermined and the restricted mean survival time was 48.9 min (95% CI: 47.4-50.5). The average decision to delivery time is affected among women who hesitate to accept consent (AHR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.02-1.25), cord prolapses (AHR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.46-3.94), rank of surgeon (AHR: 0.42. 95% CI: 0.42-1.08), no free operation room table (AHR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.28-0.94), regional anesthesia (AHR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.25-1.28), and use of a bladder flap (AHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.16-0.85). Conclusion: Overall decision to delivery times among women who underwent emergency cesarean section at selected hospitals were longer than the recommended time.
